Ambystoma laterale

Hallowell, 1856

Blue-spotted Salamander

G5Secure Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by gamfeld, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
gamfeld, CC0 1.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by daksu, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
daksu, CC BY 4.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by erinsuzanne, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
erinsuzanne, CC0 1.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by daksu, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
daksu, CC BY 4.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by gamfeld, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
gamfeld, CC0 1.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102149
Element CodeAAAAA01060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyAmbystomatidae
GenusAmbystoma
Other Common Names
blue-spotted salamander (EN) Salamandre à points bleus (FR)
Concept Reference
Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Ambystoma jeffersonianum and A. laterale comprise a complex that includes pure bisexual diploid populations and populations that may be represented by bisexual diploid individuals, female hybrids with several different combinations of parental chromosomes (including diploids, triploids, tetraploids, and pentaploids), and/or rare male hybrids. Up to at least five different chromosomal combinations have been found at a single site.

In response to the nomenclatural difficulties presented by this complex, an informal system of indicating ploidy and chromosomal makeup has been recommended (Bogart and Klemens 1997). For example, the "LLLJ" designation (or "A. (3) laterale-jeffersonianum") indicates a tetraploid salamander with three sets of laterale chromosomes and one set of jeffersonianum chromosomes. For convenience, all populations including pure laterale (LL) and laterale-dominated genomes (e.g., LLJ) might be included in the species A. laterale (e.g., Klemens 1993).

However, biological complexities confound such a simple treatment. Polyploid hybrid individuals in the complex may produce offspring with diverse chromosomal makeup. For example, an LLJ female can produce offspring that do not have laterale-dominated genomes (e.g., LJJ). And single clutches have been documented with both diploid and triploid embryos. It is even possible for a triploid hybrid to produce pure diploid offspring (e.g., LL or JJ).

Truly intermediate hybrids with equal chromosomal representation (i.e., LJ, LLJJ) are uncommon and are but two of many possible outcomes of hybridization. In New England and New York, hybrids are more common than are the bisexual species, but bisexuals usually (or are presumed to) exist in low numbers in populations composed mostly of hybrids (Bogart and Klemens 1997). Thus, for example, a pond with triploid LLJ should also have at least some LL.

Hybrid populations are maintained by breeding between a hybrid female and a male of one of the diploid bisexual species, and the hybrid offspring are the result of gynogenetic or hybridogenetic reproduction (Bogart and Klemens 1997). In gynogenetic reproduction, male sperm stimulates egg development, but the male genome is not incorporated into the zygote. In hybridogenetic reproduction, the male genome is incorporated, "but upon maturity of the offspring, the paternal genome is eliminated in a meiotic or pre-meiotic event while the rest of the hybrid's genome is passed on to future generations, usually in an altered state" (Bogart and Klemens 1997).

Thus, recent work on hybrid phenomena in these salamanders indicates that the species names "A. platineum" (= LJJ) or "A. tremblayi" (= LLJ) formerly used for the A. jeffersonianum-A. laterale hybrids are inappropriate because LJJ and LLJ are not strictly gynogenetic triploid lineages. Consequently, a recent checklist (Crother et al. 2000) did not recognize either A. platineum or A. tremblayi as valid species.

To accommodate the genetic variation in these salamanders (and the often uncertain genetic composition of particular populations), we have established for this database the following elements: (1) Ambystoma jeffersonianum (Jefferson Salamander), used for pure populations only; (2) Ambystoma laterale (Blue-spotted salamander), used for pure populations only; (3) Ambystoma hybrid pop. 1 (jeffersonianum x laterale; jeffersonianum genome dominates), used for hybrid populations dominated by the jeffersonianum genome (e.g., populations that include mainly LJJ individuals); this element includes "Ambystoma platineum"; (4) Ambystoma hybrid pop. 2 (jeffersonianum x laterale; laterale genome dominates), used for hybrid populations dominated by the laterale genome (e.g., populations that include mainly LLJ individuals); this element includes "Ambystoma tremblayi"; (5) Ambystoma pop. 3 (jeffersonianum/laterale complex - uncertain composition), used for populations for which chromosomal representation is unknown. If needed we could establish additional elements for hybrid populations that involve A. laterale, A. texanum, and/or A. tigrinum.

