Pyganodon grandis

(Say, 1829)

Giant Floater

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.117497
Element CodeIMBIV54030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusPyganodon
Synonyms
Anodonta globosaLea, 1842Anodonta grandisSay, 1829
Other Common Names
Pyganodon commune (FR)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Hoeh (1990) split Anodonta cataracta cataracta and Anodonta cataracta fragilis into distinct species (elevating Pyganodon to genus level in the process). Also Hoeh and Burch (1989) separated Anodonta lacustris as a valid species from Anodonta grandis and Anodonta cataracta and Hoeh (1990) placed them in Pyganodon as Anodonta marginata sensu stricto, is considered a nomen dubium (see Hoeh and Burch, 1989). Zanatta et al. (2007) supported the monophyly of both Pyganodon and Utterbackia using mutation coding of allozyme data, but also resolved the Eurasian Anodonta cygnea to Pyganodon, Utterbackia, and North American Anodonta; indicating further phylogenetic analysis of the Anodontinae is required including both North American and Eurasian species. There is some speculation that this species may hybridize with Pyganodon cataracta (Kat, 1985; 1986). It is undoubtedly a species complex that needs more study throughout its range (Park and Burch, 1995).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2017-08-01
Change Date1998-03-12
Edition Date2011-12-23
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2011); Morrison, M. (1998)
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread and common in North America and can tolerate a much wider range of habitats than many other unionids.
Range Extent Comments
This species is commonly distributed throughout Canada and the U.S. in the Mississippi, Great Lakes, and Hudson Bay basins. It also occurs in the Gulf of Mexico drainage area of Louisiana and Texas, and in the Red River drainage in Texas and Oklahoma. It has been introduced to some areas as glochidia on stocked fish hosts (Upper Lake Mary, Arizona- Hovingh, 2004; tidal Hudson River in Haverstraw, New York- Mills et al., 1996). In the Apalachicola Basin (ACF basin = formed by Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers) of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, this species is historically known from 59 records from 29 sites and was considered widespread throughout the ACF system including the main channel and tributaries of the Apalachicola, Chipola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers (Brim Box and Williams, 2000).
Occurrences Comments
It is common in all Illinois drainages (Cummings and Mayer, 1997; Schanzle and Cummings, 1991; Schanzle et al., 2004; Sietman et al., 2001; Tiemann et al., 2005). Indiana: lower E Fork White (Harmon, 1992), Tippecanoe (Cummings and Berlocher, 1990); Muscatatuck (Harmon, 1989); Eel, St. Mary's, St. Joseph, Maumee (Pryor, 2005); and all of Ohio (Watters, 1995; Lyons et al., 2007; Hoggarth et al. 2007; Watters et al., 2009). In West Virginia, it occured in the Upper Ohio/Kanawha (Zeto et al., 1987) and Mud River (Guyandotte drainage) (Schmidt and Zeto, 1986). It is in every Minnesota drainage (Sietman, 2003): Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior Red (Graf, 1997; Cvancara, 1970). In Texas, it is in all drainages (Howells et al., 1996) introduced in Clement Lake, El Paso Co. and lower Rio Grande (Johnson, 1999). It is common throughout Alabama (Mirarchi, 2004); Choctawhatchee (Blalock-Herod et al., 2005), Alabama (McGregor et al., 1999); Florida in the Escambia (Butler, 1989) and Bear Creek, AL/MS (McGregor and Garner, 2004); not Yellow, Blackwater, and Perdido (Williams et al., 2008). Once since 1990s from Conecuh-Escambia and Choctawhatchee (Pilarczyk et al., 2006). In the Coosa basin, Georgia, it is historical from the