Entosphenus tridentatus

(Richardson, 1836)

Pacific Lamprey

G4Apparently Secure Found in 9 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102975
Element CodeAFBAA02100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassPetromyzontida
OrderPetromyzontiformes
FamilyPetromyzontidae
GenusEntosphenus
Synonyms
Lampetra tridentata(Gairdner, 1836)
Other Common Names
Lamproie du Pacifique (FR)
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
The Goose Lake population of L. tridentata, presumably derived from sea-run populations from the Klamath drainage, likely deserves recognition as a distinct subspecies (Moyle et al. 1989, Moyle 2002). Populations in Lake Cowichan and Mesachie Lake, British Columbia, formerly included in L. tridentata, are now regarded as a distinct species, L. macrostoma (Beamish 1987).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2012-02-23
Change Date2012-02-23
Edition Date2012-02-24
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Distribution and abundance have declined greatly in much of the range (especially in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California), but the species remains widespread with many subpopulations around the margins of the northern Pacific Ocean, in much of the U.S. range, species is threatened by barriers on mainstem and tributary streams, streamflow management, stream and floodplain degradation, and reduced water quality. NatureServe's rank calculator version 3.1 yielded a rank of G3G4 or G4, depending on the estimated degree of decline.and estimated threat impact. Given the apparently secure status in British Columbia (a large area and significant portion of the range), and apparently low degree of threat and occurrence in many streams in Alaska (although status there is not well known), this species is ranked G4.
Range Extent Comments
Pacific lampreys occur in rivers around the North Pacific Ocean from Hokkaido, Japan (Yamazaki et al. 2005), to Alaska (Cape Lisburne and Norton Sound; apparently rare north of the Alaska Peninsula) and south to southern Baja California (Luzier et al. 2011). Malibu Creek, Los Angeles County, seems to be the southernmost point of regular occurrence in California; scattered distribution south of San Luis Obispo County, with regular runs in the Santa Clara River (Moyle 2002). Adults are wide-ranging in the Pacific Ocean from Japan to Baja California. Landlocked populations occur in lakes or reservoirs in British Columbia, Oregon, California, and possibly elsewhere.

At least historically, Pacific lampreys penetrated far inland in the Fraser, Columbia (to Idaho), Klamath-Trinity, Eel, and Sacramento-San Joaquin rivers. Dams now block or inhibit upstream passage in many rivers.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by a large number of subpopulations, but many of these are much reduced and of low viability.
Threat Impact Comments
Threats include artificial barriers to migration, poor water quality, predation by native and non-native species, stream and floodplain degradation, loss of estuarine habitat, decline in prey, ocean conditions, dredging, and dewatering (see Luzier et al. 2011). Primary threats are barriers on mainstem and tributary streams, streamflow management, stream and floodplain degradation, and reduced water quality (Luzier et al. 2011). The extirpated and most imperiled populations have no healthy lamprey populations nearby to aid in recovery (Luzier et al. 2011).

Hydropower development, habitat alterations, and land management practices (e.g., irrigation) are thought to be responsible for the declines in the Columbia and Snake rivers (Claire and Cochnauer). Many declines are probably the result of obstructions (i.e., dams) that prevent spawning migration of adults and cause habitat degradation of spawning and larval rearing areas (Weeks 1991). Pacific lampreys were formerly common in the Snake, Clearwater, and Salmon river drainages in Idaho, but dams have had an adverse impact on their migration up the Snake River (Wydoski and Whitney 2003). The population in Elsie Lake in British Columbia was apparently extirpated approximately seven years after dams were constructed on the lake's outlet (Beamish and Northcote 1989). The Goose Lake, California, population may be negatively affected by dams and other obstructions that prevent adults from reaching spawning areas and by stream channelization, grazing, and diversions of water for irrigation, which may cause ammocoete habitat to dry up or become unsuitable (Moyle et al. 1989 and 1995).

