Myotis californicus

(Audubon and Bachman, 1842)

California Myotis

G5Secure Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104207
Element CodeAMACC01120
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderChiroptera
FamilyVespertilionidae
GenusMyotis
Other Common Names
California Bat (EN) Californian Bat (EN) Californian Myotis (EN) Chauve-souris de Californie (FR) Un Murciélago (ES)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]
Taxonomic Comments
Analysis by Ammerman et al. (2016) of nuclear amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers recovered distinct genetic lineages or clusters that corresponded to the recognized species defined by morphology, M. californicus, M. ciliolabrum, and M. leibii.

See Bogan (1975) for information on geographic variation and subspecies in the southwestern U.S. and Mexico. Simmons (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) stated that subspecies are poorly delimited.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2016-04-04
Change Date1996-11-05
Edition Date2015-03-30
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Large range in western North America and southward to Guatemala; wide range of habitats, including altered areas; uses natural features and human-made structures as roost sites; numerous roost sites and collection/observation sites; roosting groups are relatively small, but overall population is clearly large; trend uncertain but probably relatively stable; species remains common in much of range; no major threats.
Range Extent Comments
Range includes western North America, from extreme southern Alaska south through British Columbia and the western United States to southern Baja California and Guatemala (Koopman, in Wilson and Reeder 1993). In the United States, this species occurs throughout the desert Southwest, and in lowlands to western Montana, southwestern Wyoming, Utah, and western Colorado. Winter range includes California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas; full extent of winter range is not known (Barbour and Davis 1969). Elevational range extends up to approximately 9,000 feet (2,745 meters) (Shuster 1957).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using standardized criteria, but the species is represented by a large number of known maternity roosts and collection/observation sites.
Threat Impact Comments
Overall, no major threats are known. Locally, disturbance or closure/blockage of abandoned mines, and forest management practices that reduce the availability of snags or cavity-containing trees, have reduced or eliminated roosting habitat (Hayes and Wiles 2013).

Livestock grazing could affect availability of bat food resources in some areas, but the impact of this is highly uncertain.

Broadcast application of pesticides to combat insect pests potentially has a detrimental impact on bat food resources or on the bats themselves. In northeastern Oregon, after aerial spraying of DDT to control larvae of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, M. californicus was one of the two bats that had the highest levels of pesticide residues; it continued to show high pesticide levels in its tissues 3 years after pesticide application.(Henny et al. 1982). The effects of this were not determined, and spraying of DDT no longer occurs in the region.

This species is not known to incur significant mortality from turbines at wind energy facilities (Arnett and Baerwald 2013).

As of mid-2014, this species was not known to be affected by white-nose syndrome.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

These bats occur in various habitats, including sea coasts, desert scrub, oak-juniper woodlands, montane and humid coastal forests, mountain meadows, canyons, riparian woodlands, grasslands, rural residential areas, and towns (Barbour and Davis 1969, Hoffmeister 1986, Simpson 1993, Nagorsen and Brigham 1993, Verts and Carraway 1998, Oliver 2000, Adams 2003, Falxa 2007). Night roosts are in a wide range of sheltered sites, including trees, shrubs, mines, caves, bridges and buildings (Krutzsch 1954, Barbour and Davis 1969, Hirshfeld et al. 1977). They roost by day in crevices of various kinds, including rock fissures, tree cavities, spaces behind loose tree bark, and nooks in bridges and buildings; occasionally they roost on small desert shrubs or on the ground (Barbour and Davis 1969, Nagorsen and Brigham 1993, Simpson 1993, Barclay and Brigham 2001). Hibernation sites include caves (including lava tubes), mines, tunnels, or buildings; often in buildings in the Pacific Northwest (Senger et al. 1974, Perkins et al. 1990, Nagorsen and Brigham 1993). Maternity colonies are in rock crevices, tree cavities, under bark (Brigham et al. 1997, Barclay and Brigham 2001, Vonhof and Gwilliam 2007), or in crevices of bridges or buildings. Reproductive females often change roost sites among different trees (Brigham et al. 1997). Foraging occurs in a wide range of habitats: over meadows/grassland, shrubland, and wooded areas; over water; and around street lights (e.g., see review by Oliver 2000).

Ecology

In summer, these bats roost alone or in small groups of usually not more than 25 individuals (Simpson 1993). Reproductive females in tree-dwelling populations form small colonies averaging about 10-20 individuals (range = 4-52) (Brigham et al. 1997, Barclay and Brigham 2001, Vonhof and Gwilliam 2007). Males and females roost separately in summer.

