Lampsilis siliquoidea

(Barnes, 1823)

Fatmucket

G5Secure Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.120096
Element CodeIMBIV21280
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusLampsilis
Synonyms
Lampsilis luteola(Lamarck, 1819)Lampsilis radiata luteola(Lamarck, 1819)Lampsilis radiata siliquoidea(Barnes, 1823)
Other Common Names
Lampsile solide (FR)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
The combination Lampsilis radiata luteola has been used incorrectly in place of Lampsilis siliquoidea and resulted in some confusion. For example, Lampsilis radiata luteola cited in Oesch (1984; 1995) is actually Lampsilis siliquoidea but the two names are not considered synonyms nor is siliquoidea considered a form or subspecies of radiata. Unio (= Lampsilis) luteola, previously confined to the Susquehanna and Mohawk Rivers (Johnson, 1969), falls within the overall range of and is considered a junior synonym of Lampsilis radiata and not as a senior synonym of Lampsilis siliquoidea (see Turgeon et al., 1998). Note Watters et al. (2009) conclude that Unio siliquoidea Barnes, 1823, is a junior synonym of Unio luteola Lamarck, 1819, that intergraded with Lampsilis radiata radiata in northern New York in the Finger Lakes, Erie Canal, Mohawk, and upper Susquehanna Rivers; and therefore synonymize Lampsilis siliquoidea with Lampsilis radiata as a subspecies- Lampsilis radiata luteola.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2017-08-01
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2011-12-23
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is extremely wide ranging and is stable and secure throughout its range.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs throughout the Mississippi River basin except for the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins. The range extends from western New York to Minnesota to Montana (Gangloff and Gustafson, 2000) and south to Arkansas and western into eastern Kansas and Nebraska (Hoke, 2005). It is found as far west as the eastern Colorado border and in Montana and is widespread throughout the interior of Canada, including the western Hudson Bay drainage (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998).
Occurrences Comments
It is in every drainage (extirpated from Minnesota River) in most Minnesota Cos. (Sietman, 2003); incl. Red, Lake Superior, Lake of the Woods (Graf, 1997; Cvancara, 1970). In Illinois, it is in small/medium streams throughout (Cummings and Mayer, 1997; Schanzle and Cummings, 1991; Schanzle et al. 2004; Tiemann et al., 2005). Indiana: Blue (Sietman et al., 1995), Tippecanoe (Cummings and Berlocher, 1990), E Fork White (Harmon, 1992), Muscatatuck (Harmon, 1989), St. Joseph, Maumee and Eel (Pryor, 2005). In Ohio, it is throughout (Watters, 1992; 1995; Lyons et al., 2007; Grabarciewicz, 2008; Hoggarth et al., 2007; Watters et al., 2009). In West Virginia, it is in the Upper Ohio/Kanawha (Zeto et al., 1987) and Mud Rivers (Guyandotte drainage) (Schmidt and Zeto, 1986). In South Dakota it is in the Minnesota, upper/mid Big Sioux, James, Vermillion Rivers, and Lake Kampeska (Skadsen and Perkins, 2000; Backlund, 2000; Perkins and Backlund, 2003). In Montana, it is in most tribs. of the Missouri, Marais, Milk, Yellowstone, Little Missouri Rivers; less common in Tongue and Bighorn Rivers (Yellowstone basin), Battle and Beaver Creeks (Milk basin) (Gangloff and Gustafson, 2000; Stagliano, 2010). It is in Arkansas in the Poteau (Vaughn and Spooner, 2004), Cache (Christian et al., 2005), and mouth of White (Gordon, 1982). It is widespread and abundant in Wisconsin (Mathiak, 1979). In Mississippi, it is in the Mississippi River S, Big Black, and Yazoo drainages (Jones et al., 2005). It is rare in Louisiana, from Bayou Bartholomew, Tensas River (questionably) and nearby in W Mississippi (Vidrine, 1993). In Tennessee, it is only in Reelfoot Lake (nearly extirpated) and 1 Wolf trib. (Kesler and Manning, 1996) of the Mississippi (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). It is statewide in Kentucky (Cicerello and Schuster, 2003); rarely in the Middle Green (Cochran and Layzer, 1993; Gordon, 1991), also S Fork Kentucky (Evans, 2008). It is widespread in Oklahoma in the Kiamichi, Blue, Clear Boggy and Little (Vaughn and Taylor, 1999; Vaughn, 2000) and Bird, Fourteenmile, Pryor and Big Cabin Creeks; Flint Creek; Haw Creek (LeFlore Co.); Glover Rivers and Pennington and Gates Creeks, Spring (Branson, 