Echinacea purpurea

(L.) Moench

Eastern Purple Coneflower

G4Apparently Secure Found in 38 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
UnknownThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.132226
Element CodePDAST38060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
GenusEchinacea
Other Common Names
eastern purple coneflower (EN) Échinacée pourpre (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-01-22
Change Date2000-02-27
Edition Date2024-01-12
Edition AuthorsK. McKeown (1999), rev. Eberly (2024)
Threat ImpactUnknown
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Echinacea purpurea is a perennial herb of the eastern and central United States. Although still abundant in some areas, this species has suffered from large scale habitat loss and degradation. The conversion of its native prairie and woodland habitat to pastures or developed lands, overgrazing of those lands, and the control of noxious weeds, highway maintenance practices, fire suppression, and development have contributed to a slow decline in the species. As a species of highly fragmented habitats, inbreeding depression and low reproductive success are issues to monitor moving forward, in addition to direct loss of occurrences.
Range Extent Comments
Echinacea purpurea occurs in the central and eastern United States from Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Kansas south to Texas and east to the panhandle of Florida and as far northeast as western Virginia, West Virginia, and Ohio. This species is known to persist after escaping cultivation. Therefore, the exact boundaries of the native range, and even the nativity of occurrences within the native range, can be uncertain. It is considered exotic in Ontario (Canada), in Colorado and the northeastern United States (Native Plant Trust 2023). It is questionably native in Virginia, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania (Weakley and Southeastern Flora Team 2024).
Occurrences Comments
Historically, this species was abundant, secure and widespread. Its populations may be locally abundant, but they are discontinuous in distribution. Highway department plantings of E. purpurea cultivars along roadsides may obscure true numbers of native populations. By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium records and NatureServe Network data documented between 1984 and 2024, it is estimated that there are between 81 and 300 occurrences rangewide (NatureServe 2024, SEINet 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by fire suppression resulting in habitat succession, mowing and herbicide use to control noxious weeds or roadside vegetation, conversion of habitat to pasture and subsequent intensive grazing, logging, development, competitive non-native species, and wild harvest for the medicinal herb trade.

Excessive commercial harvest for medicinal purposes is a potential future threat depending on the demand of the market, local economics, and the standing of cultivated sources. While E. angustifolia is typically targeted, any Echinacea spp. could be impacted. This species is easily cultivated by seed or by dividing the shallow fibrous roots and thus wild harvest is possibly minimal (Kindscher 2006). Castle et al. (2014) assessed the risk of overharvest as moderate for the closely related E. angustifolia, which would have a similar assessment as E. purpurea. This risk is based on life history, effects of harvest, populations size, habitat, and demand including the consideration availability of cultivated resources.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species grows in partial to full sun in open woodlands and thickets, edge of prairies and glades, and roadsides. It is often found on limestone.

Reproduction

This species has shallow fibrous roots. It takes several years for this species to reach sexual maturity (Weaver and Fitzpatrick 1934).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandShrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceous
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
IndianaSNRYes
PennsylvaniaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
South CarolinaSNRYes
TexasSNRYes
MississippiS3Yes
ColoradoSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
KentuckyS4Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
AlabamaS3Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
West VirginiaSNANo
FloridaS1Yes
ConnecticutSNANo
North CarolinaS1Yes
New JerseySNANo
MichiganSXYes
TennesseeSNRYes
LouisianaS2Yes
IowaS2Yes
ArkansasSNRYes
WisconsinSNRYes
IllinoisSNRYes
OhioSNRYes
MissouriSNRYes
MarylandSNANo
KansasS1Yes
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioSNANo
Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (38)
Arkansas (10)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainOuachita National Forest1,910
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Devils CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,877
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Indian CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,855
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest6,566
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Louisiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Missouri (1)
AreaForestAcres
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
New Hampshire (1)
AreaForestAcres
Carr MountainWhite Mountain National Forest17,110
North Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
South Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Ellicott Rock 2Sumter National Forest517
Tennessee (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
Rogers RidgeCherokee National Forest4,738
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Virginia (12)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Laurel ForkGeorge Washington National Forest9,967
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
West Virginia (3)
AreaForestAcres
Cranberry AdditionMonongahela National Forest11,123
Falls Of Hills CreekMonongahela National Forest6,925
Tea Creek MountainMonongahela National Forest8,295
References (16)
  1. Beck, J., A. Waananen, and S. Wagenius. 2023. Habitat fragmentation decouples fire-stimulated flowering from plant reproductive fitness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(39):e2306967120.
  2. Castle, L.M., S. Leopold, R. Craft, and K. Kindscher. 2014. Ranking Tool Created for Medicinal plants at Risk of Being Overharvested in the Wild. Ethnobiology Letters 5:77–88.
  3. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2006c. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 21. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, part 8: Asteraceae, part 3. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxii + 616 pp.
  4. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  5. Kindscher, K., editor. 2006. The Conservation Status of Echinacea Species. Report to the U.S. Forest Service. Onl 247 pp.
  6. Kittelson, P.M., S. Wagenius, R. Nielsen, S. Qazi, M. Howe, G. Kiefer, and R.G. Shaw. 2015. How functional traits, herbivory, and genetic diversity interact in <i>Echinacea</i>: implications for fragmented populations. Ecology 96(7):1877-86.
  7. McGregor, R.L. 1968. The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 48(4): 113-142.
  8. McKeown, K.A. 1999. A review of the taxonomy of the genus <i>Echinacea</i>. Pages 482-489 in: J. Janick (ed.). Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
  9. McKeown, Kathleen A. North Carolina State University.
  10. Native Plant Trust. 2023. Go Botany website. Online. Available: https://gobotany.newenglandwild.org (accessed 2023).
  11. NatureServe. 2024. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  12. Richardson, L.K, M.K. Gallagher, T. E. Hayes, A.S. Gallinat, G. Kiefer, K. Manion, M. Jenkins, G. Diersen, and S. Wagenius. 2020. Competition for pollination and isolation from mates differentially impact four stages of pollination in a model grassland perennial. Journal of Ecology 109:1356–1369.
  13. Southern Appalachian Species Viability Project. 2002. A partnership between the U.S. Forest Service-Region 8, Natural Heritage Programs in the Southeast, NatureServe, and independent scientists to develop and review data on 1300+ regionally and locally rare species in the Southern Appalachian and Alabama region. Database (Access 97) provided to the U.S. Forest Service by NatureServe, Durham, North Carolina.
  14. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2024. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2024).
  15. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2023. Flora of the southeastern United States. Edition of April 14, 2023. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2105 pp.
  16. Weaver, J.E., L.A. Stoddart, and W. Noll. 1935. Response of the Prairie to the Great Drought of 1934. Ecology 16(4):612–629.