Carex nigromarginata

Schwein.

Black-edge Sedge

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.155682
Element CodePMCYP039B0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderCyperales
FamilyCyperaceae
GenusCarex
Synonyms
Carex nigromarginata var. nigromarginata
Other Common Names
black edge sedge (EN) Carex à marge noire (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
This record is for the treatment of Carex nigromarginata in the narrow sense, excluding var. floridana, which is treated as a distinct species, Carex floridana Schweinitz, by Weakley et al. (2025), Crins and Rettig in FNA (2002, vol. 23), and Kartesz (1994, 1999).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-07-21
Change Date1994-05-13
Edition Date1994-06-10
Edition AuthorsHengelfelt, J. (1994); S.L. Neid (1998).
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Carex nigromarginata is relatively common with hundreds of reported occurrences (in floras and in the literature) across a fairly large geographic range. The species tolerates and even requires moderate disturbance.
Range Extent Comments
A plant typical of the dry woods from Quebec and Ontario south along the Atlantic Coast and west to the Mississippi Valley; possibly disjunct to Saskatchewan.
Occurrences Comments
Carex nigromarginata is fairly common in southern states and along the Atlantic Coast, becoming less frequent inland. In Texas alon there are more than 100 sites. There are documented, extant populations on the edge of its range in Ontario (one), Illinois (one), Missouri (one), and West Virginia (four). In 16-17 Georgia counties, mostly in the northern part of the state (Allison 1994). Reznicek (1994) suspects that it might exist in the hill country of Louisiana. It is not considered rare and is not tracked in Ohio where it is widespread and common (sometimes in huge patches) and occurring in at least 10 counties (Cusick 1994).

There is only one location known in Canada, and it is very likely that it is the only one in existence there. No other site has been found in southern Ontario despite the many general botanical surveys made by knowledgeable botanists for land use planning (Catling 1994).

The species is known only from historic records in Connecticut (Bean et al. 1962, Fernald 1902) and New York, where there are records of six element occurrences (last of which was seen in the 1980's near Rochester). There are a few historical sites that have yet to be checked again (NY NHP 1994).

There are no known extant occurrences in Indiana (Homoya 1992). Any reports for the state are regarded as false, based on misidentification of specimens (Hellmich 1994).
Threat Impact Comments
Although this species does well in areas where there is minor disturbance in the canopy, such as treefalls, it will not tolerate clear-cutting (Gaddy 1994). Excessive light and exposure is not so much a problem to the individual plants, but the following succession of shurbs and herbaceous species that usually follows a clear-cut will crowd out Carex nigromarginata. In addition, it is uncertain whether the species' seedbanks will last long enough for the forest to mature and natural openings to be created to provide habitat once again. If clear-cutting is used and then is followed by prescribed burns, there may be some potential to maintain the Carex nigromarginata population (Reznicek 1994). Succession can be a threat for this species in overgrown forests that do not allow for edges and light openings. This is a potential threat in some protected nature reserves. A similar situation occurs in forests managed to well-stocked stands of commercial timber, a practice which basically eliminates biodiversity of the understory and the ability for Carex nigromarginata to survive. Small localized soil disturbances are beneficial; however, too much (e.g., that caused by bulldozing) is a threat (Gaddy 1994). On occasion, logging skidders seem to produce advantageous soil disturbance (Reznicek 1994). Threats to the species include anything that might impact the rhizosphere (e.g., excessive grazing) (Ladd 1994). All species in the section Montanae root poorly and can be easily pulled out. Grazing by sheep has the potential to be most harmful, followed by horses and cows. Native browsers such as deer are generally not as harmful (Reznicek 1994). The deer population in the Ontario site is high; however, C. nigromarginata is probably not as threatened as other understory species. Campers trample some of the dune areas but generally not in the older dune area where C. nigromarginata exists (Catling 1994). In Georgia, invasion of Japanese honeysuckle may be the greatest threat to the species (Allsion 1994).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Cusick (1992) describes Carex nigromarginata as "a beautiful sedge with brightly-colored scales of rich chestnut or purple with a green midrib".