1966); Neosho, Mountain Fork (Spooner and Vaughn, 2007) and Blue Rivers and Honey and Sparrow Creek (Murray Co.); Poteau River; and Bird, Hominy and Salt Creeks (Branson, 1984). Kansas: Neosho, Marais des Cygnes, and Spring (Branson, 1966) basins, and (declined in Verdigris basin) still upper Fall and Caney Rivers but extirpated from Wakarusa (Tiemann, 2006), Republican, Solomon, Saline, Smoky Hill, Ninnescah, Walnut, and Cottonwood Rivers (Couch, 1997). Recently only dead shells in the Marais des Cygnes, Elk, and Fall Rivers, Kansas (Combes and Edds, 2005). In the Little Blue basin it is in the Kansas and Nebraska portions (Hoke, 2004). In the Big Blue system (SE Nebraska, NE Kansas) it was common as weathered valves and alive in W Fork Big Blue and a hole in the Big Blue mainstem, Nebraska (no recruitment) (Hoke, 2005). It is also known from the Clinton River drainage in Michigan (Trdan and Hoeh, 1993) and upper peninsula (Goodrich and Van der Schalie, 1939). It occurs in the Kalamazoo River (Mulcrone and Mehlne, 2001) and Lakes Michigan, Huron, and St. Clair drainages (Badra and Goforth, 2003), Michigan (Strayer, 1980; Trdan and Hoeh, 1993). Beetle (1989) lists Wyoming occurrences in Converse, Fremont, Natrona, and Platte Cos.; while Cvancara (2005) lists the Bighorn (Big Horn, Freemont Cos.), Tongue (Sheridan Co.), North Platte drainages (Natrona, Converse, Platte Cos.). In Canada it is widespread and abundant in Manitoba (Assiniboine- Watson, 2000; Pip, 2006), Ontario (Metcalfe-Smith et al., 2003), Quebec, Saskatchewan, and less abundant, but widespread in Northwest Territories, and Alberta (most SE of the Cordillera); and undetermined in Nunavut (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey, 2004); recently Petitot River in British Columbia (BC CDC, pers. comm., 2010).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Jass and Glenn (2004) found the species to be sexually dimorphic with males generally larger than females but females having posterior end inflation and more evenly rounded posterior margin (Jass and Glenn, 2004).

Habitat

This species is found on a variety of substrates but usually prefers quiet or slow-moving water with a mud bottom, typically avoiding riffles (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998).

Reproduction

Recorded host fishes include several sunfish and perch species (Watters, 1996). Draxler et al. (2006) confirmed glochidial transformation on several fish species including Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill), Perca flavescens (yellow perch), and Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MichiganSNRYes
IllinoisS4Yes
ArkansasS3Yes
West VirginiaS3Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
South DakotaS4Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
KansasS1Yes
IndianaS5Yes
WisconsinS4Yes
OhioS5Yes
North DakotaSNRYes
TennesseeS2Yes
MinnesotaSNRYes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
WyomingS3Yes
New YorkS4Yes
MississippiS3Yes
IowaSNRYes
NebraskaS1Yes
MontanaS5Yes
KentuckyS4Yes
MissouriS4Yes
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS5Yes
QuebecS4Yes
SaskatchewanS5Yes
AlbertaS4Yes
Northwest TerritoriesS4Yes
ManitobaS5Yes
British ColumbiaSUYes
Roadless Areas (2)
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Kawishiwi Lake To SawbillSuperior National Forest15,305
Wisconsin (1)
AreaForestAcres
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest3,707
References (93)
  1. Backlund, D.C. 2000. Summary of current known distribution and status of freshwater mussels (Unionoida) in South Dakota. Central Plains Archaeology, 8(1): 69-77.
  2. Badra, P.J. and R.R. Goforth. 2003. Freshwater mussel surveys of Great Lakes tributary rivers in Michigan. Report Number MNFI 2003-15 to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit, Lansing, Michigan. 40 pp.
  3. Beetle, D. E. 1989. Checklist of recent Mollusca of Wyoming, U.S.A. The Great Basin Naturalist 49(4):637-645.
  4. Bogan, A.E. 1993a. Workshop on freshwater bivalves of Pennsylvania. Workshop hosted by Aquatic Systems Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, held at Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 6-7 May 1993. 80 pp.
  5. Branson, B.A. 1966a. A partial biological survey of the Spring River drainage in Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri. Part I, collecting sites, basic limnological data, and mollusks. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 69(3/4): 242-293.
