Kinosternon baurii

(Garman, 1891)

Striped Mud Turtle

G4Apparently Secure (G4G5) Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
URESA Status
Medium - lowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105906
Element CodeARAAE01010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassChelonia
OrderTestudines
FamilyKinosternidae
GenusKinosternon
USESAUR
Other Common Names
striped mud turtle (EN)
Concept Reference
King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Walker et al. (1998) discovered four major mtDNA groups in K. subrubrum-K. baurii: Missouri-Louisiana, Virginia to Florida, peninsular Florida, and Louisiana to Florida panhandle; these groups do not correspond well with nominal subspecies. Walker et al. (1998) found that K. subrubrum and K. baurii in Florida are highly distinct in mtDNA genotype, but the two species exhibit minimal mtDNA divergence along the Atlantic coastal states. Walker et al. (1998) and Walker and Avise (1998) discussed the various evolutionary histories that these data may reflect, and they concluded that further data are needed before a robust taxonomy can be established.

Karl and Wilson (2001) examined rangewide mtDNA sequence data for K. baurii and found that the putatively isolated population in the lower Florida Keys does not significantly differ genetically from the upper Florida Keys population, indicating that it is not isolated or is very recently isolated from the remainder of the range.

See Iverson (1991) for a phylogenetic analysis of kinosternine turtles.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2022-04-23
Change Date2022-04-23
Edition Date2022-04-23
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., rev. B. Young (2022)
Threat ImpactMedium - low
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This species has a fairly broad distribution, occurs in a variety of habitats, is not intrinsically vulnerable, but does suffer from a variety of threats.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs from the Florida Keys (at least historically) north throughout the Atlantic Coastal Plan to southern Delaware, USA (Lamb 1983, Lamb and Lovich 1990, Johnston et al. 2021).
Occurrences Comments
This species is known from hundreds of occurrences throughout its range (Johnston et al. 2021).
Threat Impact Comments
This species has been reported to be threatened by the loss of wetlands in Virginia; and loss of habitat for development, mortality from vehicle strikes on roads, trade, and removal of mosquito control ditches to promote populations of Key deer in Florida (summarized in Johnston et al. 2021). Climate change is also a threat as areas with suitable climatic conditions are expected to decline substantially (summarized in Johnston et al. 2021).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Adults have a broad, smooth, oval, tan to black carapace (generally widest and highest behind the middle) with three yellowish or cream-colored longitudinal stripes (may be obscure or lacking in some localities) and a large olive to yellow plastron that has two transverse hinges and may have dark seam borders; plastral hinges, absent in hatchlings, are acquired in about three months (Einem 1956); vertebrals may be depressed, forming a shallow, middorsal groove (Carr 1952, Ernst and Barbour 1972); head is small and conical and generally has two light cream to yellow stripes on each side; fleshy barbels occur on the chin and neck; upper jaw is not hooked; tail is spine-tipped; carapace has 23 scutes around the margin, including the cervical (nuchal); in southern Florida, young are black with a yellow spot on each marginal scute (Ashton and Ashton 1985), and they have a rough carapace with a narrow middorsal keel and weak dorsolateral keels (absent in adults); adult males differ from adult females in having a longer thicker tail (vent posterior to rear edge of carapace) and a patch of rough scales on the inner surface of the hind leg; carapace length usually 7.5-10 cm in adults, maximum 116 mm over much of range (Einem 1956, Iverson 1979, Wygoda 1979) but reaches 125-127 mm in southern Florida (Meshaka 1988). See Ernst and Barbour (1989) and Conant and Collins (1991).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from musk turtles (genus STERNOTHERUS) in having a noticeably larger plastron and two plastral hinges (vs. one). Specimens from the northern part of the range often have been misidentified as K. SUBRUBRUM. Lamb and Lovich (1990; see also Copeia 1991:561) found that the following characteristics reliably distinguished K. BAURII from K. SUBRUBRUM SUBRUBRUM. BAURII: carapace stripes present, greatly reduced, or absent; side of head bearing a pair of stripes, either continuous or broken; canthal stripe typically extends anteriorly from eye to tip of snout; in males, ratio of posterior humeral/plastron length (PH/PL) falls between 0.29-0.33 and ratio of plastral forelobe length/plastron length (FL/PL) falls between 0.35-0.38; in females, PH/PL falls between 0.28-0.35 and FL/PL falls between 0.32-0.35. SUBRUBRUM: carapace stripes absent; side of head variable, from no markings to extensive spotting or stripelike patterning, but seldom involving a pair of stripes; if side of head is patterned, then canthal stripe, if present, does not extend anterior of eye; in males, PH/PL falls between 0.25-0.28 and FL/PL falls between 0.39-0.42; in females, PH/PL falls between 0.24-0.28 and FL/PL falls between 0.36-0.39. See Lamb and Lovich (1990) for further information on distinguishing BAURII from SUBRUBRUM in Georgia, the Carolinas, and Virginia. See Lovich and Lamb (1995) for information on distinguishing K. SUBRUBRUM HIPPOCREPIS from K. BAURII.

