Procambarus clarkii

(Girard, 1852)

Red Swamp Crawfish

G5Secure Found in 20 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.117840
Element CodeICMAL14440
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassMalacostraca
OrderDecapoda
FamilyCambaridae
GenusProcambarus
Other Common Names
Louisiana Red (EN) Red Crawfish (EN)
Concept Reference
Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
Taxonomic Comments
Electrophoretic phylogenetic analysis revealed the five southeastern species of the subgenus Scapulicambarus revealed two cl;ades, one containing P. clarkii and P. troglodytes, and the other containing P. howellae, P. paeninsulanus, and P. okaloosae (Busack 1989).
Conservation Status
Review Date2009-07-01
Change Date1996-02-19
Edition Date2009-07-01
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Native range extends from the Mississippi-Ohio confluence down the Mississippi River floodplain to Louisiana, and along the Gulf coastal Plain southwest to Alabama, to the Rio Grande basin in south New Mexico and north Mexico. It was widely introduced in many places throughout Africa, Asia, and Europe, and also outside its native range in North America.
Range Extent Comments
Native range extends from the Mississippi-Ohio confluence down the Mississippi River floodplain to Louisiana, and along the Gulf coastal Plain southwest to Alabama, to the Rio Grande basin in south New Mexico and north Mexico. Mexican distribution includes Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, Sonora, Sinaloa, Durango, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas (Hernandez et al., 2008). It was widely introduced in many places throughout Africa, Asia, and Europe, and also outside its native range in North America (see Hobbs, 1989). Genetic variation in introduced European populations found to be high enough to uniquely fingerprint most of the surveyed individuals (Barbaresi et al., 2003) and a similar situation exists in Asia (Yue et al., 2010). In the United States, established non-native populations now occur in California, Nevada, Idaho, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, and Washington (Taylor and Schuster, 2004).
Occurrences Comments
The species has been introduced to Massachusetts (University of Massachusetts campus pond, Amherst) and Rhode Island (University of Rhode Island campus pond, Kingston) (Smith, 2000). Recently it was found at a single in the Catawba River in North Carolina (Alderman, 2005). It has been introduced to all North Carolina river basins in the Piedmont Plateau and Coastal Plain (Cooper and Armstrong, 2007; Simmons and Fraley, 2010). It has been introduced in a variety of aquatic habitats in lentic areas in South Carolina across much of the state (Eversole and Jones, 2004).In Georgia, it has been introduced into a single stream in downtown Athens and a highly disturbed urban stream in Gwinnett Co. and an urban stream in the Etowah River system (Skelton, 2010). In the Cumberland Plateau it occurs from introductions in the Black Warrior River system in Jefferson Co., Alabama. (Bouchard, 1974). In Kentucky, it has a distribution almost identical to Procambarus viaeviridis; known from the floodplains of the extreme lower Tennessee, lower Ohio, and Mississippi Rivers and from tributaries of the Mississippi River in the extreme western portion of the state (Taylor and Schuster, 2004). In Indiana, it was collected in 2000 from Lake Michigan in Indiana and it has spread into the West Branch of the Grand Calamet River (Simon, 2001) and more recently in East Branch Calumet River in Lake Co. (Simon et al., 2005). In Ohio, it was introduced in the western end of Sandusky Bay, a fish hatchery at Denison University, and the Grand River upstream of Harpersfield Dam (Thoma and Jezerinac, 2000). In Missouri, it occurs widely in the Lowland Faunal Region (Pflieger, 1996). In Illinois it is known from lowland habitats in the extreme southern Illinois counties of Alexander, Jackson, massac, Pope, Pulaski, and Union (Page, 1985) and recently the North branch Chicago River in Chicago, Cook Co.; hundreds of km north (Taylor and Tucker, 2005). In Alabama, it is known from the Tennessee, Mobile, Black Warrior, Cahaba, Coosa, Tallapoosa, and Escambia River systems (Schuster and Taylor, 2004) as well as Alabama, Pascagoula, and Tombigbee drainages (Schuster et al., 2008). In Texas, the natural range is throughout the eastern portion along the coastal plain and upstream within rivers thatr flow from the Edwards Plateau into the Gulf (Johnson and Johnson, 2008). This species has been documented in Cuatro Cienegas, Coahuila, Mexico (Dinger et al., 2005).
Threat Impact Comments
The red swamp crayfish is a highly invasive species which is under no threat. It is a major threat to other crayfish and to freshwater ecosystems in general. In an anomalous instance, P. acutus replaced P. clarkii in experimental culture ponds in South Carolina in <10 years (Eversole et al., 2006).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Color usually deep, dark red; rostrum acuminate; cervical spines present; areola linear to obliterated; palm of cheliped with row of tubercles along mesial margin of palm and chela elongate; hooks on ischia of male 3rd & 4th pereiopods; male first pleopod terminating in 4 elements, cephalic process strongly lobate and with sharp angle on caudodistal margin, lacking subapical setae, with strong angular shoulder on cephalic margin quite proximal to terminal elements, that of right pleopod wrapped around margin to appear reduced or absent (Hobbs, 1976). [LENGTH: to 60 TCL; to 125 TL] [WIDTH: to 25 mm]

