Ictinia mississippiensis

(Wilson, 1811)

Mississippi Kite

G5Secure Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104468
Element CodeABNKC09010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderAccipitriformes
FamilyAccipitridae
GenusIctinia
Other Common Names
Milan du Mississippi (FR) Milano de Misisipi, Milano Boreal (ES) Mississippi kite (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Considered conspecific with Icteria Plumbea by some authors (AOU 1983).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-08
Change Date1996-11-22
Edition Date2014-03-20
Edition AuthorsJue, Dean K.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000 to >2,500,000 square km (about 80,000 to >1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 to >300
Rank Reasons
Not globally threatened and population has made comeback since the early 1900's.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: southern Arizona, central New Mexico, southeastern Colorado, north-central Kansas, southern Missouri, southern Illinois, southern Indiana, western Kentucky, western Tennessee, northwestern Mississippi, the coastal plain of the Gulf states, South Carolina and (probably) North Carolina south to southern New Mexico, Texas, the Gulf coast, and north-central Florida, the range expanding along its borders in recent years; formerly bred north to central Colorado and Iowa (AOU 1998). NON-BREEDING: apparently mostly in central South America, where recorded from Paraguay and northern Argentina; scattered sight reports suggest casual or occassional wintering north as far as southern Texas and Florida, but the vast majority lack documentation (AOU 1998). MIGRATES: regularly from Nuevo Leon, Tamaulipas, and Chiapas (casually west to Baja California) south through Middle America, Colombia, and Bolivia (AOU 1998). Casual straggler north to northern California, southern Nevada, northern Colorado, northern Wyoming, southern Saskatchewan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, southern Ontario, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, and Nova Scotia; sight report for Maine (AOU 1998).
Occurrences Comments
This is an estimate based on known populations in six U.S. states in the periphery of the Mississippi Kite's range and assumption of at least 15 element occurrences in the larger populatioin concentrations for this species in the Great Plains and most southeastern states (Parker, 1999).
Threat Impact Comments
Most raptor populations in North America have decreased in abundance since the last century as a result of persecution (e.g., shooting), habitat loss, and pesticides. Mississippi Kite, however, may benefit from habitat fragmentation. Love et al. (1985) noted that the mosaic distribution of land-use types may influence the use of windbreak forests in the south central plains of North America. The resulting vegetation patchiness may enhance foraging success and reproduction (Glinski and Ohmart 1983). Increase in local populations of the eastern breeding range became evident in the 1950s. Parker and Ogden (1979) suggested that logging in the East could have disrupted nesting, but has more likely had a positive effect by providing cultivated areas where foraging opportunities are improved for kites. Riparian habitats that historically were the primary support of the kite are disappearing at an alarming rate. Loss of riparian habitat in the Great Plains, for example, has had minimal effect due to the availability of alternate nest sites in shelterbelts and urban areas. Parker and Ogden (1979) note that removal of large numbers of shelterbelts would disturb kite nesting groups. The loss of lowland and floodplain forests in the Southeast, however, could limit the population. It remains unclear if kites will begin using upland and second growth habitat or urban sites in sufficient numbers to increase or maintain present populations (Meyer 1990). Impacts of forest clearing in South America are unknown but may be beneficial. Eggshell thinning caused by chlorinated hydrocarbons was not found to be a significant factor contributing to population declines (Parker 1976). Pesticides, however, can be a threat as noted in Oklahoma where several birds died after ingesting insects sprayed with parathion (Franson 1994). Parker (1988) reports the following as being confirmed and probable nest predators: fox squirrel (SCIURUS NIGER), raccoon (PROCYON LOTOR), bobcat (FELIS RUFUS), American Crow (CORVUS BRACHYRHYNCHOS), Swainson's Hawk (BUTEO SWAINSONI), and Great Horned Owl (BUBO VIRGINIANUS). Several species of snakes and a number of other birds and mammals probably take kite eggs and/or nestlings (Parker 1988). Persecution continues to be a possible threat especially for aggressive birds in urban area. Increased public education should eliminate this threat.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

