Pyganodon cataracta

(Say, 1817)

Eastern Floater

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.109938
Element CodeIMBIV54010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusPyganodon
Synonyms
Anodonta cataractaSay, 1817
Other Common Names
Pyganodon de l'Est (FR)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Hoeh (1990) split Anodonta cataracta cataracta and Anodonta cataracta fragilis into distinct species (elevating Pyganodon to genus level in the process). Also Hoeh and Burch (1989) separated Anodonta lacustris as a valid species from Anodonta grandis and Anodonta cataracta and Hoeh (1990) placed them in Pyganodon as Anodonta marginata sensu strictu, is considered a nomen dubium (see Hoeh and Burch, 1989). This species was placed in the newly elevated genus Pyganodon by Hoeh (1990). Recently, Zanatta et al. (2007) supported the monophyly of both Pyganodon and Utterbackia using mutation coding of allozyme data, but also resolved the Eurasian Anodonta cygnea to Pyganodon, Utterbackia, and North American Anodonta; indicating futher phylogenetic analysis of the Anodontinae is required including both North American and Eurasian species. Recently, Cyr et al. (2007) found male and female mitochondrial genomes as well as mophology support the distinction between Pyganodon fragilis and Pyganodon cataracta (with likely a recent and possibly incomplete separation) although separation of the species morphologically is difficult due to hybridization, plastic shell characters, and morphological features not always present (such as beak sculpture).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2017-08-01
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2011-12-23
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2011)
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is common and wide ranging in the Atlantic drainages from the Lower St. Lawrence River basin south to the Altamaha River basin, Georgia, and in the Alabama-Coosa River drainage, and the Apalachicola and Choctawhatchee River basins, Georgia.
Range Extent Comments
This species is common and wide ranging in the Atlantic dranages from the Lower St. Lawrence River basin south to the Altamaha River basin and west to the Great Lakes, Georgia, and in the Alabama-Coosa River drainage, and the Apalachicola and Choctawhatchee River basins, Georgia. In the Apalachicola Basin (ACF basin = formed by Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers) of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, this species is historically known from 21 records from 12 sites from the ACF system including the main channel of the Apalachicola River and mainstem and tributaries of the Chipola and Chattahoochee Rivers (but not the Flint River) (Brim Box and Williams, 2000). In the ACF basin, it was recently collected from 4 of 324 sites in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia the lower main channel of the Chipola River in Florida (first state record) and three tributaries of the Flint River (the first records from this system) (Brim-Box and Williams, 2000).
Occurrences Comments
In Maine, this is the second most common mussel species occurring in every major watershed in every county (Nedeau et al., 2000). It is found throughout much of Rhode Island (Raithel and Hartenstein, 2006). In Massachusetts, it is very common occurring in every drainage system in every county (Smith, 2000) and is similarly common in Vermont (Fichtel and Smith, 1995) and Connecticut (Nedeau and Victoria, 2003). In New York, records are from the freshwater tidal Hudson River from Dutchess Co. north to the confluence with the Mohawk River at Waterford, and the lower Delaware and Neversink Rivers (see Strayer and Jirka, 1997); also rediscovered in 2000 in large numbers in the upper Delaware River system between Hancock and Port Jervis, including the Neversink River tributary (Lellis, 2001). It likely occurs in ponds in Westchester, Queens, Bronx, and perhaps Nassau and Suffolk Cos., New York; and Fairfield Co., Connecticut. In the Delaware River basin, it has been recorded in the Middle Delaware- Mongaup- Broadhead drainage in New York to bordering Pennsylvania (Strayer and Ralley, 1991). In the Delmarva peninsula, this species was found in the Susquehanna, Bohemia, Sassafras, Chester, Choptank, Nanticoke, Wicomico, Appoquiniminik, Leipsic, St. Jones, Murderkill, Mispillion, Cedar Creek, and Indian River systems in Delaware and Maryland (Counts et al., 1991); recently in Williams Pond (Nanticoke system) in Sussex Co., Delaware (Blaine, 2010). Watters et al. (2009) lists P. cataracta marginata historically from NE Lake Erie drainages (Cuyahoga, Little Cuyahoga, Chagrin, Grand Rivers, Tinkers Creek) and Mahoning River. In Maryland, it is known from the Upper Potomac, Washington Metro, Gunpowder, Susquehanna, Elk, Choptank, Chester, and Naticoke River drainages (Bogan and Proch, 1995; Ashton, 2009), but may be extirpated from the upper Potomac in West Virginia (Taylor, 1987). It is found throughout much of eastern Virginia including the James (Burch, 2002), Potomac (Bogan and Proch, 1995), Chowan (Alderman and Alderman, 2009) and Roanoke (Bogan, 2002). Johnson (1970) cites the Dan, James, Rapidan, and Roanoke drainages in Virginia. Recently, this species was found in 3 sites in Great Pee Dee River and Lynches River in South Carolina (Catena Group, 2006). In South Carolina, it is wide ranging from the Savannah, Cooper-Santee, Pee Dee, and Waccamaw River basins (Bogan and Alderman, 2004); incl. Lake Murray (Alderman, 2006). In Alabama, it is restricted to the Chattahoochee and possibly Chipola River systems but has not been reported since the 1970s (Mirarchi, 2004). It has since been collected in the Uchee Creek, Russell Co. and Lake Martin (Tallapoosa River) specimens are this species (Williams et al., 2008). In North Carolina, it is wide-ranging from the Broad River basin north to the Pasquotank River basin (Bogan, 2002). It was recently documented in Georgia in the Lower Ogeechee/ Canoochee drainages (Sukkestad et al., 2006). In the ACF basin, it was recently collected from 4 of 324 sites in Alabama, Florida (a new state record), and Georgia the lower main channel of the Chipola River in Florida and three tributaries of the Flint River (the first records from this system) (Brim-Box and Williams, 2000). Johnson (1970) also lists it for the Altamaha, Ocmulgee, and Savannah River systems in Georgia and South Carolina. In Canada, this species is secure throughout most of its range; peripheral in Ontario (Ottawa River only), widespread and abundant in Nova Scotia (Athearn and Clarke, 1962; Clarke and Rick, 1964), Quebec, New Brunswick (Athearn, 1961) where it is stable in Petitcodiac (Hanson and Locke, 2001), Prince Edward Island (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey, 2004; Davis, 1999).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species is found in a wide variety of habitats, including small streams, rivers, ponds, and lakes. It is usually confined to slow-moving portions of riverine environments, in sandy or muddy substrates. It has a high tolerance for silt and can be found in deeper water of lakes and ponds (Nedeau et al., 2000).

Reproduction

This species is a long-term brooder- eggs are fertilized in August and glochidia are released the following spring. Reported glochidial hosts include Amploplites rupestris (rock bass) (Gray et al., 1999), Catostomus commersoni (white sucker) (Gray et al., 1999; Wiles, 1975), Cyprinus carpio (common carp) (Lefevre and Curtis, 1911; 1912), Gasterosteus aculeatus (threespine stickleback) (Wiles, 1975; Threlfall, 1986), Lepomis gibbosus (pumpkinseed) (Connor, 1905; Gray et al., 1999), Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill) (see Watters, 1994), and Perca flavescens (yellow perch) (see Watters, 1994; Gray et al., 1999).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
Prince Edward IslandS4Yes
OntarioS3Yes
New BrunswickS5Yes
Nova ScotiaS5Yes
QuebecS4Yes
Island of NewfoundlandSUYes
LabradorSUYes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MassachusettsS5Yes
GeorgiaS5Yes
New JerseyS4Yes
New YorkS4Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
Rhode IslandSNRYes
DelawareS4Yes
MarylandS5Yes
ConnecticutS5Yes
New HampshireS4Yes
VermontS4Yes
AlabamaS1Yes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
FloridaSNRYes
West VirginiaS2Yes
MaineS5Yes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
North CarolinaS5Yes
South CarolinaS4Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
New Hampshire (1)
AreaForestAcres
KilkennyWhite Mountain National Forest28,766
References (61)
  1. Alderman, J. 2006. Reconnaissance survey of the freshwater mussel fauna of the Lower Saluda and Congaree Rivers, Lake Murray, and selected tributaries. Report prepared for Kleinschmidt Associates, West Columbia, South Carolina, 31 October 2006. 166 pp.
