Lepidurus packardi

Simon, 1886

Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp

G3Vulnerable Found in 77 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.108639
Element CodeICBRA10010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassBranchiopoda
OrderNotostraca
FamilyTriopsidae
GenusLepidurus
Other Common Names
vernal pool tadpole shrimp (EN)
Concept Reference
McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Lepidurus cryptus is inseparable morphologically from Lepidurus packardi, but is genetically distinct (see Rogers, 2001).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2023-06-06
Change Date2023-06-06
Edition Date2023-06-06
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2008), K. Hunting (2023)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is a California endemic that is dependent upon seasonal wetlands (vernal pools) for survival and reproduction. While loss of vernal pool habitat has slowed and some vernal pool complexes in the Central Valley are protected, loss of seasonal wetlands to a variety of factors including drought exacerbated by climate change continues.
Range Extent Comments
The vernal pool tadpole shrimp is endemic to California, USA, occupying the Central Valley from Millville Plains and Stillwater Plains in Shasta County south to Merced County (Helm 1998). Despite a relatively large range and apparently wide tolerance to habitat variables (USFWS 2007, Helm 1998), the vernal pool tadpole shrimp was found in fewer than 20% of vernal pools sampled in two separate studies (USFWS 2007). The range extent of the vernal pool tadpole shrimp was estimated at about 151,000 km2 based om analysis of locations derived from extant element occurrences supported by the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB).
Occurrences Comments
The number of occurrences of the vernal pool tadpole shrimp is unknown It is widely but sporadically distributed over a relatively large range.
Threat Impact Comments
The USFWS (1994, 2007) identify loss of vernal pool habitat for vernal pool fairy shrimp and other vernal pool crustaceans as the primary threat factor contributing to population declines statewide. Most of the significant loss of vernal habitat in the California Central Valley can be attributed to conversion of vernal pools to urban and agricultural development (Holland 1998). USFWS (2007) suggests only 9% of historic vernal pool habitat remains with most lost to urban and agricultural development. Loss to conversion of vernal pools to agricultural development, especially in the central coast, San Joaquin Valley, and southern Sacramento Valley, is a continuing threat to vernal pool fairy shrimp populations. Loss of vernal pools reduces available habitat and agricultural uses effect local and regional hydrology by lowering the water table or diversion of surface waters which can affect the timing and availability of water in the pools. Potential climate change impacts include, but are not limited to, local site desiccation from drought, spatial and temporal water availability due to erratic weather patterns and snow melt run-off, and asynchronous pollination cycles effecting plant composition and cover.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Dorsal compound eyes; a large (up to 3.5 cm long) dorsal shield-like carapace, which is attached to the head region, covering most of the 35 to 48 pairs of swimming appendages (phyllopods); and two long cercopods at the end of the last body segment (telson) (Pennak, 1978, and Longhurst, 1955).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Mostly resembles LEPIDURUS COUSEI; but, their ranges are apparently disjunct. Identifications of the species entails the examination of the arrangement of spines and length of the supra-anal plate, eyes, and nucral organ. Individuals similar in external morphology to both species have been collected in the Modoc Plateau area of northeastern California between each of their respective ranges. Although preliminary, genetic work on LEPIDURUS, conducted by King (pers comm., 1996), has revealed that specimens obtained from the Modoc Plateau area are genetically distinct. Yet, the genetic relationships between them and L. PACKARDI and L. COUSEI have not been determined.

The only useful external morphological characteristic to distinguish the sexes are the ovisacs (AKA foot capsules) attached to the eleventh pair of appendages (i.e., phyllopods) of females (Linder, 1952).

Habitat

Found in a variety of natural, and artificial, seasonally ponded habitat types including: vernal pools, swales, ephemeral drainages, stock ponds, reservoirs, ditches, backhoe pits, and ruts caused by vehicular activities. Wetland habitats vary in size from very small (2 square meters) to very large (356,253 square meters) and exhibit extremes in depth (2-15 cm) and volume (23-9,262,573 cubic meters (Helm, 1998).