ADULT MALE: A small kite; generally appears more falcon-like than hawk-like. The head, hind-neck, and secondaries are pale ashy gray and are white-tipped. The mantle is dark, slaty, ashy, gray becoming more black at the bend of the wing; the upper back blending with the paler hind-neck. The tail is almost always squarish to rarely slightly forked; tail and primaries are slaty blackish color. The inner primaries often have a pale rufous area on the outer web and spots of similar color on the inner web. Lores and the area around the eyes are black. Underparts are light gray, but not as pale as the crown and throat. Eyes are deep red. The bill, cere, eyelids, and interior of the mouth are deep black; corner of mouth orange-red. Legs are a variable salmon-orange-red, rarely to yellow; basal phalanges of inner toe are fused to form a single functional unit. Average measurements: wing 286-305 mm; tail 149-172 mm; tarsus 35-41 mm; weight 216-269 g.

ADULT FEMALE: Sexes similar; female being larger with a darker gray head compared to the male. Average measurements: wing 300-315 mm; weight 278-339 g.

JUVENILE: Generally dark brown to blackish above. Head, neck, and ventral body is heavily streaked; secondaries are not lighter than primaries. On the tail feathers, the white areas on the inner webs are extensive and from two to three broad transverse bars. Eyes dark brown; bill bluish-gray; cere, corners of mouth, and legs yellowish-orange to orange.

IMMATURE: The body plumage is similar to the adult with the juvenile wing, tail quills, and a variable number of contour feathers retained. The mixture of adult and juvenile plumage creates a white spotted effect. Eyes may be less red than the adult; bill black; cere and legs may be more yellowish.

HATCHLING: White and downy with black eye-ring and lores. Beak blackish, cere and rictus vivid to pale yellow. Eye dark brown. Legs usually orange-yellow.

EGGS: white.

See also Johnsgard (1990), Parker (1988), National Geographic Society (1987), Terres (1980), Harrison (1975), Brown and Amadon (1968).

Diagnostic Characteristics

No other raptor can be confused with the "adult" kite (Parker 1988). Juvenile birds are likely to be mistaken for young of other species (e.g., Broad-winged hawk (BUTEO PLATYPTERUS), peregrine falcon (FALCO PEREGRINUS)). Wing and tail shapes are key distinguishing features. In flight, the wings are pointed with the leading primary relatively short and from a distance can be confused with a peregrine falcon. The uniformly black tail readily distinguishes this raptor from any other. Very similar in appearance to the Plumbeous Kite (I. PLUMBEA); where ranges overlap, sight identification becomes difficult.

Habitat

BREEDING: Tall forest, open woodland, prairie, semiarid rangeland, shelterbelts, wooded areas bordering lakes and streams in more open regions, scrubby oaks and mesquite, and lowland/floodplain forests. Requires open areas near nesting sites for foraging. More specific breeding habitat components vary by region (Great Plains and Southeastern U.S.). Nests in fork or crotch of tree, high up where possible but sometimes low in scrubby trees (Harrison 1978). May sometimes nest in stands of mature trees in towns. Most nests placed in non-conifer near woodland edge. Often reuses old kite nest.

Historically, in the Great Plains was associated with areas having sizable riparian woodlands along major river systems. Kite numbers increased during the 1950's and 60's as the birds began using shelterbelts (tree plantings designed for windbreaks and to impede soil erosion) as nest sites (Johnsgard 1990, Meyer 1990, Bolen and Flores 1989, Parker and Ogden 1979). The increase of mesquite thickets, associated with cattle raising and farming, has also offered new nesting areas, as have farm woodlots and shade trees in towns. This increase in nesting habitat has created a more uniform regional distribution of nesting kites in the Great Plains (Parker 1988, Parker and Ogden 1979).