  6. Branson, B.A. 1984. The mussels (Unionacea: Bivalvia) of Oklahoma- Part 3: Lampsilini. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 64: 20-36.
  7. Christian, A.D., J.L. Harris, W.R. Posey, J.F. Hockmuth, and G.L. Harp. 2005. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) assemblages of the lower Cache River, Arkansas. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(3): 487-512.
  8. Cicerello, R.R. and G.A. Schuster. 2003. A guide to the freshwater mussels of Kentucky. Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission Scientific and Technical Series 7:1-62.
  9. Clark, C.F. 1988. Some fresh-water mussels from the Red River drainage, Kentucky. Malacology Data Net, 2(3/4): 100-104.
  10. Clarke, A.H. 1981a. The Freshwater Molluscs of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, D.W. Friesen and Sons, Ltd.: Ottawa, Canada. 446 pp.
  11. Clarke, A.H. 1992. Ontario's Sydenham River, an important refugium for native freshwater mussels against competition from the zebra mussel, <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>. Malacology Data Net, 3(1-4): 43-55.
  12. Cochran, T.G. II and J.B. Layzer. 1993. Effects of commercial harvest on unionid habitat use in the Green and Barren Rivers, Kentucky. Pages 61-65 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, and L.M. Koch (eds.) Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels: Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 12-14 October, 1992, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois. 189 pp.
  13. Combes, M. and D. Edds. 2005. Mussel assemblages upstream from three Kansas reservoirs. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 20(1): 139-148.
  14. Couch, K.J. 1997. An Illustrated Guide to the Unionid Mussels of Kansas. Karen J. Couch. [Printed in Olathe, Kansas]. 124 pp.
  15. Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1997. Distributional checklist and status of Illinois freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionacea). Pages 129-145 in: K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (eds.) Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II: initiatives for the future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, October 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
  16. Cummings, K.S. and J.M. Berlocher. 1990. The naiades or freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Tippecanoe River, Indiana. Malacological Review 23:83-98.
  17. Cvancara, A.M. 1970. Mussels (Unionidae) of the Red River Valley in North Dakota and Minnesota, U.S.A.. Malacologia, 10(1): 57-92.
  18. Cvancara, A.M. 1983. Aquatic mollusks of North Dakota. Report of Investigation No. 78, North Dakota Geological Survey. Kay's, Inc., Jamestown, North Dakota. 141 pp.
  19. Cvancara, A.M. 2005. Illustrated key to Wyoming's freshwater mussels. A.M. Cvancara: Casper, Wyoming. 5 pp.
  20. Draxler, B., M. Hove, S. Schieffer, M. Berg, G. Widiker, B. Sietman, D. Allen, and D. Hornbach. 2006. Suitable host fishes for fatmucket (<i>Lampsilis siliquoidea</i>) and pocketbook (<i>Lampsilis cardium</i>) evaluated by high school and university researchers. Ellipsaria 8(1): 11-13.
  21. Evans, R. 2008. Year 1 update of freshwater mollusk monitoring in the South Fork Kentucky River system. Ellipsaria, 10(3): 12-13.
  22. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  23. Galbraith, H.S., D.E. Spooner, and C.C. Vaughn. 2008. Status of rare and endangered freshwater mussels in southeastern Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist, 53(1): 45-50.
  24. Gangloff, M.M. and D.L. Gustafson. 2000. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) of Montana. Central Plains Archaeology, 8(1): 121-130.
  25. Goodrich, C. and H. van der Schalie. 1939. Aquatic mollusks of the upper peninsula of Michigan. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 43: 1-45.
  26. Gordon, M.E. 1982. Mollusca of the White River, Arkansas and Missouri. The Southwestern Naturalist, 27(3): 347-352.
  27. Gordon, M.E. 1991. Aquatic mollusca of the Rough River in the vicinity of the Fort Hartford Mine site, Ohio County, Kentucky. Unpublished final report for Environmental and Safety Designs, Memphis, Tennessee, 6 July 1991. 10 pp.
  28. Grabarkiewicz, J.D. 2008. Three years of unionid surveys in Swan Creek, Lower Maumee River watershed, Lucas Co., OH. Final Report to the Ohio Division of Wildlife, Toledo Naturalists' Association, and Metroparks of the Toledo Area, Toledo, Ohio. 18 pp. + app.
  29. Graf, D.L. 1997. Distribution of unionoid (Bivalvia) faunas in Minnesota, USA. The Nautilus, 110(2): 45-54.
  30. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  31. Harmon, J.L. 1989. Freshwater bivalve mollusks (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Graham Creek, a small southeastern Indiana stream. Malacology Data Net, 2(5/6): 113-121.
