(L.) Pers.
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.160325
Element CodePDBER05010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderRanunculales
FamilyBerberidaceae
GenusJeffersonia
SynonymsPodophyllum diphyllumL.
Other Common NamesJeffersonie à deux feuilles (FR) twinleaf (EN)
Concept ReferenceKartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-07-13
Change Date1984-02-28
Edition Date2000-01-03
Edition AuthorsJohn R. Boetsch (1/00); rev. Eric Nielsen (1/00)
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank ReasonsThis species is has a relatively broad range in eastern North America and is locally very abundant in central portions of its range. This species apparently tolerates low levels of habitat disturbance (Homoya pers. comm.).
Range Extent CommentsEastern United States and southern Canada, from central and western New York (Young pers. comm.), Ontario (Kartesz 1999), Pennsylvania (Kunsman pers. comm.), and southern lower Michigan (Penskar pers. comm.) west to the northeast corner of Iowa (Pearson pers. comm.), Minnesota (USDA-NRCS 1999); south to northern Alabama (Schotz pers. comm.). In the east, confined to the ridge and valley province of the mid-Atlantic states (Frye pers. comm.).
Occurrences CommentsEstimated that several hundred populations are extant rangewide. Alabama: >10; Iowa: 6; Indiana: hundreds or thousands; Maryland: 2-3+; Michigan: 25; North Carolina: 1; New York: 13; Tennessee: 34+ (Brumback and Mehrhoff 1996, APSU 1999).
Since this is such a common species throughout much of its range, these numbers can only be estimates. Additional information on species distribution and the number of populations can be gleaned from county occurrence dot maps (USDA-NRCS 1999). The largest populations and most regular occurrence in suitable habitat is toward the centroid of the distribution of this species, such as in Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky (Schotz pers. comm., Homoya pers. comm.).
Threat Impact CommentsNo apecific evidence has been found to suggest that this species is currently being sought for the medicinal plant trade. It may experience very low-level collection as an ornamental.
A person knowledgable about the herbal medicinal trade has never seen the plant in trade, but speculates that it probably receives some local use (M. McGuffin pers. comm.).
As with all native forest herbs, habitat conversion and urban/rural development are significant direct threats (Young pers. comm., Penskar pers. comm., Homoya pers. comm., Pittman pers. comm., Kunsman pers. comm., Pearson pers. comm., Frye pers. comm., Schotz pers. comm.). Equally significant threats include habitat fragmentation and displacement by exotic species (Homoya pers. comm., Penskar pers. comm., Frye pers. comm., Enser pers. comm.). Locally, limestone quarrying is one of the development pressures on this species given its affinity for limestone substrate (Kunsman pers. comm.). This species may be relatively protected in portions of its range by its occurrence in steep, less-developable sites (Homoya pers. comm.). However, the Southern Appalachian Species Viability Project (2002) reports that this species occurs in highly productive sites for timber, putting at risk from forest management practices.