Agastache foeniculum

(Pursh) Kuntze

Blue Giant-hyssop

G5Secure Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.137289
Element CodePDLAM03040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderLamiales
FamilyLamiaceae
GenusAgastache
Other Common Names
Agastache fenouil (FR) blue giant hyssop (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-05-13
Change Date2016-05-13
Edition Date2001-02-25
Edition AuthorsSusan Spackman, David Anderson, and Steve Thomas (1/00); rev. Eric Nielsen and Larry Morse (1/00); rev. Eric Nielsen (2/00)
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
This species is apparently most abundant and secure in south-central Canada, but is considered rare in most of the rest of its native range (and has been established as an exotic in a few other places).
Range Extent Comments
The distribution of A. foeniculum is centered on the northern Plains states, with diminishing occurrences east towards the Atlantic, west towards Washington, north into Canada, and south into Colorado, Nebraska, and Kentucky (USDA-NRCS 1999). A. foeniculum is apparently restricted to North America. The more eastern and western populations of this species (Montana, Washington, and east from Minnesota, Illinois, and western Ontario) are apparently introduced (Lint and Epling 1945, Gleason and Cronquist 1963, Great Plains Flora Association 1986, New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory). In Manitoba, the plant occurs in the southern half of the province (Manitoba Conservation Data Centre).
Occurrences Comments
150-200+ occurrences of this species appear to be extant rangewide. Manitoba: >100; Michigan: 3 counties; Nebraska: 8, only 5 visited since the 1970s; Colorado: 8, 6 last observed around 1900; Wyoming: 7 extant and 2 historic; Montana: 7 sites in 7 counties in the east, although the state flora only reports it from 2 counties, both of which represent collections from plantings or possibly horticultural escapes; Ontario: reportedly "widespread and locally common" in the northwest, but some occurrences in the south are apparently adventive; British Columbia: 4, all last observed before 1950; apparently exotic in Connecticut, Delaware, and New York (Natural Heritage Programs and Conservation Data Centres).
Threat Impact Comments
Threats are habitat loss, grazing, exotic species, lack of fire, road maintenance, and wild-collection. In Manitoba, direct and indirect evidence exists of wild-collection for the plant trade. This collection probably occurs from tall grass prairie sites in the vicinity of Winnipeg (Elizabeth Punter pers. comm.). The species is reportedly "easy to collect" (Robyn Klein pers. comm.). Trade in the plant is minor, and it is cultivated but perhaps not broadly (Michael McGuffin pers. comm.). Because it grows readily and quickly from seed, it is presumed that if wild collection of this species increases in the future, the impact on wild populations could be offset rather easily by cultivation.

Most mixed grass and tallgrass prairie communities have been destroyed for agriculture. Many of the prairie communities that remain are ecologically strained by grazing, invasive species, or lack of adequate ecological management. Many dry or upland woods in the eastern half of North America have experienced dramatic reductions in fire events, causing changes in species composition, community structure, and hydrological conditions. These changes to eastern woodland communities may translate to habitat loss for this species, though it is not apparent that cause-effect relationship has been demonstrated anywhere.

In the western parts of its range, this species is found in areas that are often heavily impacted by grazing, such as moist woodlands, mesic meadows, and streambanks and lakeshores in the shortgrass and mixed-grass prairie regions. Trampling and grazing of this species by cattle has been observed in Nebraska. Occurrences in northeastern Montana are located on private land in woody ravines, and are reportedly threatened, presumably due to current land use practices. Populations in southeastern Montana, found in pine woods, have persisted under fire and logging, but are vulnerable to weed invasion and increases in grazing intensity (Bonnie Heidel pers. comm.).