In contrast, nest site selection in the Southeast has not changed as a result of habitat alteration to the extent that it has in the Midwest (Parker 1988, Parker and Ogden 1979). Nests in the Southeast are most commonly found in mature, undisturbed stands of lowland and floodplain forests and along major rivers and feed over adjacent fields (Hamel et al. 1982, Hamel 1993, Parker 1988).

NON-BREEDING: Little is known of migration and wintering habits (Johnsgard 1990, Parker 1988, Glinski and Ohmart 1983, Parker and Ogden 1979). Because it prefers to forage over open and edge habitats, agricultural expansion and forest removal in Central and South America may increase foraging habitat and prey populations there, as has happened in North America (Parker 1988, Parker and Ogden 1979).

Ecology

Forages or perches alone and in small to large flocks (Parker 1988). Usually forages within 0.5 kilometers of nest; sometimes up to several kilometers.

Reproduction

Nest preparation begins in early to mid-May, but birds may build new or add to old nests during June and early July (Parker 1988). Single brooded, clutch size one to two (usually two, rarely three). Incubation 29-31 days (also reported as 32 days), by both sexes. Young tended by both parents, climb out of nest to adjacent branches at 15-18 days, can fly at 34 days, rely on adults for several weeks thereafter (Parker 1988, Brown and Amadon 1968). Studies in the Great Plains, Arizona, and Illinois found about 50% of nests fledged young (Palmer 1988). Yearlings may breed or help at nest. Often a gregarious nester. Productivity very high in some suburban settings (e.g., golf courses), which provide protection from predators (Glinski and Gennaro 1988, Gennaro 1988).