See Kraus (1985), Bogart and Licht (1987), Bogart et al. (1987), Kraus et al. (1991), Lowcock et al. (1991), and Bogart and Klemens (1997) for information on the involvement of A. jeffersonianum in hybridization with A. texanum, A. tigrinum, and/or A. laterale. See Lowcock et al. (1987) and Bogart and Klemens (1997) for discussions of nomenclatural treatment of hybrid populations.

See Kraus (1988), Shaffer et al. (1991), and Jones et al. (1993) for phylogenetic analyses of North American Ambystoma.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-06-05
Change Date2001-12-14
Edition Date2011-05-02
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Range Extent Comments
Southeastern Quebec to Lake Winnipeg, south through Great Lakes region and New England to northern Indiana and New Jersey. Several apparently disjunct populations occur around the periphery of the range (e.g., see Brownlie [1988] for Nova Scotia record). Hybridizes with A. jeffersonianum over a large area south of this range. See Nyman et al. (1988) for distribution in New Jersey.
Occurrences Comments
Number of occurrences of pure A. laterale is uncertain, but there are many.
Threat Impact Comments
Biggest threat is loss and degradation of habitat as a result of coversion to agricultural and urban use. Roads negatively impact salamander abundance in roadside habitat (deMaynadier and Hunter 2000). Increased acid deposition is a potential threat.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

In New England and New Jersey, generally associated with lowland swamps and marshes and surrounding uplands with sandy or loamy soils (Nyman et al. 1988, Klemens 1993). in overgrown pastures. Adults usually under are objects or underground. Eggs are attached to submerged sticks or bottom of shallow forest ponds and pools. At Isle Royale, Michigan, breeds in splash pools on exposed rocky shorelines (Van Buskirk and Smith 1991). In northern Minnesota, successful reproduction in acidic bog water either does not occur or is a rare event (Karns 1992).

Ecology

See Van Buskirk and Smith (1991) for evidence of density-dependent population regulation in a population at Isle Royale, Michigan (increasing larval density in breeding pools resulted in reduced survival and growth, probably due to interference).

Reproduction

In most areas, eggs are laid in March-April (early May at Isle Royale, Michigan), singly or in clusters of up to about 35; up to 500 eggs per female. Metamorphosis late June through August, or larvae may overwinter. Aggregates when breeding.

Hybrid offspring are the result of gynogenetic or hybridogenetic reproduction (Bogart and Klemens 1997).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - Mixed
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MinnesotaS5Yes
VermontS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
New JerseyS1Yes
OhioS1Yes
MichiganS4Yes
IllinoisS3Yes
MaineS4Yes
IowaS1Yes
ConnecticutS1Yes
WisconsinS4Yes
MassachusettsS3Yes
New YorkS3Yes
New HampshireS3Yes
IndianaS2Yes
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
LabradorS3Yes
OntarioS4Yes
QuebecS5Yes
Prince Edward IslandS4Yes
Nova ScotiaS5Yes
ManitobaS3Yes
New BrunswickS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionModerate - low
9.5 - Air-borne pollutantsModerate - low

