Berberis canadensis

P. Mill.

American Barberry

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Medium - lowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.156755
Element CodePDBER02010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderRanunculales
FamilyBerberidaceae
GenusBerberis
Other Common Names
Alleghany Barberry (EN) American barberry (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-01-17
Change Date2018-01-17
Edition Date2018-01-11
Edition AuthorsOstlie, W. R. (MRO), 1998 update-S.L.Neid (MRO), rev. Treher (2018)
Threat ImpactMedium - low
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
There are over 200 occurrences known across the species range in Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, with disjunct remnant populations in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri. The exact number is unknown, and more inventory and mapping may reveal more occurrences, even in Virginia. Most populations are small and have low reproduction. Further, Berberis canadensis is threatened range-wide as it is still targeted for eradication by agricultural officials. The federal program ended but states may still continue the program. Development is a threat to sites on private land. Succession of sites or encroachment of woody vegetation threatens many occurrences. Fire and infrequent mowing may benefit the species. Very little is known about threats and trends in Virginia where over half the occurrences are found, partially because it is fairly common. The eradication for this species in Virginia is not active.
Range Extent Comments
Occurs in the southeastern United States: Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, with disjunct remnant populations in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri. Considered extirpated from Alabama, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.
Occurrences Comments
There are over 100 extant occurrences and likely over 200. In Kentucky, there is 1 but there are likely to be more occurrences (White, 1998). There are 2 in Georgia, 2 in Indiana, 13 in Missouri, 23 in North Carolina, and 44 in Tennessee. Ranked S3S4 in Virginia with occurrences in 19 counties and most likely over 100 occurrences (Johnny Townsend, pers. comm., January 2018).
Threat Impact Comments
Many occurrences, including those on private land, are threatened by encroachment of woody vegetation or succession of the habitat. Fire is one natural disturbance that maintained habitat for this species.

Berberis canadensis (and the majority of barberries) is an alternate host for the black stem rust of wheat, oats, rye barley, and various wild and cultivated grasses (Weakley 1993, Steffey 1985, Rudolf 1974, Steyermark 1963). The U.S. Department of Agriculture and state agriculture offices initiated a comprehensive barberry eradication program in the past to eliminate black stem rust. As a result, numerous populations of this species were destroyed (Weakley 1993, Wiegman 1993, Homoya 1992, Steyermark 1963). The federal program ended but states may still continue the program.

Loss of primary habitat has also played a significant role in the demise of this species. The elimination of the natural fire regime has resulted in the succession of savanna and open woodland habitats into closed-canopy woodlands. Only in sites with extremely shallow soils or areas that are frequently mowed or cleared does B. canadensis persist in any significant populations. Since settlement, much of the available habitat has been destroyed, converted to cultivated fields, land development, and urbanization (Weakley 1993). These threats remain for extant populations.

Grazing is a potential threat to extant populations (Smith 1992, Ludwig 1993). Grazing may serve to maintain the open character of woodlands, but its effects on B. canadensis plants are unknown. In some areas, the plants appear to be grazed by cattle (Smith 1992). Soil compaction and disturbance may negatively impact individual plants and populations. Deer browsing plants is also a threat.

Competition from exotic plant species (such as Lonicera tatarica and Rhamnus cathartica) is a threat to populations (Ludwig 1993). These species can form dense stands and eliminate ground layer herbaceous and other shrub species, including B. canadensis. Excessive shading and canopy closure in woodlands may be a factor in reducing seed production in the species, as has been noted in Missouri (Smith 1992).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

American barberry is a sparsely branched shrub, 0.3-2 m tall with forked or trifid spines on its branches. Branchlets are brown, purple or reddish and rough-warty. The leaves are obovate to spatulate, 2-6 cm long, with non-distinct veinlets below, margins with up to 20 teeth, with thorns. The 5-10 flowers are in racemes up to 2-6 cm long. Flower petals are yellow, notched, 2.5-3.5 mm long with basal glands. The calyx is 8-11 mm wide with inner sepals 3-4 mm long. Fruits are ovoid, fleshy, scarlet berries, 5-7 mm long. (Gleason and Cronquist 1991, Mohlenbrock 1975).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Berberis canadensis is distinguished by having a raceme of 5-10 flowers with notched yellow petals (Gleason and Cronquist 1991).

