Chlidonias niger

(Linnaeus, 1758)

Black Tern

G4Apparently Secure (G4G5) Found in 80 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Black Tern (Chlidonias niger). © Jeff Dyck; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Jeff Dyck; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Black Tern (Chlidonias niger). © Derek Hudgins; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Derek Hudgins; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Black Tern (Chlidonias niger). © Sharif Uddin; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Sharif Uddin; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Black Tern (Chlidonias niger). © Ian Davies; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ian Davies; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Black Tern (Chlidonias niger). © George Armistead | Hillstar Nature; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© George Armistead | Hillstar Nature; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Black Tern (Chlidonias niger). © Luke Seitz; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Luke Seitz; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105682
Element CodeABNNM10020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderCharadriiformes
FamilyLaridae
GenusChlidonias
Other Common Names
black tern (EN) Charrán Negro, Gaviotín Negro (ES) Guifette noire (FR) Trinta-Réis-Negro (PT)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Two subspecies are recognized, New World surinamensis and niger of Eurasia.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-07
Change Date2016-04-07
Edition Date2014-09-30
Edition AuthorsSoule, J.; Jennings, R. Revised in 1994 by G. Hammerson; Revised in 2014 by Dean K. Jue
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Widespread distribution and relatively abundant, but habitat alteration and degradation threaten the species. Although it is not federally listed, the black tern has special status in many of the states within its breeding range. In the northcentral states, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio list the black tern as an endangered species while Iowa, Michigan, and Wisconsin list it as special concern. In the Northeast, the black tern is listed as threatened in Pennsylvania, special concern in New York, and is on a "watch list" in Maine. New York State is in the process of revising its state lists and it is likely that the status of the black tern will be changed to endangered or threatened. The species has no special protection status in the Great Plains states, and in the West, it is in the protected category in Idaho and Montana. The black tern was recently proposed for threatened listing in Canada (Gerson 1987).
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: British Columbia and Mackenzie east through northern Saskatchewan to Nova Scotia, south locally to southern California, Colorado, Nebraska, southern Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, northern New England (formerly to Missouri and Kentucky); there is a single breeding record for coastal New Jersey. In Old World from northern Europe, Russia, and Siberia south to Mediterranean, Asia Minor, Turkestan, and Caspian and Aral Seas. Nonbreeders occur in summer south on Pacific coast to Panama, and in eastern North America to Gulf Coast (AOU 1983). Sparse and uncommon in northeast and on southern edge of range (Dunn and Agro 1995). See Gerson (1987) for details on distribution and abundance in Canada. NON-BREEDING: in the Americas along both coasts from Panama south to Peru, Surinam, and French Guiana; rare in Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina (AOU 1983, Dunn and Agro 1995). In the Old World in tropical Africa south to Angola and Tanzania (AOU 1983). Casual in Hawaii.
Occurrences Comments
Relatively abundant throughout most of its range. Found in both the Americas as well as Europe and Asia (Birdlife International, 2014).
Threat Impact Comments
Decline may be due to loss of freshwater marsh habitat (including losses through invasion of exotic plants and due to drought), human disturbance of nesting sites, pesticide use, and problems along the migration route or in winter range (Muller et al. 1992, Novak 1992). Loss of breeding habitat has undoubtedly been a major contributing factor in the decline. Since European settlement, 54% of all wetlands in the United States have been lost (Tiner 1984). The loss of 4.75 million acres of palustrine emergent wetlands during the mid-1950s to mid-1970s has probably had an especially significant effect on populations. Similar losses of wetlands have been documented in Canada. A decline of 9 to 61% of the original wetland area has been documented for portions of some prairie provinces while 70% of southern Ontario's original wetlands have been converted to other uses, particularly agriculture (Gerson 1987). Along the St. Lawrence River, 42% of the wetlands from Cornwall, Ontario to Matane, Quebec were lost between 1945-1975 (Gerson 1987). Wetlands in the United States and Canada continue to be threatened despite efforts to curb their loss. In addition to the outright loss of wetlands, successional change, management practices, and degradation of water quality have altered the character of some wetlands, thus rendering them less suitable as breeding habitat. Loss of high quality habitat through successional changes was noted at several historical colony locations during a recent survey in New York (Novak 1990). The quality of some remaining wetlands may be reduced because of pollution and runoff associated with increased development in the vicinity of wetlands (Gerson 1987). Wetlands in Central and South America are also threatened by land use changes and degradation of water quality (Gerson 1987). In Panama, the introduction of peacock bass (CICHLA OCELLARIS), has resulted in the decline of an important native food fish (Zaret and Paine 1973). Purple loosestrife (LYTHRUM SALICARIA), an invasive, wetland exotic that out-competes native emergent species, has drastically altered the character of wetlands in parts of the northeastern United States. The changes wrought by this plant, along with changes brought about in the attempt to control it, have altered the character of some wetlands. Loosestrife may have been a factor in the decline at Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge in New York where high quality nesting habitat is currently lacking (Novak 1990). In addition to direct loss of habitat due to wetland destruction, one of the indirect effects of wetland loss is that larger rivers experience more pronounced and frequent flooding, and riverine marshes become unreliable nesting sites. The probability of flooding on the Minnesota River during tern nesting season was 70% based on 1982-1991 data (which includes drought years of 1987-1989) (Moen 1991). The nest, a floating structure located close to open water and with eggs placed just a few centimeters above water level, predisposes this species to some natural sources of nest failure. Both Bailey (1977) and Rabenold (1986) attributed major nest failures to the flooding of nests caused by elevated water levels resulting from heavy rains. Goodwin (1960) noted that some nests were so flimsy that storms caused them to submerge. Wind and wave action has also been noted as a major cause of nest failure (Cuthbert 1954, Bergman et al. 1970). Relatively low nesting and fledging success may be typical in regions where spring and summer storms occur regularly. The impact of various types of human disturbance on nesting is not well documented. Waves caused by boats may represent a major source of egg and chick mortality at many sites in New York and elsewhere. Boat wakes were observed swamping logs both in the open and within moderately dense cattails at one site in New York and fledging success rates were comparatively low at several sites where boat traffic was heavy (Novak 1990). In New York, boat traffic per se did not have a visible influence on nearby nesting birds (Muller et al. 1992). Organochlorines including PCBs, DDT, DDE, and Dieldrin were detected in eggs collected during several studies in the midwest (Faber and Hickey 1973, Mossman 1980, Faber and Nosek 1985). PCBs, DDE, Hexachlorobenzene, and Octachlorostyrene (an industrial pollutant) were found in eggs and a chick collected from a site on Lake Ontario in western New York (Firstencel 1987). Significant changes in eggshell thickness were also noted in one study (Faber and Nosek 1985). Accumulated organochlorine contamination has been linked to lowered reproductive success and developmental problems in other tern species (Hays and Risebrough 1972, Fox 1976, Gerson 1987). These results suggest that an accumulation of environmental contaminants may be contributing to reduced reproductive success throughout various parts of the breeding range. It is suspected that many of the contaminants may be accumulated while terns are in migration or on their wintering grounds (Faanes 1979, Faber and Nosek 1985, Firstencel 1987). The use of pesticides can also affect food supplies by depressing prey for populations breeding near agricultural areas. Three of 38 (8%) nests and 16 of 26 (61.5%) penned young were taken by predators at one study site in Wisconsin (Bailey 1977), but predators responsible for these losses were not identified. Chapman-Mosher (1987) reported the loss of 8.6% of nests to predation. The great blue heron (ARDEA HERODIAS) and northern harrier (CIRCUS CYANEUS) have been observed taking terns (Chapman and Forbes 1984, Maxson 1989). A host of other potential predators have been observed in or near nesting colonies and are suspected of regular or occasional predation on eggs or chicks. Suspected predators include great horned owl (BUBO VIRGINIANUS), black-crowned night heron (NYCTICORAX NYCTICORAX), American crow (CORVUS BRACHYRHYNCHOS), water snake (NATRIX SIPEDON), snapping turtle (CHELYDRA SERPENTINA) and ring-billed gull (LARUS DELAWARENSIS) (Cuthbert 1954, Goodwin 1960, Faber and Nosek 1985, Firstencel 1987, Novak 1990).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Total length of adults 23-26.5 cm (9-10.5 inches). In alternate (breeding) plumage, head and body are black, fading to gray on the rump. Undertail coverts are white. Upper surface of wings and tail are dark gray, and wing linings are pale gray. The leading margin of the wing from the body to the first digit is white. Bill is black and feet are a dark reddish-purple (Goodwin 1960, Farrand 1983). Females are somewhat duller black than males, but this difference is often difficult to distinguish in the field (Goodwin 1960).

