Acipenser transmontanus

Richardson, 1836

White Sturgeon

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
PSESA Status
HighThreat Impact
White sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100679
Element CodeAFCAA01050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderAcipenseriformes
FamilyAcipenseridae
GenusAcipenser
USESAPS
COSEWICPS:E,T
Synonyms
Sinosturio transmontanus(Richardson, 1836)
Other Common Names
Esturgeon blanc (FR)
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Gene sequencing data of Birstein and DeSalle (1998) indicate that there are least three main clades within Acipenser: A. sturio-A. oxyrinchus, A. schrenckii-A. transmontanus, and all Ponto-Caspian species plus A. dabrysnus and A. brevirostrum.

Krieger et al. (2000) examined phylogenetic relationships of North American sturgeons based on mtDNA sequences and found that (1) nucleotide sequences for all four examined genes for the three Scaphirhynchus species were identical; (2) the two Acipenser oxyrinchus subspecies were very similar in sequence; (3) A. transmontanus and A. medirostris were sister taxa, as were A. fulvescens and A. brevirostrum (in contrast to Birstein and DeSalle 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-03-18
Change Date2024-03-18
Edition Date2024-03-26
Edition AuthorsHunting, K.
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 80
Rank Reasons
This species has a large range along the eastern Pacific Ocean and uses the ocean environment during migration and other parts of its life cycle. This species is managed for harvest and conservation purposes. Several threats, all of which are on-going, have reduced populations in some areas while populations are stable in others. Dams and other passage barriers continue to limit the riverine and estuarine habitat distribution of this species along the North American west coast.
Range Extent Comments
This species inhabits fresh water riverine and estuarian waters from the Gulf of Alaska south to about Ensenada, Mexico and spawns in estuaries and other suitable habitat associated with major coastal rivers. This species may occur in landlocked populations spawning in river bottoms and freshwater estuaries or utilize the open western Pacific Ocean for accessing coastal estuaries. Spawning has been documented in the Fraser, Kootenay, and Upper Columbia Rivers (British Columbia, Canada), the Lower Columbia River (Washington and Oregon, USA) and Willamette River, (Oregon; pers. com., L. Heironimus 2024), the Kootenai River Basin (Idaho and Montana, USA), and the Sacramento, Feather, and occasionally San Joaquin Rivers (California, USA) (Moyle et al 2015). Current spawning is thought to be limited to the Fraser, Columbia, and Sacramento-San Joaquin River Systems (COSEWIC 2013, Dubois et al 2011). Using the Hammerson and Master (2009) method for determining Range Extent for freshwater and anadromous fish, this species likely occupies over 1,000,000 square kilometers in over 100 HUC 8 watersheds. Natureserve recognizes and maintains records for 6 populations of this species as defined by COSEWIC and the USFWS for conservation purposes. These populations are used for management and do not necessarily reflect genetic units. They are: Kootenai River in Idaho and Montana, USA (Pop 1; USFWS 1994), and the Upper Columbia River (Pop 2; COSEWIC 2013), the Nechako River (Pop 3; COSEWIC 2013), the Lower Fraser River (Pop 4; COSEWIC 2013), the Upper Fraser River (Pop 5; COSEWIC 2013), and Middle Fraser River (Pop 6; COSEWIC 2013), Canada. The other portions of the species' range (e.g., in California and Oregon) are not currently designated by US or Canadian authorities.
Occurrences Comments
