Sterna hirundo

Linnaeus, 1758

Common Tern

G5Secure Found in 11 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). © Alexis Lours; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Alexis Lours; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). © Keenan Yakola; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Keenan Yakola; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). © Doug Hitchcox; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Doug Hitchcox; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). © Matt Felperin; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Matt Felperin; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). © Anonymous; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Anonymous; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). © Michael Stubblefield; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Michael Stubblefield; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101840
Element CodeABNNM08070
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderCharadriiformes
FamilyLaridae
GenusSterna
Other Common Names
Charrán Común, Gaviotín Golondrina (ES) common tern (EN) Sterne pierregarin (FR) Trinta-Réis-Boreal (PT)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Zink et al. (1995) found that populations on Asian and North American sides of Beringia exhibited a level of mtDNA differentiation intermediate between populations and species; however, sample sizes were small and no formal taxonomic change was recommended. Regional breeding populations in western Great Lakes area are not differentiated genetically into subpopulations. Very rarely hybridizes with roseate tern (e.g., see Zingo et al., 1994, Connecticut Warbler 14(2):50-55).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-10
Change Date1996-11-27
Edition Date1996-04-30
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: northern Alberta across central Ontario and southern Quebec to southern Labrador, south to eastern Washington, southeastern Alberta, northeastern Montana, North Dakota, northeastern South Dakota, central Minnesota, northeastern Illinois, northwestern Indiana, southern Michigan, northern Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania, central and northern New York, and northwestern Vermont, locally along coast to North Carolina, and locally on Gulf Coast and Bermuda, Greater Antilles, and Netherlands Antilles (AOU 1983, van Halewyn and Norton 1984). In Old World. Nonbreeders occur in summer at James Bay, throughout Great Lakes region, along Atlantic-Gulf coast, south in Middle America to Costa Rica, and throughout West Indies. NON-BREEDING: Baja California and South Carolina to Peru and northern Argentina (AOU 1983); rare in Hawaii. In Old World.
Threat Impact Comments
Populations initially were decimated by the millinery trade. Major current threats in different areas include nest-site competition from expanding ring-billed gull populations (Great Lakes region); predation by owls, black-crowned night heron, rats, or herring gull; loss of beach habitat; flooding and rising water levels (Great Lakes region); human disturbance; and possibly biocide contamination (Buckley and Buckley 1984).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Seacoasts, estuaries, bays, lakes, rivers, and marshes. Nests on sandy, pebbly, or stony beaches, matted vegetation, marsh islands, and grassy areas; typically on isolated, sparsely vegetated islands in large lakes or along coast, also in rivers. Breeds successfully on human-made islands, including navigational aids or cribs (Karwowski et al. 1995). See Spendelow and Patton (1988) and Ramos and del Nevo (1995) for further details on nesting habitat in different regions.

Ecology

In Massachusetts, loss of eggs and chicks was attributed to nocturnal desertion of nests by adults in response to predation by great horned owl (Nisbet and Welton 1984). Presence of mink can reduce reproductive success (Condor 95:708-711). Nonbreeding: singly or in small loose groups, sometimes in large flocks in migration (Stiles and Skutch 1989).

