Faxonius longidigitus

(Faxon, 1898)

Longpincered Crayfish

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.116944
Element CodeICMAL11490
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassMalacostraca
OrderDecapoda
FamilyCambaridae
GenusFaxonius
Synonyms
Orconectes longidigitus(Faxon, 1898)
Concept Reference
Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
Taxonomic Comments
Based on Crandall and De Grave (2017), the representatives of Orconectes form at least two distinct groups. The nominal group (the "cave Orconectes") form a monophyletic group that is more closely related to members of Cambarus, while the remaining "Orconectes" are more closely related to Barbicambarus, Creaserinus, and other species of Cambarus (Crandall and Fitzpatrick 1996, Fetzner 1996). As the type species of Orconectes, Orconectes inermis Cope, 1872, belongs to the cave-dwelling group, the genus is herein restricted to just those taxa. The surface-dwelling taxa now excluded from Orconectes sensu stricto are herein placed in the resurrected genus Faxonius Ortmann, 1905a, the oldest available name previously considered to be a synonym of Orconectes Cope, 1872.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Excel v3.2x
Review Date2018-10-16
Change Date2018-10-16
Edition Date2018-10-16
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2009); B. Wagner and D. Lynch (2018)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
While there is no single pervasive or severe current threat to the species, there are a variety of anthropogenic threats in the region affecting aquatic habitats and species.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found across southern Missouri and northern Arkansas in the White River Basin (Pflieger 1996). Range extent is probably less than 20,000 sq. km.
Occurrences Comments
This species occurs in 23 streams in Arkansas and half as many in Missouri.
Threat Impact Comments
Species in this genus are threatened by habitat destruction and degradation, as well as habitat fragmentation at range edges; specifically, threats include habitat modification due to agriculture, wetland destruction, and pollution (including air, water and soil pollution as these species spend time burrowing and in temporary waters). Species in this genus are also likely threatened by climate change due to their narrow thermal tolerances and small ranges. Finally, competition from introduced crayfish species (Orconectes rusticus, Procambarus clarkii, Cambarus robustus) is considered a threat to the species in this genus (Guiasu 2007).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

It occurs under large slabs of rock or rocky outcrops in clear streams, pools and lakes (Williams, 1954; Pflieger, 1996).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
ArkansasS3Yes
MissouriSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.4 - Garbage & solid wasteRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.3 - Temperature extremesPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.4 - Storms & floodingPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.5 - Other impactsPervasive - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Missouri (1)
AreaForestAcres
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
References (12)
  1. Crandall, K. A., and J. F. Fitzpatrick Jr. 1996. Crayfish molecular systematics: using a combination of procedures to estimate phylogeny. Systematic Biology 45(1):1-26.
  2. Crandall, K. A., and S. De Grave. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. Journal of Crustacean Biology 37(5):615-653.
  3. Fetzner, J.W. 1996. Biochemical systematics and evolution of the crayfish genus <i>Orconectes</i> (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 16(1): 111-127, https://doi.org/10.1163/193724096X00333<br/>
  4. Guiasu, R.C. 2007. Conservation and diversity of the crayfishes of the genus <i>Fallicambarus </i>Hobbs, 1969 (Decapoda, Cambaridae), with an emphasis on the status of <i>Fallicambarus fodiens</i> (Cottle, 1863) in Canada. Crustaceana, 80(2): 207-223.
  5. Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
  6. Litvan, M. E., R. J. DiStefano, K. J. Walker, and G. X. 2010. A recreational fishery for Longpincered Crayfish, <i>Orconectes longidigitus</i> (Faxon), in Table Rock Lake, Missouri, USA: effects of environmental factors on trapping success. Freshwater Crayfish 17:91–101. doi: 10.5869/fc.2010.v17.91
  7. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  8. Parkyn, S. M., R. J. DiStefano, and E. M. Imhoff. 2011. Comparison of constructed microhabitat 423 and baited traps in table rock reservoir Missouri, USA. Freshwater Crayfish 18:69–74.
  9. Pflieger, W.L. [B. Dryden, editor]. 1996. The Crayfishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri. 152 pp.
  10. Taylor, C. A., G. A. Schuster, J. E. Cooper, R. J. DiStefano, A. G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H. H. Hobbs III, H. W. Robison, C. E. Skelton, and R. F. Thoma. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):371-389.
  11. Westhoff, J.T., F.A. Guyot, and R.J. DiStefano. 2006. Distribution of the imperiled Williams' crayfish (<i>Orconectes williamsi</i>) in the White River drainage of Missouri: associations with multiscale environmental variables. American Midland Naturalist, 156: 273-288.
  12. Williams, A.B. 1954. Speciation and distribution of the crayfishes of the Ozark Plateaus and Ouachita Provinces. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 36: 803-918.