Habitat

Berberis canadensis occurs in open woods, on bluffs and cliffs and along river banks in the eastern and central United States (Gleason and Cronquist 1991, Cook et al. 1987, Fernald 1970, Small 1933). Formerly an inhabitant of savannas and open woodlands, fire suppression has significantly restricted its habitat to sites with shallow soil (such as glades and cliffs) or areas with mowing or other canopy-clearing activities (such as powerline corridors, railroad/road right-of-ways and riverbanks).

The single extant population from Indiana is restricted to steep banks along the Tippecanoe River in the northern part of the state (Homoya 1992). Associated plant species include Besseya bullii, Lithospermum sp. and liverworts (Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center 1989).

Historically, B. canadensis occurred in Maryland in dry, calcareous woodlands, open fields and serpentine barrens (Maryland Natural Heritage Program 1992).

In Missouri, B. canadensis is typically found on north-facing, rocky, wooded slopes; along streams; upper ledges or bluffs; exposed upper portions of bluffs on limestone, dolomite or sandstone; and mesic limestone/dolomite cliffs (Smith 1992, Roedner et al. 1978, Holt et al. 1974, University of Minnesota Herbarium (MIN)). Substrate composition usually consists of limestone, dolomite or sandstone with a somewhat basic pH (Smith 1993). Steyermark (1963) stated that the plant appears to be restricted to the edges of limestone bluffs where the soil is leached out, or near the contact point between chert or Roubidoux sandstone with limestone. Associated plant species in Missouri include Campanula rotundifolia, Carpinus caroliniana, Galium boreale ssp. septentrionale, Trautvetteria caroliniensis, and Zigadenus elegans (Smith 1992, Steyermark 1963).

Berberis canadensis is found in 19 mountain counties in southwest Virginia (Huber 1993). Occupied habitat includes dry, open woodlands over limestone, dolomite, richer sandstone or shale substrates, rocky and cliffy areas and open areas and glades with naturally thin soil (Ludwig 1993, Ludwig 1992). Associated plant species in glades include Helianthus divaricatus, Juniperus virginiana, and Schizachyrium scoparium. In rocky areas it is found with Cercis canadensis, Pellaea atropurpurea, and Quercus muehlenbergii (Ludwig 1993).

In North Carolina, B. canadensis occurs in the Piedmont on mafic rocks (such as diabase, amphibolite and gabbro) and in the Blue Ridge on calcareous (limestone, dolomite, marble) and mafic rocks (amphibolite). It generally occurs in glade, open woodland, bluff or cliff situations (North Carolina Natural Heritage 1993, Weakley 1993, University of Minnesota Herbarium (MIN)). The species was historically found in fire-maintained habitats which kept the canopy open, but is now restricted to sites with very shallow soil or with mowing maintenance (right-of-ways, powerline corridors, etc.). Due to its association with mafic and calcareous rocks (uncommon to rare in the state), B. canadensis is often associated with other rare species. Typical associated plant species include Aquilegia canadensis, Cercis canadensis, Clematis ochroleuca, Desmodium spp., Echinacea laevigata, Matelea decipiens, Parthenium auriculatum, Pycnanthemum spp., Rhus aromatica, Silphium trifoliatum, Solidago rigida, Symphoricarpos orbiculatus, and Viburnum rafinesquianum (North Carolina Natural Heritage 1993, Weakley 1993).

In Illinois, B. canadensis is known from a single extant site at the rim of a dry sandstone cliff (Illinois Natural Heritage Division 1992).