Reproduction

Breeds in late fall in most of range, or early spring in California. Females give birth to single young, late May to mid-June (Barbour and Davis 1969), in late June or July in Canada (Banfield 1974, van Zyll de Jong 1985, Nagorsen and Brigham 1993). In southwestern California, no pregnant females were found after mid-June. Pregnant and lactating females have been found in Texas in mid- to late May (Ammerman et al. 2012). Individual females produce one young per year. Potential reproductive lifespan is 15 years (Duke et al. 1979). Colonies usually are small, up to about 25 individuals.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSavannaGrassland/herbaceousDesertCliffSuburban/orchardUrban/edificarianAerial
Palustrine Habitats
RiparianAerial
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN4
ProvinceRankNative
AlbertaSUYes
British ColumbiaS4Yes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MontanaS4Yes
TexasS3Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
ArizonaS4Yes
IdahoS3Yes
OregonS3Yes
UtahS4Yes
ColoradoS3Yes
WashingtonS4Yes
NevadaS3Yes
AlaskaS4Yes
New MexicoS4Yes
Navajo NationS5Yes
WyomingSNAYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningNegligible (<1%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarrying
4 - Transportation & service corridorsNegligible (<1%)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvesting
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activities
7 - Natural system modificationsNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesNegligible or <1% pop. decline
9 - PollutionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
10 - Geological eventsNegligible (<1%)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (2)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Meadow CreekGila National Forest34,167
References (53)
  1. Adams, R. A. 2003. Bats of the Rocky Mountain West: natural history, ecology, and conservation. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado. xiii + 289 pp.
  2. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  3. Ammerman, L. K., C. L. Hice, and D. J. Schmidly. 2012. Bats of Texas. Texas A &amp; M University Press, College Station, Texas. xvi + 305 pp.
  4. Ammerman, L. K., D. N. Lee, and R. S. Pfau. 2016. Patterns of genetic divergence among <i>Myotis californicus</i>, <i>M. ciliolabrum</i>, and <i>M. leibii</i> based on amplified fragment length polymorphism. Acta Chiropterologica 18(2):336-346.
  5. Arita, H. T. 1993. Conservation biology of the cave bats in Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 74:693-702.
  6. Arnett, E. B., and E. F. Baerwald. 2013. Impacts of wind energy development on bats: implications for conservation. Pages 435-456 in R. A. Adams and S. C. Pedersen (editors). Bat evolution, ecology, and conservation. Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
  7. Banfield, A. W. F. 1974. The mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada. 438 pp.
  8. Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. The University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, Kentucky. 286 pp.
  9. Barclay, R.M.R., and R.M. Brigham. 2001. Year-to-year reuse of tree-roosts by California bats (<i>Myotis californicus</i>) in southern British Columbia. Am. Midl. Nat. 146:80-85.
  10. Bogan, M. A. 1975. Geographic variation in MYOTIS CALIFORNICUS in the southwestern United States and Mexico. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Res. Rep. 3:1-31.
  11. Bradley, R.D., L.K. Ammerman, R.J. Baker, L.C. Bradley, J.A. Cook. R.C. Dowler, C. Jones, D.J. Schmidly, F.B. Stangl Jr., R.A. Van den Bussche and B. Würsig. 2014. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2014. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 327:1-28. Available at: http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/publications/opapers/ops/OP327.pdf
  12. Brigham, R. M., M. J. Vonhof, R.M.R. Barclay, and J. C. Gwilliam. 1997. Roosting behavior and roost-site preferences of forest-dwelling California bats (<i>Myotis californicus</i>). Journal of Mammalogy 78:1231-1239.
  13. Bureau of Land Management. Life History Summaries.
  14. Clawson, R. L., R. K. LaVal, M. L. LaVal, and W. Claire. 1980. Clustering behavior of hibernating <i>Myotis sodalis</i> in Missouri, USA. Journal of Mammalogy 61:245-53.
  15. Duke, S. D., G. C. Bateman, and M. M. Bateman. 1979. Longevity record for <i>Myotis californicus</i>. Southwestern Naturalist 24:693.
  16. Falxa, G. 2007. Winter foraging of silver-haired and California myotis bats in western Washington. Northwestern Naturalist 88:98-100.
  17. Fellers, G. M., and E. D. Pierson. 2002. Habitat use and foraging behavior of Townsend's Big-eared Bat (<i>Corynorhinus townsendii</i>) in coastal California. Journal of Mammalogy 83:167-177.
  18. Garner, J. D., and J. E. Gardner. 1992. Determination of summer distribution and habitat utilization of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) in Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation. Final Report, Project E-3. Springfield, IL, 23 pp.
  19. Geluso, K. 2007. Winter activity of bats over water and along flyways in New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 52:482-492.
  20. Griffin, D. R. 1940b. Migrations of New England bats. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 86:217-246.
