Vireo bellii

Aububon, 1844

Bell's Vireo

G5Secure Found in 27 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
PSESA Status
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100979
Element CodeABPBW01110
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyVireonidae
GenusVireo
USESAPS
Synonyms
Vireo belliAububon, 1844
Other Common Names
Bell's vireo (EN) Vireo de Bell (ES) Viréo de Bell (FR)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
See Johnson et al. (1988) and Murray et al. (1994) for analyses of the phylogenetic relationships among vireos. Four subspecies recognized: V. b. bellii breeds from Colorado to Illinois south through e. Texas to Tamaulipas, Mexico; V. b. medius breeds from sw. Texas to c. Mexico; V. b. arizonae breeds from se. California to sw. New Mexico south to Sonora and Chihuahua, Mexico; and V. b. pusillus breeds in c. and sw. California south to Baja California, Mexico (AOU 1957, Brown 1993).
Conservation Status
Review Date1999-12-17
Change Date1996-12-03
Edition Date1999-12-17
Edition AuthorsDeeble, B.; revisions by M. Koenen and D.W. Mehlman
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: southern California, southern Nevada, southwestern Utah, Arizona, southern New Mexico, northeastern Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota, western North Dakota, southeastern Minnesota, southern Wisconsin, northeastern Illinois, northwestern Indiana, and southwestern Michigan south to northern Baja California, southern Sonora, southern Durango, Zacatecas, southern Tamaulipas, southern Texas, north-central Louisiana, Arkansas, and southwestern Tennessee, southwestern Kentucky, southern Indiana, and western Ohio (Brown 1993, AOU 1998). NON-BREEDING: southern Baja California and southern Sonora south to Honduras, primarily on Pacific slope; casually north to California, Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, and southern Florida, and south to Nicaragua (Brown 1993, AOU 1998).
Occurrences Comments
Several populations have been reduced or extirpated (Brown 1993). Arizona Bell's Vireo (V. B. ARIZONAE) has expanded range and increased in abundance along the Colorado River through Grand Canyon, Arizona as a result of increased breeding habitat created by flood control at Glen Canyon Dam; a breeding range expansion of at least 219 km was observed over 11 years (Brown et al. 1983).
Threat Impact Comments
HABITAT: Declines may be related to loss of riparian habitat (USFWS 1988), particularly in western portions of range. Urban development, water diversion, flood control projects, grazing, and the spread of agriculture have destroyed much western nesting habitat. The Central Valley of California, where the species was once a common breeding bird but is now extirpated, has lost 95 percent of its riparian vegetation in this century to agriculture and other anthropogenic factors (Smith 1977). The species also once bred in the Owens River Valley, where today water diversion to supply urban areas has killed most of the once lush riparian vegetation (Robinson et al. 1995). Overgrazing suppresses shrub growth and reduces available nest sites and vireo density (by 50 percent in Oklahoma; Overmire 1963). BROOD PARASITISM: Observed rates of brood parasitism by Brown-headed Cowbirds (MOLOTHRUS ATER) vary geographically, ranging from 6 percent in Grand Canyon, Arizona, to 69 percent in Kansas. Based on a model developed for Least Bell's Vireos (V. B. PUSILLUS) in California, cowbird parasitism rates exceeding 30 percent lead to unstable populations that could be extirpated by stochastic events, while rates of 48 percent and 69 percent lead to population extinction in 18 and 8 years respectively (Brown 1993, Laymon 1987). In one California study, parasitism rates were reduced from 47 percent to 10 percent, increasing fledglings per pair from 2.08 to 2.86; the latter productivity rate, but not the former, should allow the population to persist and experience moderate growth (Robinson et al. 1995). Elsewhere, nonparasitized nests successfully fledge more young than parasitized nests (Barlow 1962, Brown 1993). Birds forced into fragmented habitat or marginal nesting areas are more vulnerable to parasitism. There is reason to believe, however, that large vireo populations in suitable habitat can maintain themselves in the face of cowbird parasitism (Robinson et al. 1995). In addition, different subspecies may naturally have different vulnerability to cowbird parasitism due to the timing of migration and nest initiation. In Arizona, V. B. ARIZONAE initiates nesting in early April before cowbirds become common, whereas V. B. PUSILLUS initiates nesting during a later period that coincides with the seasonal arrival of cowbirds; this reduces the relative rate of brood parasitism experienced by the earlier nesting subspecies (Corman, pers. comm.). PREDATION: Because often nests near the ground, brooding adults and young are commonly depredated by various mammals and reptiles, including domestic cat (FELIS DOMESTICUS), raccoon (PROCYON LOTOR), opossum (DIDELPHIS VIRGINIANA), coyote (CANIS LATRANS), long-tailed weasel (MUSTELA FRENATA), dusky-footed woodrat (NEOTOMA FUSCIPES), deer mouse (PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS), house mouse (MUS MUSCULUS), rat (RATTUS RATTUS; Brown 1993, Bent 1950), and various snakes (Cink 1977, Nolan 1960). Suspected or confirmed avian predators include greater roadrunner (GEOCOCCYX CALIFORNIANUS), American crow (CORVUS BRACHYRHYNCHOS), and scrub jay (APHELOCOMA CALIFORNICA; Collins et al. 1989). POPULATION ISOLATION: One isolated population with relatively low rates of brood parasitism and intact habitat has declined; parent-offspring matings were documented, so inbreeding depression may be responsible (Robinson et al. 1995).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A rather nondescript vireo with one or two faint pale wing bars on otherwise dark wings; dark tail; indistinct spectacles; overall color ranges from olive in the central U.S. to grayish in Southwest (NGS 1983, Peterson 1990).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from the warbling vireo (VIREO GILVUS) by having wing bars and a pale eye ring.