Coosa, Etowah, Oostanaula, Conasauga, and Coosawattee (Williams and Hughes, 1998). It is in South Dakota streams (Backlund, 2000); incl. Lakes Lewis and Clark, Oahe and Sharpe, James (Perkins and Backlund, 2003), Big Sioux (Skadsen and Perkins, 2000), Minnesota River basins (Shearer et al., 2005). In Montana, it is in the NE and SE (Milk, Missouri, Little Missouri, Yellowstone, Musselshell drainages) (Gangloff and Gustafson, 2000; Stagliano, 2010). In Vermont, it is only in Lake Champlain and tribs- Missisquoi, Lamoille, Otter, East, Hubbardton, Poultney, Winooski Rivers (Fichtel and Smith, 1995). In Wisconsin it is widespread and abundant (Mathiak, 1979). In North Carolina, it is in the French Broad River and introduced in Jordan Lake (Cape Fear basin) (Bogan, 2002). In Mississippi, it is in all drainages except Coastal (Jones et al., 2005); Strong River (Darden et al., 2002). In Louisiana, it is common and widespread (Vidrine, 1993). Arkansas: Poteau (Vaughn and Spooner, 2004), Ouachita (Posey et al., 1996), Cache (Christian, 1995; Christian et al., 2005), White (Gordon, 1982; Gordon et al., 1994), St. Francis (Ahlstedt and Jenkinson, 1991), lower Arkansas (Gordon, 1985). In Tennessee, it is in the upper Powell, Clinch, Elk, Harpeth, Duck, Obion, Hatchie; impounded Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, and Reelfoot Lake (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). It is in the ACF basin (AL/FL/GA) (Brim-Box and Williams, 2000). In Kentucky, it is nearly statewide (Cicerello and Schuster, 2003; Gordon, 1991). In Wyoming, it is in the Belle Fourche and Little Missouri drainages, Cooke Co. (Cvancara, 2005). In Colorado, it is stable on eastern plains but lentic (Cordeiro, 1999; Wu, 1989; Clark et al., 2003). Oklahoma: Chikaskia, Verdigris, Kiamichi, Poteau, Neosho, Glover, Little, Mountain Fork, Blue, Washita, Red Rivers; Lake Murray, Texoma, Big and Middle Caney rivers (Branson, 1983; Vaughn, 2000). In Kansas, it is statewide and common (Couch, 1997; Tiemann, 2006). It is in the Little Blue basin (Hoke, 2004); and common in the Big Blue system, SE Nebraska and NE Kansas (Hoke, 2005) and common in Platte (Freeman and Perkins, 1992) and Cherry Co. on Niobrara (Freeman and Perkins, 1997) Rivers, Nebraska. It is in the Clinton drainage, Michigan (Trdan and Hoeh, 1993; Strayer, 1980) to Kalamazoo River (Mulcrone and Mehlne, 2001) to upper peninsula (Goodrich and Van der Schalie, 1939) in Lakes Michigan, Huron, St. Clair (Badra and Goforth, 2003). In Canada, it is widespread and common from Alberta and Northwest Territories (N to Shell Lake, Inuvik) E through Manitoba (Assiniboine drainage- Watson, 2000; Pip, 2006) to Ontario (Metcalfe-Smith et al., 2003; Schueler and Karstad, 2007) and Quebec (Metcalfe-Smith and Cudmore-Vokey, 2004).
Threat Impact Comments
Is tolerant of low oxygen levels and conditions in some impounded areas. Gross water pollution would probably be fatal. This species is also tolerant of flow regime change and can survive sedimentation and pollution events.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

See Clench and Turner (1956) under A. GIBBOSA.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Large, somewhat thicker-shelled than congeners, variable, umbones above hingeline.

Habitat

This species inhabits permanent ponds, lakes, and rivers of various sizes, usually on mud but also found on other substrates; 0.2 m water depth and beyond. It attains its greatest abundance and individual size in reservoirs, lakes and ponds having a mud bottom with little or no current but is tolerant of slow flowing pool area of rivers of all sizes (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). It is more tolerant of low oxygen levels than other unionid species.

Ecology

A species that is apparently tolerant of a fairly wide range of habitats.

