Melanerpes uropygialis

(Baird, 1854)

Gila Woodpecker

G5Secure Found in 37 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Gila Woodpecker (Melanerpes uropygialis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105515
Element CodeABNYF04150
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPiciformes
FamilyPicidae
GenusMelanerpes
Other Common Names
Carpintero del Desierto (ES) Gila woodpecker (EN) Pic des saguaros (FR)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Considered conspecific with M. hypopolius by some authors. Hybridizes locally with M. aurifrons in western Mexico. Sometimes placed in the genus Centurus (AOU 1983).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-03-19
Change Date1996-12-02
Edition Date2025-03-19
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread in the southwestern United States and western México. The population is stable, though it is threatened by habitat loss.
Range Extent Comments
This species occupies the southwestern United States and western México. It is found in extreme southern Nevada, extreme southeastern California, southern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico, Baja California, and from Sinaloa south to Jalisco (Edwards and Schnell 2020). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records, range extent is estimated to be 1,073,541 km² (RARECAT 2024).
Occurrences Comments
There are many occurrences throughout the range.
Threat Impact Comments
Habitat loss, habitat degradation, and habitat fragmentation are the primary threats for this species. Development, conversion to agriculture, and clearcutting riparian tree communities activities cause the loss of cavity-nesting sites, primarily saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea) and cottonwood trees (Populus spp.) (Remsen 1978, Kerpez and Smith 1990a, Kerpez and Smith 1990b, Rosenberg et al. 1991). Invasive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) also compete with this species for cavity-nesting sites, likely reducing nesting success (Kerpez and Smith 1990b, Edwards and Schnell 2020).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Breeds throughout arid regions of southwestern U.S. and northwestern Mexico in arid lowland scrub, arid montane scrub, tropical deciduous forest, gallery forest, second-growth scrub, and secondary forest. Frequents deserts that have large cacti or trees suitable for nesting, dry subtropical forests, riparian woodlands, and plantations. Found in river bottoms with mesquite or cottonwood groves and dry washes (Baicich and Harrison 1997, Edwards and Schnell 2000, AOU 1998). From sea level to 1,000 m, occasionally to >1,600 m, higher in Aquascalientes (Selander and Giller 1963). In the few areas where it meets Golden-fronted Woodpecker (M. AURIFRONS), it seems to prefer drier, more desert-like habitats, whereas the Golden-fronted favors riparian woods (Selander and Giller 1963). Cover vegetation may be a significant habitat requirement. Cottonwoods and other desert riparian trees, and date palms supply cover in California. Saguaros are important habitat elements outside of California, but are scarce within the state and are not so important. Areas with parasitic berry-bearing mistletoe (PHORADENDRON SP.), particularly when on mesquite, are favored. (Edwards and Schnell 2000).

In California, found in riparian woodlands, cottonwood groves, parklands and residential neighborhoods that have tall trees all year round. Also found in orchard-vineyard and urban habitats, particularly in shade trees and date palm groves. In otherwise suitable areas in se. California, availability of excavatable tree trunks for nesting seems to be the primary factor determining presence of this woodpecker (Grinnell and Miller 1944).

In Arizona, found in desert habitats, especially with saguaro and other large cacti, semidesert, riparian woodland (cottonwood-willow, mesquite) and towns, in arid regions (Tropical and lower Subtropical zones) (AOU 1998). Density is positively correlated with the number of large saguaro cacti and negatively correlated with the slope of the area. Inhabits cottonwood-dominated habitat along lower Colorado River in winter and summer; almost absent in summer from areas dominated by screwbean mesquite (PROSOPIS PUBESCENS) and from areas without snags (Brush et al. 1983). Gila Woodpeckers did not occur in isolated cottonwood groves of less than 50 ac (20ha) in Arizona (Rosenberg et al. 1991).

In New Mexico, confined to lower elevation woodlands, especially those dominated by mature cottonwoods and/or sycamores, along stream courses (Hubbard 1987). In NE Baja California, found along streams in cottonwoods (POPULUS DELTOIDES) and willows (SALIX SP.) at Rancho Rosarito and sparingly at El Palmarito in scattered palms along an arroyo (Short and Banks 1965). However, also found in two Baja California localities without saguaro where likely nesting in desert fan palms (ERYTHEA ARMATA, Cornett 1986).

Ecology

Holes produced by this woodpecker provide quarters many other bird species, mammals and reptiles, which also compete with it for nest sites (Winkler et al. 1995). Nesting cavities are utilized by American Kestrel, Elf Owl, Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl, Western Screech-Owl, Brown-crested Flycatcher, Purple Martin, Cactus Wren, lizards, snakes, rats, mice, etc. In Arizona, European Starling has had negative impact on Gila Woodpecker due to saguaro nest site competition, especially in area near agriculture and large lawns (Kerpez and Smith 1990b).

