Setophaga ruticilla

(Linnaeus, 1758)

American Redstart

G5Secure Found in 71 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101347
Element CodeABPBX06010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyParulidae
GenusSetophaga
Other Common Names
American redstart (EN) Chipe Flameante (ES) Mariquita-de-Rabo-Vermelho (PT) Paruline flamboyante (FR)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-09
Change Date1996-12-03
Edition Date1995-09-20
Edition AuthorsDirrigl, F. J., Jr., G. Hammerson, and R. Sallabanks
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Large breeding range in southern Canada and the eastern and northern U.S.; numerous occurrences; common in many areas; population relatively stable.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: southern Alaska and southern Yukon across Canada to southern Labrador and Newfoundland, south to eastern Oregon, northwestern California, Idaho, northern Utah, east-central Arizona, eastern Oklahoma, eastern Texas, northern Gulf Coast, the Carolinas, and southern Virginia. Absent from most of the Great Plains (AOU 1983). NON-BREEDING: extremely widespread, in Mexico along both coasts, on the Pacific from southern Baja California and Sinaloa south and on the Atlantic from southern Texas (rarely) and more typically from Veracruz and Yucatan peninsula south; less common in highlands. Common throughout the West Indies (Pashley 1988, Pashley 1988, Pashley and Hamilton 1990) and Central America. In South America, common in Colombia and Venezuela east into Guyana and Suriname, south through Ecuador, rarely into Peru and northwestern Brazil; Trinidad and Tobago (Sibley and Monroe 1990).
Occurrences Comments
Many occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
Primary threats are degradation and fragmentation of suitable habitat and associated increased cowbird parasitism and nest predation. Whitcomb et al. (1981) considered the species to be susceptible to fragmentation, and forest management practices that open the canopy decrease populations (Crawford et al. 1981). Noon et al. (1979) found population decreases in a variety of disturbed and successional habitats. In Arizona (the edge of the range), populations are threatened by the development of streams for recreational pursuits, and suitable habitat is susceptible to scouring by floods; this species also may be intolerant of continuous disturbance by birdwatchers and is potentially impacted by grazing (Schwartz, pers. comm.). Herbicide reversion of suitable habitat to spruce-fir forest is considered a threat in Maine (Tudor, pers. comm.). The biggest threat in Alabama (Bailey, pers. comm.) and Mississippi (Mann, pers. comm.) is the conversion of suitable habitat to pine monocultures. Tropical deforestation may be a significant threat; regional declines in this species cannot necessarily be explained by loss of habitat in temperate North America alone. Where forests are fragmented, cowbirds can have a heavy impact (Bent 1953, Klein and Rosenberg 1986, D. Backland, C. Heckscher, and V. Kleen, pers. comms.), but where forests are more extensive, cowbird parasitism is rare (e.g., Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest; Sherry and Holmes 1992). Rates of nest predation from both mammalian and avian predators also increase in fragmented landscapes; blue jays, squirrels, and many other nest predators are therefore important potential threats. In an unfragmented forest in New Hampshire, breeding abundance decline was associated with poor recruitment due primarily to nest depredation and also weather-related starvation (Sherry and Holmes 1992). Brown-headed cowbird (MOLOTHRUS ATER) parasitism at Hubbard Brook is rare because of the distance of the forest interior from nonforested habitats preferred by cowbirds. By contrast, Bent (1953) considered the cowbird to be the greatest menace. At Ithaca, New York, the redstart was the most common host of the cowbird, with over 67% of nests being parasitized. Rarely do redstarts desert a nest because of the presence of cowbird eggs. Occasionally a new nest floor is built over the cowbird eggs. In the absence of cowbirds, Sherry and Holmes (1992) found that a high percentages of nests were lost to predators (56-100%), although which mammals and/or birds were responsible was unclear; blue jays (CYANOCITTA CRISTATA) and red squirrels (TAMIASCIURUS HUDSONICUS) are the most important predators, but there are about 18 species of opportunistic nest predators at Hubbard Brook (Sherry, unpubl. data). Bent (1953) stated that the redstart's habit of nesting in rather tall, slender trees, usually at a considerable distance from the ground, frees this species from most of the enemies to which ground-nesting birds are subject. This is not so at Hubbard Brook, however: for nests less than 10 m high, sheet metal baffles placed below active nests significantly reduced the probability of nest loss; this result was statistically significant even within summers (Sherry, pers. comm.).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Length is 13 cm. Male is glossy black with bright orange patches on the sides, wings, and tail; belly and undertail coverts are white. Female is gray-olive above, white below with yellow patches. Immature resembles female. By first fall, young male's patches show some salmon; by first spring, breast has some black spotting; full adult male plumage is acquired by second late summer. Often fans tail and spreads wings when perched, making the colorful patches conspicuous.

