Cambarus bartonii

(Fabricius, 1798)

Appalachian Brook Crayfish

G5Secure Found in 24 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.872128
Element CodeICMAL07300
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassMalacostraca
OrderDecapoda
FamilyCambaridae
GenusCambarus
Other Common Names
Common Crayfish (EN) écrevisse de ruisseau (FR)
Concept Reference
McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Two subspecies of this species are recognized, Cambarus bartonii bartonii Fabricius 1798 and C. b. cavatus Hay 1902. Cambarus bartonii carinirostris Hay 1914 was elevated to species status by Thoma and Jezerinac (2000).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2015-05-26
Change Date1996-02-19
Edition Date2010-05-17
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
The nominal species widespread and abundant, found in New Brunswick, Canada, west to Kentucky and Tennessee, south to Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina and east to the Atlantic Ocean. It likely also occurs (different morph- cavatus) Alabama, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia. It is secure throughout its range and faces few threats although localized declines are occurring due to competetive exclusion by Cambarus robustus, and habitat degradation.
Range Extent Comments
The nominal species found in New Brunswick, Canada, west to Kentucky and Tennessee, south to Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina and east to the Atlantic Ocean (Hobbs, 1989). Taylor and Schuster (2004) cite Tennessee and northwestern Georgia to southwestern Virginia, West Virginia, and west to Kentucky for the subspecies cavatus. Eversole and Jones (2004) cite New Brunswick, Canada, to northern Georgia and eastern parts of Kentucky and Tennessee with populations in South Carolina and Georgia showing considerable variation across its range. In the southern portion of its range, it is confined to the Blue Ridge province of the Appalachian Highlands. In the northern portion of its range it occurs in the St. Lawrence basin in Ontario and Quebec to the southern Hudson Bay drainage.
Occurrences Comments
Reeves et al. (2000) included Twin Snakes Cave in Dade Co., Georgia. It was recently found to be extant in the Catawba River basin in North Carolina but not extending into South Carolina (Alderman, 2005). It is found throughout most river basins in North Carolina, except the Broad and Catawba where it is primarily found in the western headwaters along teh eastern Continental Divide (Simmons and Fraley, 2010). In the Cumberland Plateau it occurs in tributaries of the Tennessee River upstream from Walden Gorge (Bouchard, 1974). In Kentucky, subspecies cavatus is widespread but sporadic in the eastern half with records from all major river drainages except the Green (Taylor and Schuster, 2004). Peake et al. (2004) collected this species in the upper Cumberland and upper Kentucky River basins in Kentucky. Jezerinac and Thoma (1984) cite Ohio distribution as Jefferson Co. Cambarus bartonii bartonii is stable in West Virginia and occurs throughout the Atlantic Slope (Potomac, James, Ridge and Valley, Allegheny Mountains, Appalachian Plateau regions) (Loughman and Welsh, 2010). Cambarus bartonii cavatus is stable in West Virginia and occurs in headwaters streams and wetlands throughout central and southern portions of the Ohio River direct drains, western portions of the Kanawha River, and southwestern Ohio River basins (Loughman and Welsh, 2010). In New York's Hudson River drainage, Smith (1979) added Rensselaer and Washington Cos., frequently only in the Poestenkill and upper Hoosic River system. In Vermont, it is known from the Hudson drainage (Battenkill) and the Champlain Basin (Kart et al., 2005). In Maryland, it is stable and is distributed widely from the eastern continental divide to the Coastal Plain as well as tributaries of the Potomac River in southern Maryland (Killian et al., 2010). Francois (1959) cites it in New Jersey in Bergen, Essex, Hunterdon, Mercer, Morris, Passaic, Sussex, Union, and Warren Cos.; as well as Bucks, Northampton, and Philadelphia Cos., Pennsylvania. In Massachusetts it is confined to tributaries flowing into the Hoosic River basin in the Hudson River drainage system, with a few records outside the Hoosic River that are the result of introduction (Smith, 2000). Horowitz and Flinders (2004) found it to be the most common species encountered (9 of 15 stations) in the Piedmont, Ridge and Valley and Highlands regions of New Jersey. It was recently documented in the vicinity of Plummers Island (bank of Potomac River), Montgomery Co., Maryland (Norden, 2008).
Threat Impact Comments
Overall this species faces few threats. In certain areas, it faces localized threats. Increasing range expansion of Cambarus robustus found to competitively exclude Cambarus bartonii in Ontario (Guiasu et al., 1996; Guiasu and Dunham, 1999). Localized declines can also be attributed to general habitat degradation and loss. Fish predation poses a greater threat to small rather than larger individuals (Englund and Krupa, 2000) and predation effects were larger for deeper pools than shallow ones (Englund, 1999).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Mesial margin of palm of chela with single row of <8 tubercles; color olive to reddish brown; two terminal elements of first pleopod of male bent at least 90 degrees to main axis of pleopod; lacking spines or angles at base of acumen; carina absent (Hobbs, 1976). [LENGTH: to 75 TCL; to 150 TL] [WIDTH: to 25] Jezerinac (1985) outlines morphological differences between the two subspecies.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Both terminal elements of pleopod at right angles to shaft; rostrum only shallowly excavate and acarinate; rostral margins unthickened.