  32. Harmon, J.L. 1992. Naiades (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Sugar Creek, east fork White River drainage, in central Indiana. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):31-42.
  33. Hoggarth, M.A., D.A. Kimberly, and B.G. Van Allen. 2007. A study of the mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Symmes Creek and tributaries in Jackson, Gallia and Lawrence Counties, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 107(4):57-62.
  34. Hoke, E. 2004. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Little Blue River drainage of northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 29: 7-24.
  35. Hoke, E. 2005b. The unionid mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Big Blue River basin of northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 30: 33-57.
  36. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  37. Jass, J. and J. Glenn. 2004. Sexual dimorphism in <i>Lampsilis siliquoidea</i> (Barnes, 1823) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin, 18(1/2): 45-47.
  38. Jokinen, E.H. 2005. Pond molluscs of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: then and now. American Malacological Bulletin 20: 1-9.
  39. Jones, R.L., W.T. Slack, and P.D. Hartfield. 2005. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Mississippi. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(1): 77-92.
  40. Kesler, D.H. and D. Manning. 1996. A new mussel record for Tennessee: <i>Lampsilis siliquoidea</i> (Mollusca: Unionidae) from the Wolf River. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 71(4):90-94.
  41. Kesler, D. H., D. Manning, N. Van Tol, L. Smith, and B. Sepanski. 2001. Freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of the Wolf River in western Tennessee and Mississippi. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 76(1):38-46.
  42. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  43. Lyons, M.S., R.A. Krebs, J.P. Holt, L.J. Rundo, and W. Zawiski. 2007. Assessing causes of change in the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Black River, Ohio. American Midland Naturalist, 158: 1-15.
  44. Mathiak, H.A. 1979. A river survey of the unionid mussels of Wisconsin, 1973-1977. Sand Shell Press: Horicon, Wisconsin. 75 pp.
  45. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L. and B. Cudmore-Vokey. 2004. National general status assessment of freshwater mussels (Unionacea). National Water Research Institute / NWRI Contribution No. 04-027. Environment Canada, March 2004. Paginated separately.
  46. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L., J. Di Maio, S.K. Staton, and S.R. De Solla. 2003. Status of the freshwater mussel communities of the Sydenham River, Ontario, Canada. American Midland Naturalist 150:37-50.
  47. Mohler, J.W., P. Morrison, and J. Haas. 2006. The mussels of Muddy Creek on Erie National Wildlife Refuge. Northeastern Naturalist 13(4):569-582.
  48. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  49. Morris, T.J. and J. Di Maio. 1999. Current distributions of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in rivers of southwestern Ontario. Malacological Review, 31/32(1): 9-17.
  50. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  51. Mulcrone, R.S. and C. Mehne. 2001. Freshwater mussels of the Kalamazoo River, Michigan, from Battle Creek to Saugatuck. Report prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Lansing, Michigan. 15 pp.
  52. Oesch, R.D. 1995. Missouri Naiades. A Guide to the Mussels of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation: Jefferson City, Missouri. viii + 271 pp.
  53. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  54. Perkins III, K. and D.C. Backlund. 2003. A survey for winged mapleleaf (<i>Quadrula fragosa</i>) and scaleshell (<i>Leptodea leptodon</i>) in the James River, South Dakota. South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota, Report GFP 2003-17. 21 pp.
  55. Pip, E. 2000. The decline of freshwater molluscs in southern Manitoba. Canadian Field Naturalist 114(4):555-560.
  56. Pip, E. 2006. Littoral mollusc communities and water quality in southern Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 3637-3652.
  57. Pryor, W.W. 2005. Distribution of the native freshwater mussels in the rivers of Allen County, Indiana. Report to the St. Joseph River Watershed Initiative, Fort Wayne, Indiana. 71 pp.
  58. Schanzle, R.W. and K.S. Cummings. 1991. A survey of the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Sangamon River basin, Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes, 137: 1-25.
  59. Schanzle, R.W., G.W. Kruse, J.A. Kath, R.A. Klocek, and K.S. Cummings. 2004. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Fox River basin, Illinois and Wisconsin. Illinois Natural History Biological Notes, 141: 1-35.
  60. Schmidt, J.E. and M.A. Zeto. 1986. Naiad distribution in the Mud River drainage, southwestern West Virginia. Malacology Data Net, 1(4): 69-78.
  61. Sietman, B.E. 2003. Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: St. Paul, Minnesota. 144 pp.
  62. Sietman,. B.E., M.A. Furman, and F.A. Pursell. 1995. A qualitative unionid mussel survey of the Blue River, Indiana. Triannual Unionid Report, 8: 16-17.
