Ambystoma laterale

Hallowell, 1856

Blue-spotted Salamander

G5Secure Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by gamfeld, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
gamfeld, CC0 1.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by daksu, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
daksu, CC BY 4.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by erinsuzanne, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
erinsuzanne, CC0 1.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by daksu, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
daksu, CC BY 4.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by gamfeld, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
gamfeld, CC0 1.0
Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale). Photo by Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Ethan Rose, CC BY 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102149
Element CodeAAAAA01060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderCaudata
FamilyAmbystomatidae
GenusAmbystoma
Other Common Names
blue-spotted salamander (EN) Salamandre à points bleus (FR)
Concept Reference
Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Ambystoma jeffersonianum and A. laterale comprise a complex that includes pure bisexual diploid populations and populations that may be represented by bisexual diploid individuals, female hybrids with several different combinations of parental chromosomes (including diploids, triploids, tetraploids, and pentaploids), and/or rare male hybrids. Up to at least five different chromosomal combinations have been found at a single site. Bogart (2019) discussed the biological and taxonomic history of the unisexual Ambystoma, concluding that “none of the various unisexual salamanders can be considered a distinct species.” Raffaëlli (2022) recognized A. platineum for the asexual forms, but most recent workers have not. See also Dubois and Rafaëlli (2012).

To accommodate the genetic variation in these salamanders (and the often uncertain genetic composition of particular populations), we have established for this database the following elements: (1) Ambystoma jeffersonianum (Jefferson Salamander), used for pure populations only; (2) Ambystoma laterale (Blue-spotted salamander), used for pure populations only; (3) Ambystoma hybrid pop. 1 (jeffersonianum x laterale; jeffersonianum genome dominates), used for hybrid populations dominated by the jeffersonianum genome (e.g., populations that include mainly LJJ individuals); this element includes "Ambystoma platineum"; (4) Ambystoma hybrid pop. 2 (jeffersonianum x laterale; laterale genome dominates), used for hybrid populations dominated by the laterale genome (e.g., populations that include mainly LLJ individuals); this element includes "Ambystoma tremblayi"; (5) Ambystoma pop. 3 (jeffersonianum/laterale complex - uncertain composition), used for populations for which chromosomal representation is unknown. If needed we could establish additional elements for hybrid populations that involve A. laterale, A. texanum, and/or A. tigrinum.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-06-05
Change Date2001-12-14
Edition Date2011-05-02
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Range Extent Comments
Southeastern Quebec to Lake Winnipeg, south through Great Lakes region and New England to northern Indiana and New Jersey. Several apparently disjunct populations occur around the periphery of the range (e.g., see Brownlie [1988] for Nova Scotia record). Hybridizes with A. jeffersonianum over a large area south of this range. See Nyman et al. (1988) for distribution in New Jersey.
Occurrences Comments
Number of occurrences of pure A. laterale is uncertain, but there are many.
Threat Impact Comments
Biggest threat is loss and degradation of habitat as a result of coversion to agricultural and urban use. Roads negatively impact salamander abundance in roadside habitat (deMaynadier and Hunter 2000). Increased acid deposition is a potential threat.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

In New England and New Jersey, generally associated with lowland swamps and marshes and surrounding uplands with sandy or loamy soils (Nyman et al. 1988, Klemens 1993). in overgrown pastures. Adults usually under are objects or underground. Eggs are attached to submerged sticks or bottom of shallow forest ponds and pools. At Isle Royale, Michigan, breeds in splash pools on exposed rocky shorelines (Van Buskirk and Smith 1991). In northern Minnesota, successful reproduction in acidic bog water either does not occur or is a rare event (Karns 1992).

Ecology

See Van Buskirk and Smith (1991) for evidence of density-dependent population regulation in a population at Isle Royale, Michigan (increasing larval density in breeding pools resulted in reduced survival and growth, probably due to interference).

Reproduction

In most areas, eggs are laid in March-April (early May at Isle Royale, Michigan), singly or in clusters of up to about 35; up to 500 eggs per female. Metamorphosis late June through August, or larvae may overwinter. Aggregates when breeding.

Hybrid offspring are the result of gynogenetic or hybridogenetic reproduction (Bogart and Klemens 1997).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - Mixed
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLSCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
LabradorS3Yes
New BrunswickS4Yes
ManitobaS3Yes
Nova ScotiaS5Yes
QuebecS5Yes
OntarioS4Yes
Prince Edward IslandS4Yes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MinnesotaS5Yes
OhioS1Yes
New YorkS3Yes
New HampshireS3Yes
MassachusettsS3Yes
VermontS3Yes
WisconsinS4Yes
IllinoisS3Yes
IowaS1Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
MaineS4Yes
MichiganS4Yes
IndianaS2Yes
ConnecticutS1Yes
New JerseyS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionModerate - low
9.5 - Air-borne pollutantsModerate - low