Diagnostic Characteristics

Male with hooks on ischia of 3rd & 4th pereiopods; male first pleopod with lobate cephgalic process sharply angled on caudodiostal margin and sharp angular shoulder on cephalic margin proximal to terminal elements; areola narrow to obliterated.

Habitat

In Missouri, it occurs more often in flowing water habitats than the white river crayfish (61% lowland streams and ditches, 79% of these with noticeable current or flow), but also in swamps, sloughs and roadside pools; bottom usually mud or sand, often where there were considerable quantities of organic debris such as logs, sticks or water-soaked tree leaves (Pflieger, 1996). It is very tolerant of low oxygen and high temperature; is a secondary burrower; and is found in almost every type habitat in sluggish streams and lentic situations. It is one of few North American crayfishes with salinity tolerance.

Reproduction

Year round breeder, intrapopulational variation of seasonality high & single female may produce >1 brood in a year.
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
Rhode IslandSNANo
TennesseeS5Yes
WashingtonSNANo
New YorkSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
MississippiSNRYes
ArizonaSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
TexasSNRYes
North CarolinaSNANo
MassachusettsSNRYes
IndianaSNRYes
New JerseySNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
MissouriSNRYes
NevadaSNANo
KentuckySUYes
AlabamaS3Yes
OhioSNANo
FloridaS3Yes
OregonSNANo
IllinoisS4Yes
ArkansasS4Yes
HawaiiSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
GeorgiaSNANo
MarylandSNANo
South CarolinaSNANo
OklahomaS3Yes
UtahSNAYes
IdahoSNANo
WyomingSNRYes
LouisianaS5Yes
Roadless Areas (20)
Arizona (1)
AreaForestAcres
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
California (18)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Black CanyonInyo National Forest32,421
Boundary Peak (CA)Inyo National Forest210,884
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Mill CreekSequoia National Forest27,643
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
TenmileSiuslaw National Forest10,818
References (36)
  1. Alderman, J.M. 2005. Crayfish surveys for Catawba-Waterlee relicensing. Unpublished report prepared for Duke Power Company, Charlotte, North Carolina, 17 July 2005. 18 pp.
  2. Barbaresi, S., R. Fani, F. Gherardi, A. Mengoni, and C. Souty-Grosset. 2003. Genetic variability in European populations of an invasive American crayfish: preliminary results. Biological Invasions, 5: 269-274.
  3. Bouchard, R.W. 1974. Geography and ecology of crayfishes of the Cumberland Plateau and Cumberland Mountains, Kentucky, Virginia, Tennessee, Georgia and Alabama. Part I. The genera <i>Procambarus </i>and <i>Orconectes</i>. Freshwater Crayfish 2:563-584.
  4. Busack, C.A. 1989. Biochemical systematics of crayfishes of the genus <i>Procambarus</i>, subgenus <i>Scapulicambarus </i>(Decapoda: Cambaridae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8(2):180-186.
  5. Cooper, J.E. 2010. Annotated checklist of the crayfishes of North Carolina, and correlations of distributions with hydrologic units and physiographic provinces. Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science 126(3):69-76.
  6. Cooper, J.E. and S.A. Armstrong. 2007. Locality records and other data for invasive crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in North Carolina. Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science 123(1):1-13.
  7. Crandall, K. A., and S. De Grave. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. Journal of Crustacean Biology 37(5):615-653.
  8. Dinger, E.C., A.E. Cohen, D.A. Hendrickson, and J.C. Marks. 2005. Aquatic invertebrates of Cuatro Cienegas, Coahuila, Mexico: natives and exotics. The Southwestern Naturalist, 50(2): 237-281.
  9. Eversole, A.G. and D.R. Jones. 2004. Key to the crayfish of South Carolina. Unpublished report. Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. 43 pp.
  10. Eversole, A.G., Y. Mazlum, and M.M. Spacil. 2006. <i>Procambarus acutus acutus</i> (Girard) replacement of <i>P. clarkii </i>(Girard): A possible explanation. Freshwater Crayfish 15:63-68.
  11. Gherardi, F., S. Barbaresi, and G. Salvi. 2000. Spatial and temporal patterns in the movement of <i>Procambarus clarkii</i>, an invasive crayfish. Aquatic Sciences 62: 179-193.
  12. Hernandez, L., A.M. Maeda-Martinez, G. Ruiz-Campos, G. Rodriguez-Almaraz, F. Alonzo-Rojo, and J.C. Sainz. 2008. Geographic expansion of the invasive red crayfis <i>Procambarus clarkii</i> (Girard, 1852) (Crustacea: Decapoda) in Mexico. Biological Invasions, 10: 977-984.