Habitat

BREEDING: The types of habitat used vary widely among the four subspecies (Ehrlich et al. 1992). Dense brush, willow thickets, mesquite, streamside thickets, and scrub oak, in arid regions often near water, also adjoining uplands (AOU 1998, Kus and Miner 1989). Nests in shrub or low tree, usually averaging about one meter above ground, usually in horizontal or downsloping twig fork, typically near edge of thicket.

Nesting vegetation in California averages three to five meters in height (Franzreb 1989). Over 60 species of nest substrate plants used including willow (SALIX spp.), mesquite (PROSOPIS SPP.), rose (ROSA spp.), oak (QUERCUS spp.), and cottonwood (POPULUS spp.; Brown 1993). Wild rose and coast live oak (QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA) used more frequently than expected on the basis of their availability in the riparian zone (Gray and Greaves 1984). In the Grand Canyon, Arizona 64 percent of nests were in the introduced shrub tamarisk (TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA) and 24 percent were in honey mesquite (P. GLANDULOSA; Brown 1993).

May nest in any successional stage with dense understory vegetation; most critical structural component of habitat in California is a dense shrub layer 0.6-3.0 meters above ground (Goldwasser 1981, Franzreb 1989). Most Least Bell's Vireos (V. B. PUSILLUS) nest sites are in willow stands 5-10 years of age (RECON 1989).

Nesting success depends on an optimum microclimate, and adequate shade may be critical for successful nesting at low elevations. Tree canopies provide cooler environments for static temperature of the eggs while adults are foraging (Thelander and Crabtree 1994). For additional analysis of V. B. PUSILLUS nest site characteristics see Hendricks and Rieger 1989, and Olson and Gray 1989.

NON-BREEDING: Quantitative information needed (Brown 1993). In migration and winter, primarily in dense scrub (AOU 1998). West coast of Mexico and Honduras in thornscrub adjacent to watercourses, riparian gallery forests, tropical deciduous forest, and arid tropical scrub (Hutto 1989); rarely in interior subtropical scrub and tropical evergreen forest (Binford 1989).