There are likely between 15 – 30 populations of this species including between 12 and 25 in Canada (Lower Fraser, Mid Fraser, Lower Fraser, Nechako, Upper Columbia, and Kootenay), one to a few in Washington and Oregon, USA, (JCRMS 2015), one in Idaho and Montana, USA, (Lower Kootenai River) and possibly three in California, USA, (Upper Sacramento River, Feather River, and San Joaquin River). Most of these populations are not discrete; where not landlocked, individuals migrate in the open ocean to various rivers and estuaries along the Pacific North American coast. However, the described populations are associated with current spawning regions and for purposes of this assessment are considered the occurrences.
Threat Impact Comments
Passage barriers and dams are likely the single most significant threat to this species. They prevent fish and other aquatic species from accessing upstream habitat that was often available historically thus reducing overall habitat availability for the species. They also fragment populations reducing allelic diversity throughout their range, alter the natural hydrograph impacting the timing and duration of spawning migrations and aggregations, and block the movement of native fish that bring marine-derived nutrients into upriver environments limiting prey availability and the overall growth potential for individuals located upstream of the dams. Local water diversions – many of which are undocumented and unregulated – reduce stream flows over and above constraints imposed by dams creating passage barriers that fragments remaining habitat. Operation of new and existing agricultural lands adjacent to rivers and streams occupied by this species are also a threat. Conversion to agriculture appears to be increasing in some areas where viticulture, marijuana, and other agricultural production effect flow regimes by reducing overall flows. Agricultural operations introduce pesticides and fertilizers into streams that can create toxic conditions for this species which are particularly vulnerable to pollutants (Moyle et al 2015). In California, USA, this species spends much of its life cycle in coastal estuaries associated with the San Francisco Bay, Suisun Bay, Suisun Marsh and San Pablo Bay. Estuaries associated with other major coastal rivers including the Columbia and Fraser River, Canada, and likely others along the west coast of North America are used by this species. Estuary degradation has reduced available habitat for this and other species along the North American Pacific coast. Recent predation by Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus), California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), and harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) has been implicated as a decline factor within the Columbia River system (JCRMS 2024a) and may be a factor in other locations. Similarly, mortality from commercial salmon fishery by-catch has been identified as a potential threat in some parts of this species range and may be a threat in others (COSEWIC 2013). The effects of Climate change on freshwater fish vary regionally but include changes in water quality (especially water temperature), changes in timing and duration of flows, and extended drought and variable water availability. In a comprehensive review of climate vulnerability of at-risk freshwater fish, Moyle et al (2013) assessed 164 taxa against exposure and sensitivity criteria within four generally accepted and relevant climate scenarios. This species was classified as “vulnerable” and likely to become endangered in California, USA. Climate change will likely impact this species in a similar way in other parts of its range as well (Columbia Basin Trust 2017, WDFW 2024).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

