Frasera umpquaensis

Peck & Applegate

Umpqua Green-gentian

G3Vulnerable Found in 5 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.135499
Element CodePDGEN050F0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderGentianales
FamilyGentianaceae
GenusFrasera
Synonyms
Swertia umpquaensis(M.E. Peck & Applegate) St. John
Concept Reference
Wilson, B.L., V. Hipkins, and T.N. Kaye. 2010. One taxon or two: are Frasera umpquaensis and F. fastigiata (Gentianaceae) distinct species?. Madroño, 57(2): 106-119.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-11-11
Change Date1985-10-15
Edition Date2021-11-11
Edition AuthorsVrilakas, S., 11/97; rev. B. MacBryde, 9/2000., rev. L. Oliver (2021)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Frasera umpquaensis is known to have low numbers of plants per occurrence, and a small total area of occupied habitat, in the Cascade Mountains, Oregon south to the Klamath Mountains, California. It is found in cool, moist forests and openings. There are active threats of timber harvest and fire, along with several other lesser threats. This species was negatively impacted by the Biscuit Fire in 2002, and is monitored by the Bureau of Land Management.
Range Extent Comments
Frasera umpquensis occurs in the central-western portion of the Cascades Mountains of Oregon, with some isolated stations in the Klamath Mountains of southern Oregon and northern California. The most northern populations are in Lane County, Oregon and the most southern in California in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Most of the populations are centered around the divide between the Rogue and Umpqua rivers in Douglas and Jackson counties, Oregon.
Occurrences Comments
About 40 occurrences have been reported from Oregon and California, with close to a dozen historical occurrences (NatureServe 2021).
Threat Impact Comments
Timber harvest activity is a threat because sites are located in areas with active commercial timberlands. Smaller scale disturbances, such as recreation (camping), livestock grazing, roads, have damaged individual plants and may affect some of the smaller populations. Mining and fire are also threats (NatureServe 2021). In 2002-2003, populations in the Bureau of Land Management Medford District were noted to be in substantial decline after the devastating Biscuit Fire, and further, that the hotter the fire the lower the survivorship of Frasera umpquaensis (Kessler 2003). Three years after the fire, population numbers had recovered, however, flowering was still reduced (Anjozian 2009).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Meadow edges, ecotone between meadows and true fir forests at mid to high elevations. Can grow to a lesser degree as an understory component in open forest stands. Frasera umpquaensis prefers cool, moist forests and openings that get sunlight (Kessler 2003).

Ecology

Hot wildfire, as opposed to medium or light wildfire, is known to reduce flowering and overall reproductive success in the following years, as shown in studies that monitored plants after the Biscuit Fire of 2002 (Anjozian 2009, Kessler 2004).

Reproduction

Frasera umpquaensis blooms on a two-year cycle (Anjozian 2009).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferForest EdgeGrassland/herbaceous
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS3Yes
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3.2 - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farmingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (5)
California (2)
AreaForestAcres
ChinquapinShasta-Trinity National Forest22,040
SoliderSix Rivers National Forest14,918
Oregon (3)
AreaForestAcres
DoneganUmpqua National Forest5,914
Jackson Creek AppendageUmpqua National Forest4,673
North KalmiopsisSiskiyou National Forests91,560
References (12)
  1. Anjozian, L. 2009. Little Umpqua gentian and the big Biscuit fire. U.S. Joint Fire Science Program 55: 1-7. Accessed online at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=jfspbriefs
  2. Cripps, C. 1993. Conservation strategy FRASERA UMPQUAENSIS Peck & Appleg. (green gentian or Umpqua swertia). U.S. Dept. of Agriculture: Umpqua, Rogue River, Willamette, Siskiyou National Forests and US Dept of Interior: Medford and Eugene Districts. 35 pp.
  3. Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1400 pp.
  4. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  5. Kartesz, J. T. 1999. Comments regarding taxa 1-187 [of list supplied by TNC]. Unpublished, Biota of North America Program, North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C., Nov. 25, 1999.
  6. Kartesz, J.T., and C. Meacham. 1998a. Unpublished review draft of Floristic Synthesis, 8 Jan. 1998. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, NC.
  7. Kessler, B. 2003. Effects of the Biscuit Fire on Umpqua swertia (<i>Frasera umpquaensis). </i>Summer Intern Report. Bulletin of the Native Plant Society of Oregon 35(11): 119-125. Accessed online at: https://www.npsoregon.org/bulletin/2003/NPSO_0312.PDF
  8. Munz, P.A., with D.D. Keck. 1959. A California flora. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 1681 pp.
  9. NatureServe. Unpublished. Concept reference for taxa for which no reference which describes the circumscription has been recorded; to be used as a placeholder until such a citation is identified.
  10. Peck, M.E. 1961. A manual of the higher plants of Oregon. 2nd edition. Binsford &amp; Mort, Portland, Oregon. 936 pp.
  11. Vander Schaaf, D. l987. Draft species management guide for <i>Frasera umpquaensis</i>. Challenge grant funding with U.S. Forest Service. Oregon Natural Heritage Data Base, The Nature Conservancy, Portland.
  12. Wilson, B.L., V. Hipkins, and T.N. Kaye. 2010. One taxon or two: are <i>Frasera umpquaensis </i>and <i>F. fastigiata </i>(Gentianaceae) distinct species?. Madroño, 57(2): 106-119.