Pleurobema oviforme

(Conrad, 1834)

Tennessee Clubshell

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 20 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Tennessee clubshell (Pleurobema oviforme). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.115056
Element CodeIMBIV35220
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusPleurobema
Synonyms
Pleurobema oviforme argenteus(I. Lea, 1841)Pleurobema oviforme holstonensis(I. Lea, 1840)Pleurobema oviforme oviforme(Conrad, 1834)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
This species exhibits a high degree of ecophenotypic variation, with headwater forms more compressed than those from large rivers. The relationship between Pleurobema oviforme and Pleurobema clava is a matter of debate as P. oviforme replaces P. clava in headwaters of the Tennessee River, and it has been suggested that they are conspecific (Williams et al. 2008).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2020-10-21
Change Date2020-10-21
Edition Date2020-10-21
Edition AuthorsJackson, D. R. (2021); Cordeiro, J. (2009); Gordon, M.E. (1992)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent1000-5000 square km (about 400-2000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Although still relatively widespread, the number of occurrences is low and reflects substantial fragmentation and local extirpation from a once even more widespread and continuous distribution. Many relictual populations appear to be small and likely declining, with questionable viability. Threats to all riverine mussels are multiple and serious.
Range Extent Comments
This mussel is endemic to the Cumberland and Tennessee river systems, two major tributaries of the Ohio River, which itself flows to the Mississippi River, USA. In the Cumberland in Kentucky and Tennessee, it occurs only downstream of Cumberland Falls. In the Tennessee drainage, it is known from headwaters in southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, and eastern Tennessee downstream to Muscle Shoals, northwestern Alabama. A disjunct population inhabits the Duck River in central Tennessee. The only extant Alabama population exists in the Paint Rock River system (Williams et al. 2008), a relatively small (ca. 100 km) tributary of the Tennessee River in northern Alabama, with some tributaries also draining a portion of south-central Tennessee. Many former populations of this species are now extinct.
Occurrences Comments
Occurrences are now greatly fragmented and restricted compared to the more widespread and continuous historical condition. All extant occurrences are potentially in jeopardy. The large river morph appears to be surviving in low numbers at only a very few sites below dams, and shell measurements in Ahlstedt (1988) suggest that these probably are relict, non-reproducing individuals. Current populations are scattered disjunctly through tributaries in the Cumberlandian region of the Tennessee River, often occurring in limited sections of headwater streams. In Alabama, the species is restricted to the Paint Rock River system, Jackson County (Ahlstedt 1996), with a few likely nonviable occurrences in other Tennessee River tributaries in the northern part of the state (Mirarchi et al. 2004, Williams et al. 2008). Parmalee and Bogan (1998) reported extant populations in Tennessee in non-impounded stretches of the Clinch and Powell rivers in upper east Tennessee, the Tellico River, Elk River, Hiwassee River, Duck River (disjunct population), Little Pigeon River, Big South Fork Cumberland River, and Stone River. Hubbs (2002) found a living specimen