VOCALIZATIONS: Variable song, a series of high, thin notes usually followed by a wheezy, downslurred note (NGS 1987).

NEST: a firm, compactly woven cup of plant down, bark fibers, small rootlets, grass stems; lined with fine grasses, weed stems, hair, sometimes feathers; decorated on outside with lichens, birch bark, bud scales, plant down; bound with spider silk; built entirely by the female, typically requiring 1 week or more (but sometimes less than this). Outside diameter 2.75 in (7 cm), height 3 in (7.6 cm); inside diameter 1.75 in (4.4 cm), depth 1.5 in (3.8 cm).

EGGS: Average size 16.2 x 12.3 mm. Oval to short-oval. Shell smooth, has slight gloss. White, grayish white, creamy white, greenish white; dotted, spotted, blotched with reddish-browns, grays; often concentrated at large end.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Adults are easily distinguished from other species. Nest is similar to that of yellow warbler (DENDROICA PETECHIA) but has neater construction and thinner walls. Also similar is the nest of American goldfinch (CARDUELIS TRISTIS), but this is wider than high, whereas the redstart's is higher than wide (Harrison 1975).

Habitat

BREEDING: Various mature and second-growth wooded habitats. Deciduous and mixed deciduous-coniferous second-growth forests, alder swamps, old growth forests with regenerating trees (e.g., around tree-fall gaps), willow thickets, small groves; low, damp, second-growth deciduous and mixed floodplain forests and river swamps; most abundant in mature deciduous forest stands, but also may occur in young woods less than 15 years old; requires closed canopy and prefers dense midstory and understory and well-developed undergrowth; use of pole-stage stands apparently varies geographically (Cruickshank 1979, Crawford et al. 1981, Harrison 1984, DeGraaf 1985, Bushman and Therres 1988, Sherry and Holmes 1997). Nests usually are placed in an upright fork of a deciduous understory sapling, shrub, or tree, occasionally in a vine tangle or old vireo nest; nest usually is about 1-6 m above ground, sometimes as high as 28 m.

Southeastern U.S.: Primary breeding habitats in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain are bottomland hardwoods and swamps, especially in extensive stands. In the mountains this species occurs in hardwoods along streams, usually where it is open and not heavily wooded. Birds are less frequent in medium-growth hardwood forests away from water. Hamel et al. (1982) described the key habitat requirements for breeding as hardwood forests near water. They provided the following details on habitat use and suitability in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The following five vegetation types used by this species in five physiographic provinces (Mountains, Sandhills, Piedmont, Inner Coastal Plain, and Outer Coastal Plain) are considered in order of suitability: elm-ash-cottonwood is suitable at the sapling-poletimber stage, optimal at the late-successional sawtimber stage; southern mixed mesic hardwoods and oak-gum-cypress are suitable at both the sapling-poletimber stage and sawtimber stage; oak-hickory and cove-hardwoods are marginal habitat at the sapling-poletimber stage and suitable at the sawtimber stage. In all cases, shrubs and midstory are used for all activities (feeding/foraging, nesting, perching, roosting, and singing), whereas the overstory is used for feeding/foraging, perching, roosting, and singing, but not nesting. No specific vegetation sizes were given. Yellow birch is significantly preferred for nesting, and fledging success is significantly higher in yellow birch than beech or sugar maple; this result is especially true for large, old trees. Nest concealment from predators accounts for these patterns (Crew and Sherry, unpubl. data).

