Geomys pinetis

Rafinesque, 1806

Southeastern Pocket Gopher

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103532
Element CodeAMAFC02040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilyGeomyidae
GenusGeomys
Synonyms
Geomys colonus
Other Common Names
southeastern pocket gopher (EN)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Taxonomic Comments
This species has a complex taxonomic history at the species and subspecies level (see summary in Chambers et al. 2009). Multiple phylogenetic analyses have found populations of G. pinetis on either side of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River basin to be genetically distinct, and the authors suggest the populations east and west of that basin to be recognized as distinct forms (Sudman et al. 2006, Chambers et al. 2009, Soto-Centeno 2013, Duncan et al. 2024). All other formerly recognized forms (austrinus, colonus, cumberlandius, floridanus, fontanelus, goffi) have been synonymized with the nominate form, resulting in a single species with two subspecies: G. pinetis pinetis and G. pinetis mobilensis (Williams and Genoways 1980, Humphrey 1981, Laerm 1981, Jolley et al. 2000, Sudman et al. 2006, Chambers et al. 2009, Soto-Centeno 2013, Duncan et al. 2024). G. p. mobilensis may warrant full species status (Sudman et al. 2006, Chambers et al. 2009, Soto-Centeno 2013, Duncan et al. 2024). Also see Bradley et al. (2023) for a broad systematic reevaluation of the three genera of pocket gophers occurring in Texas and surrounding areas.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-10-02
Change Date2024-10-02
Edition Date2024-10-02
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2024)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species is found in sandy upland habitats of the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The population has been declining for decades due to development, agriculture, silviculture, road-building, and fire exclusion. Several extirpations have been documented throughout the range.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found in the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States from the Mobile River basin in southwestern Alabama eastward to the Savannah River in Georgia, and extending southward into peninsular Florida (Merriam 1895, Pembleton and Williams 1978, Hall 1981, Duncan et al. 2024). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2024) records from 2000-2024, range extent is estimated to be approximately 268,000 km².
Occurrences Comments
Applying a 3 km separation distance to GBIF (2024) records from 2000-2024, 152 occurrences are estimated.
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threats to this species are destruction of habitat and degradation of habitat. Habitat destruction occurs in the form of conversion to agriculture, urban development, and suburban development. Habitat degradation occurs in the form of conversion to dense pine plantation and from fire exclusion (Humphrey 1981, Trani et al. 2007, Bennett et al. 2020, Duncan et al. 2020, Parsons et al. 2022). Fire exclusion allows hardwood encroachment, a decline of herbaceous plant species, and canopy cover to increase (Bennett et al. 2020, Duncan et al. 2020, Parsons et al. 2022). Compounding these losses is the common view that pocket gophers are agricultural, silvicultural, and residential pest and, hence, are sometimes exterminated. Additionally, even narrow roads have been shown to be a major deterrent to movement in small mammals, and roads greater than 30 meters clearance are rarely crossed (Oxley et al. 1974).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Preferred habitats are longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) forests with sandy soils that contain less than ~8% clay content, low to intermediate canopy cover, high herbaceous ground cover, and low hardwood plant abundance (Merriam 1895, Bennett et al. 2020, Duncan et al. 2020, Parsons et al. 2022). It is also adaptable to agricultural and low-density residential settings (Duncan et al. 2020, Parsons et al. 2022).

Ecology

Pocket gophers are ecologically important as prey items and in influencing soils, microtopography, habitat heterogeneity, diversity of plant species, and primary productivity (Huntly and Inouye 1988).