in the Elk River (RM 105.4), Tennessee. Johnson et al. (2005) reported the species from Citico Creek and the Hiwassee River, both inside and adjacent to the Cherokee National Forest in, respectively, Monroe and Polk counties, Tennessee. In North Carolina, Bogan (2002) cited occurrences in the Hiwassee, Little Tennessee, and French Broad rivers in Cherokee and Transylvania counties (LeGrand et al. 2006). In Kentucky, populations exist in the lower and upper Cumberland River below Cumberland Falls (Cicerello and Schuster 2003). Virginia populations include Copper Creek (Upper Clinch River drainage; Fraley and Ahlstedt 2000, Jones et al. 2001, Hanlon et al. 2009), upper North Fork Holston River, Smyth and Bland counties (Jones and Neves 2007), and upper South Fork Holston River (Stansbery and Clench 1978).
Threat Impact Comments
This species is impacted by channel alteration, inundation from reservoirs (e.g., dams on Columbia River, Duck River, Little Tennessee River), siltation from agriculture and clear-cutting, chemical and organic pollution, urban development, and toxic mine run-off. Commercial clamming may affect relic populations in some reservoirs of the Tennessee River.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Shell solid, thinner posteriorly, medium-sized, compressed to inflated, variable: ovate to subrhombodial, subtriangular or quadrate; anterior rounded to flattly convex, ventral margin flatly convex to almost straight; posterio-ventral junction forms a blunt to biangulate point; posterior margin oblique, slightly convex to almost straight; posterio-dorsal junction forms a rounded obtuse angle; beaks subcentral (ARGENTEUM) to almost even with anterior margin (HALSTONESE), low to elevated, incurved over lunule in elevated morphs, sculped by "a number of broken, subnodulous ridges" (Simpson, 1914); posterior ridge moderately elevated, subangular, double, somewhat flattened posteriorly; posterior slope more or less flat, a slight radial depression occurs dorsally to posterior-most ridge; periostracum somewhat textured, subshiny, yellowish to yellowish-green or brownish, with variously wide and narrow interrupted green rays or rayless (generally in ARGENTEUM), termini of annual growth increments distinctly outlined in brown. Pseudocardinal teeth relatively small, subcompressed, serrated, double in left valve, single in right with accessary lamellae adjacent to contiguous sulci; interdentum short, moderately wide; lateral teeth relatively short, straight to slightly curved; muscle scars well impressed, small to moderate; pallial line impressed, lighter posteriorly;beak cavaties shalllow; nacre white to silvery-white, some iridescence posteriorly.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Although anatomically distinct with an echtobranchous marsupium as opposed to the tetrabranchous condition in FUSCONAIA, the small stream morph (ARGENTEUM) of PLEUROBEMA OVIFORME may be easily confused with F.BARNESIANA (Lea, 1838). In OVIFORME, the posterior ridge tends not to be as developed, the periostracum tends to have a greenish cast, and the ARGENTEUM morph generally is rayless (when rayed, the rays usually are wide and interrupted, raying in F.BARNESIANA typically is continous and narrow). Other morphs of OVIFORME may resemble P.CLAVA (Lamarck, 1819). However, CLAVA is more obliquely shaped (rather scaline), beaks in OVIFORME are not positioned as anteriorly (except HOLSTONTENSE) as in CLAVA, and the beak region of CLAVA may be quite inflated but flattens-out posteriorly with a vague sinus deveolped before the posterior ridge. Height: 60.8mm