Habitat

Cypress swamps, sloughs, ponds, drainage canals, wet meadows, shallow marshes, and adjacent forest areas; wanders on dry land and enters brackish ponds (e.g., in the Florida Keys; Dunson 1981). Often observed on roads and along canal banks (Carr 1940, Duellman and Schwartz 1958). Sometimes digs into decaying vegetation or soil surface. In central Florida, sometimes estivates on land when water levels are low; returns to water after rains raise water levels (Wygoda 1979). May less aquatic in the north than in southern Florida, where habitats more often include deeper flowing waters and where estivation on land is rare or absent (Ernst et al. 1972, Iverson 1979). However, in the lower Florida Keys, habitats include shallow ponds and excavated mosquito control ditches, and turtles may use terrestrial retreats if the ponds dry or become too saline (Dunson 1992).

Eggs are laid in nests dug in sand or decaying vegetation (Ernst and Barbour 1972, Iverson 1979). Sometimes oviposits in alligator nests. Nesting areas in Florida include turkey oak-longleaf pine sandhills adjacent to swamps; may travel up to at least 50-100 meters to nest (Mushinsky and Wilson 1992). After ovipositing, females often burrow underground a few meters from the nest, and then move back to wetland habitat after the next rain (Wilson, unpubl.).

Ecology

In central Florida, many adults have missing limbs and eyes and damage to the shell that could be attributed to predation attempts (Wilson, unpublished).

Leeches commonly are attached to the limbs or shell. The shell sometimes has attached algae (Neill and allen 1954).

Reproduction

In a single year in central Florida, 90% of 252 nesting events occurred during September-January, 2% in February-April, and 8% in May-June; most nesting occurred after heavy rainfall (Wilson, unpubl.; see also Wilson 1998). Clutch size is 1-7, usually 2-3. Average clutch size increases with female size. Mature females lay up to 3-6 clutches/year (Iverson 1979), 1-3/year in central Florida (Wilson, unpubl.). Eggs hatch in 97-143 days in the laboratory (Einem 1956, Lardie 1975, Iverson 1979). Iverson (1977) reported incubation times of 113-128 days. Because embryos exhibit diapause and estivation (Ewert 1985, 1991) at cool temperatures, incubation times in the field may be considerably longer than those in the laboratory. Sex of the hatchlings is affected by incubation temperature (Etchberger 1991). Eggs may incur heavy predation (Wilson, unpubl.). Hatchlings may overwinter in nest and emerge to move to wetlands in early to late spring (mainly winter-spring in Florida), usually following a heavy rain; a few hatchlings can be found traveling on land in fall (Mushinsky and Wilson 1992; Wilson, unpubl.). Females mature at an age of 5-6 years, when plastron length is 70-75 mm (Iverson 1979). Mature males have been reported with a plastron length of 76 mm or more (Einem 1956), though males may mature earlier and at smaller sizes than do females (Carr 1952). Maximum longevity in captivity is at least 25 years (Ernst and Barbour 1972).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - MixedSand/dune
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
FloridaS4Yes
South CarolinaS3Yes
MarylandSUYes
VirginiaS4Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
DelawareSNRYes
AlabamaS3Yes
GeorgiaS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateLow (long-term)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateLow (long-term)

