Vitis rupestris

Scheele

Rock Grape

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.154710
Element CodePDVIT040J0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderRhamnales
FamilyVitaceae
GenusVitis
Other Common Names
sand grape (EN) Sand Grape (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Vitis rupestris is a distinctive upright grape, not vining, yet easily confused with unusual individuals of some other species. It occasionally hybridizes with other co-occurring species of native grapes (as in the Potomac River Gorge).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2023-10-27
Change Date2001-02-26
Edition Date2020-03-05
Edition AuthorsK. Crowley, MRO (1995), rev. D. Walton (W.Va.HP, 1996), L. Morse (1998, 2000, 2001), rev. Treher and Nan McCarry (2020), rev. Frances and Eberly (2023)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Vitis rupestris is a shrubby perennial grape that occurs sporadically across a fairly broad range in the eastern United State where it is restricted to river scour and stream banks with some affinity to calcareous regions. The species is primarily threatened the alteration of natural flood regimes that maintain a favorable successional state for the species. It is especially vulnerable due to intrinsic vulnerabilities (low rate of seed production) and slow vegetative spread as a clonal species, and low genetic diversity within populations, with few genotypes represented even in large stands. Colonization of new sites is rare due to these limitations and the specific habitat requirements. Vitis rupestris is particularly important to the cultivated grapevine (V. vinifera) because it is one of three North American species that reestablished the European wine industry in the late 1800s, when many vineyards were decimated by the introduced phylloxera pest. Vitis rupestris is still used as rootstock in grape production worldwide for its resistance to phylloxera, downy mildew, and other fungal diseases affecting the wine and grape industries. Interestingly, this species has escaped and naturalized in both Europe and California, despite its rarity in the eastern United States.
Range Extent Comments
Vitis rupestris occurs in the eastern United States at disjunct locations from Pennsylvania and Maryland west to Missouri, and south to North Carolina, Alabama, and Texas. It has escaped cultivation and naturalized in California and Europe, where it is used as rootstock for cultivated grapes (Arrigo and Arnold 2007). Reports from Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Ohio are based on old literature reports not maintained in more recent floras. The Ohio report appears to be without basis (A. Cusick, pers. comm. 2001). Reports from Illinois are Vitis riparia (B. Charles, pers. comm., 2023).
Occurrences Comments
There are between 100 and 130 occurrences rangewide. In addition, there are nearly 50 occurrences not seen for over 40 years (iNaturalist 2023, NatureServe 2023, SEINet 2023).
Threat Impact Comments
The principal threat to Vitis rupestris is a change in the hydrology of its riverbank habitats, away from the natural flooding regime and periodic scouring of the riverbank. Riverbanks and hydrology have been altered by dams, roads, powerplants, and other forms of development. The species relies on a natural flooding regime and periodic scouring of the riverbank to maintain its habitat but these alterations can increase or diminish flood intensity and frequency to a level that is not favorable by the species. Changes to hydrology may be exacerbated by climate change. This species is also threatened by succession which is also maintained by flooding and scouring. Its habitat may be threatened by recreational use and by pollution or siltation. Deer browse of plants is evident at some sites. Hybridization with other native grapes may be degrading this species' gene pool (S. Grund, pers. comm., 2022).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Bushy shrub-like grape, slightly climbing with few tendrils, alternate, short, wide, and toothed leaves. Berries are black.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Tendrils lacking or only from the uppermost nodes; leaves pubescent underneath with short erect hairs not long cobweb-like hairs; pith interrupted by a diaphragm at each node.

Habitat

Vitis rupestris occurs on calcareous or gravelly banks, river bottoms, stream beds, washes, and scoured boulders and cobbles. It also occurs along the edges of limestone glades and barrens.

Ecology

Plant species associated with Vitis rupestris include Andropogon gerardii, Apocynum sp., Baptisia australis, Cornus obliqua, Platanus occidentalis, Salix caroliniana, and Ulmus alata (Morano and Walker 1995). In Indiana, V. rupestris occurs in chert and limestone gravel streambeds. The elevation of one site was noted as 430 ft. (Indiana Heritage files 1995). In Kentucky, occurrences of this species are among limestone cobble bars and scoured boulder areas (Kentucky Heritage Files 1995). In Missouri, Vitis rupestris occurs along cherty stream beds, rocky banks, and gravel bars. These sites are alternately xeric and inundated (Steyermark,1993). In Pennsylvania, Vitis rupestris occurs along river banks that are reached by high water.

