Percina aurantiaca

(Cope, 1868)

Tangerine Darter

G4Apparently Secure Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100432
Element CodeAFCQC04020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyPercidae
GenusPercina
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Conservation Status
Review Date2008-02-11
Change Date2000-02-04
Edition Date2008-02-11
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., J. M. Clayton, and M. K. Clausen
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent5000-200,000 square km (about 2000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Discontinuous distribution in tributaries of upper Tennessee River in Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia; distribution fragmented by many impoundments, but locally common and currently stable.
Range Extent Comments
This darter is disjunctly distributed in tributaries of the upper Tennessee River in Georgia, North Carolina (Menhinick 1991), Tennessee (Etnier and Starnes 1993), and Virginia (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). Elevational range in Tennessee is about 260-550 meters (Etnier and Starnes 1993).
Occurrences Comments
This species is represented by at least a few dozen distinct occurrences (subpopulations), evidenced by more than 100 collection sites. On a state-wide scale, Jenkins and Burkhead (1994) mapped 27 collection sites in Virginia, Etnier and Starnes (1993) mapped 52 collection sites in Tennessee, and Menhinick (1991) mapped 32 collection sites in North Carolina.
Threat Impact Comments
Distribution has been fragmented by many reservoirs, but the species "continues to be reasonably widespread and abundant" (Etnier and Starnes 1993).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat includes clear montane creeks and small rivers of moderate to steep gradient. Thompson (in Lee et al. 1980) reported that adults are most often taken from deep, swiftly flowing runs and rapids near boulders, whereas juveniles and young occur in shallower, quieter waters, sometimes pools. In Virginia, juveniles and adults usually are in pools and slow runs of gravel, rubble, boulder, and bedrock, and occasionally occupy swifter, shallower sections; they often move near the bottom in open water and may perch on large boulders and logs in pools (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). In Tennessee, this species inhabits deeper riffles and runs with boulders, large rubble, and bedrock substrates, in clearer portions of headwater tributaries, moving to deeper pools for winter; juveniles often occur in pools with silty sand substrates (Etnier and Starnes 1993). In Tennessee, Howell (1971) reported that large males often occupy riffles in summer and fall. In the Little River, Tennessee, Greenberg (1991) found this species in relatively deep water in riffles, runs, and most frequently pools, often over silty substrates but typically feeding on rocks substrate. In Virginia, spawning darters were in shallows of moderate to swift current, with substrates of sand or intermixed sand and gravel (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). Spawning also may occur in gravel riffles (Tennessee, Howell 1971) or shallow rubble and gravel areas (Kuehne and Barbour 1983).

Reproduction

Spawns May to June or July (Page 1983, Page 1983). Very small young have been taken in early July (Lee et al. 1980). Age range of breeding females is 2-4 years (Bart and Page 1992). Life span is a little more than 4 years (Howell 1971).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
VirginiaS2Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
TennesseeS3Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
Roadless Areas (2)
North Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Craggy MountainPisgah National Forest2,657
Tennessee (1)
AreaForestAcres
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
References (23)
  1. Bart, H. L., Jr., and L. M. Page. 1992. The influence of size and phylogeny on life history variation in North American percids. Pages 553-572 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  2. Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee. xiv + 681 pp.
  3. Freeman, B. J. (Institute of Ecology and Museum of Natural History, University of Georgia). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC.
  4. Greenberg, L. A. 1991. Habitat use and feeding behavior of thirteen species of benthic stream fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 31:389-401.
  5. Howell, J. F. 1971. The life history and ecology of <i>Percina aurantiaca</i> (Cope). Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
  6. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. xxiii + 1079 pp.
  7. Kuehne, R. A., and R. W. Barbour. 1983. The American Darters. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 177 pp.
  8. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  9. LeGrand, Harry (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  10. MacBeth, Robyn M. (Georgia Natural Heritage Program). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  11. Major, Smoot (Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC on 19 August 1997.
  12. Menhinick, Edward F. (Professor of Biology, UNC-Charlotte, NC). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. June 1997.
  13. Menhinick, E. F. 1991. The freshwater fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 227 pp.
  14. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  15. Page, L. M. 1983a. Handbook of Darters. T. F. H. Publications, Inc., Neptune City, New Jersey. 271 pp.
  16. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  17. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  18. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  19. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  20. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  21. Shute, Peggy (Aquatic Zoologist, Tennessee Valley Authority Regional Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. October 1997.
  22. State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.
  23. Warren, M. L., Jr., B. M. Burr, S. J. Walsh, H. L. Bart, Jr., R. C. Cashner, D. A. Etnier, B. J. Freeman, B. R. Kuhajda, R. L. Mayden, H. W. Robison, S. T. Ross, and W. C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries 25(10):7-31.