Gambelia sila

(Stejneger, 1890)

Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Gambelia sila. Photo by russnamitz, via iNaturalist.
russnamitz, CC0 1.0
Gambelia sila. Photo by Zack Abbey, via iNaturalist.
Zack Abbey, CC BY 4.0
Gambelia sila. Photo by russnamitz, via iNaturalist.
russnamitz, CC0 1.0
Gambelia sila. Photo by russnamitz, via iNaturalist.
russnamitz, CC0 1.0
Gambelia sila. Photo by russnamitz, via iNaturalist.
russnamitz, CC0 1.0
Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia silus). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.101103
Element CodeARACF07010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyCrotaphytidae
GenusGambelia
Synonyms
Crotaphytus silusGambelia silus(Stejneger, 1890)
Other Common Names
Bluntnose Leopard Lizard (EN)
Concept Reference
Frost, D. R., and J. T. Collins. 1988. Nomenclatural notes on reptiles of the United States. Herpetological Review 19(4):73-74.
Taxonomic Comments
Gambelia sila previously was placed in the genus Crotaphytus. McGuire (1996) spelled the specific name "silus." See Jennings (1995) for an explanation of the spelling change. An isolated population of putative hybrid (G. sila x G. wislizenii) origin has been reported in the Cuyama River drainage system southwest of the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley; apparently hybrids are no longer extant, as a result of habitat loss and local extirpation (Jennings 1995). Grimes et al. (2014) found that the mtDNA of this species forms two non-overlapping haplotype clades (Crother 2017).
Conservation Status
Review Date2014-11-10
Change Date2014-11-10
Edition Date2011-05-13
Edition AuthorsMacey, J. R., T. J. Papenfuss, and G. Hammerson
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent5000-200,000 square km (about 2000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Small range centered in the San Joaquin Valley, California; extirpated in most of original range as a result of urbanization, water development projects, and agricultural development; area of occupancy and abundance continue to decline with ongoing loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat; threatened also by pesticide use and habitat alteration (thick growths of non-native grasses).
Range Extent Comments
The historical range encompassed the San Joaquin Valley and adjacent foothills of southern California, from Stanislaus County to extreme northern Santa Barbara and Ventura counties, at elevations below 800 meters (2,600 feet) (Jennings 1995, USFWS 1998). The currently known occupied range includes scattered parcels of undeveloped land on the floor of the San Joaquin Valley and in the foothills of the Coast Range (see USFWS 1998 for further details).

In the northern part of the San Joaquin Valley, blunt-nosed leopard lizards have been found in the Firebaugh and Madera Essential Habitat Areas (Williams 1990). Other northern locations include the Ciervo, Tumey, and Panoche Hills, Anticline Ridge, Pleasant Valley, and the Lone Tree, Sandy Mush Road, Whitesbridge, Horse Pasture, and Kettleman Hills Essential Habitat Areas. In the southern San Joaquin Valley, known extant populations exists in the following locations: Pixley National Wildlife Refuge, Liberty Farm, Allensworth, Kern National Wildlife Refuge, Antelope Plain, Buttonwillow, Elk Hills, and Tupman Essential Habitat Areas; on the Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains; north of Bakersfield around Poso Creek; in western Kern County in the area around the towns of Maricopa, McKittrick, and Taft; at the Kern Front oil field; at the base of the Tehachapi Mountains on Tejon Ranch; and just west of the California Aqueduct on the Tejon and San Emizdio Ranches (USFWS 1998). The species is presumed to be extant in the upper Cuyama Valley (USFWS 1998).

The distribution approaches that of G. wislizenii in the Cuyama Valley drainage, where wislizenii occurs above 1,100 m and sila occurs below 790 m (see McGuire 1996).
Occurrences Comments
Number of occurrences is unknown due to large-scale, continuous extirpation of populations. Likely there are not much more than a few dozen distinct occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
Distribution and abundance are greatly reduced, and populations are now much fragmented, due primarily to loss of habitat to urbanization, water development projects, and agricultural development; intensive mineral development, off-road vehicle activity, pesticide application (for ground squirrels), overgrazing, and flooding also have been detrimental (USFWS 1998). Thick cover of non-native grasses degrades the habitat in some years and locations (Germano and Williams 2005). These lizards use mammal burrows for shelter, so activities that compact soil or crush burrows should be avoided.

Habitat disturbance, destruction, and fragmentation continue as the greatest threats to blunt-nosed leopard lizard populations (USFWS 1998).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

See Jennings (1995).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from G. COPEII by presence of territoriality, male breeding coloration, vertebrae with notched zygosphenes and zygantra, sexual dimorphism wherein males are larger than females, and truncated snout (McGuire 1996). See also Jennings (1995).

Habitat

This species inhabits semiarid grasslands, alkali flats, low foothills, canyon floors, large washes, and arroyos, usually on sandy, gravelly, or loamy substrate, sometimes on hardpan. It is common where there are abundant rodent burrows, rare or absent in dense vegetation or tall grass. Habitats in order of decreasing favorability: 1) clump grass and saltbush grassland, with sandy soil, 2) washes with brush, in grassland, with sandy soil, 3) alkali flats, with saltbush in sandy or gravelly soil, and 4) grassland with hardpan soil. See Warrick et al. (1998) for additional habitat information. This lizard cannot survive on lands under cultivation (may use edges adjacent to suitable habitat); repopulation of an area after tilling ends requires at least 10 years. It basks on kangaroo rat mounds and often seeks cover at the base of shrubs, in the burrows of small mammals, or in rock piles. Adults may excavate shallow burrows for shelter but depend on deeper burrows of rodents for hibernation (and egg laying). Eggs typically are laid in an abandoned rodent burrow, at a depth of about 50 cm (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1980).