Reproduction

Reproduction is mainly vegetative via rooting stems, although plants do flower and produce fruit. Germination rates are improved with chilling at 4°C for 4 weeks (Takeno et al. 1983).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandGrassland/herbaceousSand/duneBarrensBare rock/talus/scree
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
VirginiaS1Yes
KentuckyS2Yes
District of ColumbiaS1Yes
TexasS1Yes
MarylandS1Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
ArkansasS1Yes
OklahomaS2Yes
CaliforniaSNANo
West VirginiaS3Yes
MissouriS3Yes
IndianaS1Yes
TennesseeS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
Missouri (1)
AreaForestAcres
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
References (29)
  1. Arrigo, N., and C. Arnold. 2007. Naturalised <i>Vitis</i> Rootstocks in Europe and Consequences to Native Wild Grapevine. PLOS ONE 2(6):e521. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000521">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000521</a>.
  2. Baker, Brent. Botanist and Collections Manager of the ANHC Herbarium. Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission. Little Rock, Arkansas.
  3. Best, C., J.T. Howell, W. Knight, I. Knight, and M. Wells. 1996. A flora of Sonoma County: Manual of the flowering plants and ferns of Sonoma County, California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 347 pp.
  4. Comeaux, B.L. 1984. Taxonomic studies on certain native grapes of eastern United States. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
  5. Cusick, A. Botanist, Ohio Natural Heritage Program. Personal communication.
  6. Deam, C. C. 1940. Flora of Indiana. Division of Forestry, Dept. of Conservation, Indianapolis, Indiana. 1236 pp.
  7. Duncan, W.H. 1975. Sida 3: 1-76.
  8. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2016. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 12. Magnoliophyta: Vitaceae to Garryaceae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiv + 603 pp.
  9. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 910 pp.
  10. Heinitz C.C., J. Uretsky, J.C. Dodson Peterson, K.G. Huerta-Acosta, M.A. Walker. 2019. Crop Wild Relatives of Grape (<i>Vitis vinifera</i> L.) Throughout North America. Pages 329-351 in: S. Greene, K. Williams, C. Khoury, M. Kantar, L. Marek, editors. North American Crop Wild Relatives, Volume 2. Springer, Cham.
  11. Hyatt, P.E. 1993. A Survey of the Vascular Flora of Baxter County, Arkansas. Castanea 58(2): 115-140.
  12. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  13. Kral, Dr. Robert. Dept. of General Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Pers. comm. of May 17, 1995 with Kathy Crowley, MRO.
  14. Lebrun, L. 1985. Selection in vitro for NaCl-tolerance in Vitis rupestris Scheele. Annals of Botany 56:733-739.
  15. Mohlenbrock, R.H. 2014. Vascular flora of Illinois: a field guide, fourth edition. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
  16. Moore, M.O. 1989. Letter of April 10 to Dr. Bert Pittman.
  17. Moore, M. O. 1991. Classification and systematics of eastern North American Vitis L. (Vitaceae) north of Mexico. Sida 14(3): 339-367.
  18. Morano, L.D., and M.A. Walker. 1995. Soil and plant communities associated with three Vitis species. Am. Midl. Nat. 134: 254-263.
  19. Morse, Larry E. Personal Communication. North American Botanist, NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Formerly Chief Botanist, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  20. NatureServe. 2023. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  21. Oakes, H.N. 1932. A brief sketch of the life and works of Augustin Gattinger. Cullum & Ghertner Co., Nashville, TN.
  22. Pavek, Diane S. (U.S.D.A. Ag. Res. Service, Beltsville)
  23. Pavek, D.S., W.F. Lamboy, and E.J. Garvey. 2003. Selecting <i>in situ</i> conservation sites for grape genetic resources in the USA.Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50:165–173.
  24. Smith, E.B. 1988b. An atlas and annotated list of the vascular plants of Arkansas. Second edition. Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. 489 pp.
  25. Smith, Tim. Personal communication. Botanist, Missouri Department of Conservation. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO
  26. Steyermark, J.A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 1728 pp.
  27. Strausbaugh, P.D., and E.L. Core. 1978. Flora of West Virginia. Seneca Books, Inc., Grantsville, WV. 1079 pp.
  28. Takeno, K., M. Koshioka, R.P. Pharis, K. Rajasekaran, and M.G. Mullins. 1983. Endogenous Gibberellin-like substances in somatic embryos of grape (Vitis vinifera x Vitis rupestris) in relation to embryogenesis and the chilling requirement for subsequent development of mature embryos. Plant Physiol. 73: 803-808.
  29. Wen, Jun. Research Scientist and Curator. Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.