Roadless Areas (2)
Florida (2)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
PinhookOsceola National Forest15,405
References (45)
  1. Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1985. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part two. Lizards, turtles & crocodilians. Windward Pub., Inc., Miami. 191 pp.
  2. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  3. Carr, A. 1952. Handbook of turtles. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York. 542 pp.
  4. Carr, A. F., Jr. 1940. A contribution to the herpetology of Florida. Univ. Florida Biol. Sci. Ser. 3:1.118.
  5. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  6. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  8. Duellman, W. E., and A. Schwartz. 1958. Amphibians and reptiles of southern Florida. Florida State Mus. Bull. Biol. Sci. 3:181-324.
  9. Dunson, W. A. 1981. Behavioral osmoregulation in the key mud turtle, <i>Kinosternon b. baurii</i>. J. Herpetol. 15:163-173.
  10. Dunson, W. A. 1992. Striped mud turtle, Lower Keys population. Pages 105-110 in P. E. Moler, editor. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. III. Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville. 291 pp.
  11. Einem, G. E. 1956. Certain aspects of the natural history of the mud turtle, <i>Kinosternon baurii</i>. Copeia 1956:186-188.
  12. Ernst, C.H. 1974. <i>Kinosternon baurii</i>. Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. 161.1-161.2.
  13. Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1972. Turtles of the United States. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 347 pp.
  14. Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1989a. Turtles of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xii + 313 pp.
  15. Ernst, C. H., R. W. Barbour, and J. E. Lovich. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xxxviii + 578 pp.
  16. Ernst, C. H., R. W. Barbour, and J. R. Butler. 1972. Habitat preferences of two Florida turtles, genus <i>Kinosternon</i>. Trans. Kentucky Acad. Sci. 33:41-42.
  17. Etchberger, C. R. 1991. Mechanistic and evolutionary considerations of temperature-dependent sex determination in turtles. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. 190 pp.
  18. Ewert, M. A. 1985. Embryology of turtles. Pages 76-267 in C. Gans, F. Billett, and P. F. A. Maderson, editors. Biology of the Reptilia. Vol. 14. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  19. Ewert, M. A. 1991. Cold torpor, diapause, delayed hatching and estivation in reptiles and birds. Pages 173-191 in D. C. Demming and M. W. J. Ferguson, editors. Egg incubation: its effects on embryonic development in birds and reptiles. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  20. Iverson, J. B. 1977. Reproduction in freshwater and terrestrial turtles of north Florida. Herpetologica 32:203-212.
  21. Iverson, J. B. 1978. Variation in striped mud turtles, <i>Kinosternon baurii</i> (Reptilia, Testudines, Kinosternidae). J. Herpetol. 12:135-142.
  22. Iverson, J. B. 1979. The female reproductive cycle in North Florida <i>Kinosternon subrubrum</i> (Reptilia, Testudines, Kinosternidae). Brimleyana 1(1):37-46.
  23. Iverson, J. B. 1991b. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of modern kinosternine turtles. Herpetological Monographs 5:1-27.
  24. Johnston, G. R., C. K. Dodd, Jr., and D. S. Wilson. 2021. <i>Kinosternon baurii</i> (Garman 1891), Striped Mud Turtle. In: Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Rhodin, Iverson, van Dijk, Stanford, Goode, Buhlmann, and Mittermeier (Eds.) Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5 (Installment 15) 2021: Account 116. Chelonian Research Foundation and Turtle Conservancy. 19 pp.
  25. Karl, S. A., and D. S. Wilson. 2001. Phylogeography and systematics of the mud turtle, <i>Kinosternon baurii</i>. Copeia 2001:797-801.