The plants are perennial herbs, 4-12 in. tall, growing in dense tufts, often producing short branches which root. Each stem produces a single inflorescence. Principal leaf blades are very narrow. The flowers are unisexual. Staminate flowers occur on the end of the elongated flower structure, the pistillate below. Staminate flowers contain three small, slender, erect stamens which project beyond the petals when pollen is produced. There are 1-4 pistillate flowers (usually 2 or 3) up to .25 in. long, stemless, often crowded, and the lowest sometimes slightly separated but overlapping the next above. The small dry fruit does not open at maturity, is three-angled or nearly round, and contains 3 stigmas. (derived from Gleason 1952).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Carex nigromarginata is a distinct taxon. The plant remains mostly uniform in character and habitat throughout its range (Cusick 1994); however, the relative length of culm and blades, the shape and coloration of pistillate scales, the shape of staminate scales, and the size of the perigynia are variable. This has lead to the fabrication of varieties, subspecies, and species according to some authors (Gleason 1952).

Carex nigromarginata is a member of the section Montanae (Kunth) [Acrocystis Dumort.] and can be separated from similar species of this section in North America by the following characteristics: "The culms are shorter than the stiff blades and of varying lengths but concentrations of peduncled pistillate spikes at the very base of the plant are lacking; the leaf sheaths are strongly fibrillose with age and the plants are cespitose, without elongate stolons; the perigynia are quite large, mostly 3-4 mm in length with the body definitely longer than wide and are more or less concealed by dark purplish-margined scales approximately equal to the perigynia in length" (Reznicek and Catling 1982). In addition, the plant is a clump-former with no elongate rhizomes. It is a very earlier bloomer (Reznicek 1994).

Carex nigromarginata is also very similar to C. umbellata and C. abdita because of its partially hidden spikelets and its persistent and often tattered leaves. C. nigromarginata is distinguished by its much narrower perigynia (Mohlenbrock et al. 1962).

Habitat

Carex nigromarginata is thought to be a species of fire systems. It tends to occur in stable, resistant populations although the habitat and soil conditions are somewhat limited globally (Reznicek 1994). It is found on dry to mesic, acidic, sandy, or rocky substrates in deciduous (commonly oak/oak-hickory) woods edges, openings, oak savannas, road banks, etc., in the eastern United States. Less commonly, it is found associated with open coniferous habitats. Other dry woodland sedges, also of the section Montanae, are typically found with C. nigromarginata (Reznicek 1994). It is locally abundant in light gaps such as those created by windfalls and is easily established on patches of bare soil. Along the southern end of its range in the Appalachians, the habitat amplitude increases to include more mesophytic sites in deciduous forests, commonly on steep slopes where the soil is naturally disturbed by erosion and light is better able to reach the forest floor. In these situations, C. nigromarginata is the predominant understory species. Along the western end of its range, it is more likely to be found in forest openings with a fair amount of graminoids. (Cusick 1994, Reznicek 1994).

Habitat types are listed per state below. The information is accurate; however, it may not be comprehensive:

In Alabama, Carex nigromarginata is confined to the unglaciated Appalachian Plateau. It is locally common in oak-pine woods and on the tops of sandstone exposures (Cusick 1992). One collection was on a north-south ravine of sandy loam with Quercus alba, Liquidambar spp., Pinus spp., and Cornus florida (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Arkansas, J. H. Rettig made collections in 1986 from habitats including: dry, sandy soil and partial shade in sandhill vegetation of Quercus incana, Q. stellata and Pinus spp.; rocky slopes and shade above a river and road with Carpinus caroliniana, Pinus spp. and Cornus florida; and in a sandstone area with Pinus echinata, Quercus alba and Carya spp. A collection was also made in mesic slope habitat below a cliff in shale and sandstone soils with Quercus alba, Acer saccharinum, and Hamamelis sp. (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Connecticut, a 1901 historic collection was made on Lantern Hill, New London County "among rocks." This occurrence has not been relocated (Connecticut Natural Diversity Database 1994).