Roadless Areas (4)
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Hegman LakesSuperior National Forest675
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Wisconsin (2)
AreaForestAcres
09011 - Flynn Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5,951
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest3,707
References (37)
  1. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  2. Bogart, J.P. and L.E. Licht. 1987. Evidence for the requirement of sperm in unisexual salamander hybrids (genus <i>Ambystoma</i>). Canadian Field-Naturalist. 101:434-436.
  3. Bogart, J.P. and M.W. Klemens. 1997. Hybrids and genetic interactions of mole salamanders (<i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> and <i>A. laterale</i>) (Amphibia: Caudata) in New York and New England. American Museum Novitates (3218):1-78.
  4. Bogart, J.P., Lowcock, L.A., Zeyl, C.W. and Mable, B.K. 1987. Genome constitution and reproductive biology of hybrid salamanders, genus <i>Ambystoma</i>, on Kelleys Island in Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 65:2188-2201.
  5. Brownlie, J. 1988. A disjunct population of the blue-spotted salamander, AMBYSTOMA LATERALE, in southwestern Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Nat. 102:263-264.
  6. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  7. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  8. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  9. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983a. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
  10. deMaynadier, P. G., and M. L. Hunter, Jr. 2000. Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape. Natural Areas Journal 20:56-65.
  11. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  12. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  13. Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.
  14. Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.
  15. Hulse, A. C., C. J. McCoy, and E. Censky. 2001. Amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 419 pp.
  16. Jones, T. R., A. G. Kluge, and A. J. Wolf. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Biology 42:92-102.
  17. Karns, D. R. 1992. Effects of acidic bog habitats on amphibian reproduction in a northern Minnesota peatland. J. Herpetol. 26:401-412.
  18. Klemens, M. W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Bulletin 112. xii + 318 pp.
  19. Krapu, G.L., G.C. Iverson, K.J. Reinecke and C.M. Boise. 1985. Fat deposition and usage by arctic-nesting sandhill cranes during spring. Auk. 102:362-368.
  20. Kraus, F. 1985a. A new unisexual salamander from Ohio. Univ. Michigan Mus. Zool., Occas. Pap. 709:1-24.
  21. Kraus, F. 1985b. Unisexual salamander lineages in northwestern Ohio and southeastern Michigan: a study of the consequences of hybridization. Copeia 1985:309-324.
  22. Kraus, F. 1988. An empirical evaluation of the use of the ontogeny polarization criterion in phylogenetic inference. Systematic Zoology 37:106-141.
  23. Kraus, F. 1991. Intra-individual ploidy consistency among unisexual <i>Ambystoma</i>. Copeia 1991:38-43.
  24. Kraus, F., P.K. Ducey, P. Moler,. and M.M. Miyamoto. 1991. Two new triparental unisexual <i>Ambystoma</i> from Ohio and Michigan. Herpetologica. 47:429-439.
  25. Lowcock, L. A., H. Griffith, and R. W. Murphy. 1991. The <i>Ambystoma laterale-jeffersonianum</i> complex in central Ontario: ploidy structure, sex ratio, and breeding dynamics in a bisexual-unisexual community. Copeia 1991:87-105.
  26. Lowcock, L. A., L. E. Licht, and J. P. Bogart. 1987. Nomenclature in hybrid complexes of <i>Ambystoma</i> (Urodela: Ambystomatidae): no case for the erection of hybrid "species." Syst. Zool. 36:328-336.
  27. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  28. Minton, S. A., Jr. 2001. Amphibians & reptiles of Indiana. Revised second edition. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis. xiv + 404 pp.
  29. Nyman, S., M. J. Ryan, and J. D. Anderson. 1988. The distribution of the AMBYSTOMA JEFFERSONIANUM complex in New Jersey. Journal of Herpetology 22:224-228.
  30. Petranka, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  31. Phillips, C. A., R. A. Brandon, and E. O. Moll. 1999. Field guide to amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 8. xv + 282 pp.
  32. Shaffer, H. B., J. M. Clark, and F. Kraus. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 40:284-303.
  33. Smith, P. W. 1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey 28(1):1-298.
  34. Uzzell, Thomas M. 1964. Relations of the diploid and triploid species of <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> complex (Amphibia: Caudata). Copeia 1964(2):257-300.
  35. Uzzell, T.M. Jr. 1967a. <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 47:1-2.
  36. Van Buskirk, J., and D. C. Smith. 1991. Density-dependent population regulation in a salamander. Ecology 72:1747-1756.
  37. Vogt, R. C. 1981c. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.