Reproduction

Probably bradytictic (long-term brooder). This species has many glochidial hosts including Alosa chrysochloris (skipjack herring), Ambloplites rupestris (rock bass), Ameiurus natalis (yellow bullhead), Aplodinotus grunniens (freshwater drum), Campostoma anomalum (central stoneroller), Carpiodes carpio (river carpsucker), Carrasius auratus (goldfish), Catostomus commersoni (white sucker), Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Rio Grande cichlid), Culaea inconstans (brook stickleback), Cyprinus carpio (common carp), Dorosoma cepedianum (gizzard shad), Etheostoma caeruleum (rainbow darter), Etheostoma exile (Iowa darter), Etheostoma nigrum (Johnny darter), Fundulus chrysotus (golden topminnow), Fundulus diaphanus (banded killifish), Labidesthes sicculus (brook silverside), Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar), Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish), Lepomis gibbosus (pumpkinseed), Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish), Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill), Lepomis megalotis (longear sunfish), Luxilus chrysocephalus (striped shiner), Luxilus cornutus (common shiner), Lythrurus umbratilis (redfin shiner), Margariscus margarita (pearl dace), Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass), Morone chrysops (white bass), Neogobius melanostomus (round goby), Notemigonus chrysoleucas (golden shiner), Notropis heterodon (blackchin shiner), Notropis heterolepis (blacknose shiner), Perca flavescens (yellow perch), Pimephales notatus (bluntnose minnow), Poecilla reticulata (guppy), Pomoxis annularis (white crappie), Pomoxis nigromaculatus (black crappie), Rhinychthys atratulus (blacknose dace), Rutilus rutilus (roach), and Semotilus atromaculatus (creek chub) (Surber, 1913; Wilson, 1916; Lefevre and Curtis, 1910; Tucker, 1928; Arey, 1932; Clark and Berg, 1959; Trdan and Hoeh, 1982; Howells, 1997; Hankinson, 1908; Fuller, 1978; Penn, 1939; Read and Oliver, 1953; Jansen and Hanson, 1991; Jansen, 1991; Watters et al., 2005).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
South DakotaS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
North DakotaSNRYes
MissouriS5Yes
NebraskaSNRYes
New YorkS4Yes
OhioS5Yes
KansasS4Yes
TexasS4Yes
IllinoisS4Yes
ColoradoS2Yes
MichiganSNRYes
West VirginiaS3Yes
MinnesotaSNRYes
North CarolinaSNANo
KentuckyS4Yes
IowaS2Yes
ArkansasS5Yes
AlabamaS5Yes
IndianaS5Yes
VermontS2Yes
WisconsinS4Yes
GeorgiaS5Yes
MississippiS5Yes
TennesseeS5Yes
WyomingS3Yes
VirginiaSNRYes
ArizonaSNANo
LouisianaS5Yes
MontanaS4Yes
FloridaSNRYes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS5Yes
ManitobaS5Yes
AlbertaS4Yes
SaskatchewanS5Yes
Northwest TerritoriesSUYes
QuebecS4Yes
Roadless Areas (1)
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
References (147)
  1. Ahlstedt, S.A. 1995-1996. Status survey for federally listed endangered freshwater mussel species in the Paint Rock River system, northeastern Alabama, U.S.A. Walkerana 8(19):63-80.
  2. Ahlstedt, S.A. and J.J. Jenkinson. 1991. Distribution and abundance of <i>Potamilus capax</i> and other freshwater mussels in the St. Francis River system, Arkansas and Missouri, U.S.A. Walkerana, 5(14): 225-261.
  3. Arey, L.B. 1932. The formation and structure of the glochidial cyst. Biological Bulletin (Woods Hole), 62(2): 212-221.
  4. Backlund, D.C. 2000. Summary of current known distribution and status of freshwater mussels (Unionoida) in South Dakota. Central Plains Archaeology, 8(1): 69-77.
  5. Badra, P.J. and R.R. Goforth. 2003. Freshwater mussel surveys of Great Lakes tributary rivers in Michigan. Report Number MNFI 2003-15 to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management Unit, Lansing, Michigan. 40 pp.
  6. Bequaert, J.C. and W.B. Miller. 1973. The mollusks of the arid southwest with an Arizona checklist. University of Arizona Press: Tucson, Arizona. 271 pp.
  7. Blalock-Herod, H.N., J.J. Herod, J.D. Williams, B.N. Wilson, and S.W. McGregor. 2005. A historical and current perspective of the freshwater mussel fauna (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the Choctawhatchee River drainage in Alabama and Florida. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History, 24: 1-26.
  8. Bogan, A.E. 1993a. Workshop on freshwater bivalves of Pennsylvania. Workshop hosted by Aquatic Systems Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, held at Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 6-7 May 1993. 80 pp.
  9. Bogan, A. E. 1996. Freshwater bivalve section of Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. Draft Second Edition of American Fisheries Society Special Publication. 24 pp.
  10. Bogan, A.E. 2002. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of North Carolina. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences: Raleigh, North Carolina. 101 pp.
  11. Branson, B.A. 1966a. A partial biological survey of the Spring River drainage in Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri. Part I, collecting sites, basic limnological data, and mollusks. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 69(3/4): 242-293.
  12. Branson, B.A. 1983. The mussels (Unionacea: Bivalvia) of Oklahoma - Part II: the Unioninae, Pleurobemini, and Anodontini. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 63: 49-59
  13. Brim Box, J. and J.D. Williams. 2000. Unionid mollusks of the Apalachicola Basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Alabama Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 21: 1-143.
  14. Brown, K.M. and P.D. Banks. 2001. The conservation of unionid mussels in Louisiana rivers: diversity, assemblage composition and substrate use. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 11(3): 189-198.