Declines in Gila Woodpecker numbers could have a negative impact on the entire bird and wildlife community that nests in saguaro cacti. Also, declines might directly affect survival of the saguaro itself because the woodpeckers may be important pollinators of the cacti (Edwards and Schnell 2000)

Reproduction

Apparently a monogamous and solitary breeder. Highly defensive against all avian intruders (Gillman 1915), particularly Gilded Flickers and European Starlings with which it competes for nest cavities (Erlich et al. 1988). Breeding season from April through July, with peak activity in April and May, usually ending in June-August.

Digs nest cavity in saguaro cactus (CARNEGIEA GIGANTIA) and Cordon (PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI) cacti (Robbins et al. 1983), and to a lesser extent in cottonwoods (POPULUS), and willow (SALIX) (Bent 1939). Along the lower Colorado River, some nests found in honey mesquite (PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA) or screwbean (P. PUBESCENS; Anderson et al. 1982). Rarely nests in oaks and paloverde (CERCIDIUM SP.; Bent 1939), and in blue fan palm (ERYTHEA ARMATA) in one northern Baja California at locality without large cacti (Cornett 1986). In southern Arizona, Kerpez and Smith (1990a) report the greatest number of nests found in saguaro cacti in arroyos, where Gila Woodpeckers forage; fewer nests found in cacti on hillsides, ridgetops, or desert flats.

Does not nest in saguaros less than 4 (Karol and Hutto 1984) or 5 m tall in southern Arizona (Kerpez and Smith 1990a). Saguaro used for nesting are taller and more likely to have branches than randomly chosen saguaros. Nests rarely excavated above about 7 m (Karol and Hutto 1984, Smith 1990b), but rarely as low as 1 m (Edwards and Schnell 2000)

Nest hole excavated by both sexes in a living cactus or dead tree. Holes in living cacti can be used only after they have dried out. (Winkler et al. 1995), typically several months. May occupy the same nesting hole for more than one season until it is appropriated by an owl, kestrel, snake or large lizard. Non-randomly place nest holes on saguaro cacti in order to regulate its internal temperature. In cooler environments nest holes are often on the south-facing side, whereas on hotter environments the nest is placed on the north-facing side (Karol and Hutto 1984, Inouye et al. 1981). Nest holes are frequently excavated in live cactus after the nesting season to facilitate their drying.

