Lampropeltis triangulum

(Lacepède, 1789)

Eastern Milksnake

G5Secure Found in 65 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.960858
Element CodeARADB19080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusLampropeltis
Other Common Names
Couleuvre tachetée (FR) milksnake (EN) Milk Snake (EN)
Concept Reference
Ruane, S., Bryson, R.W. Jr., Pyron, R.A., and F.T. Burbrink. 2014. Coalescent Species delimitation in Milksnakes (genus Lampropeltis) and impacts on phylogenetic comparative analyses. Systematic Biology 63(2):231-250.
Taxonomic Comments
Following SSAR (Nicholson 2025), as currently defined, L. triangulum comprises populations of the former subspecies L. t. triangulum, L. t. syspila (part), and L. t. amaura (part). Burbrink et al. (2022) found using genome-scale data with detailed phylogeographic and hybrid-zone analyses, along with ecological niche-modeling analyses, that L. triangulum has a zone of hybridization (6% of the combined range) with L. gentilis that occurs primarily where the eastern Nearctic forests transition to the grasslands of the Great Plains but otherwise remains distinct throughout its range. This work also indicates that both L. triangulum and L. gentilis may hybridize with L. elapsoides specifically in a contact zone in Louisiana but that all three also remain distinct outside of that zone. In contrast, Chambers and Hillis (2020) and Chambers et al. (2023) argue that the hybridization detected between L. triangulum and L. gentilis renders these taxa as synonymous and thus all Nearctic milksnakes, excluding L. elapsoides, should be considered L. triangulum. However, Chambers et al. (2023) also found the same two lineages corresponding to L. gentilis and L. triangulum, with the same area of connection as that inferred by Ruane et al. (2014) and Burbrink et al. (2022). See Burbrink et al. (2024) for reanalyses and evaluation of Chambers et al. (2023) demonstrating species status.

Ruane et al. (2014) recognized seven distinct species previously considered to be L. triangulum: L. triangulum, L. gentilis, L. elapsoides, L. annulata, L. polyzona, L. abnorma, and L. micropholis.

The correct year of publication of the original description is 1789 (not 1788 as commonly cited).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2016-04-13
Change Date1996-10-30
Edition Date2016-04-13
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
Range extends from southern Minnesota, Michigan, southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and southern Maine southward to North Carolina and extreme northern Alabama and Georgia; also Mississippi, possibly Arkansas north of the Arkansas, and northeastern Louisiana (specifically La Salle Parish) (Ruane et al. 2014). The range meets that of L. elapsoides in the southeastern United States.
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by a very large number of occurrences (subpopulations) and locations (asdefined by IUCN).
Threat Impact Comments
Intensive agricultural development and urbanization have caused localized declines, and collectors probably have depleted accessible populations near roads, but in most areas this snake is not threatened by these factors. This species is vulnerable to snake fungal disease, but the scope, severity, and population impact of this disease on L. triangulum are unknown.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

See Williams (1994).

Diagnostic Characteristics

See Williams (1994).

Habitat

Habitats vary greatly among different geographic regions: semiarid to wet, lowland valleys to mountains, grasslands and shrublands to forests and forest edges, primary forest to secondary forest, sand dunes to rocky areas, and wilderness to semiagricultural and suburban (Campbell 1998, Lee 2000, Savage 2002, Ernst and Ernst 2003, Stebbins 2003). During daylight, this secretive generally hides in logs and stumps and under surface cover but also may be found in the open. It hibernates underground or in a deep rock crevice. Eggs are laid in soil, sawdust piles, or under surface cover.

Ecology

Home range size estimated to be about 20 ha in Kansas study (see DeGraaf and Rudis 1983).