Northeastern and north-central U.S.: In New York, breeders use low, damp woods and have been found in mixed woodland with a considerable growth of pine and hemlock; in the Adirondacks, nest sites often occur where spruces predominate. In Ohio, Michigan, and other sections of the Midwest, this species inhabits the maple, elm, ash, and pine-oak association of the larger, more mature swamp forests, although it is sometimes found among similar trees and brush in the larger upland woods. In the far Northwest, it shows a decided preference for willow trees and alder thickets. In Maine, the bird is found in hardwood or mixed deciduous and coniferous woodlands; these may be low, damp situations but birds are also often found in the second-growth of trees and brush of the dry sandy plains. Alder and willow thickets bordering streams and ponds are used here also (Bent 1953). In New Hampshire, redstarts are especially abundant in second-growth edge and in old-age northern hardwood forests, but they also occur in other moist woodlands, mixed hardwood-conifer woods, and alder and willow thickets. Here, this species breeds from near sea level to above 3000 ft (910 m), where the highest elevation hardwoods grade into conifers in the White Mountains (Sherry and Holmes 1994).

Quantitative habitat measures have been documented in a few studies. Sabo (1980) measured habitat selection in the White Mountains of New Hampshire and listed the following parameters: mean elevation - 830 m, canopy height - 10.4 m, canopy coverage - 74%, conifer foliage volume - 38%, conifer foliage cover (0-2 m) - 20%, broad leaf foliage volume (>5 m) - 92%, and dbh of live trees - 11 cm. Collins et al. (1982) quantified habitat in north-central Minnesota: ground cover - 67.7%, shrub cover - 70.7%, canopy cover - 66.3%, canopy height - 14.5 m, conifers - 4.7%, and numbers of species of trees per 0.04 ha circle - 4. In addition, Collins et al. (1982) surveyed vegetation and recorded the numbers of trees in different size classes: 10.7 (7.5-15 cm), 10.7 (15.1-23 cm), 8.2 (23.1-30 cm), 4.6 (30.1-38 cm), 1.1 (38.1-53 cm), 0.3 (53.1-68 cm), and 0.1 (>68.1 cm). Sherry and Holmes (1985, unpubl. data) documented significant preferences for deciduous stands of trees along a deciduous-coniferous gradient.

NON-BREEDING: In winter and migration, habitats include various kinds of forests, woodlands, scrublands, and thickets, including mangroves; uses a wide variety of agricultural habitats (e.g., cacao, citrus, pine plantations, mango, and sun and shade coffee plots) (Robbins et al. 1992). Primary wintering habitats are mainly in broadleaf evergreen woods and thickets, such as hammocks and mangroves (Hamel et al. 1982). In Venezuela, mangroves were a transitory habitat, used primarily in the middle of the wintering period by a low number of females (Lefebvre et al. 1992). In Jamaica, widespread in various habitats and are regularly found in drought-deciduous dry limestone forest, citrus, wet limestone forest (evergreen), gardens, and residential areas (Holmes et al. 1989, Holmes and Sherry 1992); they tend to be most abundant at lower elevations (Sherry, pers. comm.). Redstarts in Jamaica segregated by sex, with males in mangroves and females mainly in contiguous scrub habitat (Parrish and Sherry 1994). In the Dominican Republic, habitats include strand vegetation, mangroves, scrub, disturbed dry forest, riparian, urban, disturbed wet forest, mesic forest, and wet forest (Arendt 1992). In the Yucatan Peninsula, redstarts prefer moist forest, but also inhabit dry forest, wet forest, field and pasture, and acahual; late-successional forest stages are clearly preferred (Lynch 1992); redstarts were the third most common species found in mature semi-evergreen forest (after hooded [WILSONIA CITRINA] and magnolia warblers [DENDROICA MAGNOLIA]); were also found in mid-successional Acahual although less commonly so, and were rarely found in field/pasture habitat (Lynch 1989).

