Trifolium andinum

Nutt.

Intermountain Clover

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 9 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.128412
Element CodePDFAB40060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderFabales
FamilyFabaceae
GenusTrifolium
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Trifolium andinum Nuttall was named in 1838. Two varieties were named within Trifolium andinum Nuttall in 1989 (Barneby 1989), T. andinum var. podocephalum Barneby is endemic to eastern Nevada (Barneby 1989). In the 1990s and early 2000s, the other plants within this species (in Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming) were considered to be T. andinum var. andinum (Barneby 1989, Isley 1998). In 1998, Isley recognized these two varieties and noted, "The isolated populations of Trifolium andinum are all slightly different one from the other. The level of peduncle development is various, and one may also see peduncled heads (sometimes both of these in a capitulum) northeast of the peripheral Nevada montane locales" (Isley 1998). In 2008, three more varieties endemic to Utah (and the Navajo Nation within Utah), were named; T. andinum var. navajoense S. L. Welsh & N. D. Atwood, endemic to the Navajo Nation within San Juan County, in southeastern Utah, T. andinum var. wahwahense S. L. Welsh & N. D. Atwood, endemic to the Wah Wah Mountains in Beaver County in western Utah, and T. andinum var. canone S. L. Welsh & N. D. Atwood, endemic to the Canyon Mountains of Millard County, in central Utah (Alexander 2016, Welsh et al. 2008, Welsh et al. 2015). If these varieties are recognized, then T. andinum var. andinum is the only variety present in the Uinta Mountains of northeastern Utah, and in the Green River Basin of northwestern Colorado and southwestern Wyoming, where there are many documented locations (Fertig et al. 1998, Welsh et al. 2015). There are plants known from Cococino County, Arizona and a few other locations in Utah which have been identified as T. andinum, and to T. andinum var. andinum. This plant is not known from New Mexico (SEINet 2021).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-12-14
Change Date2021-12-16
Edition Date2021-12-13
Edition AuthorsFayette, Kim (1998), rev. C. Nordman (2021).
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species is known from the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming and northwestern Colorado, and isolated mountain ranges of the Great Basin in Utah, northwestern Arizona, and eastern Nevada. There are at least 200 locations documented, but the number of occurrences is unknown. Threat impact is uncertain, but likely is high to medium, threats include mining, grazing, and invasive species.
Range Extent Comments
Trifolium andinum is known from the Great Basin of the western United States. It occurs in various isolated mountain ranges in eastern Nevada and Utah, the Grand Canyon area of northwestern Arizona, and in the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming, and northwestern Colorado. The range extent is estimated to be 275,000 square kilometers. It has been mistakenly reported from New Mexico. T. andinum var. podocephalum is known only from eastern Nevada (NatureServe 2021, SEINet 2021). In Colorado and Wyoming, only Trifolium andinum var. andinum is known (Ackerfield 2012, SEINet 2021), three other varieties are known from isolated mountain ranges in Utah (Alexander 2016, Welsh et al. 2008, Welsh et al. 2015).
Occurrences Comments
There estimated to be more than 200 occurrences of Trifolium andinum, it is most common in the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming, but elsewhere it mainly occurs in isolated mountain ranges (Fertig et al. 1998, NatureServe 2021, SEINet 2021). Isely described T. andinum in general as a "little-collected clover" (Isley 1998).
Threat Impact Comments
Occurrences of Intermountain Clover are not reported to be threatened within the Dinosaur National Monument, in Colorado (Colorado Natural Heritage Program 2014). Threats to Intermountain Clover likely include grazing impacts (including from cattle, wild horses, and introduced mountain goats in Utah), recreation impacts (such as from hikers and off road vehicles), mining, road construction, drought, and invasive exotic plants, especially cheatgrass (NatureServe 2021, SEINet 2021, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources 2018). One of the known populations is very close to a large weed infestation (NatureServe 2021). Threat impact is uncertain (Alexander 2016), but likely is high to medium.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Flowers are bicolored, banner is pale, wings and keel are pink or purple tipped. Heads are subtended by an involucre of bracts. Plants densely caespitose, usually less than 1 dm tall. Numerous flowers in each head (Weber and Wittmann 2012).

Habitat

Trifolium andinum occurs in clay and sandy desert with sagebrush, black sagebrush, pinyon-juniper, upwards to ponderosa pine, limber pine-Douglas fir-mountain mahogany, or mixed shrub-grass communities at 1970 to 3100 meters elevation (Isley 1998, Welsh et al. 2015).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferWoodland - ConiferShrubland/chaparralBare rock/talus/scree
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
ArizonaSNRYes
NevadaS1Yes
WyomingS3Yes
UtahS2Yes
ColoradoS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (9)
Nevada (5)
AreaForestAcres
CottonwoodHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest18,161
Currant - East SlopeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest10,101
Indian CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest9,996
Red MountainHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest30,242
WilhoitesHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest11,297
Utah (4)
AreaForestAcres
0401001Ashley National Forest11,705
0401024Ashley National Forest12,882
North PavantFishlake National Forest53,262
Oak CreekFishlake National Forest54,053
References (12)
  1. Alexander, J. 2016. The Utah Native Plant Society Rare Plant List: Version 2. Calochortiana. 3: 1-248.
  2. Barneby, R.C. 1989. Fabales. In A. Cronquist, A.H. Holmgren, N.H. Holmgren, J.L. Reveal, and P.K. Holmgren (eds.). Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 3, Part B. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 279 pp.
  3. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. 2014. Colorado Rare Plant Guide. Online. Available: https://cnhp.colostate.edu/rareplants/index.asp (accessed 2021).
  4. Fertig, W., L. Welp, and S. Markow. 1998. The status of rare plants in southwest Wyoming. Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office By Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. Laramie, Wyoming, USA. Agreement # K910-A4-0011. Available online: http://www.uwyo.edu/wyndd/_files/docs/reports/wynddreports/u98fer09wyus.pdf (Accessed 10 December 2021).
  5. Isely, D. 1998. Native and naturalized Leguminosae (Fabaceae) of the United States (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii). Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University; MLBM Press, Provo, Utah. 1007 pp.
  6. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  7. Kearney, T.H., R.H. Peebles, and collaborators. 1951. Arizona flora. 2nd edition with Supplement (1960) by J.T. Howell, E. McClintock, and collaborators. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 1085 pp.
  8. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2021. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2021).
  9. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. 2018. Statewide management plan for mountain goat. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Utah Department of Natural Resources. Online. Available https://wildlife.utah.gov/pdf/bg/mtn_goat_plan.pdf (Accessed 2021).
  10. Weber, W.A., and R.C. Wittmann. 2012b. Colorado Flora, Western Slope, a field guide to the vascular plants, fourth edition. Boulder, Colorado. 532 pp.
  11. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich and L.C. Higgins. (Eds.) 2008. A Utah Flora. 4th edition, revised. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, U.S.A. 1019 pp.
  12. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins. (Eds). 2015. A Utah flora, fifth edition, revised 2015. Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Provo, Utah. 987 pp.