The largest North American freshwater fish; maximum length about 610 cm, maximum mass 1800 lbs (816 kg).

Habitat

This species is found at sea, usually near shore, and in large cool rivers or streams and likely spawns either over deep gravel riffles or in deep holes with swift currents and rock bottoms (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). In the Fraser River (river km 98-181), British Columbia, six spawning sites were identified; five were within side channels of the meandering reach (km 98-143); one spawning site was in the main channel in the confined reach (km 145-181) (Perrin et al. 2003). In California and almost certainly in other occupied coastal rivers and streams, this species uses estuaries for significant parts of its life cycle. This species migrates upstream to spawn and moves back downstream when spawning is completed.

Reproduction

In the Columbia River, spawns May-July (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). In California, spawning apparently occurs between mid-March and early June (Moyle 1976). Spawning occurs at intervals of 4 to 11 years. Larvae hatch from eggs in 1-2 weeks. Males may reach sexual maturity in about 9 years, females in 13-16 years (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). May live over 100 years.
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS2Yes
MontanaS1Yes
ArizonaSNANo
AlaskaS3Yes
WashingtonS3B,S4NYes
OregonS4Yes
IdahoS1Yes
CanadaN2B,N1N
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/usePervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.3 - Other ecosystem modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineModerate - low
9 - PollutionRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Montana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Buckhorn Ridge (MT)Kootenai National Forest34,716
References (56)
  1. Anders, P. J., D. L. Richards, and M. S. Powell. 2002. The first endangered white sturgeon population: repercussions in an altered large river-floodplain ecosystem. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:67-82.
  2. Beamesderfer, R.C.P., T. A. Rien, and A. A. Nigro. 1995. Differences in the dynamics and potential for production of impounded and unimpounded white sturgeon populations in the lower Columbia River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:857-872.
  3. Binkowski, F. P., and S. I. Doroshov (editors). 1985. North American Sturgeons: Biology and Aquaculture Potential. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. 163 pp.
  4. Birstein, V. J., and R. DeSalle. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of Acipenserinae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:141-155.
  5. Birstein, V. J., J. R. Waldman, and W. E. Bemis. 1997. Sturgeon biodiversity and conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Reprinted from Environmental Biology of Fishes 48(1-4).
  6. Brown, Larry (U.S. Geological Survey, WRD). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. June 2000.
  7. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2024. Petition Evaluation for the White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>). Report to the California Fish and Game Commission under the California Endangered Species Act. Sacramento, CA. 20 pp.
  8. Cochnauer, T. G. 2002. Response of a white sturgeon population to catch and release regulations--now what? American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:83-88.
  9. Columbia Basin Trust (CBT). 2017. Water monitoring and climate change in the Upper Columbia basin: Summary of current status and opportunities. 68 pp. https://ourtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017-02_Trust_WaterMonitoring-ClimateChange_Web.pdf
  10. COSEWIC. 2013. COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>) in Canada. Lower and Upper Fraser River. Upper Columbia, and Upper Kootenay Rivers. Committee on the Status of Endangered in Canada. Ottawa. 75 pp. https://wildlife-species.az.ec.gc.ca/species-risk-registry/virtual_sara/files//cosewic/sr_esturgeon_blanc_white_sturgeon_1113_e.pdf
  11. DuBois, J., M. Gingras, and G. Aasen. 2011. Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Estuary Newsletter. Status and Trends of San Francisco Estuary White Sturgeon. Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Estuary 24:50-55. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentId=44050
  12. Gingras, M. and J. DuBois. 2015. Estimating Annual Abundance of White Sturgeon 85-116 and &gt;= 169 Centimeters Total Length, IEP Newsletter Volume 28, Number 2. Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Estuary.
  13. Holliman, F. M., and J. B. Reynolds. 2002. Electroshock-induced injury in juvenile white sturgeon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:494-499.
  14. Holton, G. D., and H. E. Johnson. 1996. A field guide to Montana fishes. 2nd edition. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Montana State Parks and wildlife Interpretive Association, Helena, Montana. 104 pp.
  15. Jager, H. I., W. Van Winkle, J. A. Chandler, K. B. Lepla, P. Bates, and T. D. Counihan. 2002. A simulation study of factors controlling white sturgeon recruitment in the Snake River. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:127-150.
  16. Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.
  17. Joint Columbia River Management Staff (JCRMS). 2024a. 2024 Joint Staff Report Concerning Stock Status and Fisheries for Sturgeon and Smelt. Joint Columbia River Management Staff, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 55 pp. https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/2024-sturgeon-smelt-joint-staff-report. (Accessed 18 Mar 2024).
  18. Joint Columbia River Management Staff (JCRMS). 2024b. Sturgeon Fishery Update. Joint Columbia River Management Staff, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 4 pp. https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/2024-sturgeon-fishery-update-1.pdf. (Accessed 18 Mar 2024).
  19. Krieger, J., P. A. Fuerst, and T. M. Cavender. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American sturgeons (Order Acipenseriformes) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16:64-72.