Ecology

Males are territorial during the breeding season, but some home range overlap may occur with one or more other males; several females may use portions of a single male's territory. Home range size is usually less than 9 ha (average 2 ha in females and 4.2 in males) (Warrick et al. 1998).

On the Elkhorn Plain, estimated adult density ranged from a low of 4.35/ha to 6.0/ha; hatchling/juvenile density ranged up to 23.9-35.6/ha (Germano and Williams 2005). Numbers of active adults were as low as 20 individuals on an 8.1-ha plot in 1990, when only juveniles that had hatched the previous summer were active above ground, to as many as 164 adults on the plot three years later. The number of hatchlings varied even more dramatically with none found in 1990, and as many as 273 were estimated to be on a plot in 1993 (Germano and Williams 2005). On the Elkhorn Plain, annual variations in abundance seemed to be linked, at least partially, to large variation in rainfall, herbaceous plant production, and prey abundance (Germano and Williams 2005). Available evidence indicates that valley sites may support lower densities than those found on the Elkhorn Plain (see Germano and Williams 2005).

Predators include snakes, raptors, and roadrunners (see Germano and Carter 1995, Herpetological Review 26:100).

Reproduction

Mating takes place in spring. Eggs are laid mainly in May-July. Clutch size is up to 6 (mean around 3-4). Individual females produce 1-4 clutches per season (Germano and Williams 2005). Incubation lasts about 2 months. Hatchlings emerge in late July-early August. Sexually mature in 9-21 months. May not breed during periods of drought (Germano et al. 1994). On the Elkhorn Plain, the oldest individual found was a female estimated to be nearly five years old when last caught, but most adults were not seen after 2 years (Germano and Williams 2005).
Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceousPlaya/salt flat
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted - smallExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingUnknownSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningUnknownSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
3.1 - Oil & gas drillingUnknownSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge - smallExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsLarge - smallExtreme - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - smallSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - smallSerious - slightHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
References (26)
  1. Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
  2. Biosystems Analysis, Inc. 1989. Endangered Species Alert Program Manual: Species Accounts and Procedures. Southern California Edison Environmental Affairs Division.
  3. Brode, J. M. 1980. The blunt-nosed leopard lizard recovery plan. USFWS Endangered species Program, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
  4. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  5. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  6. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  7. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  8. Frost, D. R., and J. T. Collins. 1988. Nomenclatural notes on reptiles of the United States. Herpetological Review 19(4):73-74.
  9. Germano, D. J., and D. F. Williams. 2005. Population ecology of blunt-nosed leopard lizards in high elevation foothill habitat. Jornal of Herpetology 39:1-18.
  10. Germano, D. J., D. F. Williams, and W. Trodoff, III. 1994. Effect of drought on blunt-nosed leopard lizards (<i>Gambelia sila</i>). Northwestern Naturalist 75:11-19.
  11. Grimes, A. J., G. Corrigan, D. J. Germano, and P. T. Smith. 2014. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the endangered blunt-nosed leopard lizard, <i>Gambelia sila</i>. The Southwestern Naturalist 59(1):38-46.
  12. Jennings, M. R. 1995. <i>Gambelia sila</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 612.1-612.4.
  13. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  14. McGuire, J. A. 1996. Phylogenetic systematics of crotaphytid lizards (Reptilia: Iguania: Crotaphytidae). Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History (32):1-143.
  15. Montanucci, R. R. 1965. Observations on the San Joaquin leopard lizard, <i>Crotaphytus wislizenii silus</i> Stejneger. Herpetologica 2 1:270-283.
  16. Snow, C. 1972. Habitat Management series for endangered species, Report No. 3, Blunt Nosed Leopard Lizard, <i>Gambelia silus</i>. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Dept. of Int., Technical Note, T-N-169, Denver.
  17. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  18. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  19. Tollestrup, K. 1979. The ecology, social structure, and foraging behavior of two closely related species of leopard lizards, Gambelia silus and Gambelia wislizenii. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  20. Uptain, C., W. A. Clark, and S. M. Juarez. 1985. Mark-recapture population estimates and visitation indices for the blunt-nosed leopard lizard, Gambelia silus at the Pixley National Wildlife Refuge. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Delano, CA, Contract Nos. 10181-9810-3(js) and 10181-4672-4, 34 pp. + Appendices.
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1980. Selected vertebrate endangered species of the seacoast of the United States- Blunt-nosed leopard lizard. FWS/OBS-80/01.2, Slidell.
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 319 pp.
  24. Warrick, G. D., T. T. Kato, and B. R. Rose. 1998. Microhabitat use and home range characteristics of blunt-nosed leopard lizards. Journal of Herpetology 32:183-191.
  25. Williams, D. F. 1990b. Assessment of potential habitat for the blunt-nosed leopard lizard and San Joaquin kit fox in western Madera County, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Office, Sacramento, CA, 31 pp.
  26. Williams, D. F., and D. J. Germano. 1991. Effects of livestock grazing on endangered species at Pixley National Wildlife Refuge, Tulare County, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Kern National Wildlife Refuge, Delano, California. 33 pp.