Reproduction

Eggs are laid mostly May-July. Clutch size is 2-3. Incubation lasts 21-27 days, mainly by female. Both sexes tend young, which may leave nest after 3 days (return for brooding) and first fly at about 4 weeks. May lay 2 clutches/year, but second brood rarely fledges. In New York, breeding season was timed to overlap with seasonal increase in food abundance, but food availability began to decline before period of peak demand for food by chicks (Safina and Burger 1988); in a two-year study, fish abundance affected reproductive performance (Safina et al. 1988).
Terrestrial Habitats
Sand/dune
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5B
ProvinceRankNative
South DakotaS2BYes
DelawareS1B,S2NYes
IndianaSXBYes
ColoradoSNAYes
MaineS4BYes
NevadaSNAYes
New JerseyS3B,S4NYes
IdahoSNAYes
NebraskaSNRNYes
MarylandS1BYes
WashingtonS4NYes
IowaS2B,S3NYes
West VirginiaSNAYes
IllinoisS1Yes
LouisianaS1B,S3NYes
MississippiS1BYes
OregonSNAYes
MichiganS2Yes
VirginiaS2BYes
FloridaS4Yes
New YorkS3BYes
AlaskaS2MYes
North DakotaSUYes
VermontS1BYes
KansasSNAYes
PennsylvaniaS1B,S3MYes
New HampshireS2BYes
KentuckySNAYes
ConnecticutS3BYes
AlabamaS1B,S4NYes
CaliforniaSNAYes
WisconsinS1B,S2NYes
North CarolinaS2BYes
Rhode IslandS3BYes
GeorgiaSNRNYes
UtahSNAYes
ArkansasSNAYes
TexasS1B,S3NYes
MassachusettsS3B,S4NYes
New MexicoS4NYes
MontanaS3BYes
TennesseeS3NYes
Navajo NationS3MYes
South CarolinaS3BYes
OklahomaS1NYes
MinnesotaS2BYes
District of ColumbiaS1NYes
ArizonaS3MYes
WyomingS1Yes
OhioS1Yes
CanadaN5B,NUN
ProvinceRankNative
NunavutSUBYes
New BrunswickS3B,SUMYes
Northwest TerritoriesS4Yes
SaskatchewanS5BYes
OntarioS4BYes
ManitobaS5BYes
British ColumbiaS3MYes
LabradorS4B,SUMYes
Nova ScotiaS3BYes
QuebecS4BYes
AlbertaS4B,S5MYes
Island of NewfoundlandS4B,SUMYes
Prince Edward IslandS1BYes
Roadless Areas (11)
Michigan (2)
AreaForestAcres
Government IslandHiawatha National Forest225
Government IslandHiawatha National Forest225
Minnesota (2)
AreaForestAcres
Wood LakeSuperior National Forest596
Wood LakeSuperior National Forest596
Montana (3)
AreaForestAcres
Anaconda HillHelena National Forest18,546
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanHelena National Forest51,360
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Utah (1)
AreaForestAcres
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Wisconsin (2)
AreaForestAcres
09166 - East TorchChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,647
09166 - East TorchChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,647
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
Teton Corridor TrailheadsBridger-Teton National Forest286
References (64)
  1. Alberico, J. A. R., J. M. Reed, and L. W. Oring. 1991. Nesting near a common tern colony increases and decreases spotted sandpiper nest predation. Auk 108:904-910.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  4. Baird, P. 1976. Comparative ecology of California and Ring-billed Gulls (<i>Larus californicus</i> and <i>L. delawarensis</i>.)Ph.D. dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula.
  5. Baird, P. A. 1977. Feeding ecology of ring-billed and California gulls (<i>Larus delawarensis</i> and <i>L. californicus</i>). Pacific Seabird Bulletin 4:16-17.
  6. Barcena, F., A. M. Teixeira, and Andres Bermejo. 1984. Breeding seabird populations in the Atlantic sector of the Iberian Peninsula. Pages 335-345 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  7. Barrett, R. T., and W. Vader. 1990. The status and conservation of breeding seabirds in Norway. Pages 323-333 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  8. Bent, A.C. 1921. Life histories of North American gulls and terns. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 113. Washington, D.C.
  9. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  10. Braun, M. J., D. W. Finch, M. B. Robbins, and B. K. Schmidt. 2000. A field checklist of the birds of Guyana. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  11. Brown, R. G. B., and D. N. Nettleship. 1984. The seabirds of northeastern North America: their present status and conservation requirements. Pages 85-100 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  12. Buckley, P. A., and F. G. Buckley. 1984. Seabirds of the north and middle Atlantic coast of the United States: their status and conservation. Pages 101-133 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  13. Bugoni, L. and C. M. Vooren. 2004. Feeding ecology of the Common Tern Sterna hirundo in a wintering area in southern Brazil. Ibis 146:438-453.
  14. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 1991. The common tern: its breeding biology and social behavior. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 413 pp.
  15. Burns, K. J., and R. M. Zink. 1990. Temporal and geographic homogeneity of gene frequencies in the fox sparrow (PASSERELLA ILIACA). Auk 107:421-425.
  16. Castro, I. and A. Phillips. 1996. A guide to the birds of the Galapagos Islands. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  17. Chapdelaine, G., and P. Brousseau. 1992. Distribution, abundance, and changes of seabird populations of the Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec, 1979-1989. Can. field-Nat. 106:427-434.
  18. Clapp, R. B., and P. A. Buckley. 1984. Status and conservation of seabirds in the southeastern United States. Pages 135-155 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  19. Cooper, J., A. J. Williams, and P. L. Britton. 1984. Distribution, population sizes and conservation of breeding seabirds in the Afrotropical region. Pages 403-419 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  20. Cordeiro, P. H. C., J. M. Flores, and J. L. X. Nascimento. 1996. Análise das recuperações de Sterna hirundo no Brasil entre 1980 e 1994. Ararajuba 4 (1).