  20. Kruse, G. O., and D. L. Scarnecchia. 2002. Contaminant uptake and survival of white sturgeon embryos. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:151-160.
  21. Lane, E. D. 1991. Status of the white sturgeon, <i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>, in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 105:161-168.
  22. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  23. Master, L. L. 1996. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Progress Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia. 60 pp.
  24. Master, L. L. and A. L. Stock. 1998. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 36 pp.
  25. McCabe, G.T., Jr. and C.A. Tracy. 1994. Spawning and early life history of white sturgeon, <i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>, in the lower Columbia River. NOAA Fisheries Bulletin 92:760-772. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/1994/924/mccabe.pdf
  26. McGinnis, S. M. 1984. Freshwater fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. viii + 316 pp.
  27. Miller, A. I., T. D. Counihan, M. J. Parsley, and L. G. Beckman. 1995. Columbia River Basin white sturgeon. Pages 154-157 in E. T. LaRoe, G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac, editors. Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, WAshington, D.C.
  28. Morrow, J.E. 1980. The freshwater fishes of Alaska. Alaska Northwest Publishing Company, Anchorage, AK. 248 pp.
  29. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  30. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  31. Moyle, P. B., J. D. Kiernan, P. K. Crain, and R. M. Quiñones. 2013. Climate change vulnerability of native and alien freshwater fishes of California: a systematic assessment approach. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063883
  32. Moyle, P.B., R. M. Quiñones, J. V. Katz and J. Weaver. 2015. White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>) Account in Fish Species of Special Concern in California. Sacramento: California Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=104390&inline
  33. Nelson, J. S. 1984. Fishes of the world. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York. xv + 523 pp.
  34. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  35. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). 2011. Lower Columbia River and Oregon Coast White Sturgeon Conservation Plan. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Clackamas, OR. 192 pp. https://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/CRP/docs/lower_columbia_sturgeon/LCR_white_sturgeon_conservation_plan.pdf
  36. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  37. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  38. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  39. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  40. Parsley, M. J., and L. G. Beckman. 1994. White sturgeon spawning and rearing habitat in the lower Columbia River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:812-827.
  41. Parsley, M. J., P. J. Anders, A. I. Miller, L. G. Beckman, and G. T. McCabe, Jr. 2002. Recovery of white sturgeon populations through natural production: understanding the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on spawning and subsequent recruitment. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:55-66.
  42. Perrin, C. J., L. L. Rempel, and M. L. Rosenau. 2003. White sturgeon spawning habitat in an unregulated rvier: Fraser River, Canada. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:154-165.
  43. Richardson, J. 1836. Fauna Boreali Americana or the Zoology of the Northern Parts of British America: Containing Descriptions of the Objects of Natural History on the Late Northern Land Expeditions under Command of Captain John Franklin, E.N. Part Third, The Fish. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/41527937
  44. Rien, T. A., and J. A. North. 2002. White sturgeon transplants within the Columbia River. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28:223-236.
  45. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  46. Rodriguez, M. A. 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is complete, not lost. Ecology 83(1):1-13.
  47. Santos, N. 2015. Species Range Layer for the White Sturgeon. Univ. of Cal. Davis. GIS data depicting HUC 12 watersheds occupied by Pit-Klamath Brook Lamprey (expert opinion). California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biological Information and Observation System (BIOS), ds 1026. https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios/?bookmark=326
  48. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184. 966 pp.
  49. Simpson, J. and R. Wallace. 1982. Fishes of Idaho. The University Press of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho. 238 pp.
  50. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. Kootenai River Distinct Population Segment of the White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Spokane, WA. 30 pp. https://ecosphere-documents-production-public.s3.amazonaws.com/sams/public_docs/species_nonpublish/1749.pdf
  51. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Revised recovery plan for the Kootenai River Distinct Population Segment of the White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>). Online. Available: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/Kootenai_River_White_Sturgeon_Revised_Recovery_Plan_20190923.pdf
  52. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024.90-Day Findings for 8 Species. Notification of petition findings and initiation of status reviews. Federal Register 89(195): 81388-81394.
  53. Van Winkle, W., P. J. Anders, D. H. Secor, and D. A. Dixon, editors. 2002. Biology, management, and protection of North American sturgeon. American Fisheries Society Symposium 28, Bethesda, Maryland. xvi + 258 pp.
  54. Wallace, Richard L. (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. March 2000.
  55. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2024. Species Account for White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/species/acipenser-transmontanus#climate (Accessed 15 Jan 2024).
  56. Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. The University of Washington Press, Seattle. 220 pp.