Severe declines in salmon abundance may also be influential in the lamprey decline because salmon are one of the primary food resources (Wydoski and Whitney 2003).

Pacific lampreys were historically used extensively for food, trade, ceremonial, and medicinal purposes by Indian tribes in Oregon and British Columbia (Scott and Crossman 1973, Weeks 1991). In the 1940s, they were commercially harvested at Willamette Falls on the Willamette River, Oregon. Harvests averaged 300,000 pounds annually and were used to produce a chemical to aid in blood coagulation. Currently, commercial harvest at Willamette Falls ranges from 3,000 to 11,000 pounds annually and is sold as bait or to biological supply houses. Commercial harvest is now prohibited in some areas in Oregon. However, Indian tribes still harvest lamprey for personal use. At Willamette Falls, native harvests are probably comparable to the present level of commercial harvest. In Oregon, native harvests now occur primarily at Bonneville Dam and to a lesser extent at Sherar Falls on the Deschutes River and Willamette Falls, on the Willamette River.

A 1990 spill of hydrochloric acid in John Day River, Oregon, resulted in the death of an estimated 10,000 ammocoetes (Weeks 1991).

Legal harvest of adults and ammocetes occurs in California and Alaska (Luzier et al. 2011), but this is not known to be a significant threat.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

The predatory phase of the life cycle (excluding land-locked populations) occurs in the ocean, primarily near stream mouths in estuaries and in other coastal areas but sometimes far away (Moyle 2002). Freshwater-resident populations exist in several areas in British Columbia (McPhail 2007) and elsewhere.

Ammocoetes inhabit shallow backwater and eddy areas along edges of streams in mud, silt and sand (Lee et al. 1980). In southern California, adults apparently spend approximately one year in fresh water prior to spawning (Chase 2001).

Adults spawn in runs and riffles in rock-, sand-, or gravel-bottomed clear streams, in small, shallow depressions, or crude nests, at the heads of riffles (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). Water depth at spawning sites often is 30-150 cm (Moyle 2002).

Lake populations in British Columbia spawn at creek mouths or sometimes move up to a few hundred meters up creeks (Beamish 1987). The Goose Lake, California, population spawns in gravel riffles of tributary streams, far enough upstream such that there is adequate ammocoete habitat (muddy backwaters) downstream from the breeding area (Moyle et al. 1989).

Reproduction

The timing of migration to spawning stream varies geographically, and different runs may occur in a single river system. According to Wydoski and Whitney (1979) spawning occurs in June-July in Washington. In southern California, spawning likely begins by late January in most years, and spawning may continue into April (Chase 2001). In the Santa Clara River in southern California, upstream migration began as early as mid-December or as late as mid-March; peak migration occurred in March in most years (Chase 2001). Eggs hatch in 2 or 3 weeks. Ammocoetes remain in stream, metamorphose in 4-6 years (late September-October). Form macrostoma in British Columbia: spawns May-August, probably spends 6 years as larva and 2 years as subadult-adult before reproducing; metamorphosis July-October (Beamish 1987). Oceanic phase apparently may last 3-4 years in British Columbia but may be shorter in more southern areas (Moyle 2002). Generation time is 9 years (Luzier et al. 2011).

This is the only species of lamprey in which some individuals (from Washington) are known to spawn more than once (Page and Burr 1991).

See Luzier et al. (2011) for an up-to-date review of Pacific lamprey life history.
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
IdahoS1Yes
AlaskaS4Yes
WashingtonS1Yes
OregonS1Yes
CaliforniaS3Yes
CanadaN5B,N5N
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaS5Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsUnknown
7.2 - Dams & water management/use
9 - Pollution

