Trollius laxus

Salisb.

Spreading Globeflower

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.142297
Element CodePDRAN0P022
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderRanunculales
FamilyRanunculaceae
GenusTrollius
Synonyms
Trollius laxus ssp. laxus
Other Common Names
American Globeflower (EN) American globeflower (EN) Trollflower (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
This record is for the narrow treatment of Trollius laxus, which excludes T. laxus ssp. albiflorus as a distinct species, as recognized in FNA (vol. 3, 1997). Kartesz (1994) included the subspecies albiflorus so T. laxus ssp. laxus of Kartesz (1994) is equivalent in concept to T. laxus as recognized in FNA (1997).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-06-03
Change Date1990-06-22
Edition Date2024-06-03
Edition AuthorsBliss, P.; rev. S.M. Young; rev. T. Weldy (2005); rev. Soteropoulos (2024)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent5000-200,000 square km (about 2000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Trollius laxus is a perennial forb in alkaline meadows and open swamps occurring in the northeastern United States in Connecticut, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. There are an estimated 38 occurrences with over 20,000 individuals. Threats include habitat loss and conversion by succession, hydrological alteration, development, deer browsing, and invasive species. Historic development and land-use conversion, and the concomitant loss of calcareous wetlands, has resulted in long-term declines of at least 69%. Monitoring of populations must be conducted to improve our understanding of reproduction, plant abundance, threats, and trends, as well as establishing conservation measures to protect the species.
Range Extent Comments
Trollius laxus occurs in the northeastern United States from northwestern Connecticut, New York, and northeastern Ohio south to northern New Jersey, eastern and western Pennsylvania, and central Ohio (Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2024). Reports from several states appear to be erroneous. Gleason and Cronquist (1963) include Delaware in the range, which has been annotated to be from Delaware, New Jersey (Tucker et al. 1979), though the Flora of North America (1997) includes Delaware as part of the range. Crow (1982) and Eastman (1980) report that the old records for New Hampshire and Maine are erroneous, and Voss in Mohlenbrock (1983) indicates that the Michigan reports are doubtful as vouchers have been annotated to similar looking species.

Portions of the species' range have been extirpated, including southeastern New York (Bronx, Otsego, Rockland, Sullivan, Ulster and Westchester Counties), northern New Jersey (Bergen and Passaic Counties), and Ohio (Fairfield, Stark, and Wayne Counties). Range extent was estimated to be 94,509 square kilometers using NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1993 and 2024 (NatureServe 2024).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1993 and 2024, it is estimated that there are 38 occurrences rangewide, excluding three occurrences that were failed to find (NatureServe 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by habitat loss and conversion, with the largest threats including succession leading to the shading by shrubs or a heavy tree canopy, changes to water quality, and hydrological changes (NYNHP 2024). This species is additionally threatened by development, powerline maintenance activities including herbicide and rutting, recreational activities such as off-road vehicles, logging, grazing, and invasive species, including coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara), Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), bush honeysuckle (Lonicera mackii), purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and reed canary grass (Phragmites australis). Flooding resulting from beaver dams may be a problem, and deer browsing can severely decrease populations, with one occurrence reduced to a single individual protected by a deer exclosure (NatureServe 2024).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Spreading globeflower (Trollius laxus) is a low plant below knee height with crowded leaves arising on long petioles from the base of the plant. There are five, three-lobed leaflets spreading horizontally from the same point at the top of the petiole. The terminal lobe is longer than the lateral lobes and all have smaller lobes and/or wide but sharp teeth along the margin. The flowering stalks are longer than the leaves and terminate in one flower with five light yellow showy sepals with conspicuous veins, especially the mid vein. There is usually a set of four or five leaflets just below the flower. In the center of the flower are numerous bright yellow stamens that hide the inconspicuous petals and surround the five or more separate fruits.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Cauline leaves 1-3, deeply palmately lobed; flowers regular symmetrical, sepals showy, petaloid; petals very small, 15-20. Pistils forming follicles.

Two subspecies are recognized; T. laxus ssp. albiflorus (Gray) Love, Love and Kapoor has white to cream rather than pale greenish yellow sepals. Gray (1862), Rydberg (1900), and Hitchcock (1964) described T. laxus ssp. albiflorus as having broader sepals as well. However, Doroszewska (1974) in his taxonomic treatment of the genus, found that T. laxus ssp. albiflorus may have both broader and narrower sepals. The latter subspecies is less rare and ranges from British Columbia and Alberta in Canada south in the mountains in Washington, Montana, Wyoming, Colorada and Utah.