  15. Butler, R.S. 1989. Distributional records for freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Florida and south Alabama, with zoogeographic and taxonomic notes. Walkerana, 3(10): 239-261.
  16. Christian, A.D. 1995. Analysis of the commercial mussel beds in the Cache and White Rivers in Arkansas. M.S. Thesis, Arkansas State University. 210 pp.
  17. Christian, A.D., J.L. Harris, W.R. Posey, J.F. Hockmuth, and G.L. Harp. 2005. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) assemblages of the lower Cache River, Arkansas. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(3): 487-512.
  18. Cicerello, R.R. and G.A. Schuster. 2003. A guide to the freshwater mussels of Kentucky. Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission Scientific and Technical Series 7:1-62.
  19. Clarke, A.H. 1981a. The freshwater mollusks of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, D. W. Friesen and Sons, Ltd.: Ottawa, Canada. 446 pp.
  20. Clarke, A.H. 1992. Ontario's Sydenham River, an important refugium for native freshwater mussels against competition from the zebra mussel, <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>. Malacology Data Net, 3(1-4): 43-55.
  21. Clarke, A.H. and C.O. Berg. 1959. The freshwater mussels of central New York. Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station (N.Y. State College of Agriculture) Memoir 367:1-79.
  22. Clarke, A.H., P. Hovingh, and J.J. Clarke. 2003. A survey of the freshwater mollusks and crayfishes of eastern Colorado, at altitudes of less than 6000 feet, carried out during 2001 and 2002. Final Report to Colorado Division of Wildlife, State of Colorado, contract PSC-701-2001, 25 June 2003. 61 pp. + tabs. + app.
  23. Clench, W. J. and R. D. Turner. 1956. Freshwater mollusks of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida from the Escambia to the Suwanee River. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Sciences 1(3):97-239.
  24. Cordeiro, J. 1999. Distribution and habitat of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida: Unionidae) in Colorado. Natural History Inventory of Colorado, 19: 1-56.
  25. Couch, K.J. 1997. An Illustrated Guide to the Unionid Mussels of Kansas. Karen J. Couch. [Printed in Olathe, Kansas]. 124 pp.
  26. Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1997. Distributional checklist and status of Illinois freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionacea). Pages 129-145 in: K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (eds.) Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II: initiatives for the future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, October 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
  27. Cummings, K.S. and J.M. Berlocher. 1990. The naiades or freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Tippecanoe River, Indiana. Malacological Review 23:83-98.
  28. Cvancara, A.M. 1970. Mussels (Unionidae) of the Red River Valley in North Dakota and Minnesota, U.S.A.. Malacologia, 10(1): 57-92.
  29. Cvancara, A.M. 1983. Aquatic mollusks of North Dakota. Report of Investigation No. 78, North Dakota Geological Survey. Kay's, Inc., Jamestown, North Dakota. 141 pp.
  30. Cvancara, A.M. 2005. Illustrated key to Wyoming's freshwater mussels. A.M. Cvancara: Casper, Wyoming. 5 pp.
  31. Darden, R.I., T.L. Darden, and B.R. Kreiser. 2002. Mussel fauna of the Strong River, Mississippi. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 17(4): 651-653.
  32. Fichtel, C. and D.G. Smith. 1995. The freshwater mussels of Vermont. Nongame and Natural Heritage Program, Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department. Technical Report 18. 54 pp.
  33. Freeman, P.W. and K. Perkins. 1992. Survey of mollusks of the Platte River: Final Report. Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Island, Nebraska, March 1992. 28 pp. + app.
  34. Freeman, P.W. and K. Perkins. 1997. Survey of mollusks of the Niobrara River. Final Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Island, Nebraska, September 1997. 22 pp.
  35. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2021. The 2021 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee December 2020. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  36. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  37. Fuller, S.L.H. 1978. Freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalva: Unionidae) of the upper Mississippi River: Observations at selected sites within the nine-foot channel navigation project on behalf of The United States Army Corps of Engineers. Final report prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers no. 78-33, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 401 pp.
  38. Galbraith, H.S., D.E. Spooner, and C.C. Vaughn. 2008. Status of rare and endangered freshwater mussels in southeastern Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist, 53(1): 45-50.
  39. Gangloff, M.M. and D.L. Gustafson. 2000. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) of Montana. Central Plains Archaeology, 8(1): 121-130.
  40. Goodrich, C. and H. van der Schalie. 1939. Aquatic mollusks of the upper peninsula of Michigan. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 43: 1-45.