Roadless Areas (9)
California (5)
AreaForestAcres
Black ButteLos Padres National Forest5,116
ChinquapinShasta-Trinity National Forest22,040
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
PortugueseKlamath National Forest18,915
Tom MartinKlamath National Forest9,031
Oregon (2)
AreaForestAcres
EagleMt. Hood National Forest16,841
TahkenitchSiuslaw National Forest5,799
Washington (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekGifford Pinchot National Forest7,980
Granite MountainOkanogan National Forest27,428
References (52)
  1. Beamish, R. J. 1987. Evidence that parasitic and nonparasitic life history types are produced by one population of lamprey. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:1779-1782.
  2. Beamish, R. J. and C. D. Levings. 1991. Abundance and freshwater migrations of the anadromous parasitic lamprey <i>Lampetra tridentata</i> in a tributary of the Fraser River British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48(7):1250-1263.
  3. Beamish, R. J. and T. G. Northcote. 1989. Extinction of a population of anadromous parasitic lamprey <i>Lampetra tridentata</i> upstream of an impassable dam. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46(3):420-425.
  4. Brown, Larry (U.S. Geological Survey, WRD). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. June 2000.
  5. Chase, S. D. 2001. Contributions to the life history of adult Pacific lamprey (<i>Lampetra tridentata</i>) in the Santa Clara River of southern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 100(2):74-85.
  6. Claire, C. W., and T. G. Cochnauer. No date (probably 2004). Pacific lamprey Lampetra tridentata status and distribution in the Clearwater River drainage, Idaho. Unpublished Powerpoint presentation. Available: http://www.cbfwa.org/files/fy04conference/presentations3/200002800.pdf. Accessed 26 January 2005.
  7. Gill, H. S. , C. B. Renaud, F. Chapleau, R. L. Mayden and I. C. Potter. 2003. Phylogeny of living parasitic lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) based on morphological data. Copeia 2003(4):687-703.
  8. Hardisty, M. W. and I. C. Potter, eds. 1971. The Biology of Lampreys. Academic Press, London and New York. pp. 1-65.
  9. Japan Ministry of the Environment. 2003. Threatened wildlife of Japan, Red Data Book. Second edition. Japan Wildlife Research Centre, Tokyo.
  10. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  11. Kostow, K. 2002. Oregon lampreys: natural history, status, and analysis of management issues. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland.
  12. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  13. Love, M. 1996. Probably more than you want to know about the fishes of the Pacific coast. Really Big Press, Santa Barbara, California. 381 pp.
  14. Luzier, C. W., H. A. Schaller, J. K. Brostrom, C. Cook-Taylor, D. H. Goodman, R. D. Nelle, K. Ostrand, and B. Streif. 2011. Pacific lamprey (<i>Entosphenus tridentatus</i>) assessment and template for conservation measures. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 282 pp.
  15. Master, L. L. 1996. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Progress Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia. 60 pp.
  16. Master, L. L. and A. L. Stock. 1998. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 36 pp.
  17. McPhail, J.D. 2007. The freshwater fishes of British Columbia. The University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta.
  18. Mecklenburg, C. W., T. A. Mecklenburg, and L. K. Thorsteinson. 2002. Fishes of Alaska. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. xxxvii + 1,037 pp.
  19. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  20. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  21. Moyle, P. B., J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. Final report submitted to California Dept. of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova. 222 pp.
  22. Moyle, P. B., L. B. Brown, S. D. Chase, and R. M. Quinones. 2009. Status and conservation of lampreys in California. Pages 279-293 in L. R. Brown, S. D. Chase, M. G. Mesa, R. J. Beamish, and P. B. Moyle, editors. Biology, management, and conservation of lampreys in North America. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 72. Bethesda, Maryland.
  23. Moyle, P.B., R. M. Quiñones, J. V. Katz and J. Weaver. 2015. Pacific Lamprey (<i>Entosphenus tridentatus</i>) Account in Fish Species of Special Concern in California. Sacramento: California Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=104360&inline
  24. Moyle, P. B., R. M. Yoshiyama, J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1995. Fish species of special concern in California. Second edition. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, California. iv + 272 pp.
  25. Moyle, Peter B. (Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, UC-Davis). 2000. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. April 2000.
