Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104610
Element CodeAAAAA01100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyAmbystomatidae
GenusAmbystoma
Other Common Namesmarbled salamander (EN)
Concept ReferenceFrost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsSee Kraus (1988), Shaffer et al. (1991), and Jones et al. (1993) for phylogenetic analyses of North American Ambystoma.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-05-19
Change Date2025-05-19
Edition Date2025-05-19
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2008); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank ReasonsThis species has a large range in the eastern U.S. and is abundant. The population has suffered minor declines and likely will continue to decline slightly due to threats. It is primarily threatened by the loss of both upland and wetland habitats.
Range Extent CommentsThis species is endemic to the eastern United States. The range extends from southern New Hampshire west through southeastern New York to the southern Lake Michigan region, and south to eastern Oklahoma, eastern Texas, the Gulf Coast, and northern Florida (Anderson 1967). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records from 2000-2025, range extent is estimated to be 1.915 million km² (RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences CommentsMany and/or large occurrences exist throughout most of the range.
Threat Impact CommentsThreats to local populations likely include intensive timber harvesting practices that reduce canopy closure, understory vegetation, uncompacted forest litter, or coarse woody debris (moderately to well-decayed) in areas surrounding breeding sites (deMaynadier and Hunter 1999, Rothermel and Semlitsch 2006). Breeding sites are vulnerable to destruction and degradation through draining and filling, and many are being isolated by habitat fragmentation, which could eventually result in deleterious levels of inbreeding and reduced chances of reestablishment of locally extirpated populations. Thousands of local populations already have been eliminated by habitat loss, and more will be lost in the future (Petranka 1998, Miller 2024). Pollution in breeding ponds, such as copper, is a concern with poorly understood consequences (Quinn and Matson 2011, Soteropoulos et al. 2014).