Cynomys gunnisoni

(Baird, 1855)

Gunnison's Prairie Dog

G3Vulnerable (G3?) Found in 19 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104656
Element CodeAMAFB06040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilySciuridae
GenusCynomys
Other Common Names
Gunnison's prairie dog (EN) Ruddy Mongoose (EN)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Taxonomic Comments
Genetic data support recognition of two subspecies, gunnisoni and zuniensis (Sacket et al. 2014).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-08-16
Change Date2021-08-16
Edition Date2021-08-16
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., Cannings, S. (2008, 2011), N. Sears (2021)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Historically, this species has declined by over 90% within its range due to poisoning, introduced sylvatic plague, habitat loss, persecution, and climate change in the southern portion of their range. It still occupies most of its historical range, although at much reduced densities. Rangewide surveys have revealed that by the mid-2000s, the population appears to have stabilized at a much lower level than historically. Colonies remain susceptible to rapid declines and extirpations due to outbreaks of sylvatic plague.

In montane Colorado and New Mexico, drastic declines in area of occupancy, number of subpopulations, and population size have occurred over the past several decades, and populations remain small, fragmented, and threatened by plague. In central and south-central Colorado and north-central New Mexico, the subspecies zuniensis is considered common with no substantial immediate threats, although plague episodes and poisoning can cause localized extirpations.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs from central Colorado to central Arizona, including a small portion of southeastern Utah and much of northwestern New Mexico, US.

There are two subspecies recognized: Cynomys gunnisoni gunnisoni, occurring in the higher-elevation, “montane” northeastern portion of the range, and C. g. zuniensis, occurring in the lower-elevation, “prairie” southwestern portion of the range (USFWS 2013, Sacket et al. 2014).

Cassola (2016) estimates the current range extent at 406,222 sq. km. This estimate aligns with one derived from iNaturalist records, which calculate to 403,769 sq. km. using GeoCat (accessed August 2021).
Occurrences Comments
As of 2021, state natural heritage programs have records of at least 300 occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
Sylvatic plague, caused by the non-native bacterium Yersinia pestis, is the greatest single threat as of 2021. Prairie dogs are highly susceptible to plague, with outbreaks often causing >90% mortality in affected colonies (Cully and Williams 2001, Sacket et al. 2013, Russell et al. 2019). C. gunnisoni has the distinction of being the most susceptible of the 5 living species of Cynomys, apparently sometimes experiencing greater than 99% mortality from plague (Cully et al. 1997) or loss of entire colonies (Lechleitner et al. 1962, Raynor 1985). Based on observations of prairie dog die-offs, the general consensus is that plague outbreaks occur rapidly, such that only a few survivors are observed after 6-8 weeks (Salkeld et al. 2010, citing Pauli et al. 2006 and Webb et al. 2006). In a study on sylvatic plague and fragmentation of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), Keuler et al. (2020) found that colonies became smaller and more fragmented after the arrival of plague; the total area of each colony and the mean area per patch within a colony decreased, the number of patches per colony increased, and mean contiguity of each patch decreased, leading to population fragmentation. However, there is increasing evidence from natural populations and experimental studies that resistance to plague may be evolving (see citations in Tsuchiya et al. 2020), and recent developments in vaccines and vaccine delivery have raised the possibility of plague control in prairie dog populations.

Climate in the southern portion of this species range is projected to experience continued warmer temperatures, rapid drying, and inhibited recovery from drought conditions (Seager et al. 2007, Gutzler and Robbins 2011) (Davidson et al. 2014). Long-term research in the southern portion of their range in New Mexico and Mexico shows that both established and restored prairie dog colonies in more xeric environments are highly vulnerable to drought, and climate change increases this vulnerability (Davidson et al. 2014).