  13. Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
  14. Hobbs, Jr., H. H. 1976a. Crayfishes (Astacidae) of North and Middle America. Biological Methods Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. 173 pp.
  15. Johnson, S.K. and N.K. Johnson. 2008. Texas Crawdads. Crawdad Club Designs: College Station, Texas. 160 pp.
  16. Kerby, J.L., S.P.D. Riley, L.B. Kats, and P. Wilson. 2005. Barriers and flow as limitin factors in the spread of an invasive crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) in southern California streams. Biological Conservation, 126: 402-409.
  17. McClain, W.R. 1999. Effects of hypoxia on growth and survival of the crayfish <i>Procambarus clarkii</i>. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 121-133.
  18. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  19. McMahon, B.R. and S.A. Stuart. 1999. Haemolymph gas exchange and ionic and acid-base regulation during long-term air exposure and aquatic recovery in <i>Procambarus clarkii</i>. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 134-153.
  20. Mirarchi, R.E., M.A. Bailey, J.T. Garner, T.M. Haggerty, T.L. Best, M.F. Mettee, and P. O'Neil. 2004d. Alabama Wildlife. Volume Four: Conservation and Management Recommendations for Imperiled Wildlife. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 221 pp.
  21. Moles, M.L.F. and T.B. Tistler. 1995. Checklist of freshwater crayfishes in Mexico (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Freshwater Crayfish, 8: 51-55.
  22. Page, L. M. 1985. The crayfishes and shrimps (Decapoda) of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 33(4): 335-448.
  23. Pflieger, W.L. [B. Dryden, editor]. 1996. The Crayfishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri. 152 pp.
  24. Schuster, G. A. and C.A. Taylor. 2004. Report on the crayfishes of Alabama: literature and museum database review, species list with abbreviated annotations and proposed conservation statuses. Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report, 2004(12): 47 pp.
  25. Schuster, G.A., C.A. Taylor, and J. Johansen. 2008. An annotated checklist and preliminary designation of drainage distributions of the crayfishes of Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist, 7(3): 493-504.
  26. Simmons, J.W. and S.J. Fraley. 2010. Distribution, status, and life-history observations of crayfishes in western North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):79-126.
  27. Simon, T. P. 2001. Checklist of the crayfish and freshwater shrimp (Decapoda) of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 110:104-110.
  28. Simon, T.P., M. Weisheit, E. Seabrook, L. Freeman, S. Johnson, L. Englum, K.W. Jorck, M. Abernathy, and T.P. Simon, IV. 2005. Notes on Indiana crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) with comments on distribution, taxonomy, life history, and habitat. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 114(1):55-61.
  29. Skelton, C.E. 2010. History, status, and conservation of Georgia crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):127-138.
  30. Smith, D.G. 2000a. Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Southern New England. Douglas G. Smith: Sunderland, Massachusetts. 243 pp.
  31. Solorzano-Garcia, S., A. de la O-Martinez, S. Hernandez-Munoz, and B. Fuentes-Pardo. 1999. Melatonin induces changes in the excitability of photoreceptors in crayfish <i>Procambarus clarkii</i>. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 168-186.
  32. Taylor, C.A. and G.A. Schuster. 2004. The Crayfishes of Kentucky. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication, 28: viii + 210 pp.
  33. Taylor, C.A. and J.K. Tucker. 2005. New distributional records for Illinois crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) with comments onthe continued spread of non-native species. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 98(1-2):75-80.
  34. Taylor, C. A., G. A. Schuster, J. E. Cooper, R. J. DiStefano, A. G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H. H. Hobbs III, H. W. Robison, C. E. Skelton, and R. F. Thoma. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):371-389.
  35. Thoma, R.F. and R.E. Jezerinac. 2000. Ohio crayfish and shrimp atlas. Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contribution 7:1-28.
  36. Yue, G.H., J. Li, Z. Bai, C.M. Wang, and F. Feng. 2010. Genetic diversity and population structure of the invasive alien red swamp crayfish. Biological Invasions 12:2697-2706.