  2. Alderman, J.M. and J.D. Alderman. 2009. Chowan River freshwater mussel survey. Report prepared for Citizens Against OLF by Alderman Environmental Services, Pittsboro, North Carolina. 56 pp.
  3. Ashton, M. 2009. Recent mussel surveys in the Susquehanna River, below Conowingo Dam, Maryland. Ellipsaria 11(3):12.
  4. Athearn, H.D. 1961. Additions to the New Brunswick checklist. Sterkiana 4:33-34.
  5. Athearn, H.D. and A.H. Clarke, Jr. 1962. The freshwater mussels of Nova Scotia. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 183:11-41.
  6. Blaine, F.M. 2010. A new species location record in Sussex County Delaware. American Malacological Society Newsletter 42(1):7-9.
  7. Bogan, A.E. 2002. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of North Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 101 pp.
  8. Bogan, A.E. and J.M. Alderman. 2004. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of South Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 64 pp.
  9. Bogan, A.E. and T. Proch. 1995. Manual of the freshwater bivalves of Maryland. Prepared for a workshop held at Versar, Inc., Columbia, Maryland, 9 March 1995. 68 pp.
  10. Brim Box, J. and J.D. Williams. 2000. Unionid mollusks of the Apalachicola Basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Alabama Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 21: 1-143.
  11. Burch, P.R. 2002. Mollusks. [Reprinted- a preliminary list of the land and freshwater mollusks of the James River Basin, Virginia]. Walkerana, 13(29/30): 113-122.
  12. Clarke, A.H. 1981a. The freshwater mollusks of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, D. W. Friesen and Sons, Ltd.: Ottawa, Canada. 446 pp.
  13. Clarke, A.H. and A.M. Rick. 1963 [1964]. Supplementary records of Unionacea from Nova Scotia with a discussion of the identity of <i>Anodonta fragilis</i> Lamarck. National Museum of Canada Bulletin, Biological Science Series, 199(72): 15-27.
  14. Conner, C.H. 1905. Glochidia of <i>Unio </i>on fishes. The Nautilus, 18(12): 142-143.
  15. Cordeiro, J. 2003c. Freshwater Mussels of the New York Metropolitan Region and New Jersey. A Guide to Their Identification, Biology and Conservation. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Available online: http://cbc.amnh.org/mussel/.
  16. Counts, C.L., III, T.S. Handwerker, and R.V. Jesien. 1991. The naiades (Bivalvia: Unionidea) of the Delmarva Peninsula. American Malacological Bulletin, 9(1): 27-37.
  17. Cyr, F., A. Paquet, A.L. Martel, and B. Angers. 2007. Cryptic lineages and hybridization in freshwater mussels of the genus <i>Pyganodon </i>(Unionidae) in northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:1216-1227.
  18. Davis, D.S. 1999. Reports of museum visits and field collections related to studies of the distribution of the freshwater mussels <i>Lampsilis cariosa</i> (Say, 1817) and <i>Leptodea ochracea</i> (Say, 1817), Mollusca, Unionidae in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia in 1999. Unpublished, 23 pp.
  19. Fichtel, C. and D.G. Smith. 1995. The freshwater mussels of Vermont. Nongame and Natural Heritage Program, Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department. Technical Report 18. 54 pp.
  20. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  21. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  22. Gray, E. van S., Lellis, W.A., Cole, J.C. and C.S. Johnson. 1999. Hosts of <i>Pyganodon cataracta</i> (eastern floater) and <i>Strophitus undulatus</i> (squawfoot) from the Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania. Triannual Unionid Report, 18: 6.
  23. Hanson, J.M. and A. Locke. 2001. Survey of freshwater mussels in the Petitcodiac River drainage, New Brunswick. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 115:329-340.
  24. Hoeh, W.R. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships among eastern North American <i>Anodonta </i>(Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacological Review, 23: 63-82.
  25. Hoeh, W.R. and J.B. Burch. 1989. The taxonomic status of <i>Anodonta lacustris</i> Lea (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Walkerana, 3(10): 263-276.
  26. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  27. Johnson, R.I. 1970a. The systematics and zoogeography of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the southern Atlantic slope region. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 140(6):263-449.