  41. Gordon, M.E. 1982. Mollusca of the White River, Arkansas and Missouri. The Southwestern Naturalist, 27(3): 347-352.
  42. Gordon, M.E. 1985. Mollusca of Frog Bayou, Arkansas. The Nautilus, 99(1): 6-9.
  43. Gordon, M.E. 1991. Aquatic mollusca of the Rough River in the vicinity of the Fort Hartford Mine site, Ohio County, Kentucky. Unpublished final report for Environmental and Safety Designs, Memphis, Tennessee, 6 July 1991. 10 pp.
  44. Gordon, M.E., S.W. Chordas, G.L. Harp. and A.V. Brown. 1994. Aquatic Mollusca of the White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas, U.S.A. Walkerana, 7(17/18): 1-9
  45. Grabarkiewicz, J.D. 2008. Three years of unionid surveys in Swan Creek, Lower Maumee River watershed, Lucas Co., OH. Final Report to the Ohio Division of Wildlife, Toledo Naturalists' Association, and Metroparks of the Toledo Area, Toledo, Ohio. 18 pp. + app.
  46. Graf, D.L. 1997. Distribution of unionoid (Bivalvia) faunas in Minnesota, USA. The Nautilus, 110(2): 45-54.
  47. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  48. Haag, W. R. 2019. Reassessing enigmatic mussel declines in the United States. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 22(2):43-60.
  49. Hankinson, T.L. 1908. A biological survey of Walnut Lake, Michigan. Report of the State Biological (Geological) Survey of Michigan, 1907: 198-251.
  50. Harmon, J.L. 1989. Freshwater bivalve mollusks (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Graham Creek, a small southeastern Indiana stream. Malacology Data Net, 2(5/6): 113-121.
  51. Harmon, J.L. 1992. Naiades (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Sugar Creek, east fork White River drainage, in central Indiana. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):31-42.
  52. Heard, W.H. 1979. Identification manual of the fresh water clams of Florida. State of Florida, Department of Environmental Regulation, Technical Series, 4(2): 1-82.
  53. Hoeh, W.R. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships among eastern North American <i>Anodonta </i>(Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacological Review, 23: 63-82.
  54. Hoeh, W.R. 1991. The evolution and consequences of simultaneous hermaphroditism in the freshwater mussel genus <i>Utterbackia </i>(Bivalvia: Unionidae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 97 pp.
  55. Hoeh, W.R. and J.B. Burch. 1989. The taxonomic status of <i>Anodonta lacustris</i> Lea (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Walkerana, 3(10): 263-276.
  56. Hoggarth, M.A. 1992. An examination of the glochidia-host relationship reported in the literature for North American species of Unionacea (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Malacology Data Net, 3(1-4): 1-30.
  57. Hoggarth, M.A., D.A. Kimberly, and B.G. Van Allen. 2007. A study of the mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Symmes Creek and tributaries in Jackson, Gallia and Lawrence Counties, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 107(4):57-62.
  58. Hoke, E. 2004. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Little Blue River drainage of northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 29: 7-24.
  59. Hoke, E. 2005a. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidea) of northern Nebraska: the Missouri, Niobrara, and White River basins. American Malacological Bulletin, 20: 27-35.
  60. Hoke, E. 2005b. The unionid mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Big Blue River basin of northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 30: 33-57.
  61. Hovingh, P. 2004. Intermountain freshwater mollusks, USA (<i>Margaritifera</i>, <i>Anodonta</i>, <i>Gonidea</i>, <i>Valvata</i>, <i>Ferrissia</i>): geography, conservation, and fish management implications. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 2: 109-135.
  62. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  63. Howells, R.G. 1997b. New fish hosts for nine freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Texas. The Texas Journal of Science 49(3): 255-258.
  64. Howells, R.G., R.W. Neck, and H.D. Murray. 1996. Freshwater Mussels of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Press: Austin, Texas. 218 pp.
  65. Huebner, J.D., D.F. Malley, and K. Donkersloot. 1989. Population ecology of the freshwater mussel <i>Anodonta grandis grandis</i> in a Precambrian Shield lake. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68: 1931-1941.
  66. Jansen, W.A. 1991. Seasonal prevalence, intensity of infestation, and distribution of glochidia of <i>Anodonta grandis simpsoniana</i> Lea on yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69(4): 964-972.