Habitat

Cambarus bartonii is usually found in stream and spring habitats, but is occasionally seen in ponds (Hobbs 1989) and lakes (Jezerinac 1985). This species often burrows along streams and in seepage areas up to 1,180m above sea level (Williams and Bivens 1996). The nominal subspecies seems to prefer running water; but subspecies cavatus can be found in burrows in riparian areas, almost always in contact with the stream bed. In North Carolina, it occurs in large rivers to small, high-elevation mountain seeps and is a habitat generalist (Simmons and Fraley, 2010).

Reproduction

Mate in fall, spawn in early spring. In North Carolina, Form I males were collected in April, May, June, August, September, October, November, and December in 7-20C (Simmons and Fraley, 2010).
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOL
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaS5Yes
Rhode IslandSNRYes
AlabamaS2Yes
TennesseeS4Yes
PennsylvaniaSNRYes
KentuckySNRYes
DelawareSNRYes
New YorkS3Yes
New HampshireS2Yes
MarylandS5Yes
South CarolinaS4Yes
MaineS2Yes
New JerseyS4Yes
ConnecticutSNRYes
VirginiaS4Yes
GeorgiaS5Yes
VermontS3Yes
MassachusettsS2Yes
OhioS3Yes
West VirginiaS5Yes
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecS5Yes
New BrunswickS5Yes
OntarioS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (24)
Georgia (3)
AreaForestAcres
Indian Grave GapChattahoochee National Forest1,020
Joe GapChattahoochee National Forest5,321
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4,269
North Carolina (6)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Graveyard Ridge (addition)Pisgah National Forest1,958
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Sam Knob (addition)Pisgah National Forest2,576
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Pennsylvania (1)
AreaForestAcres
Tracy RidgeAllegheny National Forest9,034
Tennessee (1)
AreaForestAcres
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Virginia (11)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Hoop HoleJefferson National Forest4,652
Laurel ForkGeorge Washington National Forest9,967
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
Price MountainJefferson National Forest9,119
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
West Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
References (38)
  1. Alderman, J.M. 2005. Crayfish surveys for Catawba-Waterlee relicensing. Unpublished report prepared for Duke Power Company, Charlotte, North Carolina, 17 July 2005. 18 pp.
  2. Bouchard, R.W. 1974. Geography and ecology of crayfishes of the Cumberland Plateau and Cumberland Mountains, Kentucky, Virginia, Tennessee, Georgia and Alabama. Part II. The genera <i>Fallicambarus </i>and <i>Cambarus</i>. Freshwater Crayfish 2:585-605
  3. Cooper, J.E. 2010. Annotated checklist of the crayfishes of North Carolina, and correlations of distributions with hydrologic units and physiographic provinces. Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science 126(3):69-76.
  4. Crandall, K. A., and S. De Grave. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. Journal of Crustacean Biology 37(5):615-653.
  5. DiStefano, R.J. and R.J. Neves. 1991. Response of the crayfish <i>Cambarus bartonii bartonii</i> to acid exposure in southern Appalachian streams. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:1585-1591.
  6. Dube, J. et J.-F. Desroches. 2007. Les ecrevisses du Quebec. Ministere des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de l'amenagement de la faune de l'Estrie, de Montreal et de la Monteregie, Longueuil. v + 51 pp.
  7. Englund, G. 1999. Effects of fish on thelocal abundance of crayfish in stream pools. Oikos 87(1):48-56.
  8. Englund, G. and J.J. Krupa. 2000. Habitat use by crayfish in stream pools: Influence of predators, depth and body size. Freshwater Biology 43:75-83.
  9. Eversole, A.G. and D.R. Jones. 2004. Key to the crayfish of South Carolina. Unpublished report. Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. 43 pp.
  10. Francois, D.D. 1959. The crayfishes of New Jersey. The Ohio Journal of Science 59(2): 108-127.
  11. Griffith, M.B., L.T. Wolcott, S.A. Perry. 1996. Production of the crayfish <i>Cambarus bartonii </i>(Fabricius, 1798) (Decapoda, Cambaridae) in an acidic Appalachian stream (U.S.A.). Crustaceana 69:974-984.
  12. Griffith, M.B., S.A. Perry and W.B. Perry. 1994. Secondary production of macroinvertebrate shredders in headwater streams with different baseflow alkalinity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 345-356.
  13. Guiasu, R.C. and D.W. Dunham. 1999. Aggressive interactions between teh crayfishes <i>Cambarus bartonii bartonii</i> and <i>C. robustus</i> (Decapoda: Cambaridae): Interspecific and intraspecific contests. Journal of Crustacean Biology 19(1):131-146.
