Sigmodon hispidus

Say and Ord, 1825

Hispid Cotton Rat

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.799832
Element CodeAMAFF07010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderRodentia
FamilyCricetidae
GenusSigmodon
Other Common Names
hispid cotton rat (EN) Una Rata Algodonera (ES)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]
Taxonomic Comments
Musser and Carleton (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) stated that "conventional recognition of subspecies (e.g., Hall 1981) seems pointless without fresh assessment of geographic variation."
Conservation Status
Review Date2006-02-14
Change Date1996-11-12
Edition Date2006-02-14
Range Extent Comments
Much of southern U.S. from extreme southeastern California (Blood 1990), Arizona, Nebraska, and Virginia south through interior Mexico at least to central Zacatecas and western San Luis Potosi (distributional details for S. hipidus, S. mascotensis, and S. toltecus need to be reverified) (Musser and Carleton, in Wilson and Reeder 2005). Extended range from Texas and Mexico through Oklahoma and Kansas to Nebraska in recent decades.
Threat Impact Comments
See McMurry et al. (1994) for information on population responses to herbicide treatment and burning of oak savanna in Oklahoma.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A chunky rat with long, coarse fur (mixed black and buff), a sparsely haired tail shorter than the head and body, ears nearly buried in the fur, and a whitish belly; adult total length 210-365 mm, tail 81-166 mm, hind foot 27-41 mm, ear 16-24 mm (Hall 1981, Hoffmeister 1986).

Diagnostic Characteristics

The following distinctions are based on specimens from Arizona. Differs from S. FULVIVENTER by having the underparts silvery or grayish rather than buffy or fulvous, a bicolored tail, dorsum darker than venter, tops of hind feet silvery or grayish rather than buffy, hind feet and ears averaging longer (hind foot of male HISPIDUS usually 30-32 mm, 26-31 mm in FULVIVENTER), preoptic foramen usually absent, and nasals usually truncate or notched rather than tapered posteriorly (Hoffmeister 1986). Differs from S. OCHROGNATHUS by lacking an orangish or ochraceous nose ring and eye ring (color in these areas is nearly the same as that of the sides and back), having a longer hind foot (usually 29 mm or more, but smaller in some females; usually 30 mm or less in OCHROGNATHUS), longer ears and tail (tail 88-132 mm, ear 17-21 mm, in HISPIDUS; tail 80-114 mm, ear 14-19 mm, in OCHROGNATHUS), a larger skull, and the posterior border of the interparietal lacking a median notch formed by the supraoccipital (Hoffmeister 1986). Differs from S. ARIZONAE in being smaller (total length 210-319 mm in HISPIDUS, 212-349 mm in ARIZONAE), usually having a shorter hind foot (usually 32 mm or less, though sometims to 33 mm; 28-40 mm [mean 34 mm or more in males] in ARIZONAE), presphenoid narrow rather than broad, distance between parietal and squamosal crests less than 3.2 mm rather than more, occipital "shield" angled rather than curved, anterior spine on the infraorbital plate broad and blunt rather than narrow and long, length of squamosal crest generally less than 7.0 mm rather than more, palatine slits rounded posteriorly rather than tapered posteriorly, antero-ventral border of the foramen magnum rounded rather than usually angular (Hoffmeister 1986, which see for further discussion of the often subtle differences between S. HISPIDUS and S. ARIZONAE).

Habitat

Favors dense, grassy fields and roadside edges; also in brushy or weedy areas or among reeds and cattails along streams or ponds, in irrigated fields, and in desertscrub with little grass. Nests typically are built under logs, rocks, underground.

Ecology

Populations fluctuate widely, perhaps cyclically; high densities every 2-5 years. Average density 10-12 per acre (Schwartz and Schwartz 1981); maximum density twice this. On a site in Oklahoma, density estimates ranged from 0.0/ha in July 1999 to 112.5/ha in October 2000 to 0.0/ha in January 2001 (Clark et al. 2003). Cold severe winters and hot dry summer often are associated with low populations and declines in abundance (e.g., Clark et al. 2003). Common prey item for various carnivores and raptors.