Clutch size is three to five (Short 1982), rarely six eggs, with fewer eggs in second clutch (Bent 1939). Incubation poorly studied but reported to be 13 -14 days (Baicich and Harrison 1997). Both sexes incubate. Both males and females feed young (Edwards and Schnell 2000). Young leave nest about four weeks of age and are fed by adults for an extended period of time. Family grounds may remain together while adults renest. (Edwards and Schnell 2000). Can fly at approx. one month and in most cases a second brood fledges by late June. Family groups stay in territory after nesting until the young disperse or are driven away prior to the next breeding attempt.(Winkler et al. 1995). Sometimes 2-3 broods if food is abundant (Baicich and Harrison 1997). Brood parasitism not known to occur in this species.
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralDesertSuburban/orchard
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
ArizonaS3Yes
New MexicoS2B,S2NYes
CaliforniaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1.3 - Agro-industry farmingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesRestricted (11-30%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (37)
Arizona (35)
AreaForestAcres
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
Blind Indian CreekPrescott National Forest26,847
Blind Indian CreekPrescott National Forest26,847
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower Romero WSRCoronado National Forest10
Lower Romero WSRCoronado National Forest10
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
PicachoTonto National Forest4,969
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
Santa RitaCoronado National Forest6,078
Sheridan MountainPrescott National Forest37,600
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
Upper Romero WsrCoronado National Forest150
Upper Romero WsrCoronado National Forest150
Upper Romero WsrCoronado National Forest150
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
References (68)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). Banks, R.C., C. Cicero, J. L. Dunn, A. W. Kratter, P. C. Rasmussen, J. V. Remsen, Jr., J. A. Rising, and D. F. Stotz. 2003. Forty-fourth supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. The Auk 120(3):923-931.
  4. Anderson, B.W., R. D. Ohmart, and S.D. Fretwell. 1982. Evidence for social regulation in some riparian bird populations. American Naturalist 120: 340-352.
  5. Askins, R. A. 2000. Restoring North America's birds: lessons from landscape ecology. Yale University Press. 320 pp.
  6. Baicich, P. J., and C. J. O. Harrison. 1997. A guide to the nests, eggs and nestlings of North American birds. Second edition. Academic Press, New York.
  7. Belson, M. S. 1998. Red-headed Woodpecker (<i>Melanerpes erythrocephalus</i>) use of habitat at Wekiwa Springs State Park, Florida. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Cnetral Florida, Orlando.
  8. Bent, A.C. 1939d. Life histories of North American woodpeckers, U.S. Nat'l. Mus. Bull. 174. Washington, D.C.
  9. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  10. Brush, T. 1983. Cavity use by secondary cavity-nesting birds and response to manipulation. Condor 85:461-466.
  11. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  12. Cornett, J.W. 1986. Gila Woodpecker nesting in northern Baja California. West. Birds 17: 139-140.
  13. Coues, E. 1866. List of the birds of Fort Whipple, Arizona. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 18: 38-100.
  14. Crockett, A. B. 1975. Ecology and behavior of the Williamson's Sapsucker in Colorado. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
  15. Dixon, R. D. 1995a. Density, nest-site and roost-site characteristics, home-range, habitat-use, and behavior of white-headed woodpeckers. Deschutes and Winema National Forests, Oregon. Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Nongame Report 93-3-01.
  16. Dixon, R. D. 1995b. Ecology of White-headed woodpeckers in the central Oregon Cascades. M. Sc. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
  17. Dixon, R. D., and V. A. Saab. 2000. Black-backed Woodpecker (<i>Picoides arcticus</i>). No. 509 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 20pp.
  18. Edwards, H. H., and G. D. Schnell. 2000. Gila Woodpecker (<i>Melanerpes uropygialis</i>). No. 532 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 16pp.
  19. Edwards, H. H. and G. D. Schnell. 2020. Gila Woodpecker (<i>Melanerpes uropygialis</i>), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (A. F. Poole and F. B. Gill, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. doi: 10.2173/bow.gilwoo.01
  20. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The birder's handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon and Shuster, Inc., New York. xxx + 785 pp.
  21. Emlen, J. T. 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson, AZ: Derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76:184-197.
  22. Fink, D., T. Auer, A. Johnston, M. Strimas-Mackey, S. Ligocki, O. Robinson, W. Hochachka, L. Jaromczyk, C. Crowley, K. Dunham, A. Stillman, I. Davies, A. Rodewald, V. Ruiz-Gutierrez, and C. Wood. 2023. eBird Status and Trends, Data Version: 2022; Released: 2023. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. doi: 10.2173/ebirdst.2022
  23. Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California: Status and Distribution. Los Angeles Audubon Society, Los Angeles, CA.
  24. Gilman, M. F. 1915. A forty acre bird census at Sacaton, Arizona. Condor Vol. XVII:86-90
  25. Goggans, R., R. D. Dixon and L. C. Seminara. 1988. Habitat use by Three-toed and Black-backed woodpeckers, Deschutes National Forest, Oregon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife - Nongame Wildlife Program Report 87-3-02. 43pp.
  26. Grinnell, J., and A. Miller. 1944. The distribution of the birds of California. Pacific Coast Avifauna Number 27, Cooper Ornithological Club, Berkeley, California.