  63. Sietman, B.E., S.D. Whitney, D.E. Kelner, K.D. Blodgett, and H.L. Dunn. 2001. Post-extirpation recovery of the freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) fauna in the Upper Illinois River. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 16(2): 273-281.
  64. Skadsen, D.R. and K. Perkins III. 2000. Unionid mussels of the Big Sioux River and tributaries: Moody, Minnehaha, Lincoln, and Union Counties, South Dakota. GFP Report 2000-9 to the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota. 52 pp.
  65. Smith, T.A. and D. Crabtree. 2010. Freshwater mussel (Unionidae: Bivalvia) distributions and densities in French Creek, Pennsylvania. Northeastern Naturalist 17(3):387-414.
  66. Spoo, A. 2008. The Pearly Mussels of Pennsylvania. Coachwhip Publications: Landisville, Pennsylvania. 210 pp.
  67. Spooner, D.E. and C.C. Vaughn. 2007. Mussels of the Mountain Fork River, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Publications of the Oklahoma Biological Survey, 2nd series, 8: 14-18.
  68. Stagliano, D. 2010. Freshwater mussels in Montana: Comprehensive results from 3 years of SWG funded surveys. Report prepared for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, Montana. 75 pp.
  69. Strayer, D. 1980. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Clinton River, Michigan, with comments on man's impact on the fauna, 1870-1978. The Nautilus 94(4):142-149.
  70. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  71. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  72. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  73. Strayer, D.L. and K.J. Jirka. 1997. The Pearly Mussels of New York State. New York State Museum Memoir 26. The University of the State of New York. 113 pp. + figures.
  74. Tiemann, J.S.. 2006. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) survey of the Wakurusa River basin, Kansas. Transaction of the Kansas Academy of Science, 109(3/4): 221-230.
  75. Tiemann, J.S., R.E. Szafoni, and K. Roman. 2005. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) survey of Kyte River, Ogle County, Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 98(3-4):159-169.
  76. Trdan, R.J. and W.R. Hoeh. 1993. Relocation of two state-listed freshwater mussel species (<i>Epioblasma torulosa rangiana</i> and <i>Epioblasma triquetra</i>) in Michigan. Pages 100-105 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, and L.M. Koch. (eds.). Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 12-14 October 1992, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois. 189 pp.
  77. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  78. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  79. Vaughn, C.C. 2000. Changes in the mussel fauna of the middle Red River drainage: 1910 - present. Pages 225-232 in R.A. Tankersley, D.I. Warmolts, G.T. Watters, B.J. Armitage, P.D. Johnson, and R.S. Butler (eds.). Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio. 274 pp.
  80. Vaughn, C.C., and C.M. Taylor. 1999. Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction gradient. Conservation Biology 13(4):912-920.
  81. Vaughn, C.C. and D.E. Spooner. 2004. Status of the mussel fauna of the Poteau River and implications for commercial harvest. American Midland Naturalist, 152: 336-346.
  82. Vidrine, M.F. 1993. The Historical Distributions of Freshwater Mussels in Louisiana. Gail Q. Vidrine Collectibles: Eunice, Louisiana. xii + 225 pp. + 20 plates.
  83. Watson, E.T. 2000. Distribution and life history of the Unionidae (Bivalvia: Mollusca) in the Assiniboine River drainage in Manitoba, with special reference to <i>Anodontoides ferussacianus</i>. MS Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 159 pp.
  84. Watters, G.T. 1992b. Distribution of the Unionidae in south central Ohio. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):56-90.
  85. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  86. Watters, G.T. 1995a. A field guide to the freshwater mussels of Ohio. revised 3rd edition. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Columbus, Ohio. 122 pp.
  87. Watters, G.T. 1996. New hosts for Lampsilis cardium. Triannual Unionid Report 9(8).
  88. Watters, G.T., M.A. Hoggarth, and D.H. Stansbery. 2009b. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio. 421 pp.
  89. Wendeln, K.L., J.R. Runkle, and G.T. Watters. 2009. The freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of Twin Creek, Southwest Ohio. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 24(3):451-460. DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2009.9664318
  90. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  91. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  92. Wolf, C. and B. Stark. 2008. Survey of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) in the Marais des Cygnes River, Fall River, and Grouse Creek. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 111(1/2):1-20.
  93. Zeto, M.A., W.A. Tolin, and J.E. Schmidt. 1987. The freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of the upper Ohio River, Greenup and Belleville Pools, West Virginia. The Nautilus, 101: 182-185.