Sonora occipitalis

(Hallowell, 1854)

Mohave Shovel-nosed Snake

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101370
Element CodeARADB05011
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusSonora
Synonyms
Chionactis occipitalis(Hallowell, 1854)Chionactis occipitalis occipitalis(Hallowell, 1854)Chionactis occipitalis talpinaKlauber, 1951
Concept Reference
Collins, J. T. 1997. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. Fourth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular No. 25. 40 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Cox et al. (2018) proposed synonymizing Chionactis and Chilomeniscus with Sonora, which has taxonomic priority over both genera. This species is in the subgenus Chionactis with S. annulata and S. palarostris.

Based on genetic and phenotypic evidence, Wood et al. (2014) proposed that two species be recognized, Chionactis occipitalis and C. annulata. This was accepted by Crother (2017).

There is some question as to the validity of the name C. saxatilis (Funk 1967), the Gila Mountains Shovel-nosed Snake, which is generally considered to be a synonym of C. o. annulata (see Cross 1979). Mahrdt et al. (2001) considered C. saxatilis a synonym of C. o. annulata. Wood et al. (2008) demonstrated, using mtDNA and morphological data, that population structure was not concordant with the traditional subspecific taxonomy. They also revealed two potentially independent evolutionary lineages. A phylogeographic study from Wood et al. (2014) using mtDNA and microsatellites indicates that C. o. annulata should be elevated to species status, while retaining two subspecies C. a. annulata and C. a. klauberi, that conform to patterns of genetic structure. The authors find no support for C. o. talpina and place it in synonomy with C. occipitalis (Crother 2017).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-04-30
Change Date2002-08-14
Edition Date2025-04-30
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread and common within a limited range in the southwestern U.S. and northwestern México. It faces threats from habitat destruction due to development and agriculture. The population appears to be stable with no reports of recent declines.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs in the interior deserts of the southewestern United States and northwestern México. It is found in southern California, northwestern Arizona, southern Nevada, Baja California Norte, and northwestern Sonora (Mahrdt et al. 2001, Wood et al. 2014, Holycross and Mitchell 2020). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records from 1990-2025, range extent is estimated to be 307,273 km² (RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences Comments
There are many occurrences throughout the range.
Threat Impact Comments
No major rangewide threats are known at this time. At the eastern end of the range in Arizona, habitat destruction in the form of development and conversion to agriculture is an ongoing threat (Bradley and Rosen 2020). This threat likely also applies to the western edge of its range where there are large population centers. Drastic increases in road traffic has likely increased mortality in this species as it has in other desert snakes (Jones et al. 2011).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat of this burrowing snake consists of sparsely vegetated (mesquite-creosote bush, desert grasses, cactus) desert; rocky slopes, dunes, washes, sandy flats (Stebbins 2003).

Reproduction

In southern California, mating evidently peaks in May-June; clutch size usually 2-4; smallest reproductively active female was 257 mm SVL; only part of the adult female population is reproductively active in any single year; females with oviductal eggs have been found in late May (Goldberg 1997).
Terrestrial Habitats
DesertSand/dune
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaSNRYes
ArizonaS3Yes
NevadaS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
South SierraInyo National Forest41,853
References (19)
  1. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  2. Bradley, C. M., and P. C. Rosen. 2020. Defining suitable habitat and conservation status for the Tucson shovel-nosed snake (<i>Chionactis annulata klauberi</i>) in the Sonoran Desert.
  3. Collins, J. T. 1997. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. Fourth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular No. 25. 40 pp.
  4. Cox, C. L. A. R. Davis Rabosky, I. A. Holmes, J. Reyes-Velasco, C. E. Roelke, E. N. Smith, O. Flores-Villela, J. A. McGuire, and J. A. Campbell. 2018. Synopsis and taxonomic revision of three genera in the snake tribe Sonorini. Journal of Natural History 52:945-988.
  5. Cross, J. K. 1979. Multivariate and univariate character geography in <i>Chionactis </i>(Reptilia: Serpentes). Ph.D. Diss.. Univ. Arizona, Tucson.
  6. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  8. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  9. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  10. Goldberg, S. R. 1997. Reproduction in the western shovelnose snake, CHIONACTIS OCCIPITALIS (Colubridae), from California. Great Basin Naturalist 57:85-87.
  11. Holycross, A.T. and J.C. Mitchell (eds.). 2020. Snakes of Arizona. ECO Wear and Publishing, Rodeo, New Mexico, 860 pp.
  12. Jones, T. R., R. D. Babb, F. R. Hensley, C. Liwanpo, and B. K. Sullivan. 2011. Sonoran Desert snake communities at two sites: concordance and effects of increased road traffic. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6(1): 61-71.
  13. Mahrdt, C. R., K. R. Beaman, P. C. Rosen, and P. A. Holm. 2001a. Chionactis. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 730:1-6.
  14. Mahrdt, C. R., K. R. Beaman, P. C. Rosen, and P. A. Holm. 2001b. Chionactis occipitalis. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 731:1-12.
  15. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  16. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  17. Uetz, P., P. Freed, R. Aguilar, F. Reyes, and J. Hošek (eds.). 2023. The Reptile Database. Online. Available: http://www.reptile-database.org
  18. Wood, D. A., J. M. Meik, A. T. Holycross, R. N. Fisher, and A. G. Vandergast. 2008. Molecular and phenotypic diversity in the Western Shovel-nosed snake, with emphasis on the status of the Tucson Shovel-nosed snake (<i>Chionactis occipitalis klauberi</i>). Conservation Genetics 9:1489–1507.
  19. Wood D. A, R. N. Fisher, and A. G. Vandergast. 2014. Fuzzy boundaries: color and gene flow patterns among parapatric lineages of the western shovel-nosed snake and taxonomic implication. PLoS ONE 9(5): e97494. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097494