Reproduction

Breeds throughout the year, with peak activity in spring/fall; severe cold may curtail reproduction in winter. Gestation lasts 27 days. Litter size averages about 5-7; several litters per year. Sexually mature in 2-3 months. Short-lived; in Oklahoma, hardly any lived 6 months (see Caire et al. 1989).
Terrestrial Habitats
SavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld fieldDesertCropland/hedgerow
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
ColoradoS4Yes
FloridaS5Yes
South CarolinaS5Yes
GeorgiaS5Yes
NebraskaS5Yes
KentuckyS3Yes
New MexicoS5Yes
MississippiS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
MissouriS4Yes
TennesseeS5Yes
ArkansasS5Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
TexasS5Yes
LouisianaS5Yes
ArizonaS3Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
North CarolinaS5Yes
IowaSUYes
KansasS5Yes
AlabamaS5Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
Alabama (1)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
References (26)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  2. Blood, B. R. 1990. Taxonomy and distribution of <i>Sigmodon</i> in California. Bull. Southern California Acad. Sci. 89:86-93.
  3. Caire, W., J. D. Tyler, B. P. Glass, and M. A. Mares. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Oklahoma. 567 pp.
  4. Cameron, G.N. and S.R. Spencer. 1981. Sigmodon hispidus. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species No. 158. 9 pp.
  5. Cameron, G.N., W.B. Kincaid, and B.A. Carnes. 1979. Experimental species removal: temporal activity patterns of Sigmodon hispidus and Reithrodentomys fulvescens. J. Mamm. 60:195-197.
  6. Childs, J. E., J. N. Mills, and G. E. Glass. 1995. Rodent-borne hemorrhagic fever viruses: a special risk for mammalogists? Journal of Mammalogy 76:664-680.
  7. Clark, J. E., E. C. Hellgren, and E. E. Jorgensen. 2003. Catastophic decline of a high-density population of hispid cotton rats (<i>Sigmodon hispidis</i>) in central Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 48:467-471.
  8. Davis, W. B. 1978. The mammals of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept., Bull. No. 41. 294 pp.
  9. Eisenberg, J. F. and K. H. Redford. 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics, The Northern Neotropics, Volume 1, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  11. Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.
  12. Hoffmeister, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press and Arizona Game and Fish Department. 602 pp.
  13. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  14. Linzey, D.W. 2016. Mammals of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 2016 revision. Southeastern Naturalist 15(Monograph 8):1–93.
  15. Lowery, G. H., Jr. 1974. The mammals of Louisiana and its adjacent waters. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge. 565 pp.
  16. Mammalian Species, nos. 1-604. Published by the American Society of Mammalogists.
  17. McMurry, S. T., et al. 1994. Demographic profiles of populations of cotton rats in a continuum of habitat types. J. Mamm. 75:50-59.
  18. Mills, J. N., et al. 1995. Guidelines for working with rodents potentially infected with hantavirus. Journal of Mammalogy 76:716-722.
  19. Peppers, L. L., and R. D. Bradley. 2000. Cryptic species in <i>Sigmodon hispidus</i>: evidence from DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 81:332-343.
  20. Reid, F. A. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, Incorporated New York, New York. 334 pp.
  21. Schwartz, C. W., and E. R. Schwartz. 1981. The wild mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press, Columbia. 356 pp.
  22. Utrera, A., G. Duno, B. A. Ellis, R. A. Salas, N. de Manzione, C. F. Fulhurst, R. B. Tesh, and J. N. Mills. 2000. Small mammals in agricultural areas of the western llanos of Venezuela: community structure, habitat associations, and relative densities. Journal of Mammalogy 81:536-548.
  23. Voss, R. S. 1992. A revision of the South American species of Sigmodon (Mammalia: Muridae) with notes on their natural history and biogeography. American Museum Novitates, 3050: 1-56.
  24. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  25. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]
  26. Zimmerman, E. G. 1970a. Karyology, systematics and chromosome evolution in the rodent genus, <i>Sigmodon</i>. Publ. Michigan State Univ., Biol. Serv. 4:385-454.