Reproduction

Breeds year-round, with peak mating activity January-August. Litter size is 1-3 (average 2). Up to two litters per year (Hall 1981).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - ConiferGrassland/herbaceousCropland/hedgerow
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
FloridaS5Yes
AlabamaS3Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.1.3 - Persecution/controlRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityPervasive - largeModerate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Florida (1)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
References (39)
  1. Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries. 2015. Alabama's Wildlife Action Plan 2015-2025. Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries. Montgomery, Alabama. 514 pages. [Available online at http://www.outdooralabama.com/sites/default/files/AL%20SWAP%20FINAL%20POST-REVIEW%2004-22-2016.pdf}
  2. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  3. Baker, R. J., L. C. Bradley, R. D. Bradley, J. W. Dragoo, M. D. Engstrom, R. S. Hoffman, C. A. Jones, F. Reid, D. W. Rice, and C. Jones. 2003a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2003. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 229:1-23.
  4. Bennett, M. E., R. A. Gitzen, L. M. Conner, M. D. Smith, E. C. Soehren, and S. B. Castleberry. 2020. Interactions of soil and vegetation determine habitat for southeastern pocket gopher (<i>Geomys pinetis</i>). The American Midland Naturalist 184(2): 205-221. doi: 10.1637/0003-0031-184.2.205.
  5. Bradley, R. D., A. T. Pham, K. A. Rich, E. K. Roberts, T. J. Soniat, C. M. Poehlein, M. N. Mills, M. Ballard, R. M. Pitts, L. L. Lindsey, and M. K. Halsey. 2023. Genetic identification of pocket gophers (genera <i>Cratogeomys</i>, <i>Geomys</i>, and <i>Thomomys</i>) in Texas and surrounding areas. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University 78. 128 pp.
  6. Brown, L.N. 1971. Breeding biology of the pocket gopher (<i>Geomys pinetis</i>) in southern Florida. Am. Midl. Nat. 85:45-53.
  7. Chambers, R.R., P.D.  Sudman, and R.D. Bradley. 2009. A phylogenetic assessment of pocket gophers (<i>Geomys</i>): evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Journal of Mammalogy 90(3):537-547.
  8. Davis, W.B. 1940. Distribution and variation of pocket gophers. (genus <i>Geomys</i>) in the southwestern U.S. Bull. TX Agric. Exp. Sta. 590:5-37.
  9. Duncan, S. I., J. T. Pynne, E. I. Parsons, R. J. Fletcher, J. D. Austin, S. B. Castleberry, L. M. Conner, R. A. Gitzen, M. Barbour, and R. A. McCleery. 2020. Land use and cover effects on an ecosystem engineer. Forest Ecology and Management 456: 117642.
  10. Duncan, S. I., R. A. McCleery, C. M. Carneiro, J. T. Pynne, E. I. Parsons, L. M. Conner, S. B. Castleberry, R. A. Gitzen, and J. D. Austin. 2024. Genetic support for discrete conservation units of the fossorial rodent <i>Geomys pinetis</i>. Conservation Genetics 25: 1087–1101. doi: 10.1007/s10592-024-01626-6
  11. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2010. Guide to the natural communities of Florida: 2010 edition. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, FL.
  12. Genoways, H. H., M. J. Hamilton, D. S. Bell, R. R. Chambers, and R. D. Bradley. 2008. Hybrid zones, genetic isolation, and systematics of pocket gophers (genus <i>Geomys</i>) in Nebraska. Journal of Mammalogy 89:826–836.
  13. Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 2015. Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan. Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 262 pp.
  14. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2024. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2024).
  15. Hafner, D. J., E. Yensen, and G. L. Kirkland, Jr. (compilers and editors). 1998. North American rodents. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Rodent Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. x + 171 pp.
  16. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  17. Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.
  18. Howard, W. E., and H. E. Childs, Jr. 1959. Ecology of pocket gophers with emphasis on <i>Thomomys bottae mewa</i>. Hilgardia 29:277-358.
  19. Huntly, N., and R. Inouye. 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanisms. BioScience 38:786-793.
  20. Ingles, L. G. 1952. The ecology of the mountain pocket gopher, <i>Thomomys monticola</i>. Ecology 33:87-95.
  21. Jolley, T. W., R. L. Honeycutt, and R. D. Bradley. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of pocket gophers (genus <i>Geomys</i>) based on the mitochondrial 12s rRNA gene. Journal of Mammalogy 81:1025-1034.
  22. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  23. Laerm, J. 1981. Systematic status of the Cumberland Island pocket gopher, <i>Geomys cumberlandicus</i>. Brimleyana 6:141-161.
  24. Laliberté, J. 2007. National Parks Conservation Association state of the parks report, natural resource assessment Cumberland Island National Seashore, Camden County, Georgia. M.S. thesis. Duke University, Durham, NC. 105 pp.
  25. Merriam, C. H. 1895. Monographic revision of the pocket gophers, family Geomyidae (exclusive of the species of <i>Thomomys</i>). North American Fauna 8: 1-263.
  26. Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker's mammals of the world. Sixth edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes, 1,936 pp.
  27. Oxley, D. J., M. B. Fenton and G. R. Carmody. 1974. The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 51-59.
  28. Parsons, E. I., R. A. Gitzen, J. T. Pynne, L. M. Conner, S. B. Castleberry, S. I. Duncan, J. D. Austin, and R. A. McCleery. 2022. Determining habitat requirements for the southeastern pocket gopher (<i>Geomys pinetis</i>) at multiple scales. Journal of Mammalogy 103(3): 672–679. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyab144
  29. Pembleton, E. F. and S. L. Williams. 1978. <i>Geomys pinetis</i>. Mammalian Species No. 86:1-3.
  30. Skelley, P. E. and P. W. Kovarik. 2001. <i>Geomys pinetis</i> Rafinesque: Southeastern pocket gopher locality data final report to the Alabama, Florida and Georgia permitting agencies.
  31. Smolen, M. J., and J. W. Bickham. 1995. Phylogenetic implications of chromosome evolution in <i>Geomys</i>. Journal of Mammalogy 76:50-67.
  32. Soto-Centeno, J. A., L. N. Barrow, J. M. Allen, and D. L. Reed. 2013. Reevaluation of a classic phylogeographic barrier: new techniques reveal the influence of microgeographic climate variation on population divergence. Ecology and Evolution 3: 1603–1613. doi: 10.1002/ece3.576
  33. Sudman, P. D., J. K. Wickliffe, P. Horner, M. J. Smolen, J. W. Bickham, and R. D. Bradley. 2006. Molecular systematics of pocket gophers of the genus <i>Geomys</i>. Journal of Mammalogy 87:668–676.
  34. Trani, M. K., W. M. Ford, and B. R. Chapman, eds. 2007. The Land Manager's Guide to mammals of the South. The Nature Conservancy, Durham, North Carolina, and U.S. Forest Service, Atlanta, Georgia.  546 pp.
  35. Williams, L. R., and G. N. Cameron. 1990. Intraspecific response to variation in food resources by Attwater's pocket gopher. Ecology 71:797-810.
  36. Williams, S. L., and H. H. Genoways. 1980. Morphological variation in the southeastern pocket gopher, <i>Geomys pinetis</i> (Mammalia: Rodentia). Annals of Carnegie Museum 49: 405-453.
  37. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  38. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]
  39. Wilson, N., and L. A. Durden. 2003. Ectoparasites of terrestrial vertebrates inhabiting the Georgia Barrier Islands, USA: an inventory and preliminary biogeographical analysis. Journal of Biogeography, 30: 1207-1220. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00894.x