Prebasic (postbreeding) molt begins in late June when eggs begin to hatch. White feathers appear first around eyes and cheeks, then on forehead, neck, throat and breast, and finally on abdomen. Heavily molting adults take on a peculiar, piebald appearance. The prebasic molt is completed during fall migration (Goodwin 1960).

In basic (winter) plumage, underparts are pure white except for a small, dark patch on each side of the breast. The back becomes a shade of gray similar to the wings and tail. A blackish cap joins black ear coverts on the otherwise white head (Goodwin 1960, Farrand 1983). The juvenile plumage is similar to the basic plumage, but the feathers of the back are darker and the wing coverts and cap are barred and scalloped brown (Goodwin 1960, Farrand 1983).

VOCALIZATIONS: shrill, somewhat metallic alarm notes, described as "kik" or "keek", depending upon intensity and level of motivation, and a complex of contact calls described as "kyew", followed by one to four additional syllables, as "kyew-dik", "kyew-dik-ik", etc. (Goodwin 1960). The "kik" call commonly serves as a signal of impending danger in the nesting area. It may also be given during the ascent portion of the courtship flight. The "keek" call is similar to, but more shrill and forceful than the "kik" call, and is given during aggressive attacks on enemies in close proximity to the nest. The frequency of repetition increases as the terns become more aggressive. The "kyew" calls are given as parents approach and leave the nest, during foraging flights, by adults accompanied in flight by young, by parents calling to young at or near the nest, by parents at the nest during incubation, brooding and feeding, and during the courtship flights (Goodwin 1960).

EGGS: ovate with a tendency toward ovate pyriform (Bent 1921). Ground color varies from dark olive to light buff with markings of dark brown and gray. Markings vary from small dots and scrawls to very large blotches and are often particularly heavy around the larger end of the egg (Goodwin 1960). The average dimensions for 122 eggs in the U.S. National Museum were 34 x 24 mm (Bent 1921).