Intentional eradication and population control efforts through indiscriminate poisoning and recreational shooting is also a potential threat. Poisoning has caused considerable range contraction of the species in parts of Colorado and New Mexico (Armstrong et al. 2011). In Arizona, recreational shooters shot 91,000 animals in 2001 (B. Van Pelt pers. comm.) (Cassola 2016). Since then, Arizona Game and Fish Department have implemented a hunting closure for Gunnison's prairie dogs, and hunters are not allowed to shoot them during the breeding season (April 1- June 30th). Overall, the effects of recreational shooting may be localized and do not result in rangewide population declines (USFWS 2013).

Additional habitat associated risk factors such as conversion of habitat to agriculture, grazing, invasive plant species, urbanization, alteration of fire regimes, and oil and gas exploration and development are not considered major, rangewide threats (USFWS 2013, USFS 2015). This opinion is not universal as others claim that habitat loss and fragmentation from agricultural development is the foremost cause of population declines (Farid 2019).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Gunnison’s prairie dogs establish their colonies on gently sloping grasslands and semi-desert and montane shrublands, at elevations ranging from 4,600 to 12,000 feet (1,400 to 3,660 meters) (USFWS 2013).

Ecology

Colonies often are smaller than those of other species; may consist of fewer than 50-100 individuals. Colonial groups are organized into territories that generally contain one adult male, one or more adult females, nonbreeding yearlings, and young of the year; overlap between areas of high use is low between members of neighboring territories (Travis and Slobodchikoff, 1993, Can. J. Zool. 71:1186-1192). Hoogland (1999) also described social organization.

Survivorship is low: only about 50 percent of females that emerged from burrows as juveniles are alive at the end of their first year, and less than 15 percent are alive at the end of their second year (Hoogland 2001).

Major mortality factors are disease, predation, and humans. Colonies suffer drastic population declines and are often extirpated during outbreaks of flea-borne sylvatic plague (Rayner 1985; see also papers by Barnes, Cully, and Fitzgerald in Oldemeyer et al. 1993). This species and Cynomys ludovicianus occur at densities up to 10 times higher and are more social than Cynomys leucurus, and thus they are much more susceptible to the fast spread of plague; in fact, C. gunnisoni is perhaps the most susceptible (Cully and Williams 2001).

This prairie dog is an important prey species in fall for migrating raptors in northern New Mexico (Cully 1988).