  67. Jansen, W.A. and J.M. Hanson. 1991. Estimates of the number of glochidia produced by clams (<i>Anodonta grandis simpsoniana</i> Lea) attaching to yellow perch (<i>Perca flavescens</i>), and surviving to various ages in Narrow Lake, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69(4): 973-977.
  68. Johnson, R.I. 1999. Unionidae of the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo del Norte) system of Texas and Mexico. Occasional Papers on Mollusks, 6(77): 1-65.
  69. Jokinen, E.H. 2005. Pond molluscs of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: then and now. American Malacological Bulletin 20: 1-9.
  70. Jones, R.L., W.T. Slack, and P.D. Hartfield. 2005. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of Mississippi. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(1): 77-92.
  71. Kat, P.W. 1985. Historical evidence for flucuation in levels of hybridization. Evolution, 39: 1164-1169.
  72. Kat, P.W. 1986. Hybridization in a unionid faunal suture zone. Malacologia, 27: 107-125.
  73. Kesler, D.H. and N. Van Tol. 2000. Growth of the freshwater mussel <i>Pyganodon grandis</i> (Unionidae) in two west Tennessee borrow pits. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science, 75(3-4): 71-75.
  74. Kesler, D. H., D. Manning, N. Van Tol, L. Smith, and B. Sepanski. 2001. Freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of the Wolf River in western Tennessee and Mississippi. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 76(1):38-46.
  75. Kesler, J. and A. Miller. 1978. Observations on <i>Anodonta grandis</i> (Unionidae) in Green River Lake, Kentucky. The Nautilus, 92(3): 125-129.
  76. Lefevre, G. and W.C. Curtis. 1910. Reproduction and parasitism in the Unionidae. Journal of Experimental Zoology 9(1):79-115 + 5 plates.
  77. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  78. Lyons, M.S., R.A. Krebs, J.P. Holt, L.J. Rundo, and W. Zawiski. 2007. Assessing causes of change in the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Black River, Ohio. American Midland Naturalist, 158: 1-15.
  79. Martel, A.L., J.B. Madill, D.S. Ponomarenko, A. Pigeon, and N.T. Van Lankveld. 2004. Native freshwater mussels (Unionidae) and the Gatineau tadpole snail (Physidae) in Lac Meech, Gatineau Park (Quebec): distribution and abundance (2001-2003). Technical Report for the National Capital Commission, Canada, March 2004. 45 pp.
  80. Mathiak, H.A. 1979. A river survey of the unionid mussels of Wisconsin, 1973-1977. Sand Shell Press: Horicon, Wisconsin. 75 pp.
  81. McGregor, S.W. and J.T. Garner. 2004. Changes in the freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) fauna of the Bear Creek system of northwest Alabama and northeast Mississippi. American Malacological Bulletin, 18(1/2): 61-70.
  82. McGregor, S.W., T.E. Shepard, T.D. Richardson, and J.F. Fitzpatrick, Jr. 1999. A survey of the primary tributaries of the Alabama and Lower Tombigbee rivers for freshwater mussels, snails, and crayfish. Geological Survey of Alabama, Circular 196. 29 pp.
  83. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L. and B. Cudmore-Vokey. 2004. National general status assessment of freshwater mussels (Unionacea). National Water Research Institute / NWRI Contribution No. 04-027. Environment Canada, March 2004. Paginated separately.
  84. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L., J. Di Maio, S.K. Staton, and S.R. De Solla. 2003. Status of the freshwater mussel communities of the Sydenham River, Ontario, Canada. American Midland Naturalist 150:37-50.
  85. Mills, E.L., M.D. Scheuerll, D.L. Strayer, and J.T. Carlton. 1996. Exotic species in the Hudson River basin: A history of invasions and introductions. Estuaries 19:814-823.
  86. Mirarchi, R.E., et al. 2004a. Alabama Wildlife. Volume One: A Checklist of Vertebrates and Selected Invertebrates: Aquatic Mollusks, Fishes, Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 209 pp.
  87. Mohler, J.W., P. Morrison, and J. Haas. 2006. The mussels of Muddy Creek on Erie National Wildlife Refuge. Northeastern Naturalist 13(4):569-582.
  88. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  89. Morris, T.J. and J. Di Maio. 1999. Current distributions of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in rivers of southwestern Ontario. Malacological Review, 31/32(1): 9-17.
  90. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  91. Mulcrone, R.S. and C. Mehne. 2001. Freshwater mussels of the Kalamazoo River, Michigan, from Battle Creek to Saugatuck. Report prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Lansing, Michigan. 15 pp.