Ecology

BREEDING POPULATION DENSITY: Published information on bird densities from breeding bird censuses in the southeastern U.S. between 1947 and 1979 were summarized by Hamel et al. (1982). Mean (standard error) density was listed as 8.7 (2.8) pairs per 40 ha with a density range of 2.7-87 pairs per 40 ha. In northern New Hampshire (White Mountains), Sabo (1980) recorded average densities of 40 pairs per sq km in subalpine habitats, and 9 pairs per sq km in virgin spruce groves. Sherry and Holmes (1988) reported a range of 2.5-6.75 male territories on 10-ha sites at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. When population trends for the month of June (mid-breeding period) at Hubbard Brook were analyzed for the period 1969-1986, Holmes and Sherry (1988) found the mean (standard deviation) number of adult to be 28.67 (8.84) birds per 10 ha. In Maryland, Whitcomb et al. (1981) reported territorial densities to be 71 males per sq km.

Two studies of bottomland hardwood forests provide data from similar censusing techniques: Mitchell and Lancia (1990) found densities to be the highest in edge habitat (an average 0.14 birds per 25 m radius 10-min point count) in South Carolina. On the Roanoke River National Wildlife Refuge in North Carolina, R. Sallabanks (unpubl. data) found densities to be highest in the interior of wide levee forest patches (an average 0.57 birds per unlimited radius 10-min point count). Between 1986 and 1988, Sherry and Holmes (1989) found the number of yearling males to be low (0-1 males per 5 ha) compared with older males (6-8 males per 5 ha).

WINTERING POPULATIONS: Solitary in winter (Stiles and Skutch 1989). Defends winter territory (Jamaica, Holmes et al. 1989, Marra et al. 1993; Mexico, Rappole and Warner 1980); individuals commonly return to the same territory in successive years. Density in winter in Jamaica was 10-51 per 10 ha, comparable to breeding densities reported for eastern U.S., but greater than densities reported for other sites in the Caribbean and Mexico (0-17 per 10 ha) (Holmes et al. 1989; see also Bennett 1980). Winter densities were listed by Hamel et al. (1982) as a mean (standard error) of 2.5 (1.5) pairs per 40 ha with a density range of 1-4 pairs per 40 ha.

TERRITORY SIZE: Little information exists on territory size. Freemark and Merriam (1986) listed territory size as less than 2 ha near Ottawa, Canada. Based upon 14 birds, Sabo (1980) found territory size to be 0.6 ha.

COMPETITION: Several studies have addressed habitat selection and territory occupancy in response to both intra- and inter-specific competition (Ficken and Ficken 1967, Sherry 1979, Sherry and Holmes 1988, 1989, Secunda and Sherry 1991). In New Hampshire, Sherry and Holmes (1988) found the density of redstart territories to be slightly higher when a dominant competitor, the least flycatcher (EMPIDONAX MINIMUS), was absent (approximately 4.4 territories per 4 ha) than when present (approximately 4.0 territories per 4 ha). Least flycatchers locally excluded after second year redstarts from best patches of habitat within a heterogeneous array of such patches (Sherry and Holmes 1988).

MORTALITY FACTORS: Weather accounted for most nest losses during the building stage and caused starvation of nestlings in some years at Hubbard Brook (Sherry and Holmes 1994). Widespread starvation in 1984 was probably caused by a series of heavy rainstorms during the nestling period that depressed insect abundances, or reduced foraging time or success, or both (Sherry and Holmes 1992).

