Diplacus clivicola

(Greenm.) G.L. Nesom

Hill Monkeyflower

G4Apparently Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
UnknownThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.133349
Element CodePDSCR1B0S0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderLamiales
FamilyPhrymaceae
GenusDiplacus
Synonyms
Mimulus clivicolaGreenm.
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
The Flora of North America (vol. 17 2019) transfers Mimulus clivicola to Diplacus clivicola; these represent the same concept for the element.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-03-18
Change Date1994-03-14
Edition Date2025-03-18
Edition AuthorsJanice Hill, rev. D. Gries (1998), rev. N.Ventrella (2025)
Threat ImpactUnknown
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
A regional endemic, Diplacus clivicola is an annual forb occurring in narrow river canyons in Idaho, Oregon, and Montana in the western United States. There are an estimated 113 occurrences of this species, which are threatened by logging activities, invasion of exotic weeds and consequent chemical control measures, grazing, dam construction, mining, and recreation.
Range Extent Comments
Diplacus clivicola occurs in the western United States, in northern Idaho, Oregon, and Montana (FNA 2019). Although most of the floras of the Pacific Northwest (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973) describe this taxon as occurring in Washington, only one documented record by George Vasey in 1889 exists for the state, and this occurrence has not been relocated. As of 1992 no extant locations are known from any portion of Washington (Lorain 1992). Range extent was estimated using herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data collected between 1994 and 2025 (RARECAT 2024, GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, SEINet 2025).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025, it is estimated that there are 113 occurrences rangewide (RARECAT 2024, GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, SEINet 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
Both natural and human-caused factors play a role in threatening and/or eliminating populations of Diplacus clivicola (Lorain 1992). Natural threats include large-scale erosion and succession. A certain amount of erosion or soil disturbance from animal movement appears to be necessary to create patches of exposed mineral soil; however, large-scale erosion could eliminate populations. The process of natural succession can increase shading and result in soil stabilization, factors that do not favor the growth of this species (Lorain 1991).

Human-caused threats include indirect impacts as a result of logging activities, invasion of exotic weeds and consequent chemical control measures, grazing, the construction of the Dworshak Reservoir in Idaho, potential resumption of mining activities, and recreational activities. Direct timber harvest activities probably do not threaten Diplacus clivicola because this species occurs in non-timbered or very open stands which are unsuitable for intensive logging. However, some indirect impacts associated with logging activities, such as road building, road maintenance, and development or expansion of rock quarries, are associated with erosion and invasion of exotic species which pose distinct threats to Diplacus clivicola (Lorain and Moseley 1989). There are a number of highly competitive weeds that commonly occur in similar habitats as Diplacus clivicola, including knapweed, cheatgrass, and goatweed. The disappearance of many historical Diplacus clivicola sites can be directly attributable to road construction followed by the invasion of exotic weeds (Caicco 1988). Also, the chemical methods used to control these weeds may pose a further threat (Caicco 1987). Diplacus clivicola sites in west-central Idaho and adjacent northeast Oregon are frequently grazed which can result in trampling and soil damage if grazed when the soils are saturated (Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1992). The construction of the Dworshak Reservoir in north-central Idaho resulted in the loss of much suitable habitat. Resumption of mining at the presently inactive Lost Irishman Mine in the Lochsa River drainage, could pose a threat to one of the largest and best populations of Diplacus clivicola in north-central Idaho (Lorain and Moseley 1989). Recreationists pose a potential threat to those populations located near trails or existing roads (Lorain 1992).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Diplacus clivicola is a small, generally single-stemmed annual with opposite, mostly elliptic leaves and large, pink, showy flowers. The entire plant is covered with glandular hairs that emit a musky odor when rubbed between the fingers (Lorain and Moseley 1989).

Recent work with the taxon (Lorain and Moseley 1989, Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1991,1992) has identified additional characteristics that are especially helpful for identification during field investigations. These investigators described Diplacus clivicola as having "distinctly pink" flowers and a musky, sweet smell when the herbage is rubbed.

Diagnostic Characteristics

The following characteristics help distinguish Diplacus clivicola from other small, annual, pink/purple-flowering Mimulus species occurring within its range, specifically M. breweri and M. nanus. Mimulus breweri has rather inconspicuous, small (<10 mm), slender flowers, whereas, M. clivicola has larger (up to 2.5 cm), funnelform flowers. Mimulus nanus has deep magenta flowers on pedicels 1-3 mm in length, has only a few hairs, and occurs in dry, open, often sandy or gravelly places, whereas, M. clivicola has distinctly pink flowers on pedicels 3-7 mm in length, is covered with rather dense sticky hairs, and occurs usually in more mesic sites. Neither M. breweri nor M. nanus has the distinct musky, sweet odor characteristic of M. clivicola (Lorain and Moseley 1989, Lorain and Moseley 1990).

