Streptocephalus woottoni

Eng, Belk, and Eriksen, 1990

Riverside Fairy Shrimp

G1Critically Imperiled (G1G2) Found in 22 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.110736
Element CodeICBRA07010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassBranchiopoda
OrderAnostraca
FamilyStreptocephalidae
GenusStreptocephalus
Other Common Names
Riverside fairy shrimp (EN)
Concept Reference
Eng, L.L., D. Belk, and C.H. Erikson. 1990. California Anostraca: Distribution, habitat, and status. Journal of Crustacean Biology 10(2): 247-277. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1548485?refreqid=excelsior%3A2bde55ee67369e6bd73730d3e4616d34&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Conservation Status
Review Date2014-09-03
Change Date2014-09-03
Edition Date2008-10-03
Edition AuthorsRogers, D.C. (2008); Cordeiro, J. (2003)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent100-1000 square km (about 40-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 80
Rank Reasons
Limited to the southern California coastal mesa system, an area with significant pressure from urban and industrial development. Vast areas of habitat have been eliminated by conversion.
Range Extent Comments
Once thought to have the most restricted distribution of any fairy shrimp (Eng et al., 1990), but now found to be more widespread (USFWS, 2000). The five original pools from which it was collected are all in western Riverside County in an area about 13 by 7 km, between elevations of 348 and 413 m, near Temecula and Rancho California. (Eng et al. 1990). Subsequent localities have been found in Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and Ventura Counties, California. In total range extends from coastal southern California south to northwestern Baja California, Mexico (USFWS, 2000; Eriksen and Belk, 1999).
Occurrences Comments
When inititally listed it was known from 9 vernal pool complexes in Orange, Riverside, and San Diego Counties, California, and northwest Baja California, Mexico (FWS, 2000). Subsequently, it has been found in as many as 52 additional complexes with 9 of these known to have been extirpated and status unknown at 3 others. More than half of these are in San Diego Co. with another 24% in Riverside Co. and 17% in Orange Co., plus single occurrences in Ventura and Los Angeles Cos.; status of the two occurrences in Mexico is unknown at this time (USFWS, 2008).
Threat Impact Comments
From USFWS (2008):
Development is the greatest threat to the species across its range. The growth rate of the human population and associated urban and road development in southern California and northwestern Baja California is equal to or exceeds that of any other region in California and San Diego is one of the fastest growing counties in the nation (adjacent counties of Riverside and Orange are expected to grow very rapidly as well). Development of border security and associated infrastructure also threatens the species along the international border; which could have direct impacts to fairy shrimp habitat, i.e., destruction of vernal pools or their watersheds, and isolation of pools and fragmentation of pool systems; development can also cause alterations in the hydrology of adjacent pools. There are currently development proposals in place that would partially impact another 10 complexes (approximately) occupied by the fairy shrimp but it is expected that impacts will be minimized by imposing conservation measures along the way. Designation of critical habitat and vernal pool restoration have lessened development pressure. Fragmentation and isolation and associated impacts to hydrology continue to threaten the species throughout its range. Development within a vernal pool watershed can alter the timing, temperature, frequency, and length of inundation of nearby vernal pools; and persistence of this species is dependent on maintaining stable hydrology. Modifications to the uplands surrounding a vernal pool (e.g., grading cuts) can negatively affect the pool's hydrology by accelerating the flow of water into or out of the subsoil, even if such modifications occur outside the pool's surface watershed. Although initially considered a threat, destruction of pools by agriculture has largely been mitigated and is no longer considered a substantial threat. This is also the case for limited livestock grazing, which is also no longer considered the threat it once was. Human disturbance (trampling and vehicle traffic) is a minor threat in small portions of the range. Another threat is invasion by non-native plants including two nonnative wetland grasses: Agrostis avenacea (Pacific bentgrass) and Polypogon monspeliensis (annual rabbits foot grass). These invasives can overtake pools and decrease the number of days of inundation following rain events so pools no longer provide suitable fairy shrimp habitat. Threats of military activities originally identified in the recovery plan (USFWS, 1998) have largely been alleviated by better management practices and partnerships with military bases to better protect the species on military lands. Hybridization and competition with the versatile pool fairy shrimp, Branchinecta lindahli, is also a threat, but only in a few locations of disturbed pools where the species overlap. Herbicide and pesticide use is assumed to be a threat but overall impacts are not well known. Other pollution from runoff and rainwater may also threaten portions of the range. Dumped trash and other litter may decrease water quality as materials dissolve or decompose. Dumped material can also fill pools leaving little or no space for water to collect, or cover the bottom of pools, preventing larvae hatching from cysts from moving from the soil into the water column. Drought was noted in the listing rule as a stochastic (random or unpredictable) event that could have drastic affects on the species given its fragmented and restricted range. As such, climate change is now considered a potential threat. Climate change has the potential to adversely affect the fairy shrimp through changes in vernal pool inundation patterns and consistency. The exact effects are not known but are postulated, based on current climate change models, to be deleterious. Although fire was initially considered a substantial threat, the greater number of newly discovered populations helps alleviate the catastrophic effect fire would have on a single or few closely spaced occurrences. More information is needed on the impacts of fire on newly hatched fairy shrimp.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This species is as described by Eng et al. (1990). Males: Frontal appendage is cylindrical, bilobed at the tip, and extends only partway to the distal end of the basal segment of antenna. Thumb spur is a simple blade-like process. Finger has 2 teeth, with the proximal tooth shorter than the distal tooth. Lateral shoulder of the distal tooth is equal to about half the tooth's total length when measured along the proximal edge. Basal part of the penis has a short medial process with 3 spines on the anterior surface. The eversible part of the penis has a longitudinal row of spines on the medial and lateral sides. Cercopods are separate, with plumose setae along the medial and lateral borders. Females: The brood pouch extends to the 7th, 8th or 9th abdominal segment. The cercopods are similar to those of the male. (Eng et al., 1990; FWS, 2000)