Reproduction

In the mid-Atlantic region, nesting occurs from late April to early July, with a peak from mid-May to mid-June (Bushman and Therres 1988). Clutch size is 1-5; clutch size declines over the summer, however, from 4 (occasionally 5) eggs in late May/early June to 3 (occasionally 1 or 2) eggs in July. Incubation, by female, lasts 11-13 days. Young are tended by both parents, leave nest at 8-9 days. Typically, there is only one brood, though females may renest up to three times when nests are lost (Sherry and Holmes 1994). Fledging success can be highly variable from year to year; for example, Sherry and Holmes (1992) reported a range of 0.2 to 0.7 at Hubbard Brook; causes of nest failures also varied annually, as did abundance and age structure of the population. The number of yearlings that return to breed appears dependent upon nest success the previous year; poor nesting success in the mid-1980s appears to have caused a decline in the total population during that period (Sherry and Holmes 1992).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparral
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5B
ProvinceRankNative
Nova ScotiaS5BYes
Yukon TerritoryS3BYes
Northwest TerritoriesS5Yes
British ColumbiaS5BYes
SaskatchewanS5BYes
QuebecS5BYes
Prince Edward IslandS4B,S5MYes
LabradorS3B,SUMYes
Island of NewfoundlandS5BYes
New BrunswickS5BYes
OntarioS5BYes
AlbertaS5BYes
ManitobaS5BYes
United StatesN5B
ProvinceRankNative
MichiganS5Yes
PennsylvaniaS5B,S5MYes
New JerseyS4B,S4NYes
MarylandS4BYes
TennesseeS4Yes
IllinoisS5Yes
AlaskaS3BYes
TexasS2BYes
ArizonaS1Yes
North CarolinaS5BYes
ColoradoS1BYes
MaineS5B,S5MYes
KansasS2BYes
IdahoS4BYes
VermontS5BYes
MississippiS5BYes
KentuckyS4BYes
OregonSUYes
South DakotaS4BYes
South CarolinaS4Yes
AlabamaS4BYes
MissouriS4Yes
MassachusettsS5BYes
OhioS5Yes
OklahomaS3BYes
New YorkS5BYes
LouisianaS3BYes
District of ColumbiaS1B,S4NYes
WashingtonS4BYes
North DakotaSNRBYes
WisconsinS5BYes
WyomingS4B,S5NYes
New MexicoS4NYes
ConnecticutS5BYes
IowaS4B,S4NYes
GeorgiaS5Yes
UtahS3Yes
New HampshireS5BYes
Navajo NationSNAYes
FloridaS2Yes
NebraskaS4Yes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
DelawareS1BYes
West VirginiaS5BYes
VirginiaS5Yes
MontanaS5BYes
CaliforniaSNRBYes
ArkansasS3B,S5NYes
IndianaS4BYes
Rhode IslandS5BYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
11 - Climate change & severe weatherUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (71)
Alaska (1)
AreaForestAcres
HyderTongass National Forest121,723
Florida (1)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Michigan (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bear SwampHuron-Manistee National Forest3,915
FibreHiawatha National Forest7,432
Montana (8)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Big Snowy Mountains WsaLewis and Clark National Forest88,003
CataractKootenai National Forest25,446
Fishtail SaddlebackCuster National Forest16,359
Marston Face # 172Kootenai National Forest9,098
Mt. BushnellLolo National Forest41,798
North AbsarokaCuster National Forest21,063
New Hampshire (11)
AreaForestAcres
Carr MountainWhite Mountain National Forest17,110
Dartmouth RangeWhite Mountain National Forest9,233
Great Gulf Ext.White Mountain National Forest15,110
JobildunkWhite Mountain National Forest3,660
Kinsman MountainWhite Mountain National Forest8,999
Mt. Wolf - Gordon PondWhite Mountain National Forest11,846
PemigewassetWhite Mountain National Forest32,255
Pemigewasset ExtWhite Mountain National Forest15,840
Presidential - Dry River ExtWhite Mountain National Forest10,555
Sandwich RangeWhite Mountain National Forest16,797
Wild RiverWhite Mountain National Forest46,878
New Mexico (3)
AreaForestAcres
Black CanyonSanta Fe National Forest1,922
Juan de Gabaldon GrantSanta Fe National Forest8,023
Little TesuqueSanta Fe National Forest815
North Carolina (4)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
North Dakota (3)
AreaForestAcres
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
MagpieDakota Prairie Grasslands21,281
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
Pennsylvania (3)
AreaForestAcres
Allegheny FrontAllegheny National Forest7,430
Minister ValleyAllegheny National Forest1,417
Tracy RidgeAllegheny National Forest9,034
Puerto Rico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mameyes AreaCaribbean National Forest11,150
Tennessee (2)
AreaForestAcres
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Vermont (2)
AreaForestAcres
Griffith Lake 09084Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,833
Wilder Mountain 09082Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests8,759
Virginia (16)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Little Wilson Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest1,725
Mt. PleasantGeorge Washington National Forest8,933
