Scutellaria montana

Chapman

Large-flower Skullcap

G4Apparently Secure Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.159616
Element CodePDLAM1U0U0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderLamiales
FamilyLamiaceae
GenusScutellaria
Synonyms
Scutellaria serrata var. montana(Chapman) Penl.
Other Common Names
Large-flowered Skullcap (EN) largeflower skullcap (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-01-01
Change Date2013-05-23
Edition Date2025-01-01
Edition AuthorsBridges, E. (1986), A. Bishop (2006), rev. K. Gravuer (2010), rev. Soteropoulos (2025)
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Scutellaria montana is a perennial herb in rocky, shallow, submesic to xeric soils of hardwood or hardwood-pine forests that is endemic to the southeastern United States where it occurs in the Ridge and Valley and Cumberland Plateau physiographic provinces in northwestern Georgia and southeastern Tennessee. The total number of known individuals is estimated to be 50,000 in 238 populations which may be considered 128 occurrences, with additional populations and occurrences being discovered. Although some populations have a relatively high number of individuals, there are also numerous threats, including logging-associated habitat degradation, suburban development, quarrying, recreational activities, invasive species, and droughts. However, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicates this species has a low degree of threat. While Tennessee has a sufficient number of protected and self-sustaining populations to satisfy the criteria for delisting the species, the criteria require these populations to be distributed throughout its range, and very few sites are protected in Georgia. Continued monitoring of populations should be conducted to improve our understanding of reproduction, plant abundance, threats, and trends, as well as continuing conservation measures to protect the taxon.
Range Extent Comments
Scutellaria montana is endemic to the southeastern United States where it occurs in the Ridge and Valley and Cumberland Plateau physiographic provinces in northwestern Georgia and southeastern Tennessee and has been documented in the following counties: Georgia (Catoosa, Chattooga, Dade, Floyd, Gordon, Murray, Walker, and Whitfield Counties) and Tennessee (Bledsoe, Hamilton, Marion, and Sequatchie). Range extent was estimated to be 5,399 square kilometers using herbarium specimens and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1993 and 2024 (NatureServe 2024, SEINet 2024).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium specimens and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1993 and 2024, it is estimated that there are 238 populations which may be considered 128 occurrences rangewide, excluding thirteen occurrences that were failed to find (GBIF 2024, iNaturalist 2024, NatureServe 2024, SEINet 2024). Delineating separate occurrences for this species is challenging because it occurs as small clumps that are relatively close together. Continued search effort for this species continues to result in the discovery of additional occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
The USFWS (2002) documented the following high-level threats: (1) One of the greatest potential threats is the proliferation of exotic and opportunistic native species after logging in the species' habitat. Aggressive exotic vines such as kudzu and Japanese honeysuckle are responsible for the permanent or long-term destruction of numerous sites. Scutellaria montana does not compete well with its herbaceous associates and appears to be very sensitive to the amount of light in the canopy. Increased runoff and erosion from logging activities can alter downslope habitats. (2) In much of the range, habitat conversion and destruction is a significant threat. Sites in the vicinity of Chattanooga, Tennessee and Rome, Georgia are prime for suburban development, including the construction of new homes. The suburbs of Chattanooga near the state line appear to be the area where development is the biggest issue at this time. However, the low current growth rate of Chattanooga is mitigating this threat to some extent. (3) Fortunately, the more remote and steep mountain slopes on the escarpment are less likely to be developed; however, quarrying of rock in these areas is a threat. Quarrying can be an issue anywhere mineral rights are not owned by the state; even on protected land, mineral rights may be owned by another party. Rangewide, quarrying is a less likely but more widespread threat than home building. (4) The potential for conversion of forests to agriculture or grazing exists at most unprotected sites. Very few sites are protected in Georgia (USFWS 2002, T. Patrick, T. Crabtree, and C. Nordman, pers. comm., 2010).