Reproduction

Bisexual. Cysts occurring in the dry pool bottom hatch within three weeks of inundation (Ahl, 1991). Laboratory studies conducted by Ahl (1991) revealed cysts hatching within 17 days when incubated at 10 oC, however, the majority (64%) of the cysts hatched within four days. Lanway (1974) observed the appearance of hatchlings within two to three days after ponding in natural systems and 10 to 13 days after incubated at 10 oC in the laboratory. The author's dissertation work in the laboratory and field studies reveals similar hatching results as those obtained by Ahl (1991) and Lanway (1974). The hatched neonate is a metanauplius which undergoes several molts (ecdysis) each gaining additional phyllopod appendages until reaching allude. This process takes approximately six to seven weeks depending on temperature and food availability (Ahl, 1991, and Helm, in prep). Reproduction occurs throughout the ponding season, when females average between 10 and 12 mm in carapace length (Ahl, 1991). Ahl (1991) reported that fecundity increases with size and clutch size ranges from eight to 61 eggs. Ahl (1991) laboratory studies also revealed that eggs lain during the same ponding event can hatch without dehydration. Other life history characteristics include mean days to mature (38.1), mean days to reproduce (54.1), mean population longevity in days (143.6) (Helm, 1998).
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDSCRUB-SHRUB WETLAND
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3.1 - Nomadic grazingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (77)
California (76)
AreaForestAcres
BackboneShasta-Trinity National Forest11,466
Bakeoven RidgeShasta-Trinity National Forest46
Bell QuinbyShasta-Trinity National Forest11,556
BlackKlamath National Forest6,530
Bonanza KingShasta-Trinity National Forest16,402
BoulderKlamath National Forest435
Box CampKlamath National Forest858
BriscoeMendocino National Forest7,212
Burnt Lava FlowModoc National Forest8,387
Callahan FlowKlamath National Forest3,231
Callahan FlowModoc National Forest6,618
Castle Crags AShasta-Trinity National Forest113
Castle Crags BShasta-Trinity National Forest1,619
ChanchelullaShasta-Trinity National Forest3,915
China Springs AShasta-Trinity National Forest25
China Springs BShasta-Trinity National Forest568
ChinquapinShasta-Trinity National Forest22,040
Condrey Mtn.Klamath National Forest2,923
Cow CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest22,627
Cow CreekSix Rivers National Forest1,271
CrapoKlamath National Forest1,487
Deer MountainMendocino National Forest11,716
Devils RockShasta-Trinity National Forest16,209
Dog CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest5,001
EagleShasta-Trinity National Forest6,553
East BeegumShasta-Trinity National Forest8,425
East ForkShasta-Trinity National Forest6,201
East GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest27,894
Fisher Gulch BShasta-Trinity National Forest4,791
Granite PeakShasta-Trinity National Forest122
GriderKlamath National Forest10,647
Hobo GulchShasta-Trinity National Forest88
Indian CreekKlamath National Forest5,011
IshiLassen National Forest21,805
Jacobs (fs)Klamath National Forest577
JohnsonKlamath National Forest10,652
KangarooKlamath National Forest40,617
KelseyKlamath National Forest3,237
Kettle Mtn.Shasta-Trinity National Forest4,589
Lake EleanorShasta-Trinity National Forest397
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
MayfieldLassen National Forest14,444
Mt. EddyShasta-Trinity National Forest7,232
Mt. HoffmanKlamath National Forest802
Mt. Shasta AShasta-Trinity National Forest676
Mt. Shasta BShasta-Trinity National Forest2,809
Mt. Shasta CShasta-Trinity National Forest292
Murphy GladeShasta-Trinity National Forest1,015
MuseKlamath National Forest238
Orleans Mtn.Klamath National Forest49,090
Orleans Mtn.Shasta-Trinity National Forest57
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
Orleans Mtn. CSix Rivers National Forest15,589
PantherShasta-Trinity National Forest12,016
PattisonShasta-Trinity National Forest29,299
Penney RidgeShasta-Trinity National Forest5,226
Pilot CreekSix Rivers National Forest9,192
PortugueseKlamath National Forest18,915