  26. King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
  27. Kushlan, J. A., and M. S. Kushlan. 1980. Everglades alligator nests: nesting sites for marsh reptiles. Copeia 1980:930-932.
  28. Lamb, T. 1983. The Striped Mud Turtle (<i>Kinosternon bauri</i>) in South Carolina, A Confirmation Through Multivariate Character Analysis. Herpetologica 39:383-390.
  29. Lamb, T., and J. Lovich. 1990. Morphometric validation of the striped mud turtle (<i>Kinosternon baurii</i>) in the Carolinas and Virginia. Copeia 1990:613-618.
  30. Lardie, R. L. 1975. Observations on reproduction in <i>Kinosternon</i>. J. Herpetol. 9:257-260.
  31. Lazell, J. D., Jr. 1989. Wildlife of the Florida Keys: a natural history. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
  32. Lovich, J. E., and T. Lamb. 1995. Morphometric similarity between the turtles <i>Kinosternon subrubrum hippocrepis</i> and <i>K. baurii</i> . Journal of Herpetology 29:621-624.
  33. Meshaka, W. E. 1988. Reproductive characteristics of south Florida <i>Sternotherus odoratus</i> and <i>Kinosternon baurii</i> (Testudines: Kinosternidae). Proc. Arkansas Acad. Sci. 42:11. [errata corrected in 1990, vol. 44:136]
  34. Meshaka, W. E., Jr., and E. Blind. 2001. Seasonal movements and reproduction in the striped mud turtle (<i>Kinosternon baurii</i>) from the southern Everglades, Florida. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4:75-80.
  35. Mushinsky, H. R., and D. S. Wilson. 1992. Seasonal occurrence of <i>Kinosternon baurii</i> on a sandhill in central Florida. J. Herpetol. 26:207-209.
  36. Neill, W. T., and E. R. Allen. 1954. Algae on turtles: some additional considerations. Ecology 35:581-584.
  37. Nicol, R. 1970. Striped mud turtle has tiny offspring. Tortuga Gazette 6(2):4.
  38. Sachsse, W. 1977. Normale und pathologische phanomene bei zuchtversuchen mit schildkroten, hier anhand von <i>Kinosternon baurii</i> (Reptilia, Testudines, Kinosternidae). Salamandra 13:22-35.
  39. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) [Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson, R. Bour, U. Fritz, A. Georges, H. B. Shaffer, and P. P. van Dijk]. 2021. Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (9th Ed.). In: Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson , P. P. van Dijk, C. B. Stanford, E. V. Goode, K. A. Buhlmann, and R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 8:1–472. doi: 10.3854/crm.8.checklist.atlas.v9.2021.
  40. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Shaffer, H.B., Bour, R., and Rhodin, A.G.J.]. 2012. Turtles of the world, 2012 update: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5:000.243-000.328. Online. Available: www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
  41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; partial 90-day finding on a petition to list 404 species in the southeastern United States as threatened or endangered with critical habitat. Federal Register 76(187):59836-59862.
  42. Walker, D., and J. C. Avise. 1998. Principles of phylogeography as illustrated by freshwater and terrestrial turtles in the southeastern United States. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:23-58.
  43. Walker, D., P. E. Mohler, K. A. Buhlmann, and J. C. Avise. 1998. Phylogeographic patterns in <i>Kinosternon subrubrum</i> and <i>K. baurii</i> based on mitochondrial DNA restriction analyses. Herpetologica 54:174-184.
  44. Wilson, D. S. 1998. Nesting ecology of the striped mud turtle (<i>K</i><i>inosternon baurii</i>) in central Florida. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3:142-143.
  45. Wygoda, M. L. 1979. Terrestrial activity of striped mud turtles, <i>Kinosternon baurii</i> (Reptilia, Testudines, Kinosternidae) in west-central Florida. J. Herpetol. 13: 469-480.