Ecology

In California, territory size was 0.2-1.7 hectares (Franzreb 1989). Observed nesting densities range from 0.5 breeding pairs per 40 hectares of mesquite bosque habitat in the lower Colorado River Valley where nearly extirpated, to 26 pairs per 40 hectares in willow-tamarisk habitat elsewhere in Arizona (Meents et al. 1984, Szaro and Jakle 1985). Extrapolated densities of up to 200 pairs per 40 hectares have been calculated from small, extremely productive riparian study areas (Brown 1987).

Reproduction

Clutch size is three to five (commonly four). Incubation lasts 14 days. Young are tended by both parents, leave nest at 10-12 days, remain with adults for 25-30 days more. Breeding season begins early April in south to late May in north of range. Both parents incubate eggs and tend young (Harrison 1978). In Kansas, two broods per season possible, but most pairs rear only one (Barlow 1962). In California, two to four renesting attempts per season possible, two broods per season normal. Most pairs double-brooded in the Lower Colorado River Valley and Grand Canyon, Arizona (Brown 1993, Franzreb 1989). Nests constructed with grasses, bark, and other plant parts, along with spider webs and hair, to construct a nest loosely suspended from thin, forked branches; they line it with fine grasses and hairs. Most nests located 0.5 to 1.5 meters above ground, ranging from 0.2 to 8.0 meters (Thelander and Crabtree 1994).