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Washington (6)
AreaForestAcres
Boulder RiverMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest32,563
Glacier Peak JMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest26,482
Glacier Peak KMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest47,269
Higgins MountainMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest13,185
Pasayten RimOkanogan National Forest17,074
TaneumWenatchee National Forest26,140
West Virginia (6)
AreaForestAcres
Cranberry Glades Botanical AreaMonongahela National Forest785
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Falls Of Hills CreekMonongahela National Forest6,925
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
North Mountain HopevilleMonongahela National Forest6,525
Wisconsin (1)
AreaForestAcres
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest3,707
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
Piney CreekBighorn National Forest22,240
References (89)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Arendt, W. J., and collaborators. 1992. Status of North American migrant landbirds in the Caribbean region: A summary. Pages 143-71 in J. M. Hagan III, and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C. xiii + 609 pp.
  4. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  5. Bennett, S. E. 1980. Interspecific competition and the niche of the American redstart (<i>Setophaga ruticilla</i>) in wintering and breeding communities. Pages 319-335 in A. Keast and E.S. Morton, editors.Migrant birds in the neotropics: ecology, distribution, and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  6. Bent, A. C. 1953. Life histories of North American wood warblers. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 203. Washington, D.C.
  7. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  8. Blake, J.G., and J.R. Karr. 1984. Species composition of bird communities and the conservation benefit of large versus small forests. Biological Conservation 30:173-187.
  9. Bond, R. R. 1957. Ecological distribution of breeding birds in the upland forests of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27:351-84.
  10. Braun, M. J., D. W. Finch, M. B. Robbins, and B. K. Schmidt. 2000. A field checklist of the birds of Guyana. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  11. Bushman, E. S., and G. D. Therres. 1988. Habitat management guidelines for forest interior breeding birds of coastal Maryland. Maryland Dept. Natural Resources, Wildlife Tech. Publ. 88-1. 50 pp.
  12. Chasko, G. G., and J. E. Gates. 1982. Avian habitat suitability along a transmission-line corridor in an oak-hickory forest region. Wildlife Monographs, Vol. 82.
  13. Collins, S. L., F. C. James, and P. G. Risser. 1982. Habitat relationships of wood warblers (Parulidae) in north central Minnesota. Oikos 39:50-8.
  14. Crawford, H. S., R. G. Hooper, and R. W. Titterington. 1981. Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:680-92.
  15. Cruickshank, A. D. 1979. American Redstart. Pages 139-41 in L. Griscom and A. Sprunt Jr. (editors). The Warblers of North America. Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, New York.
  16. DeGraaf, R. M. 1985. Breeding bird assemblages in New England northern hardwoods. Pages 5-22 in R. J. Regan and D. E. Capen (editors). Conference Proceedings: The impact of timber management practices on nongame birds in Vermont. Montpellier, Vermont.
  17. Faaborg, J., and W. J. Arendt. 1989. Long-term declines in winter resident warblers in a Puerto Rican dry forest. Am. Birds 43:1226-1230.
  18. Ficken, M. S., and R. W. Ficken. 1967. Age-specific differences in the breeding behavior and ecology of the American Redstart. The Wilson Bulletin 79:188-99.
  19. Freemark, K.E., and H.G. Merriam. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation 36:115-141.
  20. Griscom, L., and A. Sprunt, Jr. 1979. The warblers of America. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, New York. 302 pp.
  21. Hagan, J. M., III, and D. W. Johnston, editors. 1992. Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xiii + 609 pp.
  22. Hamel, P. B., H. E. LeGrand Jr., M. R. Lennartz, and S. A. Gauthreaux, Jr. 1982. Bird-habitat relationships on southeastern forest lands. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report SE-22.
  23. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  24. Harrison, H.H. 1975. A field guide to bird's nests in the U.S. east of the Mississippi River. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 257 p.
  25. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  26. Harrison, H.H. 1984. Wood warblers' world. Simon and Schuster, New York. 335 pp.
  27. Holmes, R.T., and T.W. Sherry. 1988. Assessing population trends of New Hampshire forest birds: local vs. regional patterns. Auk 105:756-768.