Threats documented in the five-year status review (USFWS 2015) include: (1) Increasing levels of recreational activities, including hiking traffic, maintenance or rerouting of hiking trails, unauthorized camping on public and conservation lands, and illegal off-road vehicle use on undesignated trails, can directly impact plants by trampling and indirectly by reducing habitat quality. (2) Powerline and roadside maintenance activities, including the use of herbicide, manual, and mechanical treatments for vegetation management. (3) White-tailed deer graze on S. montana, though influence on individuals' stem height and number of leaves were not significant (Benson and Boyd 2014). (4) Climate change will likely result in drought conditions to increase both in frequency and severity (Karl et al. 2009).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A perennial herb with an erect, usually solitary, square stem, usually 3-5 dm tall. The leaves are lanceolate to ovate, short-petiolate, 5-8 cm by 2.5-5 cm, with blunt-serrate margins, hairy on both surfaces. The blue and white flowers, about 2.5 cm long, are borne in a terminal leafy-bracted raceme; they bloom in May and early June. The fruit contain 4 light brown nutlets, enclosed by the expanding 2-lobed calyx, the upper lobe with a "cap" above the base of the lower lobe.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Distinctive characters are the terminal inflorescence, the large flowers, the distinctive calyx, and the long, tapering leaf bases. The flowers lack the ridge (annulus) within the tube near the top of the calyx, which is characteristic of the other members of the section. Distinguished from S. pseudoserrata, the most common associated skullcap species, by the presence on the lower and upper leaf surface of a fine, dense, continuous coverage of glandular and non-glandular hairs giving it a velvety surface. The upper surface has no sessile glands (Kral 1983, Shea Hogan 1998).

Habitat

SUMMARY: Scutellaria montana is typically found in rocky, shallow soils, and on submesic to xeric, well-drained, slightly acidic oak-pine forests in the Ridge and Valley and Cumberland Plateau provinces of northwestern Georgia and adjacent southeastern Tennessee. In Georgia, it has been reported from elevations of 189 to 265 m on steep, lower slopes of all aspects. In Tennessee, the elevation range of the species is much greater, with one concentration of sites at 200 to 320 m on slightly sloping to steep lower to mid-slopes on the Upper Mississippian Pennington Formation. The other concentration is at 400 to 540 m on gentle to somewhat steep slopes of small ravines near the escarpment on the Cumberland Plateau, on Lower Pennsylvanian sandstone and shale (Bridges 1984). The soil is always rocky and somewhat shallow, with plants rooted in deeper soil between boulders, or on as little as 3 cm of soil over rocks (Collins, unpublished manuscript). The species appears to have little specific habitat preference, occurring in localized areas within its known range. It is unclear what limits the northern edge of its distribution.

FULL DESCRIPTION: Scutellaria montana is typically found in rocky, submesic to xeric, well-drained, slightly acidic slope, ravine, and stream bottom forests in the Ridge and Valley and Cumberland Plateau provinces of northwestern Georgia and adjacent southeastern Tennessee (and possibly northeastern Alabama). In Georgia, it has been reported from elevations of 189 to 265 m (620 to 870 feet) on steep, lower slopes of all aspects (Collins 1976). In Tennessee, the elevation range of the species is much greater, with one concentration of sites at 200 to 320 m (650 to 1050 feet) on slightly sloping to steep lower to mid-slopes on the Upper Mississippian Pennington Formation. Another concentration of Tennessee sites is at 400 to 540 m (1300 to 1780 feet) on gentle to somewhat steep slopes of small ravines near the escarpment on the Cumberland Plateau, on Lower Pennsylvanian sandstones and shales. The breadth of its occurrence in relation to geological strata is remarkable - shale, chert, limestone, and sandstone from Cambrian to Pennsylvanian age, essentially most of the major slope-forming formations of the region. The soil is always rocky and somewhat shallow, with plants rooted in deeper soil between boulders, or on as little as 3 cm of soil over rocks (Collins 1976).