  26. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  27. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  28. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  29. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  30. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  31. Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County (WA). 2006a. Survival and rates of predation for juvenile Pacific Lamprey migrating through Columbia River hydroelectric projects (Aquatic Issue 6.2.1.1). Wells Hydroelectric Project. FERC No. 2149. Appendix H, pages 33-45.
  32. Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County (WA). 2006b. Adult Pacific Lamprey passage and behavior study. (Aquatic Issue 6.2.1.3). Wells Hydroelectric Project. FERC No. 2149. Appendix H, pages 59-76.
  33. Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County (WA). 2006c. An assessment of adult Pacific Lamprey spawning within the Well Project (Aquatic Issue 6.2.1.2). Wells Hydroelectric Project. FERC No. 2149. Appendix H, pages 46-58.
  34. Reid, S.B. and D.H. Goodman. 2017. Pacific Lamprey range and distribution in California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In California Biological Information and Observation System. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios/?bookmark=326 (Accessed 9 July 2021).
  35. Renaud, C. B. 2008. Petromyzontidae, <i>Entosphenus tridentatus</i>: southern distribution record, Isla Clarión, Revillagigedo Archipelago, Mexico. Check List 4(1):82-85.
  36. Renaud, C., M. Docker, and N. Mandrak. 2009. Taxonomy, distribution, and conservation of lampreys in Canada. Pages 293-309 in L. R. Brown, S. D. Chase, M. G. Mesa, R. J. Beamish, and P. B. Moyle, editors. Biology, management, and conservation of lampreys in North America. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 72. Bethesda, Maryland.
  37. Richardson, J. 1836. Fauna Boreali Americana or the Zoology of the Northern Parts of British America: Containing Descriptions of the Objects of Natural History on the Late Northern Land Expeditions under Command of Captain John Franklin, E.N. Part Third, The Fish. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/41527937
  38. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  39. Rodriguez, M. A. 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is complete, not lost. Ecology 83(1):1-13.
  40. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184. 966 pp.
  41. Simpson, J. and R. Wallace. 1982. Fishes of Idaho. The University Press of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho. 238 pp.
  42. Spice, E. K., T. A. Whitesel, C. T. McFarlane, and M. F. Docker. 2011. Characterization of 12 microsatellite loci for the Pacific lamprey, <i>Entosphenus tridentatus</i> (Petromyzontidae), and cross-amplification in five other lamprey species. Genetics and Molecular Research 10:3246-3250.
  43. Texas Natural History Collection. 1996. Sept. 9 last update. Index to North American freshwater fishes (fish images, maps, and information). Online. Available: http://www.utexas.edu/depts/tnhc/na/naindex.html.
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Pacific Lamprey (<i>Entosphenus tridentatus</i>) Assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 302 pp. https://www.fws.gov/pacificlamprey/Documents/PacificLamprey_2018Assessment_final_02282019.pdf
  45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 27 December 2004. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants;90-day finding on a petition to list three species of lampreys as Threatened or Endangered. Federal Register 69(247):77158-77166.
  46. Wallace, Richard L. (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. March 2000.
  47. Wang, C. and H. Schaller. 2015. Conserving Pacific Lamprey through collaborative efforts. Fisheries 40(2):72-79.
  48. Weeks, H. 1991. Columbia River Fish Managment Plan. all-species review, lamprey. Unpublished report. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 5 pp.
  49. Weeks, H. 1993. Status of Pacific Lamprey. Status Review for Oregon State Sensitive Species Listing. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Portland, OR.
  50. Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. The University of Washington Press, Seattle. 220 pp.
  51. Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 2003. Inland fishes of Washington. Second edition, revised and expanded. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, in association with University of Washington Press, Seattle. xiii + 322 pp.
  52. Yamazaki, Y, N. Fukutomi, N. Oda, K. Shibukawa, Y. Niimura and A. Iwata. 2005. Occurrence of larval Pacific lamprey <i>Entosphenus tridentatus</i> from Japan, detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Ichthyological Research 52(3):297-301.