Habitat

This species is found in the vicinity of riffles and shoals in substrates composed of sand/gravel mixtures, occasionally mud or in cracks between bedrock slabs. It does not usually tolerate more than moderate depth, although Ahlstedt (1989) found it in fairly deep water habitats below Watts Bar Dam. In creeks and small rivers, it may be found immediately above riffles or in flats. Although there may be seasonal periods of calm water, Pleurobema oviforme usually occurs in areas of at least moderately flowing water.

Ecology

Weaver (1981) conducted studies into the life history of the PLEUROBEMA OVIFORME and included some information of ecological significance. This species was also among those examined by Neves and Widlak (1987) in an investigation of habitat utilization by juvenile mussels. Densities and relative abundances have been estimated from various populations by Ahlstedt (1986,1989), Jenkison (1988), and Jenkinson and Ahlstedt (1988).

Reproduction

The reproductive biology of this species has been studied by Weaver et al. (1991). It is a short-termed brooder with an echtobranchous marsupium. Gravid females have been reported during March through July. Weaver et al. (1991) and Kitchel (1985) reported seven species of fish to serve as glochidial hosts: Campostoma anomalum (central stoneroller), Nocomis micropogon (river chub), Notropis (= Luxilus) cornutus (common shiner), Cyprinella galacturus (whitetail shiner), Notropis leuciodus (Tennessee shiner), Notropis telescopus (telescope shiner), and Etheostoma flabellare (fantail darter).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
AlabamaS1Yes
North CarolinaS1Yes
KentuckyS1Yes
TennesseeS2Yes
VirginiaS2Yes
GeorgiaSUYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesUnknownExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesUnknownExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge - restrictedExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (20)
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
North Carolina (5)
AreaForestAcres
Boteler PeakNantahala National Forest4,205
SnowbirdNantahala National Forest8,489
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Wesser BaldNantahala National Forest4,061
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest1,255
Tennessee (7)
AreaForestAcres
Bald River Gorge AdditionCherokee National Forest1,728
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Little Frog Addition NECherokee National Forest321
Little Frog Addition NWCherokee National Forest628
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
Virginia (7)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beartown Addition AJefferson National Forest1,370
Beartown Addition BJefferson National Forest2,985
Garden MountainJefferson National Forest3,960
Hunting Camp Little Wolf CreekJefferson National Forest8,953
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
References (59)
  1. Ahlstedt, S.A. 1986. Cumberlandian mollusk conservation program, activity 1: mussel distribution surveys. Office of Natural Resources and Economic Development, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee. 125 pp.
  2. Ahlstedt, S.A. 1989. Update of the Watts Bar nuclear plant preoperational monitoring of the mussel fauna in upper Chickamunga. Tennessee Valley Authority Tech Report Series TVA/WR/AB-998/9: 1-26.
  3. Ahlstedt, S.A. 1995-1996. Status survey for federally listed endangered freshwater mussel species in the Paint Rock River system, northeastern Alabama, U.S.A. Walkerana 8(19):63-80.
  4. Ahlstedt, S.A., J.R. Powell, R.S. Butler, M.T. Fagg, D.W. Hubbs, S.F. Novak, S.R. Palmer, and P.D. Johnson. 2004. Historical and current examination of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in the Duck River basin of Tennessee. Final report submitted to the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, contract FA-02-14725-00, Tennessee. 212 pp.
  5. Alderman, John (NC Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. May 1997.
  6. Baker, F.C. 1928b. The freshwater Mollusca of Wisconsin: Part II. Pelecypoda. Bulletin of the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin, 70(2): 1-495.
  7. Barr, W.C., S.A. Ahlstedt, G.D. Hickman, and D.M. Hill. 1993-1994. Cumberlandian mollusk conservation program. Activity 8: Analysis of macrofauna factors. Walkerana 7(17/18):159-224.
  8. Bogan, A.E. 1996. <i>Pleurobema oviforme</i>. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1996: e.T17668A7282584. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1996.RLTS.T17668A7282584.en.
  9. Bogan, A.E. 2002. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of North Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 101 pp.
  10. Bogan, Art (Curator of Aquatic Invertebrates, North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps for TN. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  11. Cicerello, Ronald R. (Kentucky State Nature Preserves). 1997b. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  12. Cicerello, R.R. and G.A. Schuster. 2003. A guide to the freshwater mussels of Kentucky. Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission Scientific and Technical Series 7:1-62.
  13. Conrad, T.A. 1834. New freshwater shells of the United States, with coloured illustrations; and a monograph of the genus <i>Anculotus </i>of Say; also a synopsis of the American naiades. J. Dobson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 1-76 + 8 plates.
  14. Fraley, S.J. and S.A. Ahlstedt. 2000. The recent decline of the native mussels (Unionidae) of Copper Creek, Russell and Scott Counties, Virginia. Pages 189-195 in R.A. Tankersley, D.I. Warmolts, G.T. Watters, B.J. Armitage, P.D. Johnson, and R.S. Butler (eds.). Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio. 274 pp.