In terms of natural community types, Scutellaria montana occupies types which are typical for the region and occupy a large percentage of the lesser disturbed slopes within and beyond the known range of the species. In Wharton (1978), these community types are Armuchee Ridge Forest, Oak-Pine Forest of the Great Valley, and possibly Submesic Ridge and Slope Forest (Sedimentary Region). These types are difficult to distinguish in absolute terms, as are the community types supporting Scutellaria montana in Tennessee. Perhaps a more broadly defined type, such as "Dry-mesic acidic slope forest - Upland Oak-Pine Region Type" may be more appropriate, with numerous subtypes being possible throughout the range of the type (Virginia to Alabama and Tennessee). The distinguishing features of this type are 1) At least some natural pine occurrence for long periods [typically Pinus echinata or P. taeda, less commonly P. virginiana or P. palustris]; 2) Predominately oaks and hickories as canopy species, with scattered more mesic species; 3) Predominately deciduous shrub layer, with some evergreen Vaccinium [not dominant]; 4) Moderately dense herb layer (typically 20-50%) of a mixture of mesic and somewhat xeric species (Desmodium spp., Hexastylis spp., Chimaphila maculata characteristic); 5) Developed on well-consolidated paleozoic to pre-cambrian strata, often with some exposed rock. This is a common natural community in the Piedmont (VA, NC, SC, GA, AL), extreme Southern Blue Ridge (GA, AL) and southern Ridge and Valley and Cumberland Plateau (GA, AL, southeastern TN) on sites typical of these regions.

Scutellaria montana is associated with several of the same species throughout its range, while other associates differ in relation to degree of moisture of the site, and from northernmost to southernmost populations. Several oak species usually dominate the canopy, most often Quercus alba, Q. velutina, and/or Q. montana, less often Q. stellata and Q. rubra. Four hickory species are present from at least one site (Carya ovata, C. glabra, C. tomentosa, and C. pallida.) Pines are at least a minor component of the canopy at all sites, with Pinus echinata being most typical (less often P. virginiana, P. taeda, and P. palustris). At least at the Tennessee sites, other hardwoood species, often of more mesic affinities, are present in the canopy; Liriodendron tulipifera and Liquidambar styraciflua are the most frequent of these species.

The most typically associated subcanopy species is Cornus florida, which is extremely common in the natural community type. Numerous other subcanopy and shrub species may be present, as well as many transgressives of the canopy species. Vaccinium arboreum, Oxydendron arboreum, Sassafras albidum, and Calycanthus floridus are present at several sites, with Cercis canadensis, Vaccinium stamineum and Vaccinium pallidum said to be typical of Georgia sites (Colllins, unpublished manuscript).

The herbaceous layer associates are perhaps the most critical species in explaining Scutellaria montana habitat and occurrence, yet are even more varied than the woody associates, with at least 30 species present at more than one site. Those which are common associates in Georgia (Collins 1976) and are also present at some Tennessee sites include Dioscorea villosa, Spigelia marilandica, and Hexastylis arifolia. Several other species are common associates in Georgia, but are not known to be closely associated in Tennessee. These include Polygonatum biflorum, Geranium maculatum, Arisaema triphyllum, Asclepias quadrifolia, Trillium catesbaei, Trillium cuneatum, Chimaphila maculata, and Hypoxis hirsutus. Several additional species are associated with Scutellaria montana at two or more of the Tennessee sites, including the woody vines Smilax glauca, Vitis rotundifolia, and Parthenocissus quinquefolia, as well as Cynoglossum virginianum, Desmodium glutinosum, Lysimachia tonsa, Galium circaezans, Sanicula canadensis, Pteridium aquilinum, Polymnia uvedalia, and Coreopsis major.

The associated species of Scutellaria montana include both somewhat mesic and somewhat xeric indicator species for the region, with the extremely mesic species and most xeric species lacking. The relatively wide range of moisture preferences of associates is attributable in part to variation between sites, but much of this variation is due to the microtopography diversity within many of the sites. The steep, rocky surfaces result in both quite xeric shallow soil areas over and in small cracks between rocks, and deeper, moister soils in larger crevices in positions where runoff is channeled. The relationship of Scutellaria montana to this microtopographic variation is either not very specific, or as yet undetermined, as it can be found in many microhabitats at most sites. It does seem to be in areas with less herbaceous cover than its surroundings, and apparently does not compete well with many of its herbaceous associates. This is probably particularly true with regard to rhizomatous, colony-forming species which, once established, could easily crowd out Scutellaria. Nearest neighbor studies at one of the Tennessee sites (Bridges and Hawks 1984), indicate that S. montana is often found 3"-10" away from rhizomatous plants such as Calycanthus floridus, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, and Desmodium nudiflorum, and most shaded by a subcanopy tree of Cornus florida and a canopy Quercus alba. This situation obviously varies by site, but perhaps indicates the tenuous balance between S. montana and its larger, more aggressive, herb, vine, and shrub associates.