Habitat

BREEDING: marshes, along sloughs, rivers, lakeshores, and impoundments, or in wet meadows, typically in sites with mixture of emergent vegetation and open water. Cattails, bulrushes, burreed, and/or phragmites commonly are present in nesting areas (Bent 1921, Cuthbert 1954, Goodwin 1960, Bailey 1977, Firstencel 1987, Novak 1990). Nested in greatest numbers where emergent vegetation and open water are in an approximately 50:50 ratio (Weller and Spatcher 1965). In Wisconsin, Tilghman (1979) found nests in areas where emergent marsh coverage was 51-75%. In British Columbia, nests occurred in areas with 33% open water, 42% matted vegetation, and 25% standing vegetation (Chapman-Mosher 1987).

Nests may be placed in a variety of vegetative situations, from dense stands of emergent vegetation to open water (Bergman et al. 1970, Novak 1990), but moderate or sparse vegetation appears to be preferred (Cuthbert 1954, Weller and Spatcher 1965, Dunn 1979). Nests are typically located in shallow water, close to open water or openings in stands of emergent vegetation. The range of water depths reported varies from a "few inches" (Bent 1921) to 1-2 m (Dunn 1979). Bailey (1977) found that nests were never more than 1-2 m from open water. Dunn (1979) and Cuthbert (1954) reported the average distance to open water as 4 m and 4.6-6.1 m, respectively. One site in New York where 9 nests averaged 25.3 m from open water (Novak 1990) appears to be the exception, although Firstencel (1987) also reported nests located "deep within the cattails".

Nests on heap of floating vegetation, on old muskrat house, old grebe or coot nest, or on floating wood (Cuthbert 1954, Bergman et al. 1970, Bailey 1977, Dunn 1979, Novak 1990). Floating mats of muck or algae, mud flats, and mud mounds and islands also have been used as nest substrates (Cuthbert 1954, Bailey 1977, Dunn 1979, Connell and Norman 1989, Novak 1990). The nest consists of a small gathering of aquatic vegetation with a simple, cup-like bowl (Weller and Spatcher 1965, Bailey 1977). Although the first egg may be laid before the nest takes shape, vegetation gathered at the nest site is added throughout the incubation period (Baggerman et al. 1956, Goodwin 1960, Bailey 1977). Will nest on artificial nesting platforms (Muller et al. 1992). The height of eggs above water has often been measured. Although the height may vary based upon substrate chosen for nesting, the eggs are rarely located more than a few centimeters above the water level. The range reported in the literature varies from an average of 2.3 cm for 23 nests on dead floating vegetation in Iowa (Bergman et al. 1970), to 20.0 cm for two nests located on mud islands in New York (Firstencel 1987). The latter is clearly the exception as 8.6 cm for seven nests on old muskrat houses is the next highest figure reported (Weller and Spatcher 1965).

Exposed perches, such as channel marker posts, floating logs, fallen trees, and old dock or fence posts are used as stations for feeding recently fledged young, resting, and copulation (Cuthbert 1954, Novak 1990).

NON-BREEDING: pelagic waters as well as seacoasts, bays, estuaries, lagoons, lakes, reservoirs, and rivers (Eisenmann 1951, Zaret and Paine 1973, van Halewijn 1973, Spaans 1978, AOU 1983, Williams 1983); prefers sheltered offshore waters and bays, comes to shore chiefly during migrations (Stiles and Skutch 1989).

Ecology

Gregarious throughout the year. Has been described as a semi-colonial nesting species (Cuthbert 1954, Bergman et al. 1970). Nests may be clumped closely in favorable habitat or more widely scattered in other, perhaps less favorable areas. As is typical of colonial nesting gulls and terns, terns will join together to defend the nesting area from intruders (Cuthbert 1954).

Ectoparasites include feather mites and lice (Peters 1936, Perez and Atyeo 1984). A trematode, APORCHIS LARUS, was recorded in Russia (Mirzoeva 1980). The effects of these parasites have not been studied.

Black terns are susceptible to avian botulism. A few dead birds have been found in Nevada and Manitoba (Alcorn 1942, Manuwal 1967), but no major die-offs from this disease have been reported.

Commonly returns to previous nesting area but also commonly changes sites if conditions become unfavorable. Return rates may vary considerably among specific sites. Stern et al. (1985) found that 67% of recaptured terns nested within the same primary wetlands, while Bailey (1977) and Dunn (1979) reported return rates of 40% and 27% for sites in Wisconsin and Ontario, respectively. These return rates, which are low in comparison with other gulls and terns, may be the result of the relative instability of preferred habitat (McNicholl 1975).

Reproduction

Most terns in the northeastern United States and Canada return to breeding areas during the first two weeks of May, although birds may arrive in western New York as early as the last week of April (Laughlin and Kibbe 1985, Firstencel 1987, Gerson 1987). Conspicuous aerial courtship displays characterize the courtship period, which begins soon after arrival at the breeding site. In the "high-flight", a group of 2-20 terns ascend together to a great height then split into smaller groups of two or three and descend in rapid glides (Baggerman et al. 1956). During the "fish-flight", a male tern carries a small fish or large insect in its bill and is closely followed by a female as the two fly about the marsh. At the close of this aerial display the male follows the female to a perch and feeds her (Baggerman et al. 1956).

In the northeastern United States egg laying begins in late May, but may be initiated as late as the middle of July. Nests with eggs were observed at one site in western New York from 24 May to 12 July (Firstencel 1987). During a 1989 survey of colony sites throughout New York, nests with eggs were observed as early as 25 May and as late as 18 July (Novak 1990). Not known to be double brooded and late nests probably represent renesting attempts. At Rush Lake in Wisconsin, Bailey (1977) observed a trend toward three nesting peaks, one in late May, one in early to mid June, and one in late July. This pattern was attributed to two initial nesting periods characterized by a high degree of synchrony, followed by a period of renesting (Bailey 1977). Baggerman et al. (1956) also reported highly synchronous nesting activity.