Reproduction

Only one litter is produced per year, and only about one-fourth of males copulate as yearlings (Hoogland 2001). All females copulate as yearlings (Hoogland 2001). Seasonal timing of onset of reproduction varies somewhat with latitude, elevation, and year. Gestation lasts about 30 days. Litter size averages about 6, but for those females that are successful in weaning offspring, an average of only 3.8 young per female emerge from the nursery burrow (Hoogland 2001). The probability of weaning a litter each year is 82 percent (Hoogland 2001). Parturition occurs in April or early May in northern Arizona (Shalaway and Slobodchikoff 1988). Young stay underground for about 1 month.
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceous
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
WyomingSNAYes
New MexicoS2Yes
ArizonaS3Yes
ColoradoS3Yes
Navajo NationS4Yes
UtahS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge - restrictedSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive - largeSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (19)
Arizona (2)
AreaForestAcres
FritschePrescott National Forest14,190
Lower Jacks CanyonCoconino National Forest777
Colorado (3)
AreaForestAcres
Bristol HeadRio Grande NF46,087
HermosaSan Juan NF148,103
Storm PeakSan Juan NF57,617
New Mexico (14)
AreaForestAcres
Alamo CanyonSanta Fe National Forest8,639
Bull CanyonCarson National Forest11,512
Chama WS RiverSanta Fe National Forest4,168
Columbine - Hondo Wilderness Study AreaCarson National Forest43,739
Cruces BasinCarson National Forest5,244
El InviernoSanta Fe National Forest29,927
Elk MountainGila National Forest6,550
Guaje CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,104
LemitasSanta Fe National Forest8,129
Mesa AltaSanta Fe National Forest1,868
PollywogSanta Fe National Forest8,557
San Pedro ParksSanta Fe National Forest5,824
Thompson PeakSanta Fe National Forest33,001
Virgin CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,068
References (83)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2024. The Mammal Diversity Database (MDD). Online. Available: www.mammaldiversity.org
  2. Anderson, E., S. C. Forrest, T. W. Clark, and L. Richardson. 1986. Paleobiology, biogeography, and systematics of the black footed ferret, <i>Mustela nigripes</i> (Audobon and Bachman), 1851. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs. No. 8: 11-62.
  3. Arizona Natural Heritage Program, Heritage Data Management System (AZ HDMS). No Date. Arizona Game and Fish Department. Sabra Tonn – HDMS Program Coordinator. 5000 W. Carefree Hwy Phoenix, AZ. https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife/heritagefund/
  4. Armstrong, D.M. 1972. Distribution of mammals in Colorado. University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Monograph No. 3, Lawrence.
  5. Armstrong, D. M., J. P. Fitzgerald, and C. A. Meaney. 2011 Mammals of Colorado. Second Edition. University Press of Colorado.
  6. Biggins, D. E., D. A. Eads, and J. L. Godbey. 2021. Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 14:329-334.
  7. Biggins, D. E., J. G. Sidle, D. B. Seery, A. E. Ernst, and J. Hoogland. 2006. Estimating the abundance of prairie dogs. Pages 94-107 in: Hoogland, J. L., editor. Conservation of the black-tailed prairie dog: saving North America’s western grasslands. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia.
  8. Cassola, F. 2016. Cynomys gunnisoni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T42453A115189620. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T42453A22261232.en
  9. Colorado Parks and Wildlife. 2014. Plague in Gunnison’s prairie dogs, fact sheet. 2 pp. Online at: https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/WildlifeSpecies/Mammals/ControllingPlagueGPDFactSheet.pdf#search=Gunnison%27s%20prairie%20dog
  10. Crocker-Bedford, D. C., and J. J. Spillett. 1977. Home ranges of Utah prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 58:672-73.
  11. Cully, J. F., Jr. 1988. Gunnison's prairie dog: an important autumn raptor prey species in northern New Mexico. Pages 260-264 in Glinski et al., eds. Proc. Southwest raptor management symposium and workshop. Nat. Wildl. Fed. Sci. and Tech. Ser. No. 11.
  12. Cully, J. F., Jr. 1997. Growth and life-history changes in Gunnison's prairie dogs after a plague epizootic. Journal of Mammalogy 78:146-157.