  14. Guiasu, R.C., D.W. Dunha, and D.W. Barr. 1996. Interspecific agonistic contests between male <i>Cambarus bartonii bartonii</i> (Fabricius 1798) and <i>Cambarus robustus</i> Girard 1852 (Decapoda,Cambaridae) crayfish and the possible competition between the two species in Ontario. Freshwater Crayfish 11: 364-377.
  15. Hamr, P. and M. Berrill. 1985. The life histories of north-temperate populations of the crayfish <i>Cambarus robustus</i> and <i>Cambarus bartoni</i>. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:2313-2332.
  16. Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
  17. Hobbs, Jr., H. H. 1976a. Crayfishes (Astacidae) of North and Middle America. Biological Methods Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. 173 pp.
  18. Horowitz, R.and C. Flinders. 2004. Development of a Headwater IBI for New Jersey Upland Streams. Final Report Patrick Center Project #869, prepared for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, New Jersey; and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Edison, New Jersy, 30 November 2004.
  19. Huryn A.D. and J.B. Wallace. 1987. Production and litter processing by crayfish in an Appalachian mountain stream. Freshwater Biology 18:277-286.
  20. Jezerinac, R.F. 1985. Morphological variations of <i>Cambarus </i>(<i>Cambarus</i>) <i>bartonii cavatus </i>(Decapoda: Cambaridae) from Ohio, with a diagnosis of the Ohio form. Ohio Journal of Science 85:131-134.
  21. Jezerinac, R.F. and R.F. Thoma. 1984. An illustrated key to the Ohio <i>Cambarus </i>and <i>Fallicambarus </i>(Decapoda: Cambaridae) with comments and a new subspecies record. Ohio Journal of Science, 84: 120-125.
  22. Kart, J., R. Regan, S.R. Darling, C. Alexander, K. Cox, M. Ferguson, S. Parren, K. Royar, B. Popp (eds.). 2005. Vermont's Wildlife Action Plan. Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department. Waterbury, Vermont. Available: http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com
  23. Kilian, J.V., A.J. Becker, S.A. Stranko, M. Ashton, R.J. Klauda, J. Gerber, and M. Hurd. 2010. The status and distribution of Maryland crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):11-32.
  24. Loughman, Z.J. and S.A. Welsh. 2010. Distribution and conservation standing of West Virginia crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):63-78.
  25. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  26. Mirarchi, R.E., M.A. Bailey, J.T. Garner, T.M. Haggerty, T.L. Best, M.F. Mettee, and P. O'Neil. 2004d. Alabama Wildlife. Volume Four: Conservation and Management Recommendations for Imperiled Wildlife. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 221 pp.
  27. Norden, A.W. 2008. Biological diversity of Plummers Isalnd, Maryland: the crayfishes and their entocytherid ostracod associates. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 15: 49-51.
  28. Peake, D.R., G.J. Pond, and S.E. McMurray. 2004. Development of tolerance values for Kentucky crayfishes. Report to the Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet, Department for Environmental Protection, Division of Water, Frankfurt, Kentucky. 30 pp.
  29. Reeves, W.K., J.B. Jensen, and J.C. Ozier. 2000. New faunal and fungal records from caves in Georgia, USA. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 62(3): 169-179.
  30. Seiler, S.M. and A.M. Turner. 2004. Growth and population size of crayfish in headwater streams: Individual- and higher level consequences of acidification. Freshwater Biology 49:870-881.
  31. Simmons, J.W. and S.J. Fraley. 2010. Distribution, status, and life-history observations of crayfishes in western North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):79-126.
  32. Smith, D.G. 1979. New locality records of crayfishes from the middle Hudson River system. Ohio Journal of Science, 79(3): 133-135.
  33. Smith, D.G. 2000a. Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Southern New England. Douglas G. Smith: Sunderland, Massachusetts. 243 pp.
  34. Taylor, C.A. and G.A. Schuster. 2004. The Crayfishes of Kentucky. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication, 28: viii + 210 pp.
  35. Taylor, C. A., G. A. Schuster, J. E. Cooper, R. J. DiStefano, A. G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H. H. Hobbs III, H. W. Robison, C. E. Skelton, and R. F. Thoma. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):371-389.
  36. Thoma, R.F. and R.E. Jezerinac. 2000. Ohio crayfish and shrimp atlas. Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contribution 7:1-28.
  37. Van Luik, S.C. 1981. Ecology of crayfishes from West Virginia caves. Pages 657-658 in B.F. Beck (editor), Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Speleology: a meeting of the International Union of Speleology, Bowling Green, Kentucky, July 18-24, 1981.
  38. Woodall, W. and J.B. Wallace. 1972. The benthic fauna in four small southern Appalachian streams. American Midland Naturalist 88:393-407.