One to five eggs may be laid, although the normal clutch is usually two or three (Bent 1921). Clutches with four eggs have been reported in only two recent studies (Bergman et al. 1970, Mossman 1980) and are apparently quite rare. Other than Bent (1921), there are no published reports of five egg clutches. Single egg clutches may often be replacement nests or nests where one or more eggs have already been lost (Bent 1921, Cuthbert 1954, Firstencel 1987). In a recent study in Wisconsin, the average clutch size for 41 closely monitored nests was 2.9 (Bailey 1977). Four nests had clutches of two, but no nests contained less than two or more than three eggs. Average clutch sizes reported in other recent studies where nests may not have been monitored as carefully, range from 2.25 to 2.75 (Cuthbert 1954, Goodwin 1960, Bergman et al. 1970, Mossman 1981, Firstencel 1987, Novak 1990). Incubation begins with the laying of the first egg, and eggs require 20-24 days to hatch (Goodwin 1960, Bergman et al. 1970, Bailey 1977). Both sexes incubate (Goodwin 1960).

Young are tended by both parents. Chicks are able to swim, walk and run by the time they are two days old (Goodwin 1960). The chicks grow rapidly, doubling their weight in less than three days and quadrupling their weight in less than six days (Bailey 1977). The rate of weight gain slows after the eighth day. In some cases, chicks may be relocated from the nest site to "auxiliary" nests within a few days after hatching (Cuthbert 1954, Firstencel 1987). If disturbance at the nest is minimal, young may remain at the original nest site for as long as 14-25 days, although they hide in the vegetation at the sign of danger and may be found swimming as far as 40 ft from the nest (Cuthbert 1954, Goodwin 1960). The age at fledging is difficult to determine. Bailey (1977) reported fledging at 18 and 19 days for two chicks of known age and suggested that the majority of chicks are flying at 21 days of age with a mean fledging age possibly less than 20 days. Baggerman et al. (1956) and Goodwin (1960) reported fledging at 21 days. Young are fully fledged at about four weeks.

Estimates of nest success (expressed as a percentage of nests where at least one egg was hatched successfully) from four nest studies are as follows: 27% (15 of 55 nests) in Ontario, 29% (56 of 192 nests) in Iowa, 34% (13 of 38 nests) in Wisconsin, and 50% (12 of 24 nests) in New York (Dunn 1979, Bergman et al. 1970, Bailey 1977, Firstencel 1987, respectively). There was no obvious correlation between nest success, height of eggs above water, and number of nests per substrate in the Iowa study (Bergman et al. 1970).

Survival of young to fledging is difficult to measure because of the mobility of chicks. Bailey (1977) attempted to measure chick survival by placing fencing around nests to prevent young from moving away from the nest site. Just three of 26 (12%) chicks monitored fledged successfully. Sixteen chicks were lost to predation and several chicks died in the pen netting. Fledging success at unfenced nests (perhaps a better representation of fledging success) was estimated at 15-20% (Bailey 1977). Recent surveys have presented estimates of reproductive success based on the number of fledglings produced per egg laid in the colony (Rabenold 1987, Novak 1990). Estimates for three small (less than 10 pairs) colonies in Indiana were 0%, 53%, and 67%, for an overall average of 30% (Rabenold 1987). Estimates also varied widely for 19 sites in New York, from 4% to 38%, with an overall average of 20% (Novak 1990). Mossman (1980) reported a 25% reproductive success based on the ratio of young: adults observed at one study area in Wisconsin.

The similarity between reproductive or fledging success rates and nest success (hatching success) supports the observation by Dunn (1979) that most losses occur during the egg stage. Wind and wave action, and storms were responsible for most nest losses in several studies (Bergman et al. 1970, Bailey 1977, Dunn 1979, Faber and Nosek 1985, Chapman-Mosher 1987). Nest losses have also been attributed to egg inviability, predation, muskrat activity, and intraspecific interactions (Bergman et al. 1970, Bailey 1977, Dunn 1979, Firstencel 1987).