  13. Cully, J. F., Jr., A. M. Barnes, T. J. Quan, and G. Maupin. 1997. Dynamics of plague in a Gunnison's prairie dog colony complex from New Mexico. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 33:706-719.
  14. Cully, J. F., Jr., and E. S. Williams. 2001. Interspecific comparisons of sylvatic plague in prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 82:894-905.
  15. Davidson, A. 2016. Understanding population dynamics of Gunnison's prairie dogs and associated vertebrate species in New Mexico. Final Report to New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 7 pp.
  16. Davidson, A. D., E. A. Hunter, J. Erz, D. C. Lightfoot, A. M. McCarthy, J. K. Mueller, and K. T. Shoemaker. 2018. Reintroducing a keystone burrowing rodent to restore an arid North American grassland: challenges and successes. Restoration Ecology doi: 10.1111/rec.12671
  17. Davidson, A. D., M. T. Friggens, K. T. Shoemaker, C. L. Hayes, J. Erz, and R. Duran. 2014. Population dynamics of reintroduced Gunnison's Prairie dogs in the southern portion of their range. The Journal of Wildlife Management 78(3):429-439.
  18. Davidson, A. D., R. R. Parmenter, and J. R. Gosz. 1999. Responses of small mammals and vegetation to a reintroduction of Gunnison's prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 80:1311-1324.
  19. Ecke, D. H., and C. W. Johnson. 1952. Plague in Colorado. Part I of Plague in Colorado and Texas. U. S. Public Health Service Monograph No. 6. 54 pp.
  20. Eisen, R. J., and K. L. Gage. 2009. Adaptive strategies of <i>Yersinia pestis</i> to persist during inter-epizootic and epizootic periods. Veterinary Research 40(2):1-14.
  21. Facka, A. N., P. L. Ford, and G. W. Roemer. 2008. A novel approach for assessing density and range-wide abundance of prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 89(2):356-364.
  22. Facka, A. N., R. C. Lonsinger, and G. W. Roemer. 2008. Estimates of population size of Gunnison’s prairie dogs in the Aubrey Valley, Arizona based on a new monitoring approach. Final report to the Arizona Game and Fish Department. 26 pp.
  23. Farid, R. H. 2019. Demography and population dynamics of the Gunnison’s Prairie Dog (<i>Cynomys gunnisoni</i>) in the Southwest United States. PhD dissertation., University of Florida. 95 pp.
  24. Findley, J. S., A. H. Harris, D. E. Wilson, and C. Jones. 1975. Mammals of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 360 pp.
  25. Fitzgerald, J. P. 1993. The ecology of plague in Gunnison's prairie dogs and suggestions for the recovery of black-footed ferrets. Pages 50-59 in J. L. Oldemeyer, D. E. Biggins, B. J. Miller, and R. Crete, editors. Management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of the black-footed ferret. 96 pp.
  26. Fitzgerald, J. P., and R. R. Lechleitner. 1974. Observations on the biology of Gunnison's prairie dogs in central Colorado. American Midland Naturalist 92:146-163.
  27. Fitzgerald, J. P., C. A. Meaney, and D. M. Armstrong. 1994 [1995]. Mammals of Colorado. Denver Museum of Natural History and University Press of Colorado. xiii + 467 pp.
  28. Forest Guardians. 2004. Petition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the Gunnison's prairie dog as an endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et Seq. (1973 as amended), and to designate critical habitat. Forest Guardians, 312 Montezuma Ave. Suite A, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501.
  29. Garrett, M. G., and W. L. Franklin. 1988. Behavioral ecology of dispersal in the black-tailed prairie dog. J. Mamm. 69:236-250.
  30. Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool (GeoCAT). Online. Available: <a href="http://geocat.kew.org/">http://geocat.kew.org/</a> (Accessed 2021)
  31. Goodwin, H. T. 1995a. Pliocene-Pleistocene biogeographic history of prairie dogs, genus <i>Cynomys</i> (Sciuridae). Journal of Mammalogy 76:100-122.
  32. Goodwin, T. H. 1995b. Systematic revision of fossil prairie dogs with description of two new species. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 86:1-38.
  33. Gutzler, D. S., and T. O. Robbins. 2011. Climate variability and projected change in the western United States: regional downscaling and drought statistics. Climate Dynamics 37(5):835-849.
  34. Hoffmeister, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press and Arizona Game and Fish Department. 602 pp.
  35. Hollister, N. 1916. A systematic account of the prairie-dogs. North American Fauna 40:1-37.