  27. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  28. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  29. Hubbard, J. P. 1987. The vegetative communities and vertebrate fauna of the Gray Ranch, Hidalgo County, New Mexico. Endangered species program, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, NM.
  30. Husak, M. S. 1997. Seasonal variation in territorial behavior of the Golden-fronted Woodpecker. M.Sc. thesis, Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas.
  31. Ingold, D.J. 1991. Nest-site fidelity in Red-headed and Red-bellied Woodpeckers. Wilson Bulletin 103(1):118.
  32. Inouye, R. S., N. J. Huntly and D. W. Inouye. 1981. Non-random orientation of Gila Woodpecker nest entrances in saguaro cacti. Condor 83:88-89.
  33. Kaufman, K. 1996. Lives of North American birds. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA.
  34. Kerpez, T. A., and N. S. Smith. 1990a. Competition between European starlings and native woodpeckers for nest cavities in saguaros. Auk 107:367-375.
  35. Kerpez, T. A., and N. S. Smith. 1990b. Nest-site selection and nest-cavity characteristics of Gila woodpeckers and northern flickers. Condor 92:193-198.
  36. Korol, J. J., and R. L. Hutto. 1984. Factors affecting nest site location in Gila Woodpeckers. Condor 86:73-78.
  37. Latta, M. J., C. J. Beardmore, and T. E. Corman. 1999. Arizona Partners in Flight bird conservation plan. Version 1.0. Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Technical Report 142. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ.
  38. Lawrence, L. deK. 1967. A comparative life-history study of four species of woodpeckers. Ornithological Monographs No. 5. 156 pages.
  39. Laymon, S. A., and M. D. Halterman. 1987b. Can the western subspecies of Yellow-billed Cuckoo be saved from extinction? Western Birds 18:19-25.
  40. Lisi, G. 1988. A field study of Black-backed Woodpeckers in Vermont. Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, Nongame and Endangered Species Program, Technical Report 3.
  41. McAuliffe, J. R., and P. Hendricks. 1988. Determinants of the vertical distributions of woodpecker nest cavities in the saguaro cactus. Condor. 90:791-801.
  42. Miller, A. H., and C. E. Bock. 1972. Natural history of the Nuttall Woodpecker at the Hastings Reservation. Condor 74:284-294.
  43. Mills, G. S., J. B. Dunning, Jr., and J. M. Bates. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding birds community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91:416-428.
  44. Moskovits, D. 1978. Winter territorial and foraging behavior of Red-headed Woodpecker in Florida. Wilson Bulletin 90:521-535.
  45. NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2024. Version: 1.1.1 (released Oct 01, 2024).
  46. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 1994. Endangered Species of New Mexico -- 1994 Biennial Review and Recommendations. Authority: New Mexico Wildlife Conservation Act (NMSA 17-2-37, 1978).
  47. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  48. Phillips, A., J. Marshall, and G. Monson. 1964. The birds of Arizona. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
  49. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  50. Radke, W. J. 1975. Opportunistic feeding of the Gila Woodpecker. Wilson Bulletin 87:275-276.
  51. Remsen, Jr., J.V. 1978. Bird species of special concern in California. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department for Fish and Game. 54 pp.
  52. Robbins, C.S., B. Bruun and H.S. Zim. 1983. A guide to field identification. Birds of North America. Revised edition. Golden Press, NY. 360 pp.
  53. Rosenberg, D. V., R. D. Ohmart, and B. W. Anderson. 1982. Community organization of riparian breeding birds: response to an annual resource peak. Auk 99:260-274.
  54. Rosenberg, K.V, A.M. Dokter, P.J. Blancher, J.R. Sauer, A.C. Smith, P.A. Smith, J.C. Stanton, A. Panjabi, L. Helft, M. Parr, P.P. Marra. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. Published online. 19 Sep 2019.
  55. Rosenberg, K. V., R. D. Ohmart, W. C. Hunter, and B. W. Anderson. 1991. Birds of the Lower Colorado Valley. The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon. 416pp.
  56. Selander, R. K., and D. R. Giller. 1963. Species limits in the woodpecker genus CENTURUS (Aves). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 124: 213-274.
  57. Short, L. L. 1974. Nesting of southern Sonoran birds during the summer rainy season. Condor 76:21-32.
  58. Short, L. L. 1982. Woodpeckers of the World. Museum of Natural History [Greenville, Delaware], Monograph Series xviii + 676 pp.
  59. Short, L. L., and R. C. Banks. 1965. Notes on birds of northwestern Baja California. Transactions San Diego Soceity of Natural History 14: 41-52.
  60. Szaro, R.C. 1989. Riparian forest and scrubland community types of Arizona and New Mexico. Desert Plants 9(3-4):70-138.
  61. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  62. Thomas, J. W., R. G. Anderson, C. Maser, and E. L. Bull. 1979. Snags. Pages 60-77 in J. W. Thomas (editor). Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. U.S.D.A. Handbook 553.
  63. Tweit, R. C., and J. C. Tweit. 1986. Urban development effects on the abundance of some common resident birds of the Tucson area of Arizona. American Birds 40:431-436.
  64. van Rossem, A. J. 1933. The Gila Woodpecker in the Imperial Valley of California. Condor 35:74.
  65. Venables, A., and M. W. Collopy. 1989. Seasonal foraging and habitat requirements of Red-headed Woodpeckers in north-central Florida. Florida Game Fresh Water Fish Comm. Nongame Wildlife Program Final Report Project no. GFC-84-006.
  66. Wilbur, S. R. 1987. Birds of Baja California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
  67. Williams, J. B., and G. O. Batzli. 1979. Competition among bark-foraging birds in central Illinois: experimental evidence. Condor 81:122-132.
  68. Winkler, H., D. A. Christie, and D. Nurney. 1995. Woodpeckers. A Guide to the Woodpeckers of the World. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.