In Georgia, C. nigromarginata is generally found in dry rocky woods in partial shade (Allison 1994). Notes from collections that have been made include: a rocky woods near the summit of Graves Mountain, altitude 850 ft. (University of Minnesota Herbarium); on top of a sandstone formation; and in sandy loam soil at the edge of an opening in low woods of Carya, Pinus and Quercus nigra (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Illinois, Carex nigromarginata occurs on a wooded bluff with a steep slope in the Ozark Hill Prairie Research Natural Area (Illinois Natural Heritage Division 1994). A collection was made on a low, open, west-facing slope underlain with sandstone. This site "was almost certainly a savanna in the past" (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Kentucky, a collection was made from a rocky slope of a south-facing creek valley in young oak woods (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Massachusetts, a collection was made on an east-facing mountain slope in a woodland clearing (University of Minnesota Herbarium).

A Mississippi collection was made on the south side of Highway 82 on sandy loam soil with thick leaf litter under mixed hardwoods and pines (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Missouri, this species has been collected from the Ozarks and from acid soils on wooded sandstone slopes, in crevices on sandstone or chert outcrops, and on gravely wooded soils of Crowley Ridge (Steyermark 1963). It is also known from a site on a steep open hillside in nearly pure sand (Missouri Natural Heritage Database 1994). It is a species of savanna remnants and dry oak forests in openings. New populations are found with some regularity (Ladd 1994, Yatskievych 1994).

In Ohio, the species grows in very dry, well-drained upland white oak/Virginia pine woodlands in acidic (never basic) soil on sandstone ledges and cliffs (Cusick 1994).

A population on Long Point on the north shore of Lake Erie in Norfolk County, Ontario, is the only population confirmed from Canada (Catling 1994, Oldham 1994, Ontario Conservation Data Centre 1994, Reznicek and Catling 1982, Reznicek and Catling 1989). The old dune area is unique to this part of Canada and is strongly influenced by the moderating local climate of the lake. Catling (1994) believes that the most important environmental influence on this population is this climate. The plants are found in two sites. In the first site, they are frequent and locally dominant in the driest areas of sandy knolls in an open Quercus rubra and Acer rubrum woodland (Reznicek and Catling 1982, University of Michigan Herbarium). These areas receive a significant amount of light due to the presence of an open marsh and pools surrounding the small knolls and the absence of shrubs and saplings due to deer browsing. The rooting medium has a pH of 4.6 and includes an upper 2 cm of coarse sand mixed with much organic material. The substrate is almost pure sand at 5 cm depth and has a pH of 5.0. Dominant associates included the mosses Leucobryum albidum, Polytrichum ohioense, and Dicranum scoparium; a sparse cover of vascular plants including Carex artitecta, Danthonia spicata (Poverty Grass), Panicum linearifolium (Panic Grass), and Poa compressa (Canada bluegrass). Also included are Panicum latifolium, P. oligosanthes, Carex muhlenbergii, and C. pensylvanica. The second site is on low dunes in a sandy opening of a Betula papifera forest with lichens and Polytrichum sp. (Reznicek and Catling 1982, University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Pennsylvania, a collection was made on an open logging road in a mixed hardwood forest (University of Michigan Herbarium). It was also collected in dry fields and wooded slopes (University of Minnesota Herbarium).

In South Carolina, a collection was made from a dry, steep hardwood forest above a small stream (University of Michigan Herbarium) and on a bluff in a mixed hardwood forest (University of Minnesota Herbarium).

In Tennessee, collections were made from dry cherty ridgetop forests dominated by Quercus prinus. Two mesic woods locations are also worth noting. (University of Michigan Herbarium).

In Virginia, a collection was made on a north-northwest facing roadbank with Fagus grandifolius, Liriodendron, Quercus falcata, and Liquidambar (University of Michigan Herbarium) and in a dry pine and oak woods.

In West Virginia, a collection was made on a dry, rocky road bank (University of Michigan Herbarium). Other locations include a sandstone cliff; an oak-hemlock slope; a dry rocky road bank; an open, dry woodland area; and a dry ridge top between a meander of Sugar Creek (West Virginia Natural Heritage Program 1992).

