Sylvilagus obscurus

Chapman, Cramer, Deppenaar and Robinson, 1992

Appalachian Cottontail

G4Apparently Secure Found in 12 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101018
Element CodeAMAEB01090
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderLagomorpha
FamilyLeporidae
GenusSylvilagus
Other Common Names
Appalachian cottontail (EN)
Concept Reference
Chapman, J. A., K. L. Cramer, N. J. Dippenaar, and T. J. Robinson. 1992. Systematics and biogeography of the New England cottontail, Sylvilagus transitionalis (Bangs, 1895), with the description of a new species from the Appalachian Mountains. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 105(4):841-866.
Taxonomic Comments
Sylvilagus obscurus is regarded by some as a junior synonym of S. transitionalis.
Conservation Status
Review Date2006-01-23
Change Date2000-02-29
Edition Date2006-01-23
Rank Reasons
Populations in the small range in the Appalachian Mountains southwest of the Hudson River are experiencing a loss of habitat due to human use and the range expansion of the eastern cottontail; populations are small and isolated; population trend and degree of threat posed by the eastern cottontail are not well known in most areas.
Range Extent Comments
Appalachian Mountain chain, its marginal plateau, and mountain balds, southwest of the Hudson River, in Pennsylvania, western Maryland, West Virginia, western Virginia, southeastern Kentucky, western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, western South Carolina, northern Georgia, and northern Alabama (Chapman et al. 1992). Occurs in discrete populations.
Occurrences Comments
There are at least several dozen extant occurrences in areas west and south of the Hudson River.
Threat Impact Comments
West and south of the Hudson River, the main threats are alteration of habitat by human activities and the related problem of competition and interbreeding with the eastern cottontail. The eastern cottontail competes with, and rapidly replaces, the Appalachian cottontail on cleared and cultivated ground; in some areas, the eastern cottontail is invading the forest habitats of the Appalachian cottontail. Introductions of exotic subspecies of Sylvilagus floridanus may have broadened the ecological tolerances of Sylvilagus floridanus and improved its ability to outcompete S. obscurus. Handley and Gordon (in Linzey 1979) doubted that this is a significant factor in Virginia where there has been little, if any, stocking of cottontails. MtDNA data indicate that hybridization is not occurring between the Appalachian cottontail and the eastern cottontail.

The fairly limited geographic distribution of the southern populations mainly is broken into small, isolated populations (Chapman and Stauffer 1979). Such populations are vulnerable to extirpation by chance events (Kirtland 1986). This is a game species in some southern states, but hunting pressure in some areas is low due to the remoteness of most occurrences (D. Feller, pers., comm., 1997). However, in West Virginia, between 1985 and 1990, 76 of 204 cottontail skulls provided by hunters and biologists were S. obscurus (unpublished USFWS performance report).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Medium-sized rabbit with fine silky fur; upper sides pinkish buff to ochraceous buff; venter bright whitish to pale buffy whitish; fore legs rusty rufous; cheeks distinctly grizzled gray; ears short and rounded, with the anterior edges black; usually a distinct black spot between the ears, rarely a prominent white spot or blaze on the forehead (Chapman et al. 1992).

Habitat

Strictly associated with dense cover and conifers at higher elevations; conifers and heaths, especially KALMIA and VACCINIUM (Maryland, West Virginia, Georgia, Alabama); 6-7-year-old clear cuts (Virginia); areas of heath and scrubby conifers, maintained by periodic fires, adjacent to deciduous growth (Chapman et al. 1992). In western Maryland, used areas with dense understory vegetation within mature mixed-oak forest or patches of recent clearcuts; avoided steep slopes (Barry et al. 1996).

Nests are made in a depression on the ground, sometimes at the base of a stump, lined with grass and fur and capped with twigs and leaves. (Dalke 1942, Tefft and Chapman 1983). They are usually in brush or woods rather than grasslands (Dalke 1937).

Ecology

In western Maryland, home range was about 2-10 ha (media 4.3) in females, 4-9 ha (median 8.0) in males (Barry et al. 1996).

Reproduction

Gestation period is about 4 weeks. Litter size is genrally 3-5 or occasionally up to 8, with up to several litters per year. Most individuals first breed in their second season, but some juveniles breed.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferForest - MixedForest EdgeWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparral
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
VirginiaS4Yes
KentuckyS4Yes
West VirginiaS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
AlabamaS1Yes
TennesseeS3Yes
South CarolinaS2Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
MarylandS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasHigh (continuing)
1.3 - Tourism & recreation areasHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsHigh (continuing)
4.2 - Utility & service linesHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (12)
North Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tennessee (3)
AreaForestAcres
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Virginia (4)
AreaForestAcres
Laurel ForkGeorge Washington National Forest9,967
Mt. PleasantGeorge Washington National Forest8,933
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
West Virginia (3)
AreaForestAcres
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
References (7)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  2. Baker, R. J., L. C. Bradley, R. D. Bradley, J. W. Dragoo, M. D. Engstrom, R. S. Hoffman, C. A. Jones, F. Reid, D. W. Rice, and C. Jones. 2003a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2003. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 229:1-23.
  3. Bradley, R.D., L.K. Ammerman, R.J. Baker, L.C. Bradley, J.A. Cook. R.C. Dowler, C. Jones, D.J. Schmidly, F.B. Stangl Jr., R.A. Van den Bussche and B. Würsig. 2014. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2014. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 327:1-28. Available at: http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/publications/opapers/ops/OP327.pdf
  4. Chapman, J. A., K. L. Cramer, N. J. Dippenaar, and T. J. Robinson. 1992. Systematics and biogeography of the New England cottontail, <i>Sylvilagus transitionalis</i> (Bangs, 1895), with the description of a new species from the Appalachian Mountains. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 105(4):841-866.
  5. Linzey, D.W. 2016. Mammals of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 2016 revision. Southeastern Naturalist 15(Monograph 8):1–93.
  6. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  7. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]