Diagnostic Characteristics

Streptocephalus seali is the described species most similar to Streptocephalus woottoni. The cercopods of mature male S. wootoni are edged with plumose setae, while on S. seali, spines replace the setae on the distal half of the cercopods. In addition, S. seali and S. similis have confluent inner margins of the cercopods, which S. wootoni lacks. In preserved females, no species-distinguishing characteristics are observable; however, in living S. wootoni, both male and female have the red color of the cercopods covering the ninth and part of the eighth abdominal segments. In living S. seali, no red extends onto the abdominal segments of either sex. (Eng et al., 1990; FWS, 2000)

Habitat

The 5 original sites in Riverside County are vernal pools, seasonally astatic (dry up and refill one or more times during the year), and occur in earth slump basins or tectonic swales, in patches of grassland and agriculture interspersed in coastal sage scrub vegetation. Minimum habitat size was 750 square meters, with a minimum depth of 30 cm at maximum filling. Total Dissolved Solids, alkalinity, and chloride were very low, conditions corroborated by pH at neutral or just below. This species did not appear until later in the season, so it can be considered a warm water species. (Eng et al., 1990). The species is generally found in vernal pool complexes, which average 5 to 50 pools although some contain as few as 2 and a few contain several hundred; that are generally hydrologically connected; and it is also found at one man-made complex at Johnson Ranch (USFWS, 2008)

Ecology

Occurs in seasonal pools that are filled by winter and spring rains that usually begin in November and continue into April or May. There was minimal perennial vegetation immediately surrounding these pools, but two contained emergent Eleocharis. One pool contained a good deal of dead, but rooted, woody portions of terrestrial vegetation which apparently grew in the basin when it was dry. The more open pools had turbid water, while deeper or partially vegetated pools were clear. In three of the five collection sites, Streptocephalus woottoni and Branchinecta lindahli occurred together. S. woottoni was always taken in deeper water among loose emergent vegetation. (Eng et al., 1990; FWS, 2000)

Reproduction

The biology of this new species has not been studied. However, it seems to appear later in the season. Early February collections from the type locality did not contain any Streptocephalus woottoni, mid-March collections contained immature individuals, and late March collections contained mature specimens. (Eng et al., 1990). Hatching of cysts observed in January to March; however, in years with early or late rainfall, the hatching period may be extended. The species hatches within 7 to 21 days after the pool refills, depending on water temperature, and matures between 48 to 56 days, depending on a variety of habitat conditions. "Resting" or summer cysts are capable of withstanding temperature extremes and prolonged drying. When the pools refill in the same or subsequent rainy seasons, some but not all of the eggs may hatch. Reproductive success is spread over several seasons (FWS, 2003).
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOL
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
6.2 - War, civil unrest & military exercisesRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightModerate - low
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightModerate - low
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightModerate (short-term)
8.3 - Introduced genetic materialLarge - restrictedUnknownHigh - moderate
9 - PollutionRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.4 - Garbage & solid wasteRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.2 - DroughtsLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.3 - Temperature extremesLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.4 - Storms & floodingLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low

Roadless Areas (22)
California (22)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
CuyamaLos Padres National Forest19,631
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
JuncalLos Padres National Forest12,289
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
QuatalLos Padres National Forest7,253
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
San Mateo CanyonCleveland National Forest65
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
References (12)
  1. Bohonak, A.J. 2005. Genetic testing of the endangered fairy shrimp species <i>Branchinecta sandiegoensis</i>. Final report to City of San Diego and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Appendix to the City of San Diego's Vernal Pool Inventory): San Diego, California. 10 pp. + app.
  2. Eng, L.L., D. Belk, and C.H. Erikson. 1990. California Anostraca: Distribution, habitat, and status. Journal of Crustacean Biology 10(2): 247-277. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1548485?refreqid=excelsior%3A2bde55ee67369e6bd73730d3e4616d34&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  3. Eriksen, C. H. and D. Belk. 1999. Fairy Shrimps of California's Puddles, Pools, and Playas. Mad River Press: Eureka, California.196 pp.
  4. Maeda-Martinez, A.M., H. Obregon-Barboza, M.A. Prieto-Salazar, and H. Garcia-Velazco. 2005b. Two new fairy shrimp of the genus <i>Streptocephalus </i>(Branchiopoda: Anostraca) from North America. Journal of Crustacean Biology 25(4): 537-546.
  5. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  6. Pennak, R.W. 1989. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca. 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York. 628 pp.
  7. Rogers, D. C. 2013. Anostraca catalogus (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 61(2):525–546.
  8. Rogers, D.C. and B.J. Hann. 2016. Class Branchiopoda (in Chapter 16, Phylum Arthropoda). Pages 437-477 in J.H. Thorp and and D.C. Rogers (Editors), Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates, 4th edition, Volume II: Keys to Nearctic Fauna. Academic Press.
  9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Vernal Pools of Southern California Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 113+ pp.
  10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2000. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; proposed designation of critical habitat for the riverside fairy shrimp. Federal Register 65(184): 57136-57159.
  11. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2008. Riverside fairy shrimp (<i>Streptocephalus woottoni</i>) 5-year review: Summary and evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Carlsbad, California. 57 pp. + app. https://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/SpeciesStatusList/5YR/20080930_5YR_RFS.pdf
  12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. 5-Year Review: Riverside Fairy Shrimp (<i>Streptocephalus woottoni</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad, CA. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/tess/species_nonpublish/3502.pdf