Lampropeltis elapsoides

(Holbrook, 1838)

Scarlet Kingsnake

G5Secure Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
LowThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105132
Element CodeARADB19054
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassReptilia
OrderSquamata
FamilyColubridae
GenusLampropeltis
Synonyms
Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides(Holbrook, 1838)
Other Common Names
scarlet kingsnake (EN)
Concept Reference
Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
This taxon has long been regarded as a subspecies of L. triangulum. Armstrong et al. (2001) examined populations of L. trianugulum subspecies syspila and elapsoides in western Kentucky and adjacent Tennessee and concluded that the two taxa exist in sympatry with minimal, if any, gene flow between the populations. Based on multiple nuclear and mitochondrial genes, Pyron and Burbrink (2009) reported that elapsoides is well differentiated from L. triangulum. Consequently, Crother et al. (in Crother 2012) listed L. elapsoides as a distinct species. Conant and Collins (1991) mapped extensive areas of apparent intergradation between elapsoides and other triangulum subspecies, but Pyron and Burbrink (2009) did not delineate the range of L. elapsoides nor specify contact zones or discuss possible hybridization between elapsoides and populations of L. triangulum.

Analyses by Ruane et al. (2014) support the existence of seven distinct species previously considered to be L. triangulum, which they propose should be formally recognized. These seven taxa were all originally described as full species based on morphology (e.g., size, body form, color/pattern) before being synonymized with L. triangulum and are as follows: L. triangulum (Lacépède 1788), L. gentilis (Baird and Girard 1853), L. elapsoides (Holbrook 1838), L. annulata Kennicott 1861, L. polyzona Cope 1861, L. abnorma (Bocourt 1886), and L. micropholis Cope 1861.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2016-04-06
Change Date1997-02-26
Edition Date2013-07-11
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Large range in southeastern United States; many occurrences; presumed large population size; probably relatively stable or at least not declining at a rapid rate.
Range Extent Comments
Range extends from southeastern Virginia and the Coastal Plain of North and South Carolina southward through Georgia to southern Florida, and westward to eastern Louisiana, Tennessee, and Kentucky (Conant and Collins 1991, Pyron and Burbrink 2009). Distributional details along the northern and western edges of the range have not been precisely delineated. Suspected “intergrades” with L. triangulum from eastern Virginia to southern New Jersey are likely L. triangulum and not hybrids (Ruane et al. 2014).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using consistent criteria, but this species is represented by a large number of collection sites and locations (as defined by IUCN).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitats include pine flatwoods and wet prairie hammocks; less frequently bottomland, mixed hardwood, and upland pine forest, sandhills, and maritime hammock; rare in extensive grassy wetlands (except "limestone-lined banks of sugar cane irrigation fields") (Tennant 1997). Stumps and logs are commonly used as cover.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - Mixed
Palustrine Habitats
SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
AlabamaS5Yes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
FloridaS4Yes
KentuckyS1Yes
South CarolinaS5Yes
North CarolinaS3Yes
VirginiaSUYes
LouisianaS2Yes
TennesseeSNRYes
MississippiS4Yes
GeorgiaS4Yes
Roadless Areas (3)
Florida (2)
AreaForestAcres
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
North Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
References (9)
  1. Armstrong, M. P., D. Frymire, and E. J. Zimmerer. 2001. Analysis of sympatric populations of <i>Lampropeltis triangulum syspila</i> and <i>Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides</i>, in western Kentucky and adjacent Tennessee with relation to the taxonomic status of the scarlet kingsnake. Journal of Herpetology 35:688-693.
  2. Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
  3. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  4. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
  5. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  6. Jensen, J. B., C. D. Camp, W. Gibbons, and M. J. Elliot, editors. 2008. Amphibians and reptiles of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens. xvii + 575 pp.
  7. Pyron, R. A., and F. T. Burbrink. 2009. Neogene diversification and taxonomic stability in the snake tribe Lampropeltini (Serpentes: Colubridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52:524-529.
  8. Ruane, S., Bryson, R.W. Jr., Pyron, R.A., and F.T. Burbrink. 2014. Coalescent Species delimitation in Milksnakes (genus <i>Lampropeltis</i>) and impacts on phylogenetic comparative analyses. Systematic Biology 63(2):231-250.
  9. Tennant, A. 1997. A field guide to snakes of Florida. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. xiii + 257 pp.