Ecology

The life history of Scutellaria montana has not been specifically studied, and relatively little of it is known. Mature nutlets were not even seen until about 1983 by workers at Shorter College, thus indicating the early stage of work on the biology of the species. Collins (unpublished manuscript) summarizes the general life cycle as follows: "Nutlets are released from late June through early July (mid-June to mid-July?), overwinter, and apparently germinate in late March. Mature individuals that have perennated as rootstocks begin shoot growth in late March. By early April, plants are 5-10 cm tall and are pushing through the leaf litter. Anthesis typically begins during mid-May and continues through early June. Pollination is principally or exclusively by Hymenoptera of the superfamily Apoidea (bees). The corolla shrivels somewhat and falls from the calyx one or two days after pollination, presumably within 24 hours of fertilization. The calyx closes around the developing fruit immediately after corolla abscission. During the next two to four weeks, the calyx and the enclosed nutlets enlarge and mature. The calyx then dehisces by the loss of the upper lip, and the nutlets are released...A different course is followed if fertilization does not occur. The corolla shrivels markedly and may or may not remain united to the calyx. The entire calyx, still open at the mouth, falls leaving the pedicel bare."

Workers at Shorter College are apparently conducting demographic and autecological studies on S. montana. Preliminary results indicate that less than 40 % of the flowers produce mature nutlets. Collins (1976) found that in other species of this group of Scutellaria studied, 76 to 93% of the flowers form nutlets. This lowered rate of fruit production, and the often few-flowered inflorescences, combine to give S. montana a reproductive capacity less than many of its relatives. The nutlets have a smooth exterior and do not appear to be adapted for any means of long-distance dispersal; they most likely fall a short distance (= 5 m) from the parent plant due to explosion of mint capsule. They could be washed downslope by water, or carried by small animals, but have only remote chances of extrapopulation dispersal. However, as Collins (unpublished manuscript) notes, this cannot alone explain its rarity, in that all of its more widespread relatives have virtually identical seed dispersal.

Conditions necessary for germination and establishment are still unknown, although the Marshall Forest population has variously been described as from 500 to 1,300 plants. This may represent actual population fluctuations.

Scutellaria species in the group to which S. montana belongs generally occur at fairly low density, scattered seemingly at random over fairly large areas of forest. Large colonies are seldom found, and individual plants are usually widely spaced and easily distinguishable. S. montana may sometimes occur in tighter colonies than many of its relatives, as indicated by its clumped distribution at Marshall Forest. In the largest Tennessee population (ca. 5,000 individuals), the plants are spaced at approximately 6" intervals (Hawks 1985b), giving a density of 4/sq ft, or ca. 40/sq meter. In the smaller Tennessee populations, however, density is 1 plant per sq meter or less, and individuals can be separated by 50m or more from the nearest S. montana (Bridges 1983, 1984; Bridges and Hawks 1984)

Collins (unpublished manuscript) indicates that S. montana was only known to occur in minimally disturbed sites with a stable habitat. This would indicate it to be a plant of late-successional or climax forests. In Tennessee, some of the sites have clearly younger trees and more recent disturbances than the above would suggest. One site has trees generally 30-40 years old; most sites average trees less than 60 years old. The largest site is in a relatively old (50-60 yrs ?) forest, but is unique in that there had been a gentle ground fire about three years before the discovery of S. montana at the site. While S. montana will not, or has not been observed, to grow in early successional pine stands, it will occupy relatively mature stands with varying degrees of disturbances. Thus it can be considered a mid-to-late successional species which probably persists in, but is not restricted to, mature or climax forests. This is the typical situation for most forest herbs of the region.