  36. Hoogland, J. L. 1999. Philopatry, dispersal, and social organization of Gunnison's prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 80:243-251.
  37. Hoogland, J. L. 2001. Black-tailed, Gunnison's, and Utah Prairie Dogs reproduce slowly. Journal of Mammalogy 82:917-927.
  38. Hoogland, J. L., editor. 2006. Conservation of the black-tailed prairie dog: saving North America’s western grasslands. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia.
  39. Hoogland J. L., K. E. Cannon, L. M. DeBarbieri, and T. G. Manno. 2006. Selective predation on Utah prairie dogs. The American Naturalist 168(4):546-552.
  40. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  41. Keuler, K. M., G. M. Bron, R. Griebel, and K. L. D. Richgels. 2020. An invasive disease, sylvatic plague, increases fragmentation of black-tailed prairie dog (<i>Cynomys ludovicianus</i>) colonies. PloS one 15(7): e0235907.
  42. Knowles, C. 2002. Status of white-tailed and Gunnison's prairie dogs. National Wildlife Federation, Missoula, Montana, and Environmental Defense, Washington, D.C. 30 pp.
  43. Knowles, C. J. 1985. Observations on prairie dog dispersal in Montana. Prairie Nat. 17:33-40.
  44. Lechleitner, R., R., J. V. Tileston, and L. Kartman. 1962. Die-off of a Gunnison's prairie dog colony in central Colorado. I. Ecological observations and description of the epizootic. Zoonoses Research 1:185-199.
  45. Link, V. B. 1955. A history of plague in the United States. U.S. Public Health Science, Public Health Monograph 26, Washington, D.C., 120 pp.
  46. Longhurst, W. 1944. Observations on the ecology of the Gunnison prairie dog in Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy 25:24-36.
  47. Magle, S. B., E. W. Ruell, M. F. Antolin, and K. R. Crooks. 2010. Population genetic structure of black-tailed prairie dogs, a highly interactive species, in fragmented urban habitat. Journal of Mammalogy 91(2):326-335.
  48. Markman, D. W., M. F. Antolin, R. A. Bowen, W. H. Wheat, M. Woods, M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, and M. Jackson. 2018. Yersinia pestis survival and replication in potential ameba reservoir. Emerging Infectious Diseases 24(2):294-302. doi:10.3201/eid2402.171065.
  49. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 2016. State Wildlife Action Plan for New Mexico. Sante Fe, NM. 383 pages. Online portal at: https://nmswap.org/species.
  50. Oldemeyer, J. L., et al. 1994. Proceedings of a symposium for the management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of the black-footed ferret. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 13. 96 pp.
  51. Oliver, George. Utah Natural Heritage Program, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, Utah
  52. Pauli, J. N., S. W. Buskirk, E. S. Williams, and W. H. Edwards. 2006. A plague epizootic in the black-tailed prairie dog (<i>Cynomys ludovicianus</i>). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 42(1):74-80.
  53. Pauling, C. D., D. L. Finke, and D. M. Anderson. 2021. Interrelationship of soil moisture and temperature to sylvatic plague cycle among prairie dogs in the Western United States. Integrative Zoology 2021(0):1-16.
  54. Pizzimenti, J. 1975. Evolution of the prairie dog genus <i>Cynomys</i>. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 39:1-73.
  55. Pizzimenti, J.J. and R.S. Hoffmann. 1973. <i>Cynomys gunnisoni</i>. Mammalian Species, 25:1-4.
  56. Rayner, L. S. 1985. Dynamics of a plague outbreak in Gunnison's prairie dog. J. Mamm. 66:194-196.
  57. Rayor, L. S. 1985. Effects of habitat quality on growth, age of first reproduction, and dispersal in Gunnison's prairie dogs (CYNOMYS GUNNISONI). Can. J. Zool. 60:2835-2840.
  58. Reading, R. P., B. J. Miller, and S. R. Kellert. 1999. Values and attitudes toward prairie dogs. Anthrozoös 12(1):43–52.
  59. Rocke T. E., D. W. Tripp, R. E. Russell, R. C. Abbott, K. L. D. Richgels, M. R. Matchett, et al. 2017. Bait-delivered sylvatic plague vaccine protects prairie dogs (<i>Cynomys </i>spp.) from plague in field efficacy trials in Western U.S. EcoHealth 14:438-450.
  60. Rocke, T. E., J. Williamson, K. R. Cobble, J. D. Busch, M. F. Antolin, and D.M. Wagner. 2012. Resistance to plague among black-tailed prairie dog populations. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 12(2):111-116.
  61. Russell, R. E., D. W. Tripp, and T. E. Rocke. 2019. Differential plague susceptibility in species and populations of prairie dogs. Ecology and evolution 9(20):11962-11971.