Habitat

Trollius laxus grows in wetlands influenced by cold, highly alkaline groundwater seepage. It is found in open fens, along swamp margins, and in partly sunny, wet openings in seepage swamps. In the opinion of Tom Rawinski (pers. comm., s.d.), T. laxus is an obligate calcicole under natural conditions. Swamp populations tend to be rather widely spaced and patchy, but can be large. T. laxus reaches its greatest density in sloping fens. Here, individuals grow either on sedge tussocks somewhat above the saturated soils, or on seepy mineral soil. In seepage swamps, it grows alongside wet depressions or on sedge tussocks. Soils at the Mahoning Co., Ohio population (pH range of 5.9 to 6.7) are not highly organic, and have a high percentage of available carbonates due in part to a limestone formation on surrounding higher ground (Parsons and Yates 1984).

In sloping fens commonly associated species are: Acer rubrum, Aster puniceus, A. umbellatus, Bromus ciliatus, Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex aquatilis, C. flava, C. hystricina, C. interior, C. lacustris, C. leptalea, Chelone glabra, Cicuta maculata, Cirsium muticum, Clematis virginiana, Cornus racemosa, C. stolonifera, Cypripedium reginae, Epilobium leptophyllum, Equisetum arvense, Eriophorum viride-carinatum, Eupatorium maculatum, Fragaria virginiana, Galium sp., Geum rivale, Iris versicolor, Juncus sp., Liparis loeselii, Lycopus sp., Mentha arvensis, Muhlenbergia glomerata, Pinus strobus, Prunella vulgaris, Rhamnus alnifolia, Rubus pubescens, Senecio aureus, Smilacina stellata, Solidago patula, Symplocarpus foetidus, Thalictrum polygamum, (Vaccinium corymbosum and Hamamelis virginiana on acid hummocks), Viburnum cassinoides, V. recognitum, and Zizea aurea. This list was compiled from three sites, two in NY and one in CT.

In seepage swamps commonly associated species are Acer rubrum, Caltha palustris, Carex stricta, Carpinus caroliniana, Galium sp., Geranium maculatum, Geum rivale, Onoclea sensibilis, Osmunda spp., Pinus strobus, Mitella diphylla, Rhamnus alnifolia, Saxifraga pensylvanica, Senecio aureus, Smilacina stellata, Symplocarpus foetidus, Thalictrum polyganum, and Tsuga canadensis. In NY and CT, disjunct populations of northern plants such as Conioselinum chinense, Mitella nuda, and Petasites frigidus sometimes occur in these same wetlands as well as Abies balsamea and Thuja occidentalis (Rawinski personal communication). This list was compiled from six sites; three in Connecticut, one in New York, one in Pennsylvania, and one in Ohio.

Ecology

Trollius laxus flowers from mid-April to mid-May before the canopy trees fully leaf-out. In this regard it behaves like a number of its associated swamp species: Caltha palustris, Cardamine douglasii, Petasites frigidus, Ranunculus septentrionalis, Symplocarpus foetidus, and Viola papilionacea. The seeds which ripen from late May to early July are dispersed passively by gravity with the aid of wind, rain and seasonally high water (Parsons and Yates 1984). Trollius populations increase in size solely by seed (Parsons and Yates 1984), the more vigorous individuals with several flowers producing more seeds. In two independent greenhouse studies, 90% of the seeds collected in the wild germinated when subjected to a 90 day moist, cold period or a moist, cold period coupled with freezing (Parsons and Yates 1984, Brumback 1981). On the other hand, seeds kept in a pit greenhouse without an extended cold period germinated at significantly lower percentages, 8.0% - 2.8% (Parsons and Yates 1984). Seeds are thought to germinate in the wild the following April or May (Parsons and Yates 1984). Under greenhouse conditions, a few seedlings will flower that summer, but the vast majority remain vegetative (Parsons and Yates 1984). In the well maintained population at the Garden in the Woods, some seedlings flower the 2nd year, and most flower the 3rd year (Brumback 1983). No studies have been done on wild populations.