Collections at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville Herbarium (TENN) suggest that occupied habitat is relatively open woodlands (Pyne 1994). Collections have been made from wooded slopes, shale slopes, bluffs, terraces along river bluffs and river banks.

Ecology

American barberry is one of the few native shrubs that is not vulnerable to the effects of black walnut toxicity (Hill 2003).

Reproduction

Flowers April - May, fruits September - October (Radford et al. 1968, Chafin 2007).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandSavanna
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
South CarolinaS1Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
West VirginiaS1Yes
TennesseeS2Yes
MissouriS1Yes
ArkansasSHYes
KentuckyS1Yes
PennsylvaniaSXYes
VirginiaS3Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
IndianaS1Yes
North CarolinaS2Yes
AlabamaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived, DECIDUOUS, SPRING-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (2)
Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
References (46)
  1. Chafin, L.G. 2007. Field guide to the rare plants of Georgia. State Botanical Garden of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
  2. Cook, J. G., R. P. Lanka, J. L. Henszey, M. L. Neighbours, K. H. Dueholm, K. D. Kozie and S. H. Anderson. 1987. Species abstracts for federal rare animals. Section 5, Appendix 2 in literature reviews of rare species known to occur on National Park Service lands, Midwest Region. National Park Service, Midwest Regional Office, Omaha, Nebraska.
  3. Cusick, A. 1993. Chief botanist, Ohio Natural Heritage Program. Personal communication: ESA questionnaire for BERBERIS CANADENSIS. 4 pp.
  4. Deam, C. C. 1940. Flora of Indiana. Division of Forestry, Dept. of Conservation, Indianapolis, Indiana. 1236 pp.
  5. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. Corrected printing (1970). D. Van Nostrand Company, New York. 1632 pp.
  6. Fleurat-Lessard, P. and B. Millet. 1984. Ultrastructural features of cortical parenchyma cells ('motor cells') in stamen filaments of Berberis canadensis Mills. and tertiary pulvini of Mimosa pudica L. J. Exp. Bot. 35(158):1332-1341.
  7. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 3. Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiii + 590 pp.
  8. Gleason, H.A. 1952. The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 3 volumes. Hafner Press, New York. 1732 pp.
  9. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 910 pp.
  10. Harvill, A.M., Jr., T.R. Bradley, C.E. Stevens, T.F. Wieboldt, D.M.E. Ware, and D.W. Ogle. 1986. Atlas of the Virginia flora. Second edition. Virginia Botanical Associates, Farmville. 135 pp.
  11. Herkert, J.R. 1991c. Endangered and Threatened Species of Illinois: Status and Distribution. Volume 1 - Plants. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board.
  12. Hill, S. R. 2003. Conservation Assessment for American Barberry (<i>Berberis canadensis</i> Mill.). Report prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, by the Illinois Natural History Survey. 7 March 2003. 39 pp. http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/wildlife/tes/ca-overview/docs/plant_Berberis_canadensis-AmericanBarberry.pdf
  13. Holt, Francis T., et al., eds. 1974. Rare and Endangered Species of Missouri. Missouri Dept. of Conservation and Soil Conservation Service, no city, state. Unpaginated.
  14. Homoya, M. 1992. Ecologist/Botanist, Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center. Personal communication with M. Penskar, MI NFI: ESA questionnaire for Rubus centralis. 4 pp.
  15. Homoya, M. Botanist, Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center, Division of Nature Preserves, Department of Natural Resources, Indianapolis, IN. Personal communication with Mike Penskar, 9 June 1992.
  16. Huber, F. 1993. Forest botanist, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Personal communication: ESA questionnaire for BERBERIS CANADENSIS. 4 pp.
  17. Huber, F. 1993. Forest botanist, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Personal communication with Donn M. Ambrose, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy. 1 p.
  18. Jones, S. B., Jr., and N. C. Coile. 1988. The distribution of the vascular flora of Georgia. Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens.