Has been described as a semi-colonial nesting species (Cuthbert 1954, Bergman et al. 1970). Nests may be clumped closely in favorable habitat or more widely scattered in other, perhaps less favorable areas. As is typical of colonial nesting gulls and terns, terns will join together to defend the nesting area from intruders (Cuthbert 1954).
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4B
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS3BYes
IdahoS1BYes
TennesseeS4NYes
WyomingS1Yes
KansasS1BYes
South DakotaS3BYes
UtahS2Yes
KentuckySXB,S4NYes
AlabamaSNRYes
MontanaS3BYes
ColoradoS2BYes
OhioS1Yes
New JerseySNRMYes
MissouriSXYes
ArkansasSNAYes
MarylandSNAYes
TexasS3Yes
MichiganS2Yes
MassachusettsS2NYes
MaineS2BYes
New MexicoS3NYes
ArizonaS3MYes
New HampshireSNAYes
VirginiaSNAYes
New YorkS2BYes
District of ColumbiaS1NYes
ConnecticutSNAYes
IowaS1B,S4NYes
FloridaS2MYes
NebraskaS1Yes
IndianaS1BYes
North CarolinaSNAYes
South CarolinaS3MYes
MississippiS3MYes
NevadaS2BYes
North DakotaSNRBYes
IllinoisS1Yes
CaliforniaS2Yes
Navajo NationS3MYes
VermontS1BYes
LouisianaS3MYes
GeorgiaS3Yes
WisconsinS2BYes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
West VirginiaSNAYes
OklahomaSNRNYes
PennsylvaniaS1B,S3MYes
DelawareS1MYes
WashingtonS4BYes
CanadaN5B
ProvinceRankNative
Northwest TerritoriesS3Yes
QuebecS2BYes
OntarioS3B,S4MYes
SaskatchewanS5BYes
Yukon TerritoryS1BYes
AlbertaS4BYes
Nova ScotiaS1BYes
British ColumbiaS3BYes
ManitobaS4BYes
New BrunswickS2BYes
Roadless Areas (80)
California (26)
AreaForestAcres
Benton RangeInyo National Forest9,637
Black CanyonInyo National Forest32,421
Boundary Peak (CA)Inyo National Forest210,884
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
Coyote SoutheastInyo National Forest53,159
Crane Mtn.Modoc National Forest1,269
Damon ButteModoc National Forest25,022
Devil's Gate (CA)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest9,946
Dobie FlatModoc National Forest15,079
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Granite PeakSan Bernardino National Forest450
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Horse Mdw.Inyo National Forest5,687
Log Cabin SaddlebagInyo National Forest15,165
Long MeadowHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest11,967
Mt. JacksonHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest20,721
Mt. VidaModoc National Forest7,771
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
ParsnipModoc National Forest8,485
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Timbered CraterLassen National Forest4,096
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
WattersonInyo National Forest6,922
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
Wonoga Pk.Inyo National Forest11,272
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Peace RockBoise National Forest191,734
Michigan (1)
AreaForestAcres
Government IslandHiawatha National Forest225
Montana (11)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
BridgerGallatin National Forest45,059
Cabin Creek Wildlife Management Area OcdGallatin National Forest35,048
Cube Iron - SilcoxLolo National Forest36,998
Devils TowerHelena National Forest7,144
Lincoln GulchHelena National Forest8,250
Sheep MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest31,584
Swan River Island RA LIFAAFlathead National Forest465
Nevada (12)
AreaForestAcres
Bald Mtn.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest41,598
Boundary Peak (NV)Inyo National Forest21,851
Pearl PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest71,405
Potts - AHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest180
Rose - Alum CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest853
Rose - Dutch LouieHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest363
Rose - EvansHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,782
Rose - Hunter EastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest54
Rose - Hunter Lk NoHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest149
Rose - NortheastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest550
Ward MountainHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest15,927
White SageHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest11,993
North Dakota (4)
AreaForestAcres
DelamereDakota Prairie Grasslands5,087
DurlerDakota Prairie Grasslands12,464
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands5,317
Oregon (9)
AreaForestAcres
Brattain ButteFremont National Forest5,959
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
Hurricane CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest1,606
MarshWinema National Forest1,226
North PaulinaDeschutes National Forest19,670
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
South PaulinaDeschutes National Forest9,074
WaldoDeschutes National Forest4,973
Utah (4)
AreaForestAcres
Rock Creek - Green ForkWasatch-Cache National Forest5,660
SanpitchManti-Lasal National Forest29,129
South FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,374
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Washington (6)
AreaForestAcres
Abercrombie - HooknoseColville National Forest33,862
Bodie MountainColville National Forest2,467
Bodie MountainOkanogan National Forest3,941
Clackamas MountainOkanogan National Forest12,478
Granite MountainOkanogan National Forest27,428
Mt. BonaparteOkanogan National Forest10,891
Wisconsin (3)
AreaForestAcres
09177 - Le Roy CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest8,138
09180 - Perch LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest2,390
09181 - FoursectionChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest2,037
Wyoming (3)
AreaForestAcres
Gros Ventre MountainsBridger-Teton National Forest106,418
Munger MountainBridger-Teton National Forest12,827
Phillips RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest10,108
References (148)
  1. Adams, R. 1988. The black tern (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) in Michigan. Unpubl. report, Kalamazoo, Michigan. 3 pp.
  2. Alcorn, J. R. 1942. Birds affected by botulism at Soda Lake, Nevada. Condor 44:80-81.
  3. Alcorn, J. R. 1988. The birds of Nevada. Fairview West Publishing, Fallon, NV.
  4. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  5. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  6. Andrle, R. F., and J. R. Carrol, editors. 1988. The atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York. 551 pp.