Populations of T. laxus appear to be able to maintain themselves over long periods of time. Field observations throughout its range report that seedlings and mature individuals are present. Furthermore, there are extant populations from which herbarium specimens were collected as early as the 1910s. A number of references in the literature suggest that T. laxus declines as shade increases (Mitchell and Sheviak 1981, Spooner 1981), although these are unsubstantiated reports. Populations of T. laxus growing in open fens tend to have higher densities than populations in seepage swamps, and thus, it is possible that shading decreases population size. However, swamp populations, though scattered, are viable and can be large (Parsons and Yates 1984, Rawinski, pers. comm.). In addition, factors other than shade may contribute to its smaller densities in seepage swamps, e.g., differences in soils, acidity, and moisture availability.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - Hardwood
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDBog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
New JerseyS1Yes
ConnecticutS1Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
OhioSNRYes
New YorkS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.3.4 - Scale unknown/unrecordedSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.2 - Utility & service linesSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3.5 - Motivation unknown/unrecordedSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineModerate (short-term)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1.1 - Unspecified speciesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesSmall (1-10%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2.2 - Named speciesSmall (1-10%)Extreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, DECIDUOUS
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
Snowy RangeMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest29,660
References (34)
  1. Abrams, L. 1944. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states: Washington, Oregon, and California. Vol. 2. Polygonaceae to Krameriaceae. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. 635 pp.
  2. Bissel, J.K. 1987. A New Locality for <i>Trollius laxus</i> Saliab. <i>laxus </i>in Ohio. Rhodora 87:459-461.
  3. Brumback, W. 1983. Propagating endangered plants, theory and practice. Wild Flower Notes and News, New England Wild Flower Society, 1:4-5.
  4. Brumback, W.E. 1988. Notes on propagation of rare New England species. Rhodora 91: 154-162.
  5. Crow, G.E. 1982. New England's Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 5, Newton Corner, MA).
  6. Doroszewska, A. 1974. The genus Trollius L. A taxonomic study. Monogr. Bot. 41:1-167.
  7. Eastman, L.M. 1980. Abstract: The rare and endangered species in Maine. Rhodora 82:191-192.
  8. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. Corrected printing (1970). D. Van Nostrand Company, New York. 1632 pp.
  9. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 3. Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiii + 590 pp.
  10. Gleason, H.A. 1952. The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 3 volumes. Hafner Press, New York. 1732 pp.
  11. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1963. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, NY. 810 pp.
  12. Gray, A. 1862. Enumeration of plants of the Rocky Mountains. Amer. J. Sci. II 33:241.
  13. Henry, L.K. and W.E. Buker. 1958. The Ranunculaceae in western Pennsylvania. Castanea 23(2):33-45.
  14. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist, M. Ownbey, and J.W. Thompson. 1964. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 2: Salicaceae to Saxifragaceae, by C.L. Hitchcock and A. Cronquist. Univ. Washington Press, Seattle. 597 pp.
  15. House, H.D. 1924. Annotated list of the ferns and flowering plants of New York State. New York Sate Museum Bulletin No. 254. The University of the State of New York, Albany. pg. 332.
  16. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  17. Love, A., D. Love, and B.M. Kapoor. 1971. Cytotaxonomy of a century of Rocky Mountain orophytes. Artic Alpine Res. 3:139-165.
  18. McCance, R.M., Jr., and J.F. Burns, eds. 1984. Ohio endangered and threatened vascular plants: Abstracts of state-listed taxa. Division Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Dept. Natural Resources, Columbus. 635 pp.
  19. Mehrhoff, L.J. 1978. Rare and endangered vascular plant species in Connecticut. New England Botanical Club, Cambridge, MA. 41 pp.
  20. Mitchell, R. S., and C. J. Sheviak. 1981. Rare Plants of New York State. Bull. No. 445. New York State Museum. University of the State of New York, Albany, N.Y. 96 pp.
  21. Mitchell, R. S., and K. J. Dean. 1982. Ranunculaceae (Crowfoot family) of New York State. The State Education Department, Albany, New York.
  22. Mitchell, R. S., C. J. Sheviak, and J. K. Dean. 1980. Rare and Endangered Vascular Plant Species in New York State. State Botanist's Office. New York State Museum, Albany, New York. In cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 38 pp.
  23. Mohlenbrock, R.H. 1983. Where have all the wildflowers gone? A region-by-region guide to threatened or endangered U.S. wildflowers. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc., New York. 239 pp.
  24. NatureServe. 2024. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  25. New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP). 2024. Online Conservation Guide for <i>Trollius laxus</i>. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/spreading-globeflower/. Accessed June 3, 2024.
  26. Pammel, L.H. 1911. Manual of Poisonous Plants. Torch Press, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
  27. Parsons, B.C. and T.A. Yates. 1984. The cultural requirements of <i>Trollius laxus</i> Salisb. ssp. <i>laxus</i>. The Holden Arboretum, Mentor, Ohio.
  28. Rawinski, Thomas. Botanist. U. S. Forest Service Northeastern Area.
  29. Robertson, B.M. 1941. Distribution of the Ranunculaceae in Michigan. Papers Mich. Acad. 26:31-59.
  30. Rydberg, P.A. 1900. Catalogue of the flora of Montana and the Yellowstone National Park. Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard. 1:152.
  31. Spooner, D.M. 1981. Ohio Status of Trollius laxus ssp. laxus. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus. Unpublished report. 14 pp.
  32. Tucker, A. O., et al. 1979. Rare and Endangered Vascular Plant Species in Delaware. The Society of Natural History of Delaware, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 89 pp.
  33. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2024. Flora of the southeastern United States. Edition of March 4, 2024. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2203 pp.
  34. Wiegman, P.G. 1979. Rare and Endangered Vascular Plant Species in Pennsylvania. Western Pennsylvania Conservancy in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 5, Newton Corner, MA).