Lindera melissifolia

(Walt.) Blume

Pondberry

G3Vulnerable Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Pondberry (Lindera melissifolia). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.129236
Element CodePDLAU07020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderLaurales
FamilyLauraceae
GenusLindera
Synonyms
Lindera melissifolium(Walt.) Blume
Other Common Names
Southern Spicebush (EN) southern spicebush (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Distinct species, but L. benzoin var. pubescens and L. subcoriacea were formerly confused with it.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2015-10-29
Change Date2015-10-29
Edition Date2015-10-29
Edition AuthorsRusso, M.J.(1995); rev. Amoroso/Maybury, 6/96, rev. Maybury 2003, rev. K. Gravuer (2008), rev. Treher (2015)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 300
Rank Reasons
Mapped and believed extant at about 99 sites, although some of these are in close proximity, so the number of extant populations may be somewhat less. A few extant populations appear quite large, but may contain few different genetic individuals; many sites are small and isolated. Believed extirpated from Louisiana and possibly Florida; extant populations are known from the coastal plain in North Carolina south to Georgia and Alabama and from the Mississippi Embayment in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Missouri. Extensive clearing and drainage of bottomland forests is probably the major factor affecting the species, both historically and currently. Also appears susceptible to the emerging Red Bay or Laurel Wilt Disease; one Georgia population is known to be infected, but the full potential range and impact of the disease is unknown at this time. Limited sexual reproduction, dispersal, and recruitment are also a concern for the species' persistence in its now highly-fragmented habitat.
Range Extent Comments
Chiefly coastal plain, North Carolina south to Florida and west to Alabama and in Mississippi Embayment to southern Missouri and Arkansas. Very scattered distribution. Devall et al. (2001) note the possibility that the species never occurred in present-day Florida - the only evidence for occurrence there are two 1800s specimens labeled "Florida" and "West Florida"; however, the "West Florida" territory of that time includes parts of present-day LA, MS, AL, and FL. Known county distribution is as follows: North Carolina - Cumberland, Sampson, Onslow, and Bladen (historical) counties; South Carolina - Beaufort, Berkeley, and Colleton (historical) counties; Georgia - Baker, Calhoun, Effingham, Taylor, Wheeler, Worth, Chatham (historical), and Screven (historical) counties; Florida - Gadsden (historical) County; Alabama - Covington and Wilcox (historical) counties (Covington County locations were found in 2004, representing a re-discovery of the species in Alabama); Mississippi - Bolivar, Sharkey, Sunflower, and Tallahatchie counties; Louisiana - Union (historical) and Morehouse (historical) parishes; Arkansas - Ashley, Clay, Craighead, Jackson, Lawrence, Poinsett, and Woodruff counties; Missouri -Ripley County; re-introduced population in Butler County. A single range extent polygon was calculated as approximately 500,000 square km using GIS tools.
Occurrences Comments
Approximately 99 extant occurrences are currently mapped, of which 2-3 are reintroductions (2 in Missouri and possibly 1 in Arkansas). An additional 17 occurrences are likely extirpated. However, the true number of extant populations may be less than 99, as some currently-mapped occurrences are in close proximity. For example, 19 EOs in Mississippi derive from one USFS inventory of the Delta National Forest, and 18 EOs in Arkansas derive from one status survey in Jackson and Lawrence counties. If more data on these occurrences were available, perhaps they could be delineated as a smaller number of populations.
Threat Impact Comments
Loss and alteration of habitat has been and continues to be the most significant threat. Multiple causes of habitat loss/degradation are known, including land clearing, hydrological alteration (drainage, ditching, flooding), timber harvesting, leveling of mound/depression topography, and road building. Uses to which habitats have been converted include tree farming (plantations), crop production, and residential areas. The reduced area and extreme fragmentation of remaining suitable habitat is of concern, especially given incomplete knowledge of the effects of surrounding land practices and the potential impact of climate change (P. McKenzie pers. comm. 2008). Fragmentation also greatly reduces the chances that waning populations will be rescued or replaced by incoming propagules. An important emerging threat to this species is Red Bay or Laurel Wilt disease. This fungal disease, spread by a newly-established ambrosia beetle from Asia, is causing widespread mortality of red bay (Persea borbonia) trees in coastal SC, GA, and FL so far and is spreading rapidly north, south, and inland. This disease can infect Lindera melissifolia as well (Johnson et al. 2007). One L. melissifolia stand in Effingham Co., GA is under attack; it has not yet fully succumbed and is being monitored (T. Patrick, pers. comm. 2008). It is possible that this disease could spread throughout the range of L. melissifolia. Threats of lower magnitude include trampling by domestic animals such as hogs and cattle (affects at least one GA site and one AR site), competition with aggressive non-native plant species, and increased frequency of droughts in the southeast. Less severe dieback of plant stems than that caused by Red Bay disease has also been observed at many sites throughout the range, but it has proven difficult to conclusively link stem dieback to population decline. Overall, threats remain high in most of the range.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Lindera melissifolia (and L. benzoin) can be distinguished from another rare species, L. subcoriacea, by its thin leaves that are not strongly whitened below. L. melissifolia can be distinguished from the common L. benzoin by leaves that are drooping, as opposed to erect-ascending or spreading, have a much stronger sassafras odor, and have more rounded bases. L. melissifolia also tends to occur in wetter habitats than does L. benzoin (Delay et al. 1993).