In the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, this species is scarce (P1). Although it has been known to occur in rich woods at low elevations, a specimen was collected recently from a post-fire dry woods (Rock 1994). Radford (1968) also describes this as a dry woods species.

Ecology

Carex nigromarginata does not compete well with other herbaceous species (Gaddy 1994). It is a seed banking species that does well in bare soil and areas where the soil is disturbed, such as on soil tip mounds, ant hills, logging roads, road banks, and burned areas (Reznicek 1994).

Pre-existing and seeded plants tend to be almost weedy in areas with new openings in the canopy (e.g., under new windfalls), then will persist as succession shades them into less productive populations (Gaddy 1994). Phenology: The black-edged sedge is one of the few Carices to produce evergreen or overwintering leaves. Evergreen leaves allow growth to continue in late autumn after tree leaf fall has occurred and prior to leaf flourishing in the spring. Early growth in the spring allows these plants to out-compete neighboring plants by producing large clumps before other vegetation has the chance to begin growth for the year. Flowering and fruiting occur very early for this species. In South Carolina, it flowers in late March and early April and fruits soon after (Gaddy 1986, Gaddy 1994, Radford et al. 1968). In New York, this species flowers through May and fruits in early June (New York Natural Heritage Program 1994).

Dispersal: Carex nigromarginata was demonstrated to be regularly, but perhaps not solely, dispersed by ants in the southern Appalachians of South Carolina (Gaddy 1986). Fresh Carex nigromarginata diaspores were presented to two ant species, Crematogaster lineolata and Prenolepis impairis. In 100% of all encounters with the diaspores, both species of ants transported the diaspores more than ten centimeters. This high rate may be explained by the relatively large white elaiosomes, swellings near the base of the perigynia present on the diaspores. The ants typically move these seeds into disturbed areas such as soil piles caused by treefalls or onto areas where soil sloughs off of tree bases.