Usually returns to same nesting territory in successive years (Franzreb 1989). More than 60 percent of male and 30 percent of female returning birds utilize the previous year's territories (Greaves 1989). Most fledglings that survive to breed, return to their natal area (Greaves and Gray 1991). Nest site occasionally found in same shrub as in previous years (Greaves 1987).
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodShrubland/chaparralOld field
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4B
ProvinceRankNative
MissouriS3Yes
IndianaS3BYes
ColoradoS1BYes
TennesseeS1BYes
WisconsinS2BYes
NevadaS2BYes
IowaS3B,S4NYes
KansasS4BYes
CaliforniaSNRYes
AlabamaSNAYes
NebraskaS4Yes
IllinoisS4Yes
MichiganSNRNYes
UtahSUBYes
FloridaSNAYes
ArizonaS4Yes
KentuckyS2BYes
LouisianaS1BYes
TexasS3BYes
MinnesotaS3BYes
North DakotaS3Yes
New MexicoS2B,S3NYes
OklahomaS3BYes
ArkansasS3BYes
South DakotaS4BYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesPervasive - largeModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (27)
Arizona (20)
AreaForestAcres
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
Cdo WsaCoronado National Forest1,955
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower RinconCoronado National Forest3,278
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
PicachoTonto National Forest4,969
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
Santa TeresaCoronado National Forest8,929
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
Upper Romero WsrCoronado National Forest150
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
California (5)
AreaForestAcres
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
New Mexico (2)
AreaForestAcres
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
References (75)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1957. The AOU check-list of North American birds, 5th ed. Port City Press, Inc., Baltimore, MD. 691 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  4. Baird, K.J., and J.P. Rieger. 1989. A restoration design for Least Bell's Vireo habitat in San Diego County. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
  5. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  6. Barlow, J. 1962a. Natural history of the bell vireo. Lawrence. 296 pp.
  7. Barlow, J.C. 1962b. The natural history of the bell vireo. VIREO BELLII (Audubon). Univ. Kansas Publ. Museum Natural History 12:241-96.
  8. Barlow, J.C. 1980. Patterns of ecological interactions among migrant and resident vireos on the wintering grounds. Pages 79-107 in A. Keast and E.S. Morton, editors. Migrant birds in the neotropics: ecology, distribution, and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  9. Beezley, J.A. and J. P. Rieger. 1987. Least Bell's Vireo management by cowbird trapping. Western Birds 18:55-61.
  10. Bent, A.C. 1950. Life histories of North American wagtails, shrikes, vireos, and their allies. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 197. Washington, D.C.
  11. Binford, L.C. 1989. A distributional survey of the birds of the Mexican state of Oaxaca. American Ornithologists' Union, Ornithological monographs No. 43. 418 pp.
  12. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  13. Brown, B.T. 1993. Bell's Vireo (VIREO BELLII). In A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 35. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 20 pp.
  14. Brown, B.T., S.W. Carothers, and R.R. Johnson. 1983. Breeding range expansion of Bell's Vireo in Grand Canyon, Arizona. Condor 85:499-500.
  15. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  16. Carter, M., C. Hunter, D. Pashley, and D. Petit. 1998. The Watch List. Bird Conservation, Summer 1998:10.
  17. Carter, M.F., W.C. Hunter, D.N. Pashley, J.S. Bradley, C.S. Aid, J. Price, and G.S. Butcher. 1997. Setting landbird conservation priorities for states, provinces, and physiographic areas of North America. In R.E. Bonney, Jr., D.N. Pashley, and R. Cooper, editors. Strategies for bird conservation: creating the Partners in Flight planning process. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
  18. Carter, M., G. Fenwick, C. Hunter, D. Pashley, D. Petit, J. Price, and J. Trapp. 1996. Watchlist 1996: For the future. Field Notes 50(3):238-240.
  19. Chapin, E. A. 1925. Food habits of the vireos. U.S.D.A. Agricultural Bulletin. 42pp.
  20. Cink, C.L. 1977. Snake predation on Bell's Vireo nestlings. Wilson Bulletin 89(2):349.
  21. Collins, C.T., K. Corey, J. Pike, and L.R. Hays. 1991. The status and management of the Least Bell's Vireo within the Prado Basin, California, 1986-1990. Final Rep. to Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA.
  22. Collins, C.T., L.R. Hays, M. Wheeler, and D. Willick. 1989. The status and management of the Least Bell's Vireo within the Prado Basin, California, during 1989. Final Rep. to Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA.
  23. Dickey, D.R., and A.J. Van Rossem. 1938. The birds of El Salvador. Publ. Field Museum of Nat. His. Zool. Ser. 23:185-187.
  24. Dobkin, D.S. 1994. Conservation and management of neotropical migrant landbirds in the Northern Rockies and Great Plains. University of Idaho Press, Moscow, ID.
  25. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  26. Franzreb, K. E. 1989. Ecology and conservation of the endangered least Bell's vireo. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biol. Rep. 89(1). 17 pp.
  27. Franzreb, K.E. 1990. An analysis of options for reintroducing a migratory, native passerine, the endangered Least Bell's Vireo in the Central Valley, California. Biological Conservation 53(2):105-124.
  28. Goldwasser, S. 1981. Habitat requirements of the Least Bell's Vireo. Final Rep., California Dept. of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA.
  29. Gray, M.V. and J.M. Greaves. 1984. Riparian forests as habitat for the Least Bell's Vireo, pp. 605-611 IN California riparian systems: ecology, conservation and productive management. R. Warner and K. Hendrix, Eds. Univ. of California Press, Davis.
  30. Greaves, J. M. 1987. Nest-site tenacity of Least Bell's Vireos. Western Birds 18: 50-54.