Habitat

Can apparently occupy a variety of habitats as long as hydrological requirements are met. Occurs in seasonally flooded wetlands such as floodplain/bottomland hardwood forests and forested swales, on the bottoms and edges of shallow seasonal ponds in old dune fields, along the margins of ponds and depressions in pinelands, around the edges of sinkholes in coastal areas with karst topography, and along the borders of Sphagnum bogs. Usually in shade, but tolerates full sun.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - HardwoodWoodland - Conifer
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLFORESTED WETLANDBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
LouisianaSHYes
MississippiS2Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
North CarolinaS1Yes
ArkansasS2Yes
South CarolinaS2Yes
FloridaSXYes
AlabamaS1Yes
MissouriS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
6.3 - Work & other activitiesLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - moderate
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - low
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - low

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, DECIDUOUS
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (2)
South Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
Hellhole ExtFrancis Marion National Forest891
Wambaw ExtFrancis Marion National Forest527
References (16)
  1. Cooper, J.E., S.S. Robinson, and J.B. Funderburg (eds.). 1977. Endangered and threatened plants and animals of North Carolina. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. 444 pp.
  2. DeLay, L., R. O'Connor, J. Ryan, and R.R. Currie. 1993. Recovery plan for pondberry (<i>Lindera melissifolia</i> [Walt] Blume). Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Atlanta, GA. 43 pp.
  3. Devall, M., N. Schiff, and D. Boyette. 2001. Ecology and reproductive biology of the endangered Pondberry, <i>Lindera melissifolia</i> (Walt) Blume. Natural Areas Journal 21(3): 250-258.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 3. Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiii + 590 pp.
  5. Johnson, J., L. Reid, B. Mayfield, D. Duerr, and S. Fraedrich. 2007. New disease epidemic threatens redbay and other related species. Georgia Forestry Commision, South Carolina Forestry Commission, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services - Division of Forestry, and USDA Forest Service. Online. Availablie: http://www.state.sc.us/forest/idwilt.pdf (Accessed 2008)
  6. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  7. Korte, P.A., and L.H. Fredrickson. 1977. Loss of Missouri's lowland hardwood ecosystem. Transcripts of the North American Wildlands Natural Resources Conference 42: 31-41.
  8. McCue, K. 2002. National Collection Plant Profile: <i>Lindera melissifolia, </i>Center for Plant Conservation. Online. Available: www.centerforplantconservation.org/asp/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=2573 (Accessed 2008).
  9. McKenzie, Paul M. Biologist. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Columbia, Missouri
  10. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
  11. Richards, E.L. and S.L. Orzell. 1987. New locations for pondberry (<i>Lindera melissifolia</i>) in Arkansas. Proceedings Arkansas Academy Science 41: 114.
  12. Smith, Tim. Personal communication. Botanist, Missouri Department of Conservation. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO
  13. Steyermark, J.A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 1728 pp.
  14. Sutter, R.D., V. Frantz, and K.A. McCarthy. 1988. Atlas of rare and endangered plant species in North Carolina. North Carolina Dept. Agriculture, Plant Protection Section, Conservation Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 174 pp.
  15. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, PLANTS Database [USDA PLANTS]. http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed 2015.
  16. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1986. Determination of endangered status for <i>Lindera melissifolia</i>. Federal Register 51(147): 27495-27500.