Lithobates yavapaiensis

(Platz and Frost, 1984)

Lowland Leopard Frog

G4Apparently Secure Found in 22 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100159
Element CodeAAABH01250
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyRanidae
GenusLithobates
Synonyms
Rana yavapaiensisPlatz and Frost, 1984
Other Common Names
Lowland Leopard Frog (EN) Rana de Yavapai (ES) Yavapai leopard frog (EN)
Concept Reference
Jaeger, J. R., B. R. Riddle, R. D. Jennings, and D. F. Bradford. 2001. Rediscovering Rana onca: evidence for phylogenetically distinct leopard frogs from the border region of Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. Copeia 2001:339-354.
Taxonomic Comments
Referred to in some literature as "lowland type" of leopard frog (Platz and Frost 1984). Low rate of hybridization with R. chiricahuensis. Jaeger et al. (2001) examined variation in mtDNA and morphology and concluded that certain leopard frog populations in the Virgin River/Black Canyon (Colorado River) region represent a species (R. onca) distinct from R. yavapaiensis.
Conservation Status
Review Date2002-04-17
Change Date2001-11-27
Edition Date2002-04-17
Edition AuthorsClausen, M. K., and G. Hammerson
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Large number of occurrences still exist in central Arizona (the largest portion of United States range) but, apparently extirpated from other portions of range in the southwestern United States; information is not available for Mexico; populations declining everywhere except central Arizona; ongoing threats from habitat alteration and fragmentation and introduced species; occurs on several state or federal areas in Arizona that are being managed for the species. If the status in Mexico is determined to be drastically declining or extirpated the GRANK should be revised accordingly.
Range Extent Comments
Western and central Arizona and southwestern New Mexico south to northern Sonora and northwestern Chihuahua; southcentral and southeastern California and adjacent Arizona, from San Felipe Creek to the Colorado River (Painter 1985, Jennings and Hayes 1994, Jaeger et al. 2001). Usually below 1000 meters, to 1700 meters in central Arizona (Platz and Frost 1984, Stebbins 1985). Apparently extirpated in Imperial Valley, California, and along the lower Colorado River, Arizona-California, though may be extant in some areas close to the Colorado River in Arizona (Clarkson and Rorabaugh 1989, Jennings and Hayes 1994); replaced by introduced R. berlandieri along the Colorado and Gila rivers, Arizona (Clarkson and Rorabaugh 1989). In Arizona, found in every county except Apache and Navajo with 57% of all localities occurring in Gila, Maricopa, and Yavapai counties (Sredl et al. 1997). Believed extirpated from New Mexico (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997). Leopard frogs from the Virgin River drainage and adjacent portions of the Colorado River (Black Canyon), mapped as Rana yavapaiensis by Platz (1988), are now believed to represent Rana onca (Jaeger et al. 2001).
Occurrences Comments
Possibly extirpated from peripheral areas of the range in New Mexico and California, but large numbers still occur in areas of Arizona. Information is not available for Mexico. In California, historical records are from 28 locations with the most recent observation in 1965. Has not been observed during recent general herpetological surveys in California and is believed to be extirpated (Jennings and Hayes 1994). In New Mexico, known from 14 historical locations. A 1995 survey of 72 potential locations in New Mexico, including six historical sites that had not been surveyed in the past 10 years, resulted in no observations. New Mexico populations are now believed to be extirpated or occurring in very low numbers (Jennings 1995, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997). In Arizona, the Natural Heritage Program recorded 302 occurrences with 90% believed to be extant (Sabra Schwartz, pers. comm., 1998). An extensive 1991-1996 survey in Arizona resulted in the relocation of this species at 43 of the 115 historical localities surveyed and at 61 additional new sites (Sredl et al. 1997).
Threat Impact Comments
The greatest threat is habitat alteration and fragmentation and the introduction of non-native predatory and competitive fishes, crayfishes, and frogs (see Jennings and Hayes 1994, Sredl et al. 1997). Habitat alteration is the result of agricultural practices, livestock grazing, development, and reservoir construction (see Jennings and Hayes 1994). Damming, draining, and diverting of water have fragmented formerly contiguous aquatic habitats. In many areas, fragmentation has been accentuated by introduced predatory fishes, crayfish, and bullfrogs. The species has been replaced by introduced R. berlandieri along the Colorado and Gila rivers, Arizona (Clarkson and Rorabaugh 1989). These factors result in the blockage of potential dispersal corridors for recolonization. Populations are also vulnerable to large-scale mortality on a frequent basis due to drought, disease, and sulphur toxicity (Sredl et al. 1997).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species preferably inhabits rocky streams in canyon habitats surrounded by conifer forests or ponds and stream pools, usually in areas of scrub desert. Eggs and larvae develop in quiet water.