  31. Greaves, J.M. 1989. Maintaining site integrity for breeding Least Bell's Vireos. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
  32. Greaves, J. M. and M. V. Gray. 1991. The Least Bell's Vireo population in the Gibraltar Reservoir area during 1991. Final report to Los Padres National Forest, Goleta, CA.
  33. Hagan, J. M., III, and D. W. Johnston, editors. 1992. Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xiii + 609 pp.
  34. Hands, H. M., R. D. Drobney, and M. R. Ryan. 1989. Status of the Bell's vireo in the northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit Rep. 13 pp.
  35. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  36. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  37. Hendricks, B.J., and J.P. Rieger. 1989. Description of nesting habitat for the Least Bell's Vireo in San Diego County. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
  38. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  39. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  40. Hutto, R.L. 1989. The effect of habitat alteration on migratory land birds in a west Mexican tropical deciduous forest: a conservation perspective. Conservation Biology 3(2):138-148.
  41. Johnson, N. K., R. M. Zink, and J. A. Marten. 1988. Genetic evidence for relationships in the avian family Vireonidae. Condor 90:428-445.
  42. Keast, A., and E.S. Morton. 1980. Migrant birds in the neotropics: ecology, distribution, and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  43. Kus, B.E. 1998. Use of restored riparian habitat by the endangered Least Bell's Vireo. Restoration Ecology 6(1):75-82.
  44. Kus, B.E., and K.L. Miner. 1989. Use of non-riparian habitats by Least Bell's Vireos. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
  45. Laymon, S. A. 1987. Brown-headed Cowbirds in California: historical perspectives and management opportunities in riparian habitats. Western Birds 18:63-70.
  46. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  47. Meents, J.K., B.W. Anderson, and R.D. Ohmart. 1984. Sensitivity of riparian birds to habitat loss, pp. 619-625 IN California riparian systems: ecology, conservation, and productive management. R. Warner and K. Hendrix, Eds. Univ. of California Press, Davis.
  48. Monroe, B.L., Jr. 1968. A distributional survey of the birds of Honduras. Ornithological Monographs 7:1-458.
  49. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  50. Muehter, V.R. 1998. WatchList Website, National Audubon Society, Version 97.12. Online. Available: http://www.audubon.org/bird/watch/.
  51. Murray, B.W., W.B. McGillivray, and J.C. Barlow. 1994. The use of cytochrome B sequence variation in estimation of phylogeny in the Vireonidae. Condor 96(4):1037-1054.
  52. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  53. Nolan, Val Jr. 1960. Breeding behavior of the Bell Vireo in southern Indiana. The Condor 62(4)224-244. 1960.
  54. Olson, T.E., and M.V. Gray. 1989. Characteristics of Least Bell's Vireo nest sites along the Santa Ynez river. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
  55. Overmire, T.G. 1962. Nesting of the Bell's Vireo in Oklahoma. Condor 64:75.
  56. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  57. Peterson, R. T. 1990b. A field guide to western birds. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. 432 pp.
  58. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  59. Regional Environmental Consultants (RECON). 1989. Draft comprehensive species management plan for the Least Bell's Vireo. San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA.
  60. Robinson, S.K., S.I. Rothstein, M.C. Brittingham, L.J. Petit, and J.A. Grzybowski. 1995. Ecology and behavior of cowbirds and their impact on host populations. Pages 428-460 in T.E. Martin and D.M. Finch, editors. Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. Oxford University Press, New York.
  61. Rosenberg, K.V., R.D. Ohmart, W.C. Hunter, and B.W. Anderson. 1990. Birds of the lower Colorado River valley. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 464 pp.
  62. Salata, L.R. 1983. Status of the Least Bell's Vireo on Camp Pendleton, California: research done in 1983. Final Rep., U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Service, Laguna Niguel.
  63. Sauer, J.R., and S. Droege. 1992. Geographical patterns in population trends of Neotropical migrants in North America. Pages 26-42 in J.M. Hagan, III, and D.W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  64. Sauer, J.R., S. Schwartz, and B. Hoover. 1996. The Christmas Bird Count Home Page. Version 95.1 U.S.G.S. Biological Resource Division, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Online. Available: http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/cbc.html.
  65. Smith, F. 1977. A short review of the status of riparian forests in California. IN Riparian forests in California: their ecology and conservation. A. Sands, ed. Institute for Ecology Publication 15, 122 p.
  66. Szaro, R.C., and M.D. Jakle. 1985. Avian use of a desert riparian island and its adjacent scrub habitat. Condor 87:511-519.
  67. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  68. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  69. Thelander, C.G., and M. Crabtree. 1994. Life on the edge: a guide to California's endangered natural resources. BioSystems Books, Santa Cruz, CA. 550 pp.
  70. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  71. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory Nongame Birds of Management Concern in the United States: The 1987 List. Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  72. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1988. Least Bell's vireo recovery plan. Portland, Oregon.
  73. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1999. Status of listed species and recovery plan development, Least Bell's Vireo. Web site of USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource.
  74. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  75. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.