  28. Holmes, R. T., and T. W. Sherry. 1992. Site fidelity of Migratory warblers in temperate breeding and Neotropical wintering areas: Implications for population dynamics, habitat selection, and conservaion. Pages 563-75 in J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  29. Holmes, R.T., T.W. Sherry, and L. Reitsma. 1989. Population structure, territoriality and overwinter survival of two migrant warbler species in Jamaica. Condor 91:545-561.
  30. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  31. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  32. Hussell, D. J. T., M. H. Mather, and P. H. Sinclair. 1992. Trends in numbers of tropical- and temperate-wintering migrant landbirds in migration at Long Point, Ontario, 1961-1988. Pages 101-14 in J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  33. Johns, B. W. 1993. The influence of grove size on bird species richness in aspen parklands. Wilson Bull. 105:256-264.
  34. Keast, A., and E.S. Morton. 1980. Migrant birds in the neotropics: ecology, distribution, and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  35. Klein, N. K., and K. V. Rosenberg. 1986. Feeding of Brown-Headed Cowbird (<i>Molothrus ater</i>) fledglings by more than one "host" species. The Auk 103:213-4.
  36. Lack, D. 1976. Island biology illustrated by the land birds of Jamaica. Studies in Ecology, Vol. 3. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 445 pp.
  37. Lefebvre, G., B. Poulin, and R. McNeil. 1992. Abundance, feeding behavior, and body condition of Nearctic warblers wintering in Venezuelan mangroves. Wilson Bull. 104:400-412.
  38. Lefebvre, L. W., and J. T. Tilmant. 1992. Round-tailed muskrat <i>Neofiber alleni</i>. Pages 276-286 in S. R. Humphrey, editor. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. I. Mammals. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville. xviii + 392 pp.
  39. Lemon, R. E., D. M. Weary, and K. J. Norris. 1992. Male morphology and behavior correlate with reproductive success in the American Redstart. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29:399-403.
  40. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  41. Lynch, J. F. 1989. Distribution of overwintering Nearctic migrants in the Yucatan Peninsula, I: general patterns of occurrence. Condor 91:515-544.
  42. Lynch, J. F. 1992. Distribution of overwintering Neararctic migrants in the Yucatan Peninsula, II: Use of native and human-modified vegetation. Pages 178-96 in J. M. Hagan III, and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  43. Marra, P.P., T.W. Sherry, and R.T. Holmes. 1993. Territorial exclusion by a neotropical migrant bird in winter: a removal experiment with American Redstarts (<i>Setophaga ruticilla</i>) in Jamaica. Auk 110:565-572.
  44. Mitchell, L. J., and R. A. Lancia. 1990. Breeding bird community changes in a Bald Cypress-Tupelo wetland following timber harvesting. Pages 189-201 in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeasten Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Vol. 44.
  45. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  46. Morse, D. H. 1973. The foraging of small populations of yellow warblers and American redstarts. Ecology 54:346-55.
  47. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America. Second edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
  48. Noon, B. R., V. P. Bingham, and J. P. Noon. 1979. The effects of changes in habitat on northern hardwood forest bird communities. Pages 33-48 in D. M. DeGraaf and K. E. Evans (editors). Management of north central and northeastern forests for nongame birds. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report NC-51.
  49. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  50. Parrish, J.D., and T.W. Sherry. 1994. Sexual habitat segregation by American Redstarts wintering in Jamaica: importance of resource seasonality. The Auk 111(1):38-49.
  51. Pashley, D. N. 1988a. Warblers of the West Indies. I. The Virgin Islands. Caribbean J. Sci. 24:11-22.
  52. Pashley, D. N. 1988b. Warblers of the West Indies. II. The Western Caribbean. Caribbean J. Sci. 24:112-126.
  53. Pashley, D. N., and R. B. Hamilton. 1990. Warblers of the West Indies. III. The Lesser Antilles. Caribbean J. Sci. 26:75-97.
  54. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  55. Price, J., S. Droege, and A. Price. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, New York. x + 364 pp.
  56. Procter-Gray, E. 1991. Female-like plumage of subadult male American redstarts does not reduce aggression from other males. The Auk 108:872-9.
  57. Procter-Gray, E., and R. T. Holmes. 1981. Adaptive significance of delayed attainment of plumage in male American redstarts: tests of two hypotheses. Evolution 35:742-51.