Reproduction

Two breeding seasons per year reported in Arizona larvae may overwinter (Platz 1988).
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
UtahSNRYes
ArizonaS2Yes
New MexicoS1Yes
CaliforniaSXYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (22)
Arizona (22)
AreaForestAcres
Arnold MesaPrescott National Forest12,286
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
Blind Indian CreekPrescott National Forest26,847
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower RinconCoronado National Forest3,278
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
Mitchell PeakApache-Sitgreaves National Forests35,398
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
Pine Mountain Wilderness ContiguousPrescott National Forest3,129
Pine Mountain Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest6,518
PipestemApache-Sitgreaves National Forests34,598
Santa TeresaCoronado National Forest8,929
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
SunsetApache-Sitgreaves National Forests28,948
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
References (19)
  1. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  2. Bradley, G.A., Rosen, P.C., Sredl, M.J., Jones, T.R. and Longcore, J.E. 2002. Chytridiomycosis in native Arizona frogs. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 38:206-212.
  3. Clarkson, R. W., and J. C. Rorabauch. 1989. Status of leopard frogs (<i>Rana pipiens</i> complex: Ranidae) in Arizona and southeastern California. Southwest. Nat. 34:531-538.
  4. Clarkson, W.R. and Rorabaugh, J.C. 1989. Status of leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex:Ranidae) in Arizona and southeastern California. Southwestern Naturalist 34:531-538.
  5. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  6. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  7. Frost, D. R. 2010. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.4 (8 April 2010). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  8. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  9. Jaeger, J. R., B. R. Riddle, R. D. Jennings, and D. F. Bradford. 2001. Rediscovering <i>Rana onca</i>: evidence for phylogenetically distinct leopard frogs from the border region of Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. Copeia 2001:339-354.
  10. Jennings, M. R., and M. P. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California. Final Report submitted to the California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division. Contract No. 8023. 255 pp.
  11. Jennings, R. D. 1995. Investigations of recently viable leopard frog populations in New Mexico: <i>Rana chiricahuensis</i> and <i>Rana yavapaiensis</i>. Report submitted to New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Endangered Species Program, Santa Fe, New Mexico. 36 pp.
  12. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 1997. Fish and Wildlife Information Exchange--VA Tech. Online. Available: http://www.fw.vt.edu/fishex/nm.htm. Accessed 14 April 1998, last update 29 October 1997.
  13. Platz, J. E. 1988. <i>Rana yavapaiensis</i>. Catalogue Amer. Amphibians Reptiles 418: 1-2.
  14. Platz, J. E., and J. S. Frost. 1984. <i>Rana yavapaiensis</i>, a new species of leopard frog (<i>Rana pipiens</i> complex). Copeia 1984:940-948.
  15. Schwalbe, C. R. 1993. Status of amphibians in Arizona. Park Science 13(4):10.
  16. Schwartz, S. Data Manager, Arizona Heritage Data Management System, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ
  17. Sredl, M.J., E.P. Collins, and J.M. Howland. 1997b. Mark-recapture of Arizona leopard frogs. Pages 1-20 in M.J. Sredl, editor. Ranid frog conservation and management. Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Technical Report 121. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona.
  18. Sredl, M. J., J. M. Howland, J. E. Wallace, and L. S. Saylor. 1997a. Status and distribution of Arizona's native ranid frogs. Pages 37-89 in M. J. Sredl, editor. Ranid frog conservation and management. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program, Technical Report 121.
  19. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.