Nests are found in groups sometimes referred to as colonies. There are no home range data in literature (Kalla and Alsop 1983), however home range has recently been studied by the University of Missouri. Glinski and Ohmart (1983) state that territory size consisted of a space within 50 to 100 meters from an active nest. Parker (pers. comm.), however, questions this claim stating that he has never seen clear territorial behavior in these kites. Glinski and Ohmart (1983) also noted that nests within their study groups were spaced from 125 to 1,700 meters. Adult kites seldom fail to pair and attempt nesting (Glinski and Ohmart 1983, Parker 1988).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSavannaGrassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5B
ProvinceRankNative
New JerseySNA,S4NYes
KansasS4BYes
TennesseeS2Yes
VirginiaS2BYes
ArkansasS4B,S4NYes
LouisianaS5BYes
ArizonaS2BYes
OhioS4BYes
MissouriS3Yes
AlabamaS4Yes
IndianaS1BYes
IllinoisS2Yes
Navajo NationSNRYes
OklahomaSNRBYes
TexasS4BYes
ColoradoS1BYes
New MexicoS2B,S3NYes
FloridaS3BYes
North CarolinaS3BYes
GeorgiaS3Yes
South CarolinaS4Yes
MississippiS4BYes
NebraskaS1BYes
KentuckyS2BYes
Roadless Areas (2)
Arkansas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
Tennessee (1)
AreaForestAcres
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
References (67)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Areta, J. I. and S. H. Seipke. 2006. A 10,000 Mississippi Kite flock observed in Fuerte Esperanza, Argentina. Ornitología Neotropical 17:433-437.
  4. Bent, A.C. 1937. Life histories of North American birds of prey. Part 1. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 137. 409 pp.
  5. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  6. Bolen, E. G., and D. Flores. 1993. The Mississippi kite: portrait of a southern hawk. Univ. Texas Press, Austin. 128 pp.
  7. Bolen, E. G. and D. L. Flores. 1989. The Mississippi kite in the environmental history of the southern Great Plains. Prairie Nat. 21(2):65-74
  8. Brown, L. and D. Amadon. 1968. Eagles, Hawks, and Falcons of the World. McGraw-Hill, NY.
  9. Clarkson, K. E. and L. P. Laniawe. 2000. Hawaiian Hawk, <i>Buteo solitarius</i>. In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America. No. 523. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 16 pp.
  10. Craighead, J. J., and F. C. Craighead, Jr. 1956. Hawks, Owls and Wildlife. The Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C.
  11. England, A. S., M. J. Bechard, and C. S. Houston. 1997. Swainson's Hawk (<i>Buteo swainsoni</i>). No. 265 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 28pp.
  12. Fisher, A.K. 1893. The hawks and owls of the United States in their relation to agriculture. Washington U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Bull. no. 6. 210 pp.
  13. Franson, C. 1994. Parathion poisoning of Mississippi kites in Oklahoma. Journal of Raptor Research 28:108-109.
  14. Gennaro, A. L. 1988a. Breeding biology of an urban population of Mississippi kites in New Mexico. Pages 188-190 in Glinski et al., eds. Proc. Southwest raptor management symposium and workshop. Nat. Wildl. Fed. Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 11.
  15. Gennaro, A. L. 1988b. Extent and control of aggressive behavior toward humans by Mississippi kites. Pages 249-252 in Glinski et al., eds. Proc. Southwest raptor management symposium and workshop. Nat. Wildl. Fed. Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 11.
  16. Glinski, R. L., and A. L. Gennaro. 1988. Mississippi kite. Pages 54-56 in Glinski et al., eds. Proc. Southwest Raptor Manage. Symp. and Workshop. National Wildlife Federation Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 11.
  17. Glinski, R. L., and R. D. Ohmart. 1983. Breeding ecology of the Mississippi kite in Arizona. Condor 85:200-207.
  18. Hamel, P. B. 1993. The Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature Conservancy and U.S. Forest Service. Chapel Hill and Asheville, North Carolina.
  19. Hamel, P. B., H. E. LeGrand Jr., M. R. Lennartz, and S. A. Gauthreaux, Jr. 1982. Bird-habitat relationships on southeastern forest lands. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report SE-22.
  20. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  21. Harrison, H.H. 1975. A field guide to bird's nests in the U.S. east of the Mississippi River. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 257 p.
  22. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  23. Hawbecker, A. C. 1942. A life history study of the white-tailed kite. Condor 44:267-276.
  24. Hector, D. P. 1988b. Aplomado Falcon (<i>Falco femoralis</i>). Pages 315-322 in R. S. Palmer, editor, Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 5: Family Accipitridae, Family Falconidae. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
  25. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  26. Houston, C. S., and J. K. Schmutz. 1995. Swainson's Hawk banding in North America to 1992. North American Bird Bander 20:120-127.
  27. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  28. Johnsgard, P. A. 1990. Hawks, eagles, and falcons of North America. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C. xvi + 403 pp.
  29. Johnson, R. R., R. L. Glinski, and S. W. Matteson. 2000. Zone-tailed Hawk (<i>Buteo albonotatus</i>). No. 529 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 20pp.