Reproduction

Lays clutch of 2-17 eggs, usually in June-July in U.S. Eggs hatch in about 6-9 weeks, August or September. Sexually mature in 3rd or 4th year in Kansas (see DeGraaf and Rudis 1983).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld fieldDesertSand/duneBare rock/talus/screeCliffCropland/hedgerowSuburban/orchard
Palustrine Habitats
SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MissouriS5Yes
LouisianaS2Yes
MaineS5Yes
South CarolinaS2Yes
WisconsinS4Yes
Rhode IslandS5Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
DelawareS1Yes
MarylandS4Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
MichiganS5Yes
IowaS4Yes
AlabamaSNRYes
KentuckyS5Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
West VirginiaS5Yes
District of ColumbiaS1Yes
New HampshireS5Yes
OhioSNRYes
ConnecticutS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
TennesseeS5Yes
VermontS5Yes
PennsylvaniaS5Yes
MassachusettsS5Yes
MississippiS3Yes
MinnesotaS4Yes
IllinoisSNRYes
New YorkS5Yes
New JerseyS4Yes
IndianaS4Yes
CanadaN4
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecS3Yes
OntarioS4Yes
Roadless Areas (65)
Georgia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
New Hampshire (7)
AreaForestAcres
Carr MountainWhite Mountain National Forest17,110
PemigewassetWhite Mountain National Forest32,255
Pemigewasset ExtWhite Mountain National Forest15,840
Presidential - Dry River ExtWhite Mountain National Forest10,555
Sandwich RangeWhite Mountain National Forest16,797
WatervilleWhite Mountain National Forest4,312
Wild RiverWhite Mountain National Forest46,878
North Carolina (8)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Craggy MountainPisgah National Forest2,657
Dobson KnobPisgah National Forest6,111
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Middle Prong AdditionPisgah National Forest1,852
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest1,255
Pennsylvania (2)
AreaForestAcres
Allegheny FrontAllegheny National Forest7,430
CornplanterAllegheny National Forest2,929
South Carolina (3)
AreaForestAcres
Bee CoveSumter National Forest3,025
Big MountainSumter National Forest2,337
Ellicott Rock 2Sumter National Forest517
Tennessee (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Rogers RidgeCherokee National Forest4,738
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Vermont (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Griffith Lake 09084Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,833
Virginia (27)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Elliott KnobGeorge Washington National Forest9,380
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Hunting Camp Little Wolf CreekJefferson National Forest8,953
JerkemtightGeorge Washington National Forest16,687
Laurel ForkGeorge Washington National Forest9,967
Little Dry Run AdditionJefferson National Forest2,204
Little RiverGeorge Washington National Forest27,292
Little Wilson Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest1,725
Mottesheard (VA)Jefferson National Forest2,596
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
New London Bridge BranchJefferson National Forest844
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oliver MountainGeorge Washington National Forest13,090
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
West Virginia (9)
AreaForestAcres
Canaan LoopMonongahela National Forest7,867
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
Laurel ForkMonongahela National Forest1,172
Little Allegheny MountainMonongahela National Forest10,514
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
North Mountain HopevilleMonongahela National Forest6,525
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
References (39)
  1. Armstrong, M. P., D. Frymire, and E. J. Zimmerer. 2001. Analysis of sympatric populations of <i>Lampropeltis triangulum syspila</i> and <i>Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides</i>, in western Kentucky and adjacent Tennessee with relation to the taxonomic status of the scarlet kingsnake. Journal of Herpetology 35:688-693.
  2. Burbrink, F. T., and M. Gehara. 2018. The biogeography of deep time phylogenetic reticulation. Systematic Biology 67(5):743-755.
  3. Burbrink, F. T., B. I. Crother, C. M. Murray, B. T. Smith, S. Ruane, E. A. Myers, and R. A. Pyron. 2022. Empirical and philosophical problems with the subspecies rank. Ecology and Evolution 12(7):1-17.
  4. Burbrink, F. T., E. A. Myers, R. A. Pyron. 2024. Understanding species limits through the formation of phylogeographic lineages. Ecology and Evolution 14(10):1-18.
  5. Burbrink, F. T., J. M. Bernstein, A. Kuhn, M. Gehara, and S. Ruane. 2022. Ecological divergence and the history of gene flow in the Nearctic milksnakes (<i>Lampropeltis triangulum</i> Complex). Systematic Biology 71(4):839–858.
  6. Campbell, J. A. 1998. Amphibians and reptiles of northern Guatemala, the Yucatan, and Belize. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. xix + 380 pp.
  7. Chambers, E. A., and D. M. Hillis. 2020. The multispecies coalescent over-splits species in the case of geographically widespread taxa. Systematic Biology 69(1):184-193. Advance online publication 2019.
  8. Chambers, E. A., T. L. Marshall, and D. M. Hillis. 2023. The importance of contact zones for distinguishing interspecific from intraspecific geographic variation. Systematic Biology 72(2):357–371.
  9. Collins, J. T. 1982. Amphibians and reptiles in Kansas. Second edition. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist., Pub. Ed. Ser. 8. xiii + 356 pp.
  10. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  11. Collins, J. T. 1991. Viewpoint: a new taxonomic arrangement for some North American amphibians and reptiles. SSAR Herpetol. Review 22:42-43.
  12. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  13. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  14. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  15. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  16. Degenhardt, W. G., C. W. Painter, and A. H. Price. 1996. Amphibians and reptiles of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. xix + 431 pp.
  17. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983a. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
  18. Dowling, H. G. 1993. Viewpoint: a reply to Collins (1991, 1992). Herpetol. Rev. 24:11-13.
  19. Dundee, H. A., and D. A. Rossman. 1989. The amphibians and reptiles of Louisiana. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
  20. Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
  21. Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.
  22. Hammerson, G. A. 1999. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Second edition. University Press of Colorado, Boulder. xxvi + 484 pp.
  23. Lee, J. C. 2000. A field guide to the amphibians and reptiles of the Maya world: the lowlands of Mexico, northern Guatemala, and Belize. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. 402 pp.
  24. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  25. Nicholson, K. E. (ed.). 2025. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. Ninth Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 87pp. Online database available at: https://cnah.org/SSARnames.aspx
  26. Palmer, W. M., and A. L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  27. Pyron, R. A., and F. T. Burbrink. 2009. Neogene diversification and taxonomic stability in the snake tribe Lampropeltini (Serpentes: Colubridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52:524-529.
  28. Roth, J. J., and H. M. Smith. 1990. The milksnake, <i>Lampropeltis triangulum</i>, in northwest Colorado. Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society 25(1):6-7.
  29. Ruane, S., Bryson, R.W. Jr., Pyron, R.A., and F.T. Burbrink. 2014. Coalescent Species delimitation in Milksnakes (genus <i>Lampropeltis</i>) and impacts on phylogenetic comparative analyses. Systematic Biology 63(2):231-250.
  30. Savage, J. M. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  31. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  32. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  33. Tennant, A. 1984. The Snakes of Texas. Texas Monthly Press, Austin, Texas. 561 pp.
  34. Trauth, S. E., H. W. Robison, and M. V. Plummer. 2004. The amphibians and reptiles of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press.
  35. Vogt, R. C. 1981c. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.
  36. Werler, J. E., and J. R. Dixon. 2000. Texas snakes: identification, distribution, and natural history. University of Texas Press, Austin. xv + 437 pp.
  37. Williams, K. L. 1978c. Systematics and natural history of the American milk snake, <i>Lampropeltis triangulum</i>. Milwaukee Pub. Mus. Pub. Biol. &amp; Geol. 2:1-258.
  38. Williams, K. L. 1988c. Systematics and natural history of the American milksnake, <i>Lampropeltis triangulum</i>. Second edition. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  39. Williams, K. L. 1994b. <i>Lampropeltis triangulum</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 594.1-594.10.