Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.148616
Element CodePDANN02080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderMagnoliales
FamilyAnnonaceae
GenusAsimina
Other Common NamesAsiminier trilobé (FR) Common Pawpaw (EN) pawpaw (EN)
Concept ReferenceKartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-07-16
Change Date1983-09-19
Edition Date2000-01-03
Edition AuthorsJohn R. Boetsch (1/00); rev. Eric Nielsen and Larry Morse (1/00)
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank ReasonsThis species is has a very broad range in eastern North America and is frequently encountered in a wide variety of wooded habitats across its range. At present, collection pressure does not seem to be a major concern, however as with most plants of potential commercial value, future changes in the market may put increased pressure on this species unless cultivation is pursued.
Range Extent CommentsEastern North America, from central and western New York (Young pers. comm.) and Ontario west to Wisconsin (USDA-NRCS 1999), southern Iowa (Pearson pers. comm.), eastern Kansas (Freeman pers. comm.) and Nebraska (Kartesz 1999); south to Texas, Louisiana and Florida; east to the Carolinas (USDA-NRCS 1999).
Occurrences CommentsSeveral thousand populations are likely extant rangewide. Alabama: hundreds; Indiana: thousands; Kansas: >100; Maryland: hundreds; North Carolina: 50-75+ (Kauffman pers. comm.); Nebraska: 25-50+; New York: 16; South Carolina: thousands; Tennessee: 73+ (Brumback and Mehrhoff 1996, APSU 1999).
Since this is such a common species throughout much of its range, these numbers can only be estimates. Additional information on species distribution and the number of populations can be gleaned from county occurrence dot maps (USDA-NRCS 1999).
Threat Impact CommentsThere is indirect evidence from West Virginia and Tennessee, obtained from reliable sources, that collecting occurs from wild populations for the plant trade. Typically the fruits are collected and sold at local markets, either fresh or as preserves (Blakley pers. comm., Suggs pers. comm., Kauffman pers. comm., Hardy pers. comm., Freeman pers. comm.). Collection of material for the medicinal trade is apparently not common, though there exists a potential market for this species in the near future due to purported anti-cancer properties (Suggs pers. comm.). In Tennessee, this plant is collected from the wild and sold as nursery stock (Warren Co. Nursery).
A person knowledgable about the herbal medicinal trade says that the plant is not in commerce for medicinal purposes (M. McGuffin pers. comm.).
Habitat conversion and urban/rural development are significant direct threats (Homoya pers. comm., Pittman pers. comm., Young pers. comm., Schotz pers. comm., Freeman pers. comm., Steinauer pers. comm., Kunsman pers. comm.). Equally significant threats include habitat fragmentation and displacement by exotic species (Homoya pers. comm., Penskar pers. comm., Frye pers. comm., Steinauer pers. comm.).