  21. Hayes, G., and G. J. Wiles. 2013. Washington bat conservation plan. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. viii + 138 pp.<br>
  22. Henny, C. J., L. J. Blus, and R. M. Prouty. 1982a. Organochlorine residues and shell thinning in Oregon U.S.A. sea bird eggs. Murrelet 63:15-21.
  23. Hirshfeld, J. R., Z. C. Nelson, and W. G. Bradley. 1977. Night roosting behavior in four species of desert bats. Southwestern Naturalist 22:427-433.
  24. Hoffmeister, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press and Arizona Game and Fish Department. 602 pp.
  25. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  26. Kiser, J. D. and C. L. Elliott. 1996. Foraging habitat, food habits, and roost tree characteristics of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) during autumn in Johnson County, Kentucky. Final report, Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Frankfort, Kentucky. 65pp.
  27. Krutzsch, P. H. 1954. Notes on habits of the bat, <i>Myotis californicus</i>. Journal of Mammalogy 35: 539-545.
  28. Linzey, D. W. 1998. The mammals of Virginia. McDonald and Woodward, Blacksburg, VA. 459 pp.
  29. Mammalian Species, nos. 1-604. Published by the American Society of Mammalogists.
  30. Menzel, M. A., R. Odom, S. Owen, W. M. Ford, B. R. Chapman, K. V. Miller, J. Edwards, and P. Wood. 1999b. Investigation of foraging habitat use by bats with a focus on Northern Long-eared Myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>): a comparison of methods. IN M. K. Clark, editor. Abstracts from the 1999 Colloquium on the conservation of mammals in the Southeastern United States. Available at: http://www.batworkinggroups.org/sbdnnews.htm. Accessed 2001-06-12.
  31. Morgan, C. N., L. K. Ammerman, K. D. Demere, J. B. Doty, Y. J. Nakazawa, and M. R. Mauldin. 2019. Field identification key and guide for bats of the United States of America. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 360. Texas Tech University Natural Science Research Laboratory. 29 pp.
  32. Nagorsen, D. W., and R. M. Brigham. 1993. Bats of British Columbia. Vol. I. The Mammals of British Columbia. UBC Press, Vancouver, 164 pp.
  33. O'Farrell, M. J., et al. 1967. Fall and winter bat activity at a desert spring in southern Nevada. The Southwestern Naturalist 12(2):163-171.
  34. Oliver, G. V. 2000. The bats of Utah: a literature review. Publication No. 00-14, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City.
  35. Perkins, J. M., J. M. Barss, and J. Peterson. 1990. Winter records of bats in Oregon and Washington. Northwestern Naturalist 71:59-62.
  36. Reid, F. A. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, Incorporated New York, New York. 334 pp.
  37. Reid, F. A. 2006. A field guide to mammals of North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  38. Rodriguez, R. M., and L. K. Ammerman. 2004. Mitochondrial DNA divergence does not reflect morphological difference between <i>Myotis californicus</i> and <i>Myotis ciliolabrum</i>. Journal of Mammalogy 85:842-851.
  39. Ruffner, G. A., R. M. Poche, M. Meierkord, and J. A. Neal. 1979. Winter bat activity over a desert wash in southwestern Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 24:447-453.
  40. Schmidly, D. J. 1977. The mammals of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend National Park and Guadalupe Mountains National Park. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
  41. Schmidly, D. J. 1991. The bats of Texas. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, Texas. 188 pp.
  42. Senger, C., R. Senger, D. Senger, and S. Senger. 1974. Winter records of myotid bats in western Washington. Murrelet 55:13-14.
  43. Shuster, E. D. 1957. The taxonomy and distribution of the bats of Utah. Unpublished M. A. thesis, Univ. Utah. iii + 104 pp.
  44. Simmons, N. B. and A. L. Cirranello. 2025. Bat Species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic database. Version 1.7. Online. Available: https://batnames.org/
  45. Simpson, M. R. 1993. Myotis californicus. Am. Soc. Mamm., Mammalian Species No. 428:1-4.
  46. Stock, A. D. 1965. Systematics and distribution of mammals of Washington County, Utah. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Univ. of Utah. 267 pp.
  47. Tuttle, M. D. 1976a. Population ecology of the gray bat (<i>Myotis grisescens</i>): philopatry, timing, and patterns of movement, weight loss during migration, and seasonal adaptive strategies. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Occasional Papers (54):1-38.
  48. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Agency draft Indiana Bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) revised recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 53 pp.
  49. van Zyll de Jong, C.G. 1985. Handbook of Canadian Mammals. Vol. II, Bats. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 212 pp.
  50. Verts, B. J., and L. N. Carraway. 1998. Land mammals of Oregon. University of California Press, Berkeley. xvi + 668 pp.
  51. Vonhof, M. J., and J. C. Gwilliam. 2007. Intra- and interspecific patterns of day roost selection by three species of forest-dwelling bats in southern British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management 252:165-175.
  52. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  53. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]