Lichanura orcutti

(Stejneger, 1889)

Rosy Boa

G4Apparently Secure Found in 24 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.861668
Element CodeARADA01030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyBoidae
GenusLichanura
Synonyms
Lichanura roseofuscaCope, 1861
Other Common Names
Desert Rosy Boa (EN) Northern Three-Lined Boa (EN)
Concept Reference
Wood, D. A., T. W. Reeder, and R. N. Fisher. 2008. Novel patterns of historical isolation, dispersal, and secondary contact across Baja California in the rosy boa (Lichanura trivirgata). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46:484-502.
Taxonomic Comments
Wood et al. (2008), used mtDNA and found three main clades within trivirgata that do not correspond to currently recognized subspecies. They concluded that these clades corresponded to two species, L. trivirgata and L. orcutti (Crother 2017, Reynolds and Henderson 2018). Holycross and Wood (2020) note that L roseofusca should be given priority over L. orcutti.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2016-04-05
Change Date2011-05-26
Edition Date2016-04-05
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Range includes deserts of southern California and western Arizona; occurs in many localities; probably slowly declining; locally threatened by habitat loss/degradation from development and by collection for the pet trade.
Range Extent Comments
Range extends north of the United States-Mexico border within San Diego County in California along the coastal Peninsular Ranges, and northward into the Mohave Desert and eastward in the Sonoran Desert of California and western Arizona; in Arizona, this species inhabits areas north of the Gila River, except for individuals inhabiting the Gila Mountains (Wood et al. 2008). This species also occurs in the Newberry Mountains in southern Nevada (Mulks 2011).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using consistent criteria, but this species is represented by a large number of collection sites and locations (as defined by IUCN).
Threat Impact Comments
Overall, this snake probably is not very threatened. Some habitat is being lost to residential/commerical development, but often this species occurs in inaccessible, rugged terrain that affords natural protection from grazing and development, and a large extent of suitable habitat remains. Some populations may be vulnerable to habitat loss/degradation from renewable energy development, but the scope of this over the next 10 years appears to be negligible. Some local populations along roads probably are threatened by overcollecting and mortality from vehicles. This is a popular species in the pet trade, and collectors often target this snake; however, it is difficult to find and collect in quantity.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitats are diverse and include desert, arid scrub, brushland, sandy plains, rocky slopes, and chaparral-covered foothills, particularly where moisture is available, as around springs, streams, and canyon floors (but these snakes are not dependent on permanent water). This is a mainly terrestrial species, but it sometimes climbs into shrubs.

Reproduction

Live-bearing.
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralDesertBare rock/talus/scree
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaSNRYes
ArizonaS3Yes
NevadaSUYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningNegligible (<1%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
3.3 - Renewable energy
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (24)
California (24)
AreaForestAcres
Cactus Springs BSan Bernardino National Forest3,106
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
ChicoSequoia National Forest39,836
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
Crystal CreekSan Bernardino National Forest6,783
Cucamonga AAngeles National Forest1,249
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Cucamonga CSan Bernardino National Forest4,106
Cutca ValleyCleveland National Forest14,530
Domeland Add.Sequoia National Forest3,046
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Hixon FlatSan Bernardino National Forest8,095
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
References (17)
  1. Burbrink, F. T. 2005. Inferring the phylogenetic position of <i>Boa constrictor</i> among the Boinae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34:167-180.
  2. Collins, J. T., and T. W. Taggart. 2002. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians, turtles, reptiles, & crocodilians. Fifth edition. Publication of The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence, Kansas. iv + 44 pp.
  3. Collins, J. T., and T. W. Taggart. 2009. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians, turtles, reptiles, and crocodilians. Sixth edition. The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrance, Kansas. iv + 44 pp.
  4. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  5. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  6. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  7. Grismer, L. L. 2002. Amphibians and reptiles of Baja California including its Pacific islands and islands in the Sea of Cortes. University of California Press, Berkeley. xiii + 399 pp.
  8. Holman, J. A. 2000. Fossil Snakes of North America. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. 357 pp.
  9. Holycross, A.T. and J.C. Mitchell (eds.). 2020. Snakes of Arizona. ECO Wear and Publishing, Rodeo, New Mexico, 860 pp.
  10. Kluge, A. G. 1993. <i>Calabaria </i>and the phylogeny of erycine snakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 107:293-351.
  11. Mulks, M. 2011. Geographic distribution: <i>Lichanura trivirgata gracia</i>. Herpetological Review 42(1):115.
  12. Reynolds, R. G., and R. W. Henderson. 2018. Boas of the world (superfamily Booidae): a checklist with systematic, taxonomic, and conservation assessments. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 162(1):1-58.
  13. Rodriguez-Robles, J. A., G. R. Stewart, and T. J. Pappenfuss. 2001. Mitochondrial DNA-based phylogeography of North American rubber boas, <i>Charina bottae</i> (Serpentes: Boidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18:227-237.
  14. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  15. Weisman, C. M. 1988. Morphometric and electrophoretic comparison between the Pacific rubber boa (<i>Charina bottae bottae</i>) and the southern rubber boa (<i>Charina bottae umbratica</i>)."PhD dissertation, Department of Biological Sciences.California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California.
  16. Wood, D. A., T. W. Reeder, and R. N. Fisher. 2008. Novel patterns of historical isolation, dispersal, and secondary contact across Baja California in the rosy boa (<i>Lichanura trivirgata). </i>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46:484-502.
  17. Yingling, R. P. 1982. <i>Lichanura</i>, <i>L. trivirgata</i>. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 294.1-294.2.