  30. Jones, H. L., P. Balderamos, J. Caulfield, A. Caulfield, G. Crawford, T. M. Donegan, E. McRae, M. Meadows, M. Muschamp, P. Saqui, V. Spek, J. Urbina, and B. Zimmer. 2002. Fourteen new bird species for Belize. Cotinga 17:33-42.
  31. Kalla, P. I. and F. J. Alsop III. 1983. The distribution, habitat preference, and status of the Mississippi kite in Tennessee. Am. Birds 37(2):146-9.
  32. Kochert, M. N. 1986. Raptors. pages 313-349 IN: A. Y. Cooperrider, R. J. Boyd, and H. R. Stuart, editors. Inventory and monitoring of wildlife habitat. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center.
  33. Leary, A. W., R. Mazaika, and M. J. Bechard. 1998. Factors affecting the size of Ferruginous Hawk home ranges. Wilson Bulletin 110:198-205.
  34. Love, D., J. A. Grzybowski, and F. L. Knopf. 1985. Influence of various land uses on windbreak selection by nesting Mississippi kites. The Wilson Bulletin 97(4):561-5.
  35. Martin, K., and J. Parker. 1991. Mississippi kites reborn in Tennessee. The Tennesse Conservationist LVII(3):5-10.
  36. Matteson, S. W., and J. O. Riley. 1981. Distribution and nesting success of Zone-tailed Hawks in west Texas. Wilson Bulletin 107:719-723.
  37. Meyer, K. D. 1990. Kites. In Proceeding of the Southeast raptor management symposium and workshop. B. G. Pendleton, N. N. LeFranc Jr., and B. A. Millsap (editors). National Wildlife Federation Sci. and Tech. Series No. 14.
  38. Montoya, A.B., P.J. Zwank, and M. Cardenas. 1997. Breeding biology of Aplomado Falcons in desert grasslands of Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology 68(1):135-143.
  39. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
  40. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America. Second edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
  41. Olendorff, R. R. 1993. Status, biology, and management of Ferruginous Hawks: a review. Raptor Res. and Tech. Asst. Cen., Special Report. U.S. Dept. Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho. 84 pp.
  42. Palmer, R. S., editor. 1988a. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 4. [Diurnal raptors, part 1]. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. vii + 433 pp.
  43. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  44. Parker, J. 1988. The ace dive-bomber of the prairie is a terror on the green. Smithsonian 19:54-63.
  45. Parker, J. W. 1976. Pesticides and eggshell thinning in the Mississippi kite. Journal of Wildlife Management 40(2):243-8.
  46. Parker, J. W., 1980. Kites of the prairies. Bird Watcher's Digest (July/August):88-95.
  47. Parker, J. W. 1986. Urban-nesting Mississippi kites: history, problems, management, and benefits. In Proc. Natl. Symp. on Urban Wild. L. W. Adams and D. L. Leedy (editors). Natl. Inst. for Urban Wildl., Columbia, Maryland.
  48. Parker, J.W. 1999. Mississippi Kite (<i>Ictinia mississippiensis</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/402/doi:10.2173/bna.402.
  49. Parker, J. W. and J. C. Ogden. 1979. The recent history and status of the Mississippi kite. American Birds 33(2):119-28.
  50. Parker, J. W. and M. Ports. 1982. Helping at the nest by yearling Mississippi kites. Raptor Research 16(1):14-7.
  51. Pendleton, B. A. G., B. A. Millsap, K. W. Cline, and D. M. Bird. 1987. Raptor management techniques manual. National Wildlife Federation, Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 10. 420 pp.
  52. Petersen, L. 1979. Ecology of Great Horned Owls and Red-tailed Hawks in southeastern Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin no. 111.
  53. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  54. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  55. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  56. Ridgely, R. S., and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A guide to the birds of Panama with Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Honduras. Second edition. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 534 pp.
  57. Ridgely, R. S. and P. J. Greenfield. 2001. The birds of Ecuador: Status, distribution, and taxonomy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  58. Robbins, C. S., D. Bystrack, and P. H. Geissler. 1986. The breeding bird survey: its first fifteen years, 1965-1979. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publ. 157. Washington, D.C.
  59. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2001. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2000. Version 2001.2, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.
  60. Sibley, C.G., and B.L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. xxiv + 1111 pp.
  61. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  62. Smith, D. G., and J. R. Murphy. 1973. Breeding ecology of raptors in the eastern Great Basin of Utah. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biol. Ser. 13:1-76.
  63. Steenhof, K. 1998. Prairie Falcon (<i>Falco mexicanus</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 346. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 28 pp.
  64. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  65. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  66. Woodbridge, B., K. K. Finley, and P. H. Bloom. 1995. Reproductive performance, age structure, and natal dispersal of Swainson's Hawks in the Butte Valley, California. Journal of Raptor Research 29:187-192.
  67. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.