  7. Baggerman, B., et al. 1956. Observations on the behavior of the black tern, CHLIDONIAS NIGER L., in the breeding area. Ardea 44:2-71.
  8. Bailey, P. F. 1977. The breeding biology of the black tern. M.S. thesis, Univ. Wisconsin, Oshkosh. 67 pp.
  9. Baird, P. 1976. Comparative ecology of California and Ring-billed Gulls (<i>Larus californicus</i> and <i>L. delawarensis</i>.)Ph.D. dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula.
  10. Baird, P. A. 1977. Feeding ecology of ring-billed and California gulls (<i>Larus delawarensis</i> and <i>L. californicus</i>). Pacific Seabird Bulletin 4:16-17.
  11. Bartgis, R. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Dept. of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD.
  12. Beedy, E. C., R. Duke, and L.R. Mewaldt. 1990. Black tern. In: D. C. Zeiner, W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. California's wildlife vol. 2: birds. California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System, State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA.
  13. Bent, A.C. 1921. Life histories of North American gulls and terns. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 113. Washington, D.C.
  14. Bergman, R. D., P. Swain, and M. W. Weller. 1970. A comparative study of nesting Forster's and black terns. Wilson Bull. 82:435-444.
  15. Bevier, L. R., editor. 1994. The atlas of breeding birds of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut Bull. 113. xvii + 461 pp.
  16. Bier, C. Director/Zoologist. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory, Natural Areas Program, Pittsburgh, PA. Personal communication.
  17. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  18. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  19. Blodgett, B. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife, Field Headquarters, Westboro, MA.
  20. Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan. xvii + 594 pp.
  21. Brown, M., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J. Wildl. Manage. 50:392-397.
  22. Bull, J. 1974. Birds of New York state. Doubleday/Natural History Press, Garden City, New York. Reprint, 1985 (with Supplement, Federation of New York Bird Clubs, 1976), Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
  23. Busby, Bill. pers. comm. Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory, Kansas Biological Survey,. Lawrence, KS
  24. Carroll, J.R. 1988. Status and breeding ecology of the black tern (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) in New York. New York Dept. Environ. Conserv., Delmar, New York. 20 pp.
  25. Carter, M., G. Fenwick, C. Hunter, D. Pashley, D. Petit, J. Price, and J. Trapp. 1996. Watchlist 1996: For the future. Field Notes 50(3):238-240.
  26. Castro, I. and A. Phillips. 1996. A guide to the birds of the Galapagos Islands. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  27. Chapman, B. A., and L. S. Forbes. 1984. Observations on detrimental effects of great blue herons on breeding black terns. J. Field Ornithol. 55:251-252.
  28. Chapman-Moser, B. 1987. Factors influencing reproductive success and nesting strategies in black terns. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser Univ., British Columbia.
  29. Clapp, R. B., M. K. Klimkiewicz, and J. H. Kennard. 1982. Longevity records of North American birds: Gaviidae through Alcidae. J. Field Ornithol. 53:81-124.
  30. Connell, S. R., and A. J. Norman. 1989. Survey of colonial nesting birds in Maple District, 1989. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Maple, Ontario. 82 pp.
  31. Cuthbert, N. L. 1954. A nesting study of the black tern in Michigan. Auk 71:36-63.
  32. Droege, S., and J.R. Sauer. 1990. North American Breeding Bird Survey, annual summary, 1989. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(8). 22 pp.
  33. Ducey, J. E. 1988. Nebraska Birds breeding status and distribution. Simmons-Boardman Books, Omaha, NE.
  34. Dulin, G. S. 1990. 1990 Summary Report of the Forster's and black tern breeding survey of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Vicinity. unpublished report to the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and the Minnesota Nongame Wildlife Program.
  35. Dunn, E. H. 1979. Nesting biology and development of young in Ontario black terns. Can. Field-Nat. 93:276-281.
  36. Dunn, E. H. 1987. Black Tern. in: M. D. Cadman, P. F. J. Eagles, and F. M. Helleiner, compilers. Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, ON.
  37. Dunn, E.H., and D.J. Agro. 1995. Black Tern (<i>Childonias niger</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 147. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 24 pp.
  38. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1992. Birds in Jeopardy: the Imperiled and Extinct Birds of the United States and Canada, Including Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 259 pp.
  39. Einsweiler, S. S. 1988. Black tern nesting biology in Cheyboygan County, Michigan. M.S. thesis, Central Michigan Univ., Mt. Pleasant, Michigan. 43 pp.
  40. Eisenmann, E. 1951. Northern birds summering in Panama. Wilson Bull. 63:181-185.
  41. Eliason, B. 1989. Black tern: a summary of information on its status in Minnesota. unpublished report to USFWS.
  42. Eliason, B. pers. comm. Minnesota Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN
  43. Enser, R.W. 1992. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Rhode Island (1982-1987). Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management: Rhode Island. 206 pp.
  44. Faanes, C. A. 1979. Status of the black tern in western Wisconsin. Passenger Pigeon 41:124-128.
  45. Faber, R. A. 1990. Nesting Ecology of the black tern on the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge and the Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge. unpublished Final Report for FWS Grant Agreement No. 14-16-0003-90-951.
  46. Faber, R. A., and J. J. Hickey. 1973. Eggshell thinning, chlorinated hydrocarbons and mercury in inland aquatic bird eggs, 1969 and 1970. Pestic. Monit. J. 7:27-36.
  47. Faber, R. A., and J. Nosek. 1985. Preliminary assessment of tern reproduction in relation to environmental contaminants on the Mississippi River. Unpubl. report to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Minnesota. 22 pp.
  48. Farrand, J., editor. 1983. Audubon Society master guide to birding. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 3 vols., 1244 pp.
