Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.106326
Element CodeARADB02020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusCarphophis
SynonymsCarphophis amoenus vermis(Kennicott, 1859)
Other Common NamesWestern Worm Snake (EN)
Concept ReferenceClark, D. R., Jr. 1968. A proposal of specific status for the western worm snake, Carphophis amoenus vermis (Kennicott). Herpetologica 24:104-112.
Taxonomic CommentsClark (1968) proposed that C. vermis and C. amoenus be recognized as distinct species. Rossman (1973) cited intergrade populations as evidence that amoenus and vermis are conspecific. Separate species status was proposed by Collins (1991), but no supporting data were presented. Ernst et al. (2003) also treated amoenus and vermis as distinct species without refuting or mentioning Rossman's conclusion; they distinguished the taxa using differences in coloration. Crother (2017) follow Clark (1968) but anticipate results from molecular studies to better understand population structure and gene flow among allopatric lineages.
Conservation Status
Review Date2006-08-30
Change Date1996-10-31
Edition Date2005-09-09
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Range Extent CommentsThe range includes southeastern Nebraska, southern Iowa, western Illinois, eastern Kansas (Collins 1993), Missouri (Johnson 2000), eastern Oklahoma, Arkansas (Trauth et al. 2004), northern Louisiana (Dundee and Rossman 1989), and northeastern Texas (Werler and Dixon 2000), with an isolated population in southwestern Wisconsin (Vogt 1981); populations in northeastern Louisiana and adjacent southeastern Arkansas appear to be isolated from the main range (Ernst et al. 2003). Range is west of the Mississippi River except in Illinois and Wisconsin.
Occurrences CommentsThis species is represented by a large number of occurrences or subpopulations (100s) (e.g., see maps in Ernst et al. 2003 and Trauth et al. 2004).
Threat Impact CommentsTrauth et al. (2004) suggested that some populations in northern Arkansas may be detrimentally affected by alteration of forest floor habitat (removal of rocks for rock gardens), but they stated that the species is not endangered or threatened in Arkansas. Overall, this snake is not significantly threatened.