Habitat

Diplacus clivicola occurs on bluffs and in vegetation openings, on disturbed slopes, and in well-developed loam soils from 500-2000 m in elevation (FNA 2019). This species is restricted to a very specific set of habitat parameters. Plants typically occur in open pockets of moist, exposed mineral soil created by natural disturbances (such as erosion, big-game activity, etc.) or human-caused disturbances (roadcuts, etc.). They are almost exclusively found on southern exposures (southeast, south, southwest) with steep slopes (generally > 60%) in microhabitats that hold moisture during the spring.

Differences in elevation, soils, and plant associations exist among the northern Idaho, north-central Idaho, and northeastern Oregon sites. Elevations range from 1600 to 4100 ft (mostly < 3600 ft) in northern Idaho, from 4200 to 5600 ft in west-central Idaho (with a single site extending to 7100 ft), and from 2500 to 5500 ft (mostly > 3500 ft) in northeastern Oregon. Soils range from deep, loose, decomposed granitics in northern Idaho, to deep to thin basaltics in west-central Idaho, to shallow, gravelly basaltics in northeastern Oregon (Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1991,1992).

Most Diplacus clivicola populations in northern Idaho occur in Douglas-fir/Idaho fescue (Pseudotsuga menziesii/Festuca idahoensis), Douglas-fir/ninebark (Pseudotsuga menziesii/Physocarpus malvaceus), and grand fir/ninebark (Abies grandis/Physocarpus malvaceus) habitat types (Cooper et al. 1987). The plant associates in these habitat types include Collomia linearis, Clarkia pulchella, Sedum lanceolatum, Pteridium aquilinum, Collinsia parviflora, Achillea millefolium, Agropyron spicatum, and Triodanis perfoliata. Clarkia pulchella and Collomia linearis are excellent indicators for identifying potential habitat (Lorain and Moseley 1989, Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1991,1992).

Most of the populations in west-central Idaho occur in a much drier sagebrush habitat type, the stiff sagebrush/Sandberg's bluegrass (Artemisia rigida/Poa secunda) habitat type (Tisdale 1986) with the following plant associates: Castilleja oresbia, Allium tolmiei var. persimile, Allium acuminatum, Lomatium dissectum, and Clarkia pulchella. Other populations were found in habitats similar to northern Idaho, Douglas-fir/mountain snowberry and Douglas-fir/ninebark habitat types with the following plant associates: Carex geyeri, Collinsia parviflora, Antennaria luzuloides, Collomia linearis, Potentilla glandulosa, Paeonia brownii, Amelanchier alnifolia, Spiraea betulifolia, and Penstemon payettensis (Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1991,1992).

Most populations in northeastern Oregon occur as part of the Cusick's camas seepage plant community type (Camassia cusickii) (Johnson and Simon 1987), which tends to occur beneath basalt rims where seepage water persists into early summer. Plant associates in this community type include Camassia cusickii, Allium acuminatum, Calochortus eurycarpus, Sedum stenopetalum, Collomia linearis, Bromus tectorum, Collinsia parviflora, Achillea millefolium, Agropyron spicatum, Eriogonum heracleoides, and Perideridia bolanderi. Annual Mimulus species such as M. nanus, M. breweri, M. floribundus and M. guttatus, were often found in this community type. Camassia cusickii was the best indicator for identifying potential habitat in northeastern Oregon (Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1991,1992).

Reproduction

Spring precipitation, availability of suitable microhabitat, and certain activities of big game animals seem to have high correlation with the germination and establishment of this species. Availability of spring moisture appears to be a necessary requirement. All known populations occur in moist microhabitats, such as seepages caused by perched water tables, areas where water channels following rain, or in big-game tracks that hold water. Although these sites may dry out later in the summer, they provide a moist substrate in the spring for seed germination and flowering (Lorain and Moseley 1989, Lorain and Moseley 1990, Lorain 1991,1992). Suitable microhabitat, patches of exposed mineral soil, which can result from natural causes such as erosion and the movements of big game or man-caused disturbances such as road-building, appears to be another necessary requirement. The movement of deer and elk not only create areas of exposed mineral soil and tracks that trap water, ideal conditions for germination and growth of the species, but also serve to disperse the seeds. Another aspect of big game activity which may be favoring the establishment of this species, is their grazing of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), a very competitive introduced winter annual. This may reduce competition for limited soil moisture on southern slopes, especially during droughty springs, and favor the establishment and growth of Diplacus clivicola (Lorain 1989).