Reproduction

The nutlets have a smooth exterior and do not appear to be adapted for any means of long-distance dispersal; they most likely fall a short distance (= 5 m) from the parent plant due to explosion of mint capsule. They could be washed downslope by water, or carried by small animals, but have only remote chances of extrapopulation dispersal (Collins, unpublished manuscript).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - HardwoodForest - Mixed
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
TennesseeS4Yes
GeorgiaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateModerate - low
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateModerate - low
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
3 - Energy production & miningLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
3.2 - Mining & quarryingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh - moderate
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
4.2 - Utility & service linesRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceUnknownSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesUnknownSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (2)
Georgia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Ken MountainChattahoochee National Forest527
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
References (27)
  1. Benson, A.R. and J.N. Boyd. 2014. Individual-and population-level effects of <i>Odocoileus virginianus </i>herbivory on the rare forest herb <i>Scutellaria montana</i>. Global Ecology and Conservation 1: 80-92.
  2. Bridges, E. 1983, 1984. Unpublished field data on <i>Scutellaria montana</i>.
  3. Bridges, E. 1986. TNC element stewardship abstract: Scutellaria montana. Unpublished document prepared for the Southeast Regional Office of The Nature Conservancy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 11 pp.
  4. Bridges, E., D. Durham, D. Eager, L. Smith, and P. Somers. 1984. An ecological survey of the Tennessee River Gorge. Report to The Nature Concervancy, Tennessee Field Office, Nashville. 76 pp. and appendices.
  5. Collins, J. L. 1976. A revision of the annulate Scutellaria (Labiatae). Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, Tennessee. 294 pp.
  6. Collins, J. L. Unpublished manuscript. The taxonomy, distribution and rarity of <i>Scutellaria montana </i>Chapm. (Lamiaceae).
  7. Crabtree, Todd. Personal communication. Botanist, Tennessee Division of Natural Areas, Tennessee Department of Environmental Conservation, Nashville, TN.
  8. Cruzan, M.B. 2001. Population size and fragmentation thresholds for the maintenance of genetic diversity in the herbaceous endemic <i>Scutellaria montana</i> (Lamiaceae). Evolution 55(8): 1569-1580.
  9. Epling, C. 1942. The American species of Scutellaria. Univ. of California Publications in Botany 20(1): 1-146.
  10. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. Corrected printing (1970). D. Van Nostrand Company, New York. 1632 pp.
  11. Hawks, G. 1985. Unpublished field data on <i>Scutellaria montana</i>.
  12. Karl, T. A., J. M. Melillo, and T. C. Peterson, editors. 2009. Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press. 196 pp.
  13. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  14. Kral, R. 1983a. A report on some rare, threatened or endangered forest related vascular plants of the south. USFS technical publication R8-TP2, Atlanta, GA. Vol. 1: 718 pp.
  15. Lowe, D.W., J.R. Matthews, and C.J. Moseley, eds. 1990. The official World Wildlife Fund guide to endangered species of North America. Beacham Publishing, Washington, D.C. 1180 pp.
  16. McCollum, J.L., and D.R. Ettman. 1987. Georgia's protected plants. Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Social Circle, GA. 64 pp.
  17. McKerrow, A. 1994. Technical/Agency draft recovery plan for large-flowered skullcap (Scutellaria montana). Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, NC. 37 pp.
  18. NatureServe. 2024. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  19. Nordman, Carl. Personal communication. Regional Vegetation Ecologist, NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  20. Patrick, Tom. Georgia Natural Heritage Program. Personal communication.
  21. Shea, A. and T. Hogan. 1998. Status survey report of <i>Scutellaria montana</i> Chapman. Unpublished report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, NC 104 pp.
  22. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2024. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2024).
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1986. Determination of endangered status for <i>Scutellaria montana</i> (large-flowered skullcap). Federal Register 51(119): 22521-22524.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Status review: Large-flowered skullcap (<i>Scutellaria montana</i> Chapman). Asheville Field Office, Asheville, North Carolina. 4 pp.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2002. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; reclassification of <i>Scutellaria montana</i> (Large-flowered skullcap) from endangered to threatened. Federal Register 67(9): 1662-1668.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Large-flowered Skullcap (<i>Scutellaria montana</i>) Five-year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cookeville, TN. 31 pp. [https://ecosphere-documents-production-public.s3.amazonaws.com/sams/public_docs/species_nonpublish/2243.pdf]
  27. Wharton, C. H. 1978. The natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, Atlanta. 227 pp.