  92. Oesch, R.D. 1995. Missouri Naiades. A Guide to the Mussels of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation: Jefferson City, Missouri. viii + 271 pp.
  93. Park, G. and J. B. Burch. 1995. Karyotype analyses of six species of North American freshwater mussels (Bivalvia, Unionidae). Malacological Review, 28: 43-61.
  94. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  95. Penn, G.H. 1939. A study of the life cycle of the freshwater mussel, <i>Anodonta grandis</i>, in New Orleans. The Nautilus, 52(3): 99-101.
  96. Perkins III, K. and D.C. Backlund. 2003. A survey for winged mapleleaf (<i>Quadrula fragosa</i>) and scaleshell (<i>Leptodea leptodon</i>) in the James River, South Dakota. South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota, Report GFP 2003-17. 21 pp.
  97. Pilarczyk, M.M., P.M. Stewart, D.N. Shelton, H.N. Blalock-Herod, and J.D. Williams. 2006. Current and Recent historical freshwater mussel assemblages in the Gulf Coastal Plains. Southeastern Naturalist, 5(2): 205-226.
  98. Pip, E. 2000. The decline of freshwater molluscs in southern Manitoba. Canadian Field Naturalist 114(4):555-560.
  99. Pip, E. 2006. Littoral mollusc communities and water quality in southern Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 3637-3652.
  100. Posey, W.R., III, J.L. Harris, and G.L. Harp. 1996b. An evaluation of the mussel community in the Lower Ouachita River. Report to the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Arkansas. 28 pp.
  101. Pryor, W.W. 2005. Distribution of the native freshwater mussels in the rivers of Allen County, Indiana. Report to the St. Joseph River Watershed Initiative, Fort Wayne, Indiana. 71 pp.
  102. Read, L.B. and K.H. Oliver. 1953. Notes on the ecology of the fresh-water mussels of Dallas County. Field and Laboratory, 21: 75-80.
  103. Schanzle, R.W. and K.S. Cummings. 1991. A survey of the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Sangamon River basin, Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes, 137: 1-25.
  104. Schanzle, R.W., G.W. Kruse, J.A. Kath, R.A. Klocek, and K.S. Cummings. 2004. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Fox River basin, Illinois and Wisconsin. Illinois Natural History Biological Notes, 141: 1-35.
  105. Schmidt, J.E. and M.A. Zeto. 1986. Naiad distribution in the Mud River drainage, southwestern West Virginia. Malacology Data Net, 1(4): 69-78.
  106. Schueler, F.W. and A. Karstad. 2007. Report on unionid conservation & exploration in eastern Ontario: 2007. The Popular Clammer: a Newsletter About Freshwater Unionid Mussels in Canada, 1: 1-2.
  107. Shearer, J., D. Backlund, and S.K. Wilson. 2005. Freshwater mussel surveys of the 39-Mile District- Missouri National Recreational River, South Dakota and Nebraska. Final Report to the National Park Service, O'Neill, Nebraska, SD GFP Report 2005-08, submtted 21 November 2005. 16 pp.
  108. Sietman, B.E. 2003. Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: St. Paul, Minnesota. 144 pp.
  109. Sietman, B.E., S.D. Whitney, D.E. Kelner, K.D. Blodgett, and H.L. Dunn. 2001. Post-extirpation recovery of the freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) fauna in the Upper Illinois River. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 16(2): 273-281.
  110. Skadsen, D.R. and K. Perkins III. 2000. Unionid mussels of the Big Sioux River and tributaries: Moody, Minnehaha, Lincoln, and Union Counties, South Dakota. GFP Report 2000-9 to the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota. 52 pp.
  111. Smith, D.C., M.A. Gates, R.A. Krebs, and M.J.S. Tevesz. 2002. A survey of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) and other molluscs in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contribution, 8: 1-31.
  112. Smith, T.A. and D. Crabtree. 2010. Freshwater mussel (Unionidae: Bivalvia) distributions and densities in French Creek, Pennsylvania. Northeastern Naturalist 17(3):387-414.
  113. Spoo, A. 2008. The Pearly Mussels of Pennsylvania. Coachwhip Publications: Landisville, Pennsylvania. 210 pp.
  114. Stagliano, D. 2010. Freshwater mussels in Montana: Comprehensive results from 3 years of SWG funded surveys. Report prepared for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, Montana. 75 pp.
  115. Strayer, D. 1980. The freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Clinton River, Michigan, with comments on man's impact on the fauna, 1870-1978. The Nautilus 94(4):142-149.
