Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104902
Element CodeAMALD01012
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSubspecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
CITESAppendix I
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderArtiodactyla
FamilyAntilocapridae
GenusAntilocapra
Other Common NamesSonoran pronghorn (EN)
Concept ReferenceHall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I & II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsThe distinctiveness of this subspecies remains to be ascertained (Hoffmeister 1986).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-03-29
Change Date1996-03-19
Edition Date2021-03-29
Edition AuthorsSchwartz, S. (2006, 2011), Flower, C. (2021)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank ReasonsThis subspecies has a small, reduced range in Arizona (US) and Sonora (Mexico). The Arizona population was nearly extirpated by severe drought in 2002, however, intensive conservation measures have helped the populations recover. In addition to the wild population, the Kofa and Sauceda populations in Arizona are stable to increasing. Population decline is attributed mainly to loss of habitat, habitat fragmentation, climate change, drought, and (in Mexico) probably poaching.
Range Extent CommentsFormerly throughout southern Arizona, US, and in Mexico south to Guaymas, Sonora. Presently in Yuma, Pima, and Maricopa counties, south of the Bill Williams River and west of the Baboquivari Mountains, southwestern Arizona, and in northwestern Sonora (Matthews and Moseley 1990, Hoffmeister 1986).
Historically, Sonoran pronghorn ranged from the area between the Baboquivari Mountains and the Santa Cruz River in the east; to the vicinity of present-day Interstate 10 and no farther than the Bill Williams River in the north; to the main coastline of the Gulf of California to near Kino Bay and east to Hermosillo in the south; and into the Imperial Valley of California and the northern Gulf of California Coast of Baja California in the west, a range of about 55,0000 mi2 (142,450 km2 ) (USFWS 2010).
Populations in Arizona include the Cabeza Prieta, Kofa and Sauceda populations. The Cabeza Prieta population is an endangered population which generally occurs south of Interstate 8, west of Highway 85, and east of the Copper and Cabeza Prieta Mountains. The Kofa population is an experimental population that is found within the larger nonessential experimental population area in the vicinity of Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, north of Interstate 8. The Sauceda population is an experimental population initiated in December, 2015 within the larger nonessential experimental population area in the vicinity of Barry M. Goldwater Range East, east of Highway 85.
Occurrences CommentsFive populations are extant, three in Arizona, and two in northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Populations in Arizona include the Cabeza Prieta, Kofa and Sauceda populations. The Cabeza Prieta population is an endangered population which generally occurs south of Interstate 8, west of Highway 85, and east of the Copper and Cabeza Prieta Mountains. The Kofa population is an experimental population that is found within the larger nonessential experimental population area in the vicinity of Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, north of Interstate 8. The Sauceda population is an experimental population initiated in December, 2015 within the larger nonessential experimental population area in the vicinity of Barry M. Goldwater Range East, east of Highway 85.
Threat Impact CommentsPopulation decline is attributed mainly to loss of habitat, habitat fragmentation, climate change, and drought. Specific threats and stressors include mining; agriculture, livestock grazing, renewable energy development, habitat conversion, physical barriers, border activities, reduced availability of water, low annual rainfall, thermal stress, reduced forage quality, fire, increased cover of creosote bush, invasive plant encroachment, decreasing pollinator populations, military activity, disease interactions with cattle, lack of genetic diversity, recreation, poaching, and lack of redundancy of populations and small population side.