  62. Sackett, L. C., A. Seglund, R. P. Guarlnick, M. N. Mazzella, D. M. Wagner, J. D. Busch, and A. P. Martin. 2014. Evidence for two subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dogs (<i>Cynomys gunnisoni</i>), and the general importance of the subspecies concept. Biological Conservation 174:1-11.
  63. Sackett, L. C, S. K. Collinge, and A. P. Martin. 2013. Do pathogens reduce genetic diversity of their hosts? Variable effects of sylvatic plague in black tailed prairie dogs. Molecular Ecology 22(9):2441-2445.
  64. Salkeld, D. J., M. Salathé, P. Stapp, and J. Holland Jones. 2010. Plague outbreaks in prairie dog populations explained by percolation thresholds of alternate host abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(32):14247-14250.
  65. Seager, R., M. Ting, I. Held, Y. Kushnir, J. Lu, G. Vecchi, H.-P. Huang, N. Harnik, A. Leetmaa, N.-C. Lau, C. Li, J. Velez, and N. Naik. 2007. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181-1184.
  66. Seglund, A. E., A. E. Ernst, M. Grenier, B. Luce, A. Puchniak, and P. Schnurr. 2006. White-tailed prairie dog conservation assessment. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Laramie, Wyoming. Unpublished report.
  67. Seglund, S.E. and P.M. Schnurr. 2010. Colorado Gunnison’s and white-tailed prairie dog conservation Strategy. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO. 218 pp.+appendices.
  68. Shalaway, S., and C. N. Slobodchikoff. 1988. Seasonal changes in the diet of Gunnison's prairie dog. J. Mamm. 69:835-841.
  69. Slobodchikoff, C. N., A. Robinson, and C. Schaack. 1989. Habitat use by Gunnison's prairie dogs. Pages 403-408 in B88SZA01NA.
  70. Slobodchikoff, C. N., B. S. Perla, and J. L. Verdolin. 2009. Prairie Dogs: Communication and Community in an Animal Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  71. Streich, S. P. 2018. Describing the genetic diversity and population relationships of the montane subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dog, <i>Cynomys gunnisoni gunnisoni</i>. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder. 41 pp.
  72. Stuart, James N. Non-game Mammal Specialist. New Mexico Department of Game &amp; Fish, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Personal communication.
  73. Travis, S. E., C. N. Slobodchikoff, and P. Keim. 1995. Ecological and demographic effects on intraspecific variation in the social system of prairie dogs. Ecology 76:1794-1803.
  74. Travis, S. E., C. N. Slobodchikoff, and P. Keim. 1997. DNA fingerprinting reveals low genetic diversity in Gunnison's prairie dog (<i>Cynomys gunnisoni</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 78:725-732.
  75. Tsuchiya, M. T. N., R. B. Dikow, and L. Cassin-Sackett. 2020. First genome sequence of the Gunnison’s Prairie Dog (<i>Cynomys gunnisoni</i>), a keystone species and player in the transmission of Sylvatic Plague. Genome Biology and Evolution 12(5):618-625.
  76. USDA Forest Service (USFS). 2015. Gunnison's Prairie Dog. 6 pp. Online at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd534301.pdf
  77. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List the Gunnison’s Prairie Dog as an Endangered or Threatened Species; Proposed Rule. Federal Register 78(220):68660-68685.
  78. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 5 February 2008. 12-month finding on a petition to list the Gunnison's prairie dog as threatened or endangered. Federal Register 73(24):6660-6684.
  79. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 7 February 2006. 90-day finding on a petition to list the Gunnison's prairie dog as threatened or endangered. Federal Register 71(25):6241-6248.
  80. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. 2020. Gunnison's Prairie Dog (<i>Cynomys gunnisoni</i>), Species Status Statement. 4 pp. Online. Available: https://wildlife.utah.gov/pdf/sensitive_species/mammals_gunnisons_prairie_dog_2020.pdf
  81. Wagner, D. M., L. C. Drickamer, D. M. Krpata, C. J. Allender, W. E. Van Pelt, and P. Keim. 2006. Persistence of Gunnison's prairie dog colonies in Arizona, USA. Biological Conservation 130:331-339.
  82. Webb, C. T., C. P. Brooks, K. L. Gage, and M. F. Antolin. 2006. Classic flea-borne transmission does not drive plague epizootics in prairie dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(16):6236-6241.
  83. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.