In Manitoba, threats are road maintenance activities, haying, grazing, and wild-collection (Elizabeth Punter pers. comm.). This species is apparently less susceptible to damage from Verticillium wilt (a fungal disease caused by the widely distributed Verticillium spp.) than one of the other commonly cultivated species, the non-native Agastache rugosa (Fuentes-Granados and Widrlechner 1995).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

In the eastern part of its range (roughly east from Wisconsin and Illinois) A. foeniculum grows in prairies and dry woods (Gleason and Cronquist 1963), but further west, its habitat becomes more that of moist woods, lakeshores, and open, wet ditches (Great Plains Flora Association 1986). In Ontario it is reported from dry, open, rocky sites (Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre). In Michigan it is found in dry fields and forest clearings (Michigan Natural Features Inventory). In southeastern Montana it is found in pine woodlands, while in northeastern Montana it is found in woody ravines (Montana Natural Heritage Program).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
AlbertaS4Yes
SaskatchewanS4Yes
New BrunswickSNANo
ManitobaS5Yes
British ColumbiaSNANo
QuebecSNANo
OntarioS4Yes
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
NebraskaS1Yes
New YorkSNANo
IowaS1Yes
Rhode IslandSNANo
North DakotaSNRYes
South DakotaSNRYes
ConnecticutSNANo
MichiganSNANo
ColoradoS2Yes
WashingtonSNRYes
MontanaSUYes
PennsylvaniaSNRYes
KentuckySNANo
MinnesotaSNRYes
IllinoisSNRYes
WyomingS2Yes
New HampshireSNANo
DelawareSNANo
WisconsinSNRYes
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (3)
Minnesota (2)
AreaForestAcres
Baker - Homer - Brule LakesSuperior National Forest6,712
Brule Lake - Eagle MountainSuperior National Forest12,380
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
Sand CreekBlack Hills National Forest7,950
References (21)
  1. Ayers, G.S., and M.P. Widrlechner. 1994a. The genus <i>Agastache </i>as bee forage: A historical perspective. American Bee Journal 134(5): 341-348.
  2. Ayers, G.S., and M.P. Widrlechner. 1994b. The genus <i>Agastache </i>as bee forage: An analysis of reader returns. American Bee Journal 134(7): 477-483.
  3. Francis, F.J. 1985. Pigments and other colorants. In: Femenna, O.R. (ed.) Food chemistry. 2nd edition. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
  4. Fuentes-Granados, R.G., and M.P. Widrlechner. 1995b. Diversity among and within populations of <i>Agastache foeniculum</i>. In: Hartnett, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th annual North American prairie conference. Kansas State University, Manhattan.
  5. Fuentes-Granados, R.G., and M.P. Widrlechnera. 1995a. Evaluation of <i>Agastache </i>and other Lamiaceae species for reaction to <i>Verticillium dahliae</i>. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 3(3): 3-11.
  6. Fuentes-Granados, R.G., M.P. Widrlechner, and L.A. Wilson. 1998. An overview of Agastache research. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 6(1): 69-97.
  7. Galambosi, B., and Z. Galambosi-Szebeni. 1992. Studies on the cultivation methods of Agastache foeniculum in Finland. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 41: 107-115.
  8. Gill, L.S. 1979. Cytotaxonomic studies of the tribe Nepeteae (Labiatae) in Canada. Genetica 50: 111-117.
  9. Gill, L.S. 1980. Reproductive biology of the Canadian Labiatae. Phytologia 47: 89-96.
  10. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1963. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, NY. 810 pp.
  11. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence. 1392 pp.
  12. Heidel, Bonnie. Personal Communication. Lead Botanist. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
  13. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  14. Klein, Robyn. Instructor, Sweetgrass School of Herbalism. Personal communication.
  15. Lint, H., and C. Epling. 1945. A revision of Agastache. American Midland Naturalist 33: 207-230.
  16. Mayer, D.F., C.A. Johansen, and J.C. Bach. 1982. Land-based honey production. American Bee Journal 123: 379-380.
  17. McGuffin, Michael. Personal communication. American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring MD
  18. Punter, C. Elizabeth. Special Projects Botanist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre. Personal communication.
  19. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. November 3-last update. The PLANTS database. Online. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plants. Accessed 2000-Jan.
  20. Weber, W.A., and R.C. Wittmann. 1996b. Colorado flora: Western slope. Univ. Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado. 496 pp.
  21. Widrlechner, Mark. North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station, Iowa State University. Personal communication.