Roadless Areas (4)
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Hegman LakesSuperior National Forest675
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Wisconsin (2)
AreaForestAcres
09011 - Flynn Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5,951
09012 - Round Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest3,707
References (41)
  1. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  2. Bogart, J. P. 2019. Unisexual salamanders in the genus <i>Ambystoma</i>. Herpetologica 75(4):259-267.
  3. Bogart, J.P. and L.E. Licht. 1987. Evidence for the requirement of sperm in unisexual salamander hybrids (genus <i>Ambystoma</i>). Canadian Field-Naturalist. 101:434-436.
  4. Bogart, J.P. and M.W. Klemens. 1997. Hybrids and genetic interactions of mole salamanders (<i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> and <i>A. laterale</i>) (Amphibia: Caudata) in New York and New England. American Museum Novitates (3218):1-78.
  5. Bogart, J.P., Lowcock, L.A., Zeyl, C.W. and Mable, B.K. 1987. Genome constitution and reproductive biology of hybrid salamanders, genus <i>Ambystoma</i>, on Kelleys Island in Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 65:2188-2201.
  6. Brownlie, J. 1988. A disjunct population of the blue-spotted salamander, AMBYSTOMA LATERALE, in southwestern Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Nat. 102:263-264.
  7. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  8. Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
  9. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  10. DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983a. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
  11. deMaynadier, P. G., and M. L. Hunter, Jr. 2000. Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape. Natural Areas Journal 20:56-65.
  12. DuBois, A., and J. Raffaëlli. 2012. A new ergotaxonomy of the order Urodela Duméril, 1805 (Amphibia, Batrachia). Alytes. Paris 28:77–161.
  13. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  14. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  15. Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.
  16. Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.
  17. Hulse, A. C., C. J. McCoy, and E. Censky. 2001. Amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 419 pp.
  18. Jones, T. R., A. G. Kluge, and A. J. Wolf. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Biology 42:92-102.
  19. Karns, D. R. 1992. Effects of acidic bog habitats on amphibian reproduction in a northern Minnesota peatland. J. Herpetol. 26:401-412.
  20. Klemens, M. W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Bulletin 112. xii + 318 pp.
  21. Krapu, G.L., G.C. Iverson, K.J. Reinecke and C.M. Boise. 1985. Fat deposition and usage by arctic-nesting sandhill cranes during spring. Auk. 102:362-368.
  22. Kraus, F. 1985a. A new unisexual salamander from Ohio. Univ. Michigan Mus. Zool., Occas. Pap. 709:1-24.
  23. Kraus, F. 1985b. Unisexual salamander lineages in northwestern Ohio and southeastern Michigan: a study of the consequences of hybridization. Copeia 1985:309-324.
  24. Kraus, F. 1988. An empirical evaluation of the use of the ontogeny polarization criterion in phylogenetic inference. Systematic Zoology 37:106-141.
  25. Kraus, F. 1991. Intra-individual ploidy consistency among unisexual <i>Ambystoma</i>. Copeia 1991:38-43.
  26. Kraus, F., P.K. Ducey, P. Moler,. and M.M. Miyamoto. 1991. Two new triparental unisexual <i>Ambystoma</i> from Ohio and Michigan. Herpetologica. 47:429-439.
  27. Lowcock, L. A., H. Griffith, and R. W. Murphy. 1991. The <i>Ambystoma laterale-jeffersonianum</i> complex in central Ontario: ploidy structure, sex ratio, and breeding dynamics in a bisexual-unisexual community. Copeia 1991:87-105.
  28. Lowcock, L. A., L. E. Licht, and J. P. Bogart. 1987. Nomenclature in hybrid complexes of <i>Ambystoma</i> (Urodela: Ambystomatidae): no case for the erection of hybrid "species." Syst. Zool. 36:328-336.
  29. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  30. Minton, S. A., Jr. 2001. Amphibians & reptiles of Indiana. Revised second edition. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis. xiv + 404 pp.
  31. Nicholson, K. E. (ed.). 2025. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. Ninth Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 87 pp. Online database available at: https://cnah.org/SSARnames.aspx
  32. Nyman, S., M. J. Ryan, and J. D. Anderson. 1988. The distribution of the AMBYSTOMA JEFFERSONIANUM complex in New Jersey. Journal of Herpetology 22:224-228.
  33. Petranka, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  34. Phillips, C. A., R. A. Brandon, and E. O. Moll. 1999. Field guide to amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 8. xv + 282 pp.
  35. Raffaëlli, J. 2022. Salamanders & newts of the world. 3rd Edition. Penclen Edition. 1100 pp.
  36. Shaffer, H. B., J. M. Clark, and F. Kraus. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 40:284-303.
  37. Smith, P. W. 1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey 28(1):1-298.
  38. Uzzell, Thomas M. 1964. Relations of the diploid and triploid species of <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i> complex (Amphibia: Caudata). Copeia 1964(2):257-300.
  39. Uzzell, T.M. Jr. 1967a. <i>Ambystoma jeffersonianum</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 47:1-2.
  40. Van Buskirk, J., and D. C. Smith. 1991. Density-dependent population regulation in a salamander. Ecology 72:1747-1756.
  41. Vogt, R. C. 1981c. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.