RussianKlamath National Forest21,771
Salt GulchShasta-Trinity National Forest6,511
ShacklefordKlamath National Forest1,679
SiskiyouKlamath National Forest54,039
Siskiyou ASix Rivers National Forest1,017
Siskiyou BSix Rivers National Forest18,871
Slate CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest6,636
SnoozerKlamath National Forest23,414
South ForkShasta-Trinity National Forest16,786
Stoveleg GapShasta-Trinity National Forest61
Tom MartinKlamath National Forest9,031
Ukonom CreekKlamath National Forest4,621
UnderwoodSix Rivers National Forest6,591
UnderwoodShasta-Trinity National Forest3,046
Weaver BallyShasta-Trinity National Forest829
Wells MountainShasta-Trinity National Forest5,919
West BeegumShasta-Trinity National Forest5,198
West GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest37,516
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
References (17)
  1. Ahl, J. S. B. 1991. Factors affecting contributions of the tadpole shrimp, <i>Lepidurus packardi</i>, to its oversummering egg reserves. Hydrobiologia 212:137-43.
  2. Helm, B.P. 1998. Biogeography of eight large branchiopods endemic to California. Pages 124-139 in C.W. Witham, E.T. Bauder, D. Belk, W.R. Ferren, Jr. and R. Ornduff (eds.) Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems- Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant society, Sacramento, California.
  3. Holland, R. 1998. Changes in Great Valley vernal distribution from 1989 to 1997. Report prepared for California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. 18 pp. [https://dfgsecure.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/wetlands/pdfs/Holland_ChangesInGreatValleyVernalPoolDistribution.pdf]
  4. Holland, R. F. 1978. The geographic and edaphic distribution of vernal pools in the Great Central Valley, California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication No. 4. Sacramento, CA.
  5. King, Jaime. Ph.D. candidate. University of California, Davis, California. Personal communication.
  6. Lanway, C. S. 1974. Environmental factors affecting crustacean hatching in five temporary ponds. Department of Biological Sciences, Chico State University, Chico.
  7. Linder, F. 1952. Contributions to the morphology and taxonomy of the Branchiopoda Notostraca, with special reference to the North American Species. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 102:1-69.
  8. Longhurst, A. R. 1955. A review of the Notostraca. Bull. Brit. Mus. Zool. 3:1-57.
  9. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  10. Pennak, R.W. 1978. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York. 803 pp.
  11. Rogers, D.C. 2001. Revision of the Nearctic <i>Lepidurus </i>(Notostraca). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 21(4): 991-1006.
  12. Rogers, D.C. and B.J. Hann. 2016. Class Branchiopoda (in Chapter 16, Phylum Arthropoda). Pages 437-477 in J.H. Thorp and and D.C. Rogers (Editors), Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates, 4th edition, Volume II: Keys to Nearctic Fauna. Academic Press.
  13. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1994. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Animal Candidate Review for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species. Federal Register 59(219):58982-59028.
  14. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Recovery plan for vernal pools ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. xxvi + 606 pages.
  15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Sacramento Field Office, Sacramento, CA. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/tess/species_nonpublish/1126.pdf
  16. USFWS [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]. 2004a. Draft recovery plan for vernal pool ecosystems of California and southern Oregon. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
  17. Witham, C.W., R.F. Holland and J. Vollmar. 2014. Changes in the Distribution of Great Valley Vernal Pool Habitats from 2005 to 2012. Sacramento, CA. Report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Reclamation CVPIA Habitat Restoration Program under Grant Agreement No. F11AP00169 with the USFWS. Citation and analysis from BIOS dataset 1070.