  49. Firstencel, H. 1987. The black tern (CHLIDONIAS NIGER Linn.): breeding ecology in upstate New York and results of pesticide residue analysis. M.S. thesis, State Univ. of New York, Rockport. 63 pp.
  50. Foss, C. Audubon Society of New Hampshire, Concord, New Hampshire.
  51. Fox, G. A. 1976. Eggshell quality: its ecological and physiological significance in a DDE-contaminated common tern population. Wilson Bull. 88:459-477.
  52. Frederickson, L. H., and T. S. Taylor. 1982. Management of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Resource Publ. 148. 29 pp.
  53. Garber, Chris S. Deceased. Former Zoologist, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Jelm, WY
  54. Genoways, H. H., and F. J. Brenner, editors. 1985. Species of special concern in Pennsylvania. Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. of Nat. Hist. No. 11.
  55. Gerson, H. 1987. The status of the black tern (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), Toronto, Ontario. 54 pp.
  56. Gibbs, J.P., and S.M. Melvin. 1989. An assessment of wading birds and other wetlands avifauna and their habitats in Maine. Unpubl. report, Maine Dept. Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Bangor, Maine. 114 pp.
  57. Gibbs, J. P., Hampden, Maine.
  58. Godfrey, W. E. 1986. The birds of Canada. Revised edition. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa. 596 pp. + plates.
  59. Goodwin, R. E. 1960. A study of the ethology of the black tern, CHLIDONIAS NIGER SURINAMENSIS (Gmelin). Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York. 193 pp.
  60. Groves, C. 1992. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Dept. of Fish and Game, Boise, ID. pers. comm.
  61. Hagan, J. M., III, and D. W. Johnston, editors. 1992. Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xiii + 609 pp.
  62. Hall, G.A. 1983. West Virginia birds. Carnegie Museum of Natural History Special Publlication 7: 180 pp.
  63. Hands, H.M., R.D. Drobney, and M.R. Ryan. 1989. Status of the black tern in the northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit Rep. 15 pp.
  64. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  65. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  66. Hays, H., and R. W. Risebrough. 1972. Pollutant concentrations in abnormal young terns from Long Island Sound. Auk 89:19-35.
  67. Heath, S.R., E.H. Dunn and D.J. Agro. 2009. Black Ternn (<i>Chlidonias niger</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/147/doi:10.2173/bna.147.
  68. Hentcy, E. Department of Resources &amp; Economic Development, Concord, NH.
  69. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  70. Hess, G.K., R.L. West, M. Barnhill, and L. Fleming. 1999. Birds of Delaware. Univ. Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
  71. Hicks, L. E. 1935. Distribution of the breeding birds of Ohio. Ohio State Univ. Studies, Vol. XL, November 10, 1935, No. 5; Ohio Biological Survey Bull. 32(Vol. VI(3)).
  72. Hilty, S. J., J. A. Gwynne, and G. Tudor. 2003. The birds of Venezuela, 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  73. Hoffman, R. M. 1990. Birds of Wisconsin's deep marshes and shallow open-water communities. Passenger Pigeon 52(3): 259- 272.
  74. Howell, D. Iowa Natural Areas Inventory, Bureau of Preserves and Ecological Services, Dept. of Nat. Res., Des Moines, Iowa
  75. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  76. Huges, D. In prep. Breeding bird atlas of New Jersey.
  77. Janssen, R. B. 1987. Birds in Minnesota. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 352 pp.
  78. Johnsgard, P. A. 1979. Birds of the Great Plains: breeding species and their distribution. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 539 pp.
  79. Johnsgard, P. A. 1980. A revised list of the birds of Nebraska and adjacent plains states. Occ. Papers of the NE Ornithologist's Union, No. 6.
  80. Kibbe, D. 1989. Survey of Vermont's rare marshland bird species. Unpubl. report, Hoboken, New Jersey. 8 pp.
  81. Laughlin, S. B., and D. P. Kibbe, editors. 1985. The atlas of breeding birds of Vermont. University Press of New England, Hanover Vermont. 456 pp.
  82. Manuwal, D. A. 1967. Observations on a localized duck sickness in the Delta Marsh: summer 1964. Wilson Bull. 79:219-222.
  83. Martin, M. L. pers. comm., Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Nature Preserves. Indianapolis, Indiana
  84. Maxson, G. A. D. 1989. Marsh hawk predation on black tern and pectoral sandpiper. Prairie Naturalist 10:25-26.
  85. McAtee, W. L., and F. E. L. Beal. 1912. Some common game, aquatic, and rapacious birds in relation to man. USDA Farmers' Bull. 497. 30 pp.
  86. McGriff, Darlene. California Natural Heritage Division, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA
  87. McNicholl, M. K. 1975. Larid site tenacity and group adherence in relation to habitat. Auk 92:98-104.
  88. Mirzoeva, S. S. 1980. Trematodes of birds of the Divichinsk Bay of central Caspia. Izvestiya Akad. Navk Azerb. SSR 1980:88-93.
  89. Morrison, M., Wilder, VT.
  90. Mossman, M. 1980. The second year of Wisconsin's black tern survey, 1980. Unpubl. report, Dept. of Wildlife Ecology, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison. 14 pp.
  91. Mossman, M. 1981. The 1981 black tern survey. Unpubl. report, Office of Endangered and Nongame Species, Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison, WI. 9 pp.
  92. Mossman, M. 1982. The 1982 black tern survey. Unpubl. report, Bureau of Endangered Resources, Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison, WI. 5 pp.
  93. Muller, S.L., I.M. Mazzocchi, and K. Loconti-Lee. 1992. Black tern (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) investigations in New York state, 1990 and 1991. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Watertown, NY. 35 pp.
  94. Novak, P. G. 1990. Population status of the black tern (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) in New York state, 1989. New York Sate Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Nongame Unit, Delmar, NY. 30 pp.
  95. Novak, P. G. 1992. Black tern, CHLIDONIAS NIGER. Pages 149-169 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  96. Owens, T. pers. comm. Department of Wildlife, Nongame Data Systems, Olympia, WA
  97. Palmer, R. S. 1949. Maine Birds. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, Vol. 102. 656 pp.