  58. Raffaele, H. A. 1983a. A guide to the birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Fondo Educativo Interamericano, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 255 pp.
  59. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  60. Rappole, J. H., and D. W. Warner. 1980. Ecological aspects of migrant bird behavior in Veracruz, Mexico. Pages 353-393 in A. Keast and E.S. Morton, editors. Migrant birds in the neotropics: ecology, distribution, and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  61. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  62. Ridgely, R. S. and G. Tudor. 1989. The birds of South America. Volume 1. University of Texas Press, Austin, USA. 516 pp.
  63. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  64. Robbins, C. S., B. A. Dowell, D. K. Dawson, J. A. Colon, R. Estrada, A. Sutton, R. Sutton, and D. Weyer. 1992. Comparison of Neotropical migrant landbird poulations wintering in tropical forest, isolated forest fragments, and agricultural habitats. Pages 207-20 in J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  65. Robinson, S. K., and R. T. Holmes. 1984. Effects of plant species and foliage structure on the foraging behavior of forest birds. The Auk 101:672-84.
  66. Sabo, S. R. 1980. Niche and habitat relations in subalpine bird communites of the White Mountians of New Hampshire, U.S.A. Ecological Monographs 50:241-60.
  67. Sauer, J.R., and S. Droege. 1992. Geographical patterns in population trends of Neotropical migrants in North America. Pages 26-42 in J.M. Hagan, III, and D.W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  68. Schackell, N. L., R. E. Lemon, and D. Roff. 1988. Song similarity between neighboring American redstarts (<i>Setophaga ruticilla</i>): a statistical analysis. The Auk 105:609-15.
  69. Secunda, R. C., and T. W. Sherry. 1991. Polyterritorial polygyny in the American redstart. The Wilson Bulletin 103:190-203.
  70. Sherry, T. W. 1979. Competitive interactions and adaptive strategies of American redstarts and least flycatchers in northern hardwoods forest. The Auk 96:265-83.
  71. Sherry, T. W., and R. T. Holmes. 1985. Dispersion and habitat responses of birds in northern hardwood forests. Pages 283-309 in M. L. Cody (editor). Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press.
  72. Sherry, T. W., and R. T. Holmes. 1988. Habitat selection by breeding American redstarts in response to a dominant competitor, the least flycatcher. Auk 105:350-364.
  73. Sherry, T. W. and R. T. Holmes. 1989. Age-specific social dominance affects habitat use by breeding American redstarts (<i>Setophaga ruticilla</i>): a removal experiment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25:327-33.
  74. Sherry, T. W., and R. T. Holmes. 1991. Population age structure of long-distance migratory passerine birds: variation in time and space. Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici.
  75. Sherry, T. W. and R. T. Holmes. 1992. Population fluctuations in a long-distance Neotropical migrant: demographic evidence for the importance of breeding season events in the American redstart. Pages 431-442 in J.M. Hagan, III, and D.W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  76. Sherry, T.W. and R.T. Holmes. 1994. American Redstart (<i>Setophaga ruticilla</i>). Pages 286-287 in C.R. Foss, editor. Atlas of breeding birds in New Hampshire. Arcadia, Dover, NH.
  77. Sherry, T.W., and R.T. Holmes. 1997. American Redstart (<i>Setophaga ruticilla</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 277. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 32 pp.
  78. Sibley, C.G., and B.L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. xxiv + 1111 pp.
  79. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  80. Sliwa, A., and T. W. Sherry. 1992. Surveying wintering warbler populations in Jamaica: point counts with and without broadcast vocalizations. Condor 94:924-936.
  81. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  82. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  83. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  84. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  85. Whitcomb, R. F., C. S. Robbins, J. F. Lynch, B. L. Whitcomb, M. K. Klimciewicz, and D. Bystrak. 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. Pages 125-206 in R. L. Burgess, and B. L. Sharpe (editors). Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes.
  86. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  87. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  88. Witham, J. W., and M. L. Hunter. 1992. Population trends of neotropical migrant landbirds in northern coastal New England. In J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migratory Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  89. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.