  28. Lefevre, G. and W.T. Curtis. 1911. Metamorphosis without parasitism in the Unionidae. Science, 33(857): 863-865.
  29. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  30. Lellis, W.A. 2001. Freshwater mussel survey of the upper Delaware scenic and Recreational River: Qualitative survey 2000. Report to the National Park Service, New York Natural Heritage Program, Albany, New York.
  31. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L. and B. Cudmore-Vokey. 2004. National general status assessment of freshwater mussels (Unionacea). National Water Research Institute / NWRI Contribution No. 04-027. Environment Canada, March 2004. Paginated separately.
  32. Mirarchi, R.E., et al. 2004a. Alabama Wildlife. Volume One: A Checklist of Vertebrates and Selected Invertebrates: Aquatic Mollusks, Fishes, Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 209 pp.
  33. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  34. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  35. Nedeau, E.J. and J. Victoria. 2003. A Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Connecticut. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut. 31 pp.
  36. Nedeau, E.J., M.A. McCollough, and B.I. Swartz. 2000. The Freshwater Mussels of Maine. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Augusta, Maine. 118 pp.
  37. Raithel, C.J. and R.H. Hartenstein. 2006. The status of freshwater mussels in Rhode Island. Northeastern Naturalist 13(1):103-116.
  38. Ricciardi, A., F.J. Whoriskey, and J.B. Rasmussen. 1996. Impact of <i>Dreissena </i>invasion on native unionid bivalves in the upper St. Lawrence River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 53: 1434-1444.
  39. Sabine, D.L., S. Makepeace, and D.F. McAlpine. 2004. The yellow lampmussel (<i>Lampsilis cariosa</i>) in New Brunswick: a population of significant conservation value. Northeastern Naturalist, 11(4): 407-420.
  40. Smith, D.G. 2000a. Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Southern New England. Douglas G. Smith: Sunderland, Massachusetts. 243 pp.
  41. Spoo, A. 2008. The Pearly Mussels of Pennsylvania. Coachwhip Publications: Landisville, Pennsylvania. 210 pp.
  42. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  43. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  44. Strayer, D.L. and J. Ralley. 1991. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of the upper Delaware River drainage. American Malacological Bulletin 9(1):21-25.
  45. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  46. Strayer, D.L. and K.J. Jirka. 1997. The Pearly Mussels of New York State. New York State Museum Memoir 26. The University of the State of New York. 113 pp. + figures.
  47. Sukkestad, K.E., E.P. Keferl, and T.D. Bryce. 2006. Freshwater molluscs of Fort Stewart, Georgia, U.S.A. American Malacological Bulletin, 21(1/2): 31-38.
  48. Taylor, R.W. 1985. Comments on the distribution of freshwater mussels (Unionacea) of the Potomac River headwaters in West Virginia. The Nautilus 99(2-3):84-87.
  49. The Catena Group. 2006. Freshwater mussel surveys of the Pee Dee River basin in South Carolina. Unpublished report prepared for the Nature Conservancy- South Carolina Chapter, January 3, 2006. 47 pp.
  50. Threlfall, W. 1986. Seasonal occurrence of <i>Anodonta cataracta</i> Say, 1817, glochidia on three-spined sticklebacks, <i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i> Linnaeus. The Veliger, 29(2): 231-234.
  51. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  52. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  53. Van Snik Gray, E.S., W.A. Lellis, J.C. Cole, and C.S. Johnson. 1999. Hosts of <i>Pyganodon cataracta </i>(eastern floater) and <i>Strophitus undulatus </i>(squawfoot) from the Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania. Triannual Unionid Report, 18: 6.
  54. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  55. Watters, G.T. 1994. An annotated bibliography of the reproduction and propagation of the Unionoidea (primarily of North America). Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contributions, 1: 1-158.
  56. Watters, G.T., M.A. Hoggarth, and D.H. Stansbery. 2009b. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio. 421 pp.
  57. Wiles, M. 1975a. The glochidia of certain Unionidae (Mollusca) in Nova Scotia and their fish hosts. Canadian Journal of Zoology 53: 33-41.
  58. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  59. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  60. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  61. Zanatta, D.T., A. Ngo, and J. Lindell. 2007a. Reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships among <i>Anodonta</i>, <i>Pyganodon</i>, and <i>Utterbackia </i>(Bivalvia: Unionoida) using mutation coding of allozyme data. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 156: 211-216.