  98. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  99. Parmalee, D. F. 1961. A nesting colony of black terns in Kansas. Kansas Ornithological Society Bulletin 12(4): 25-27.
  100. Perez, T. M., and W. T. Atyeo. 1984. Feather mites, feather lice, and thanatochresis. J. Parasitol. 70:807-812.
  101. Peterjohn, B.G., and D.L. Rice. 1991. Ohio breeding bird atlas. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Columbus, Ohio. 416 pp.
  102. Peters, H.S. 1936. A list of external parasites from birds of the eastern part of the United States. Bird-Banding 7:9-27.
  103. Pierson, E. C. 1983. Black terns nesting in Maine. Unpubl. report, Maine Critical Areas Program, Augusta, Maine. 21 pp.
  104. Pittman, H. H. 1927. The black terns of Saskatchewan. Condor 29:140-143.
  105. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  106. Powell, A. N. 1991. Monitoring black tern populations in Minnesota in association with the USFWS Waterfowl Production Survey. unpublished report to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Nongame Program.
  107. Rabenold, P. P. 1986. 1986 survey of black terns (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) breeding in Indiana. Unpubl. report, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Widlife, Indianapolis. 17 pp.
  108. Rabenold, P. P. 1987. 1987 survey of black terns (CHLIDONIAS NIGER) breeding in Indiana. Unpubl. report, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Widlife, Indianapolis. 13 pp.
  109. Raffaele, H. A. 1983a. A guide to the birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Fondo Educativo Interamericano, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 255 pp.
  110. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  111. Ridd, S., Richmond, VA.
  112. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  113. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  114. Rimmer, S. Vermont Institute of Natural Science, Woodstock, Vermont.
  115. Robbins, S. D., Jr. 1991. Wisconsin birdlife: population and distribution past and present. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  116. Rosche, R. C. 1982. Birds of northwestern Nebraska and southwestern South Dakota. published by author, Chadron, NE.
  117. Rothweiler, R. A. 1960. Food habits, movements, and nesting of gulls, Freezout Lake, Teton County, Montana. Montana Fish and Game Department, Helena. Paper No. 494. 26pp.
  118. Sauer, J.R., and S. Droege. 1992. Geographical patterns in population trends of Neotropical migrants in North America. Pages 26-42 in J.M. Hagan, III, and D.W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  119. Scharf, W. 1989. Black tern nesting phenology and habitat in marshes of the St. Mary's River, Michigan. unpublished report for Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division, Natural Heritage Fund.
  120. Scharf, W. Northwestern Michigan College, Traverse City, Michigan.
  121. Schneider, K.J., and D.M. Pence, editors. 1992. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 400 pp.
  122. Sheppard, J. L. pers. comm. Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216.
  123. Sheppard, J. L. pers. comm. Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO
  124. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  125. Spaans, A. L. 1978. Status of terns along the Suriname coast. Bird-Banding 49:66-76.
  126. Spendelow, J. A. and S. R. Patton. 1988. National Atlas of Coastal Waterbird Colonies in the Contiguous United States: 1976-1982. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 88(5). x + 326 pp.
  127. Stern, M. A., and R. L. Jarvis. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in black terns. Wilson Bull. 103(2): 266-271.
  128. Stern, M. A. pers. comm. Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Oregon Field Office, Portland, OR
  129. Stern, M. A., R. L. Jarvis, and R. Del Caro. 1985. Mate fidelity, site tenacity, and sex dimorphic traits in black terns. Colonial Waterbird Group Newsletter 9:52.
  130. Stewart, R. E. 1975. Breeding Birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo ND.
  131. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  132. Stone, W. 1937. Bird studies at Old Cape May: an ornithology of coastal New Jersey. Dover Publ., New York.
  133. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  134. Thompson, B. C., J. A. Jackson, J. Burger, L. A. Hill, E. M. Kirsch, and J. L. Atwood. 1997. Least Tern (<i>Sterna antillarum</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 290. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 32 pp.
  135. Tilghman, N. G. 1979. The black tern survey, 1979. Unpubl. report, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. 11 pp.
  136. Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C. 59 pp.
  137. Toone, R. Personal communication. Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City, UT
  138. Tramer, E. J. and E. J. Durbin. 1980. Breeding birds of Ohio's Lake Erie marshes. unpublished report for the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves.
  139. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory Nongame Birds of Management Concern in the United States: The 1987 List. Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  140. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: the 1987 list. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  141. van Halewijn, R. 1973. Black tern, CHLIDONIAS NIGER, in the south Caribbean Sea. Ardea 61:189-191.
  142. Van Rossem, A. J. 1933. Terns as destroyers of birds' eggs. Condor 35:49-51.
  143. Weller, M. W., and C. S. Spatcher. 1965. Role of habitat in the distribution and abundance of marsh birds. Iowa State University Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station Special Report No. 43. Ames, Iowa. 31 pp.
  144. Weller, M. W., and L. H. Frederickson. 1973. Avian ecology of a managed glacial marsh. The Living Bird 12:269-291.
  145. Wetlands International. 2014. Waterbird Population Estimates. Retrieved from <a href="http://wpe.wetlands.org/">wpe.wetlands.org</a> on various dates in 2014.
  146. Williams, S. O. 1983d. Distribution and migration of the black tern in Mexico. Condor 85:376-378.
  147. Zaret, T. M., and R. T. Paine. 1973. Species introduction in a tropical lake. Science 182:449-455.
  148. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.