Strombocarpa pubescens

(Benth.) A. Gray

Screwbean Mesquite

G3Vulnerable Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.158270
Element CodePDFAB3A050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderFabales
FamilyFabaceae
GenusStrombocarpa
Synonyms
Prosopis pubescensBenth.
Other Common Names
American Screwbean (EN) screwbean mesquite (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Hughes et al. (2022) found that the genus Prosopis is polyphyletic and resurrect segregate genera; Prosopis pubescens is treated as Strombocarpa pubescens.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-03-13
Change Date2025-03-13
Edition Date2025-03-14
Edition AuthorsJohnson, J. (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Prosopis pubescens is a small tree that forms dense woodlands along riparian areas in the southwestern United States. It is the dominant species within mesquite bosques along river corridors and provides food and shelter for many wildlife species. Despite a large range and number of occurrences, this species has experienced catastrophic declines in many populations in the western part of its range due to combinations of factors that are not entirely understood. Heat, drought, flooding, and fungal pathogens likely contribute to these mass die-offs. Additionally, the species is threatened by human disturbance such as water diversions and dams, urban and agricultural development, and livestock grazing.
Range Extent Comments
The native range of Prosopis pubescens extends from southeastern California west into southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah, southern and western Arizona, southwestern and south-central New Mexico, western Texas and northern Mexico, including Baja California, Sonora, Chihuahua, and Coahuila. Prosopis pubescens has been introduced to areas in India, Pakistan, and southern and southwestern Africa (Meyer 2005). Range extent was estimated using herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data collected between 1994 and 2025 (RARECAT 2024, GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, SEINet 2025).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance, or 10 km separation distance between occurrences along the same waterway, to herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025, it is estimated that there are more than 300 occurrences rangewide (RARECAT 2024, GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, SEINet 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
Prosopis pubescens is dependent on shallow groundwater in desert riparian areas, a habitat affected heavily by humans in the past hundred years (Foldi 2014). Threats to this species include urban and agricultural development, groundwater extraction, surface water diversion and impoundment, livestock grazing, herbicide use, pathogenic canker fungus, and climate change (Foldi 2014, Miller 2018, Cowan 2024).

Examinations of large-scale die-offs have shown that drought followed by flooding has been responsible for some tree deaths at Ash Meadows (DRI 2023). Similar hydrological cycles in reservoirs may kill trees that grow along the edges of the impounded water. Another study has shown the canker fungus Neoscytalidium dimidiatum to be strongly linked to tree deaths in Nevada and likely in Arizona. The wood-boring beetle Chrysobothris octocola was also observed on the infected trees, but it is unknown whether the beetle is a vector or simply attacking weakened trees. The authors speculate that this may be a new strain of a native fungus that developed in the Lower Colorado River area and spread to other populations. The fungus is most active during hot weather and hotter summer temperatures may be contributing to the virulence and spread of the fungus (Cowan 2024).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Screwbean mesquite is found in desert riparian woodland and scrub habitats along streams and rivers and in alkaline sinks. Screwbean mesquite can be a dominant species in the mesquite bosque habitat type or an understory tree in cottonwood gallery forests in the desert southwest (Meyer 2005).

Reproduction

"Seeds of screwbean mesquite are transported by water and domestic and wild animals, including coyotes and rodents. Digestion also scarifies the seeds, which is generally required for germination" (Meyer 2005).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodSavanna
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
TexasSNRYes
UtahS1Yes
New MexicoSNRYes
ArizonaS4Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
NevadaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)UnknownLow (long-term)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2.3 - Abstraction of surface water (agricultural use)Restricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2.7 - Abstraction of ground water (agricultural use)Restricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionRestricted (11-30%)UnknownUnknown
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsRestricted (11-30%)UnknownUnknown
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesRestricted (11-30%)UnknownUnknown
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate (short-term)
11.2 - DroughtsLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate (short-term)
11.3 - Temperature extremesPervasive (71-100%)UnknownUnknown

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (3)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
New Mexico (2)
AreaForestAcres
Apache Kid ContiguousCibola National Forest67,542
San JoseCibola National Forest16,950
References (14)
  1. Cowan J., J. Hu, K. Haubensak, K. Grady. 2024. Range-wide population decline of a foundational riparian species tree is linked to an endemic fungal pathogen in the western United States. Biological Conservation, Volume 296, ISSN 0006-3207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110704.
  2. Desert Research Institute (DRI). July 10, 2023. Cracking the Mysterious Case of Dying Desert Forests. DRI Behind the Science Blog. https://www.dri.edu/dying-desert-forests/
  3. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2023. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 11. Magnoliophyta: Fabaceae, parts 1+2. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvii + 1108 pp.
  4. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  5. Hughes C.E., J.J. Ringelberg, G.P. Lewis, and S.A. Catalano. 2022. Disintegration of the genus <i>Prosopis </i>L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). In: Hughes C.E., L.P. de Queiroz, G.P. Lewis (Eds) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae Part 1: New generic delimitations. PhytoKeys 205: 147-189. [https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.75379]
  6. iNaturalist. 2025. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2025).
  7. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  8. Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook No. 541. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C. 375 pp.
  9. Meyer, Rachelle. 2005. <i>Prosopis pubescens</i>. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/tree/propub/all.html
  10. Miller, M. 2018. The Mystery of the Dying Mesquites. Cool Green Science, The Nature Conservancy. https://blog.nature.org/2018/10/09/the-mystery-of-the-dying-mesquites/
  11. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  12. NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2024. Version: 1.1.1 (released Oct 01, 2024).
  13. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2025. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2025).
  14. Steven E. Foldi "Disappearance of a dominant bosque species: screwbean mesquite (<i>Prosopis pubescens</i>)," The Southwestern Naturalist 59(3), 337-343, (1 September 2014). <a href="https://doi-org.nal.idm.oclc.org/10.1894/F02-JEM-03.1" target="_blank">https://doi-org.nal.idm.oclc.org/10.1894/F02-JEM-03.1</a>