  15. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  16. Gordon, M.E. and J.B. Layzer. 1989. Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of the Cumberland River review of life histories and ecological relationships. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, 89(15): 1-99.
  17. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  18. Haag, W. R. 2019. Reassessing enigmatic mussel declines in the United States. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 22(2):43-60.
  19. Hanlon, S.D., M.A. Petty, and R.J. Neves. 2009. Status of native freshwater mussels in Copper Creek, Virginia. Southeastern Naturalist 8(1):1-18.
  20. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  21. Hubbs, D. 2002. Monitoring and management of endangered mussels. 2001-02 Annual Report Project 7365, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee. 3 pp.
  22. Isom, B. G. and P. Yokley, Jr. 1973. The mussels of the Flint and Paint Rock River Systems of the southwest slope of the Cumberland Plateau in North Alabama-1965 and 1967. The American Midland Naturalist 89(2):442-446.
  23. Isom, B.G., P. Yokley, Jr., and C.H. Gooch. 1973. Mussels of Elk River Basin in Alabama and Tennessee- 1965-1967. American Midland Naturalist 89(2):437-442.
  24. James, M.R. 1987. Ecology of the freshwater mussel <i>Hyridella menziesi</i> in a small oliogotrophic lake. Archives of Hydrobiology 108:337-348.
  25. Jenkinson, J.J. 1988. Resurvey of freshwater mussel stocks in Duck River, TN. Report to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee. 20 pp.
  26. Jenkinson, J.J. and S.A. Ahlsedt. 1988a. Quantitative reassessment of the freshwater mussel fauna in the Clinch River, Tennessee and Virginia. Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee. 28 pp.
  27. Johnson, P.D., C. St. Aubin, and S.A. Ahlstedt. 2005. Freshwater mussel survey results for the Cherokee and Chattahoochee districts of the United States Forest Service in Tennessee and Georgia. Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Daphne, Alabama. 32 pp.
  28. Jones, J.W. and R.J. Neves. 2007. Freshwater mussel status: Upper North Fork Holston River, Virginia. Northeastern Naturalist, 14(3): 471-480.
  29. Jones, J.W., R.J. Neves, M.A. Patterson, C.R. Good, and A. DiVittorio. 2001. A status survey of freshwater mussel populations in the upper Clinch River, Tazewell County, Virginia. Banisteria 17: 20-30.
  30. Jones, R.L., W.T. Slack, and P.D. Hartfield. 2005. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Mississippi. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(1): 77-92.
  31. Kitchel, H.E. 1985. Life history of the endangered shiny pigtoe pearly mussel, <i>Fusconaia edgariana</i> in the North Fork Holston River, VA. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, Virginia. 124 pp.
  32. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  33. LeGrand, H.E., Jr., S.P. Hall, S.E. McRae, and J.T. Finnegan. 2006. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 104 pp.
  34. Lopez, G.R. and I.J. Holopainen. 1987. Interstitial suspension-feeding by <i>Pisidium </i>spp. (Pisidiiae: Bivalvia): a new guild in lentic benthos? American Malacological Bulletin, 5: 21-29.
  35. Major, Smoot (Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC on 19 August 1997.
  36. Mirarchi, R.E., J.T. Garner, M.F. Mettee, and P.E. O'Neil. 2004b. Alabama wildlife. Volume 2. Imperiled aquatic mollusks and fishes. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. xii + 255 pp.
  37. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  38. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  39. Neves, R.J. and J.C. Widlak. 1987. Habitat ecology of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a headwater stream in Virginia. American Malacological Bulletin 5:1-7.
  40. Ortmann, A.E. 1918a. The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the Upper Tennessee Drainage. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 57: 577-580.
  41. Ortmann, A.E. 1920. Correlation of shape and station in freshwater mussels. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 59: 269-312.
  42. Ortmann, A.E. 1924. The naiad fauna of Duck River in Tennessee. The American Midland Naturalist, 9: 18-62.
  43. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  44. Simpson, C.T. 1914. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Naiades or Pearly Fresh-water Mussels. Bryant Walker: Detroit, Michigan. 1540 pp.
  45. Stansbery, D. H. and W. J. Clench. 1977 [1978]. The Pleuroceridae and Unionidae of the Upper South Fork Holston River in Virginia. Bulletin of the American Malacological Union 1977:75-79.
  46. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  47. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  48. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  49. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  50. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; partial 90-day finding on a petition to list 404 species in the southeastern United States as threatened or endangered with critical habitat. Federal Register 76(187):59836-59862.
  51. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Tennessee Clubshell, Tennessee Pigtoe, and Cumberland Moccasinshell. Proposed rule. Federal Register 88(161):57060-57077.
  52. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.
  53. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  54. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  55. Weaver, L.R., G.B. Pardue, and R.J. Neves. 1991. Reproductive biology and fish hosts of the Tennessee clubshell <i>Pleurobema oviforme</i> (Mollusca: Unionidae) in Virginia. American Midland Naturalist, 126(1): 82-89.
  56. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  57. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  58. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  59. Zale, A.V. and R.J. Nevesb. 1982b. Identification of a fish host for <i>Alasmidonta minor </i> (Mollusca: Unionidae). American Midland Naturalist 107(2): 386-388.