Reproduction: A plant can clone outward and sustain a population theoretically "forever" under optimum conditions, eliminated only by a change of habitat. What sometimes appears to be a large population of 20-30 clumps may in reality be a single clone, the central vegetative material simply decayed away over time. The species can produce a seedbank that lasts at least decades and questionably for centuries (Reznicek 1994). It is also evident that sexual reproduction occurs in a population; the tussocks are generally of varying sizes (Cusick 1994). Chromosome number: 2n = 34, n=17 (Smith 1988).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN1
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS1Yes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
IllinoisS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
South CarolinaS5Yes
MissouriS4Yes
WisconsinSNRYes
New JerseyS5Yes
MississippiS5Yes
LouisianaSNRYes
New YorkS3Yes
TexasSNRYes
West VirginiaS3Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
DelawareS5Yes
OhioSNRYes
FloridaSNRYes
MarylandSNRYes
TennesseeSNRYes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
ArkansasS5Yes
ConnecticutSHYes
GeorgiaSNRYes
AlabamaSNRYes
North CarolinaS3Yes
KentuckyS4Yes
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Alabama (1)
AreaForestAcres
Oakey MountainTalladega National Forest6,129
References (41)
  1. Allison, J. 1994. Botanist, Georgia Natural Heritage Inventory. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 1 p.
  2. Argus, G.W., and K.M. Pryer. 1990. Rare vascular plants in Canada. Our natural heritage. Canadian Museum Nature, Ottawa. 191 pp. + maps.
  3. Argus, G.W., K.M. Pryer, D.J. White, and C.J. Keddy. 1982-1987. Atlas of the Rare Vascular Plants of Ontario. Parts 1-4. Botany Divison, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario.
  4. Bean, R.C., A.F. Hill, and R.J. Eaton. 1962. Fifteenth report of the Committee on Plant Distribution. Rhodora 64:168-179.
  5. Catling, P. 1994. Botanist, Agriculture Canada, Biological Research Division, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 1 p.
  6. Correll, D.S. and M.C. Johnston. 1970. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, TX.
  7. Cusick, A. 1992. Carex Section Acrocystis (Cyperaceae) in Ohio. Michigan Botanist 31: 99-108.
  8. Cusick, A. Botanist. Ohio Natural Heritage Program. Personal communication with W.Watson, MRO-TNC, January 1994.
  9. Cusick, A.W. 1994. Chief Botanist, Ohio Natural Heritage Program. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 2 pp.
  10. Fernald, M.L. 1902. Preliminary lists of New England plants - X. CAREX. Rhodora 4:218-230.
  11. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002b. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 23. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiv + 608 pp.
  12. Gaddy, L.L. 1986. Twelve new ant-dispersed species from the southern Appalachians. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 113: 247-251.
  13. Gaddy, L.L. Consulting Biologist, Walhalla, South Carolina. Personal communication with J. Hengelfelt, MRO, June 1994.
  14. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 910 pp.
  15. Hellmich, R. 1994. Data Manager, Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 1 p.
  16. Homoya, M. 1992. Ecologist/Botanist, Indiana Natural Heritage Data Center. Personal communication with M. Penskar, Michigan Natural Features Inventory: ESA questionnaire for CAREX NIGROMARGINATA. 4 pp.
  17. Jones, S. 1994. Department of Range Sciences, Texas A & M University. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 2 pp.
  18. Jones, S. B., Jr., and N. C. Coile. 1988. The distribution of the vascular flora of Georgia. Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens.
  19. Jones, S. S.M. Tracy Herbarium, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Personal communication with W.Ostilie, Jan. 1994.
  20. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  21. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  22. Ladd, D. 1994. Director of Science and Stewardship, Missouri Field Office, The Nature Conservancy. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 1 p.
  23. Mohlenbrock, R.H. 1986. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
  24. Mohlenbrock, R., Ozment, and Folkerts. 1962. Additions to the Flora of Illinois. Rhodora 64:356-357.
  25. Oldham, M. 1994. Botanist, Ontario Conservation Data Centre. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Letter. 2 pp.
  26. Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1964. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  27. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
  28. Rettig, J.H. 1990. Achene micromorphology of the Carex nigromarinata complex (section Acrocystis, Cyperaceae). Rhodora 92: 70-79.
  29. Rettig, J.H. 1994. Biology Department, College of the Ozarks. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 2 pp.
  30. Rettig, J.H., and D.E. Giannasi. 1990. Foliar flavonoids of the <i>Carex nigromarginata</i> complex (Sect. Acrocystis, Cyperaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 18(6):393-397.
  31. Reznicek, A.A. 1990 Four new species of Carex (Cyperaceae) from Mexico, with note on the Mexican Carex flora. Contr. Univ. Mich. Herb. 17: 279-293.
  32. Reznicek, A.A. 1994. Botanist, Michigan University Herbarium. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy: Telephone conversation notes. 4 pp.
  33. Reznicek, A.A. and P.M. Catling. 1982. Cyperaceae new to Canad from Long Point, Morfolk County. Can. Field Nat. 96: 184-188.
  34. Reznicek, A.A. and P.M. Catling. 1989. Flora of Long Point, regional municipality of Halimand-Norfolk, Ontario. Mich. Bot. 28(3): 99-175.
  35. Rhoads, A.F., and W. Klein. 1993. Atlas of the Flora of Pennsylvania: An Annotated Checklist. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA.
  36. Rock, J. 1994. Botanist, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy. Letter. 2 pp.
  37. Smith, E. B. 1988b. An atlas and annotated list of the vascular plants of Arkansas, 2nd edition. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
  38. Smith, E.B. 1988b. An atlas and annotated list of the vascular plants of Arkansas. Second edition. Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. 489 pp.
  39. Steyermark, J.A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 1728 pp.
  40. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2025. Flora of the southeastern United States Web App. Edition of February 18, 2025. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Online. Available: https://fsus.ncbg.unc.edu (accessed 2025).
  41. Yatskievych, George. 1994. Botanist, Missouri Botanical Gardens, Missouri State Conservation Department. Personal communication with Jennifer Hengelfelt, Midwestern Regional Office, The Nature Conservancy. Telephone conversation notes. 3 pp.