  21. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  22. Erwin, R. M. 1980. Breeding habitat used by colonially nesting waterbirds in two mid-Atlantic US regions under different regimes of human disturbance. Biol. Conserv. 18: 39-51.
  23. Evans, P. G. H. 1984b. Status and conservation of seabirds in northwest Europe (excluding Norways and the USSR). Pages 293-321 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  24. Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.
  25. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  26. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  27. Hays, H. 1984. Common terns raise young from successive broods. Auk 101:274-280.
  28. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  29. Howes, L.-A., and W. A. Montevecchi. 1993. Population trends and interactions among terns and gulls in Gros Morne National Park, Newfoundland. Can. J. Zool. 71:1516-1520.
  30. Hyslop, C., and J. Kennedy, editors. 1992. Bird trends: a report on results of national ornithological surveys in Canada. Number 2, Autumn 1992. Migratory Birds Conservation Division, Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario. 20 pp.
  31. James, P. C. 1984. The status and conservation of seabirds in the Mediterranean region. Pages 371-375 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  32. Jaramillo, A. 2003. Birds of Chile. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  33. Karwowski, K., J. E. Gates, and L. H. Harper. 1995. Common terns nesting on navigational aids and natural islands in the St. Lawrence River, New York. Wilson Bulletin 107:423-436.
  34. Le Grand, G., K. Emmerson, and A. Martin. 1984. The status and conservation of seabirds in the Macaronesian Islands. Pages 377-391 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  35. Mauco, L. and M. Favero. 2004. Diet of the Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) during the nonbreeding season in Mar Chiquita Lagoon, Buenas Aires, Argentina. Ornitologia Neotropical 15:121-132.
  36. Melville, D. S. 1984. Seabirds of China and the surrounding seas. Pages 501-511 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2.
  37. Minsky, D. 1981. The terns of Cape Cod. The Associaiton for the Preservation of Cape Cod, Informational Bull. No. 9. 34 pp.
  38. Morris, R. D., and G. P. Burness. 1992. A new procedure for transmitter attachment: effects on brood attendance and chick feeding rates by male common terns. Condor 94:239-243.
  39. Narosky, T. and D. Yzurieta. 2003. Birds of Argentina and Uruguay. Asociación Ornitológica del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  40. Nisbet, I. C. T. 1983. Paralytic shellfish poisoning: effects on breeding terns. Condor 85:338-345.
  41. Nisbet, I. C. T., and M. J. Welton. 1984. Seasonal variations in breeding success of common terns: consequencesof predation. Condor 86:53-60.
  42. Palmer, R. S. 1941. A behavior study of the common tern. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 42. 119 pp.
  43. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  44. Peterson, R.T. 1980b. A field guide to the birds of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  45. Peterson, R.T. 1990b. A field guide to western birds. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  46. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  47. Raffaele, H. A. 1983a. A guide to the birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Fondo Educativo Interamericano, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 255 pp.
  48. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  49. Ramos, J. A., and A. J. del Nevo. 1995. Nest-site selection by roseate terns and common terns in the Azores. Auk 112:580-589.
  50. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  51. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  52. Rothweiler, R. A. 1960. Food habits, movements, and nesting of gulls, Freezout Lake, Teton County, Montana. Montana Fish and Game Department, Helena. Paper No. 494. 26pp.
  53. Safina, C., and J. Burger. 1988. Prey dynamics and the breeding phenology of common terns (STERNA HIRUNDO). Auk 105:720-726.
  54. Safina, C., et al. 1988. Evidence for prey limitation of common and roseate tern reproduction. Condor 90:852-859.
  55. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  56. Spendelow, J. A. and S. R. Patton. 1988. National Atlas of Coastal Waterbird Colonies in the Contiguous United States: 1976-1982. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 88(5). x + 326 pp.
  57. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  58. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  59. Thompson, B. C., J. A. Jackson, J. Burger, L. A. Hill, E. M. Kirsch, and J. L. Atwood. 1997. Least Tern (<i>Sterna antillarum</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 290. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 32 pp.
  60. van Halewyn, R., and R. L. Norton. 1984. The status and conservation of seabirds in the Caribbean. Pages 169-222 in Croxall et al., eds. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. ICBP Tech. Pub. No. 2
  61. Van Rossem, A. J. 1933. Terns as destroyers of birds' eggs. Condor 35:49-51.
  62. Wiggins, D. A., et al. 1984. Occurrence and timing of second clutches in common terns. Auk 101:281-284.
  63. Zink, R. M., S. Rohwer, A. V. Andreev, and D. L. Dittman. 1995. Trans-Beringia comparisons of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in birds. Condor 97:639-649.
  64. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.