  116. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  117. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  118. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  119. Strayer, D.L. and K.J. Jirka. 1997. The Pearly Mussels of New York State. New York State Museum Memoir 26. The University of the State of New York. 113 pp. + figures.
  120. Surber, T. 1913. Notes on the natural hosts of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries, 32: 101-116.
  121. Tiemann, J.S.. 2006. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) survey of the Wakurusa River basin, Kansas. Transaction of the Kansas Academy of Science, 109(3/4): 221-230.
  122. Tiemann, J.S., R.E. Szafoni, and K. Roman. 2005. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) survey of Kyte River, Ogle County, Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 98(3-4):159-169.
  123. Trdan, R.J. and W.R. Hoeh. 1982. Eurytopic host use by two congeneric species of freshwater mussel (Pelecypoda: Unionidae: Anodonta). American Midland Naturalist, 108(2): 381-388.
  124. Trdan, R.J. and W.R. Hoeh. 1993. Relocation of two state-listed freshwater mussel species (<i>Epioblasma torulosa rangiana</i> and <i>Epioblasma triquetra</i>) in Michigan. Pages 100-105 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, and L.M. Koch. (eds.). Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 12-14 October 1992, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois. 189 pp.
  125. Tucker, M.E. 1928. Studies on the life cycles of two species of fresh-water mussels belonging to the genus <i>Anodonta</i>. Biological Bulletin (Woods Hole), 54(2): 117-127.
  126. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  127. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  128. van der Schalie, H. 1940. The naiad fauna of the Chipola River in northwestern Florida. Lloydia 3(3):191-208.
  129. Vaughn, C.C. 2000. Changes in the mussel fauna of the middle Red River drainage: 1910 - present. Pages 225-232 in R.A. Tankersley, D.I. Warmolts, G.T. Watters, B.J. Armitage, P.D. Johnson, and R.S. Butler (eds.). Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio. 274 pp.
  130. Vaughn, C.C. and D.E. Spooner. 2004. Status of the mussel fauna of the Poteau River and implications for commercial harvest. American Midland Naturalist, 152: 336-346.
  131. Vidrine, M.F. 1993. The Historical Distributions of Freshwater Mussels in Louisiana. Gail Q. Vidrine Collectibles: Eunice, Louisiana. xii + 225 pp. + 20 plates.
  132. Watson, E.T. 2000. Distribution and life history of the Unionidae (Bivalvia: Mollusca) in the Assiniboine River drainage in Manitoba, with special reference to <i>Anodontoides ferussacianus</i>. MS Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 159 pp.
  133. Watters, G.T. 1992b. Distribution of the Unionidae in south central Ohio. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):56-90.
  134. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  135. Watters, G.T. 1995a. A field guide to the freshwater mussels of Ohio. revised 3rd edition. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Columbus, Ohio. 122 pp.
  136. Watters, G.T., M.A. Hoggarth, and D.H. Stansbery. 2009b. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio. 421 pp.
  137. Watters, G.T., T. Menker, S. Thomas, and K. Luehnl. 2005. Host identifications or confirmations. Ellipsaria, 7(2): 11-12.
  138. Wendeln, K.L., J.R. Runkle, and G.T. Watters. 2009. The freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of Twin Creek, Southwest Ohio. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 24(3):451-460. DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2009.9664318
  139. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  140. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  141. Williams, J.D. and M.H. Hughes. 1998. Freshwater mussels of selected reaches of the main channel rivers in the Coosa drainage of Georgia. U.S. Geological report to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, Alabama. 21 pp.
  142. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  143. Wilson, C. B. 1916. Copepod parasites of fresh-water fishes and their economic relations to mussel glochidia. Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries. [Issued separately as U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Document 824], 34: 333-374 + 15 plates.
  144. Wolf, C. and B. Stark. 2008. Survey of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) in the Marais des Cygnes River, Fall River, and Grouse Creek. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 111(1/2):1-20.
  145. Wu, S.-K. 1989. Colorado freshwater mollusks. Natural History Inventory of Colorado 11: 1-117.
  146. Zanatta, D.T., A. Ngo, and J. Lindell. 2007a. Reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships among <i>Anodonta</i>, <i>Pyganodon</i>, and <i>Utterbackia </i>(Bivalvia: Unionoida) using mutation coding of allozyme data. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 156: 211-216.
  147. Zeto, M.A., W.A. Tolin, and J.E. Schmidt. 1987. The freshwater mussels (Unionidae) of the upper Ohio River, Greenup and Belleville Pools, West Virginia. The Nautilus, 101: 182-185.