Research on seed germination and early growth characteristics was conducted by researchers in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Montana (Pavek and Mitchell-Olds 1990). Seed germination required three weeks of stratification (moist, cool conditions of 100% humidity at approximately 40 degrees C). There was a high percentage of germination (no actual values given) occurring 12-19 days after the stratification period was complete. First flower buds developed at approximately 5 weeks, just after the second pair of leaves when the plants were only 0.5 inches tall.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferShrubland/chaparralCliff
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
IdahoS3Yes
MontanaS2Yes
OregonS3Yes
Plant Characteristics
DurationANNUAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
North Lochsa SlopeNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest117,662
References (28)
  1. Caicco, S. L. 1988. Field investigations of selected sensitive plant species on the Clearwater National Forest. Idaho Natural Heritage Program, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, Idaho. 21 pp. plus appendices.
  2. Caicco, S. L. 1989. Field investigations of selected sensitive plant species on the Nez Perce National Forest. 12 pp. plus appendices.
  3. Conservation Data Center. 1994. Rare, threatened, and endangered plants and animals of Idaho, third edition. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, Idaho.
  4. Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
  5. Cronquist, A. 1961. Mimulus. Pp. 337-350 in Hitchcock, C. L., A. Cronquist, M. Ownbey and J. W. Thompson. 1961. Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. Washington Press, Seattle, WA. 4 v.
  6. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2019. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 17: Magnoliophyta: Tetrachondraceae to Orobanchaceae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiv + 737 pp.
  7. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  8. Grant, A.L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 11 (2-3): 99-374.
  9. Greenman, J.M. 1899. Northwestern plants, chiefly from Oregon. Erythea 7(11): 115-120.
  10. Heller, A.A. 1904. Western species, new and old. II. Muhlenbergia 1(4): 47-62.
  11. Hitchcock, C.L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: An Illustrated Manual. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. 730 pp.
  12. iNaturalist. 2025. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2025).
  13. Johnson, Jr., C. G., and S. A. Simon. 1987. Plant associations of the Wallowa-Snake Province. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. R6-ECOL-TP-255A-86. 400+ pp.
  14. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  15. Lorain, C. and R.K. Mosely. 1990. Continued field investigations of Mimulus clivicola (bank monkeyflower). Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID.
  16. Lorain, C.C. 1991. Species management guide for Mimulus clivicola (bank monkeyflower) on the Clearwater and Nez Perce National Forest. Unpublished report on file at Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Conservation Data Center, Boise, Idaho. 16 pp. plus appendices.
  17. Lorain, C.C. 1992. Conservation strategy- Mimulus clivicola (bank monkeyflower). USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Missoula, MT. Unpublished report on file at Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Conservation Data Center, Boise, Idaho. 22 pp. plus appendices.
  18. Lorain, C.C. and R.K. Moseley. 1989. Field investigation of Mimulus clivicola (bank monkeyflower), a Region 1 Sensitive Species, on the Clearwater and Nez Perce National Forests. Challenge Cost Share report submitted to the Clearwater National Forest. Unpublished report on file at: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID. 15 pp. plus appendices.
  19. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  20. NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2024. Version: 1.1.1 (released Oct 01, 2024).
  21. Oregon Natural Heritage Program. 1993. Rare, threatened, and endangered plants and animals of Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Program. Portland, OR. 79 pp.
  22. Pavek, D., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1990. Personal communication to C.C. Lorain. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.
  23. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2025. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2025).
  24. Tisdale, E. W. 1986. Canyon grasslands and associated shrublands of west-central Idaho and adjacent areas. Bulletin No. 40. Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow. 42 pp.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1991. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Review of plant taxa for listing as endangered and threatened species: Notice of review. Federal Register 56: 58804-59936 (21 Nov 1991).
  26. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 1987. Ecosystem classification handbook FSH 12/87 R-1, Ch. 4- Ecodata sampling methods. USDA Forest Service, Regional Office, Northern Region, Missoula, MT.
  27. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 1991. Threatened, endangered and sensitive plants and animals. USDA Forest Service Manual, Chapter 2670. Washington, DC.
  28. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1994. Endangered, threatened and sensitive vascular plants of Washington. Dept. of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. 52 pp.