Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101408
Element CodeAAAAD08010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyPlethodontidae
GenusHemidactylium
SynonymsBatrachoseps scutatusBoulenger, 1882Salamandra scutataTemminck and Schlegel, 1838
Other Common Namesfour-toed salamander (EN) Salamandre à quatre doigts (FR) Salamandre à quatre orteils (FR)
Concept ReferenceFrost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsHerman and Bouzat (2016) analyzed geographic variation in a mitochondrial gene throughout the range of the genus and found six highly divergent lineages, but suggested no change in the current taxonomy (Crother 2017).
Conservation Status
Review Date2014-02-18
Change Date2001-10-25
Edition Date2014-02-18
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and D. R. Jackson (2014)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank ReasonsWidely but discontinuously distributed throughout much of the eastern U.S. and adjacent Canada; secretive species that is proving to be more abundant and widespread than previously available records indicated; secure.
Range Extent CommentsDiscontinuously distributed from Nova Scotia (Friet and MacDonald 1995), New Brunswick, southern Quebec (e.g., Sharbel 1990), southern Ontario, Michigan, Wisconsin (Vogt 1981), and Minnesota (Dorff 1995, Hall et al. 2000) south to southeastern Oklahoma, Louisiana (Dundee and Rossman 1989), Mississippi, Alabama (Mount 1975), Florida panhandle, and Georgia (Conant and Collins 1991). Distribution is fairly continuous in the northeastern part of the range, spotty in the southwestern part.
Occurrences CommentsHundreds of known occurrences. Many new ones are being discovered. As an indication of this, 18 new county records were published in Herpetological Review during the period 1995-2000; these included several for Minnesota, where the species had not been previously documented. In southern New England, where the species had been regarded as rare, Klemens (1993) found that H. SCUTATUM was widely distributed and secure. Most state distribution maps do not distinguish between old and recent records. Gilhen (1984) mapped a dozen locations in Nova Scotia. Klemens (1993) mapped dozens of occurrences (many previously unreported) in Connecticut. Redmond and Scott (1996) mapped 25 locations in Tennessee but stated that the distribution is poorly known. Pfingsten and Downs (1989) mapped 47 post-1950 locations in Ohio. Vogt (1981) mapped 25 locations in Wisconsin. Phillips et al. (1999) mapped pre-1980 records for 7 counties and 4 more recent county occurrences. Tobey (1985) mapped about 55 locations in Virginia. Green and Pauley (1987) mapped occurrences in about 20 counties in West Virginia; they stated that the species probably occurs throughout the state. Johnson (1987) mapped 12 locations in 12 counties in Missouri. Minton (1972) mentioned that some of the 10 populations he mapped in Indiana may no longer exist. At the southern limit of the range in the Florida panhandle, specimens are known from three river drainages in four counties (Means 1992, Krysko et al. 2011). Dundee and Rossman (1989) recorded two occurrences in Louisiana.
Threat Impact CommentsPrimary potential threat is loss/degradation of habitat, but this is ameliorated in some areas by wetland protection regulations. However, colonies may be more or less isolated by the species' relatively restricted habitat preferences, and development of intervening uplands may inhibit dispersal and colonization of new habitats (Harding 1997). Populations may flourish in many moderately developed and semi-rural areas in southern New England (Klemens 1993). Road mortality does not appear substantial when compared to many species of frogs and AMBYSTOMA salamanders (Klemens 1993). Impoundments likely have reduced the range in some areas (Means 1992). Tolerant of nondestructive intrusion.