  19. Kartesz, J.T. 1993. Species distribution data for vascular plants of 70 geographical areas, from unpublished data files at the North Carolina Botanical Garden, July, 1993.
  20. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  21. Kunsman, J. 1992. Botanist, Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory-East. Personal communication: ESA questionnaire for BERBERIS CANADENSIS. 4 pp.
  22. Ludwig, C. 1993. Botanist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Personal communication with M. Penskar, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, The Nature Conservancy. 2 pp.
  23. Ludwig, C. Botanist, Virginia Division of Natural Heritage, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA. Personal communication with Donn Ambrose, 25 June 1993.
  24. Ludwig, Chris. Botanist, Virginia Division of Natural Heritage, Department of Conservation and Recreation. Pers. comm. with M. Penskar, MI NFI: Letter. 2 pp.
  25. Martin, A. C., H. S. Zim, and A. L. Nelson. A. 1951. American wildlife and plants: A guide to wildlife food habits: The use of trees, shrubs, weeds, and herbs by birds and mammals of the U.S. Dover Publications, New York. 500 pp.
  26. Mohlenbrock, R. H. 1975. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 494 pp.
  27. Patrick, T. 1989. Botanist, Georgia Heritage Inventory. Personal communication: ESA questionnaire for BERBERIS CANADENSIS. 4 pp.
  28. Pilet, P.E. and J.C. Roland. 1974. Growth and extensibility of collenchyma cells. Plant Sci. Lett. 2:203-207.
  29. Pyne, Milo. Personal communication. Southeast Regional Ecologist. NatureServe, Southeast Regional Office, Durham, NC.
  30. Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1964. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  31. Roberts, S.J. 1985. A note on Pseudomonas syrinagae pv. berberidis infections of BERBERIS: comparative infection studies in attached and detached leaves. J. App. Bact. 59:369-374.
  32. Roberts, S.J. and T.F. Preece. 1984. A note on Pseudomonas syrinagae pv. berberidis infections of BERBERIS: Aetiology of the leaf spot and leaf fall disease in England. J. App. Bact. 56:507-513.
  33. Roedner, B.J., D.A. Hamilton, and K.E. Evans. 1978. Rare plants of the Ozark Plateau: A field guide. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN. 238 pp.
  34. Rudolf, P.O. 1974. BERBERIS L., Barberry, Mahonia, in Agric. Handbook, U.S. Dept. Agric. 450:247-251.
  35. Schwegman, J. 1989. Illinois Natural Heritage Division. Personal communication: ESA questionnaire for BERBERIS CANADENSIS. 4 pp.
  36. Small, J.K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. Two volumes. Hafner Publishing Company, New York.
  37. Smith, T. 1992. Botanist, Missouri Natural Heritage Inventory. Personal communication: ESA questionnaire for BERBERIS CANADENSIS. 4 pp.
  38. Stedman, R. M. and R. L. Argyle. 1985. Rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) as predators on young bloaters (Coregonus hoyi) in Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 11(1):40-42.
  39. Steffey, J. 1985. Strange relatives: The barberry family. Am. Hort. 64(4):4-9.
  40. Steyermark, J.A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 1728 pp.
  41. Townsend, J. Personal communication. Staff Botanist. Virginia Division of Natural Heritage. Department of Conservation and Recreation. Richmond, VA.
  42. U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS). 2011. Barberry Inspection Manual. Accessed 2 August 2011. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/barberry/downloads/manual.pdf.
  43. Weakley, A. Botanist, North Carolina Heritage Program, NC Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Rec., Raleigh, NC. Personal communication with Donn Ambrose, 31 May 1993; ESA questionnaire for Berberis canadensis.
  44. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2024. Flora of the southeastern United States. Edition of March 4, 2024. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2203 pp.
  45. White, D. Botanist, Kentucky Natural Heritage Program, Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. Email communication with S.L.Neid (MRO), 30 March 1998.
  46. Wiegman, P.G. 1993. Director, Natural Science and Stewardship, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. Personal communication with Donn M. Ambrose, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy. 2 pp.