Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.894223
Element CodeARADB19020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusLampropeltis
SynonymsLampropeltis getulus
Other Common Nameseastern kingsnake (EN)
Concept ReferenceCrother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
Taxonomic CommentsKrysko et al. (2017) used mtDNA and nDNA and inferred three monophyletic groups that generally corresponded to the geographic regions Florida Peninsula, Atlantic Coast, and Eastern Apalachicola Lowlands which contained previously recognized subspecies L. g. floridana, L. g. getula, and L. g. meansi. The authors considered the members of the clades as morphologically diagnosable and elevated them to species. Krysko et al. also recognized L. nigrita from Mexico and southeastern Arizona (Crother 2017).
The specific name formerly was getulus (see Frost and Collins 1988).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2016-04-08
Change Date1996-10-30
Edition Date2016-04-08
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Rank ReasonsWidely distributed in southeastern United States; many occurrences and locations in a broad range of habitats; presumed large population size; no major threats.
Range Extent CommentsRange extends from eastern West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and southern New Jersey southward through the southeastern United States to southern Alabama.
Occurrences CommentsThe number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using consistent criteria, but this species is represented by a very large number of collection sites and locations (as defined by IUCN); for example, see Palmer and Braswell 1995).
Threat Impact CommentsThis snake is popular in the pet trade, and locally collection may reduce some populations. Some habitat has been lost/degraded as a result of intensive urbanization and agricultural development. Overall, the threat level is low.